WTA YEC end of RR rankings

Ted S.

unread,

Oct 28, 2011, 9:08:10 PM10/28/11

to

If Azarenka wins the title, she's #2, otherwise Kvitova is #2. If the
final is Stosur/Zvonareva, the winner of that would be #4.

1 Wozniacki 7485 (1-2)
2 Kvitova 6560 (3-0) *
3 Sharapova 6510 (0-2)
4 Azarenka 6160 (2-0) *
5 Li 5720 (1-2)
6 Stosur 5585 (2-1) *
7 Zvonareva 5435 (1-2) *
8 Radwanska 5250 (1-2)
9 Bartoli 4710

--
Ted Schuerzinger
tedstennis at myrealbox dot com
If you're afraid of the ball, don't sit in the front row. --Anastasia
Rodionova

DavidW

unread,

Oct 30, 2011, 11:28:34 PM10/30/11

to

Ted S. wrote:
> If Azarenka wins the title, she's #2, otherwise Kvitova is #2. If the
> final is Stosur/Zvonareva, the winner of that would be #4.
>
> 1 Wozniacki 7485 (1-2)
> 2 Kvitova 6560 (3-0) *
> 3 Sharapova 6510 (0-2)

Can Shrap catch up to Kvitova before the AO? It would be a new experience for
Kvitova to go into a slam seeded to reach the final and probably favourite to
win.

Sakari Lund

unread,

Oct 31, 2011, 9:24:59 AM10/31/11

to

On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:28:34 +1100, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided>
wrote:

Those were the points after Round Robin. The points now are:

1. Wozniacki 7485
2. Kvitova 7370
3. Azarenka 6520
4. Sharapova 6510

There is basically one week in Australia that affects the AO seedings.
So yes, Kvitova is safe at #2. Don't know if she even has a chance for
#1 before AO.

I am now really hoping for the Kim - Kvitova match at AO too. That
could be great.

DavidW

unread,

Oct 31, 2011, 5:30:25 PM10/31/11

to

Sakari Lund wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:28:34 +1100, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided>
> wrote:
>
>> Ted S. wrote:
>>> If Azarenka wins the title, she's #2, otherwise Kvitova is #2. If
>>> the final is Stosur/Zvonareva, the winner of that would be #4.
>>>
>>> 1 Wozniacki 7485 (1-2)
>>> 2 Kvitova 6560 (3-0) *
>>> 3 Sharapova 6510 (0-2)
>>
>> Can Shrap catch up to Kvitova before the AO? It would be a new
>> experience for Kvitova to go into a slam seeded to reach the final
>> and probably favourite to win.
>
> Those were the points after Round Robin. The points now are:
>
> 1. Wozniacki 7485
> 2. Kvitova 7370

Wow. I wasn't expecting such a big jump. I thought Wozniacki was safe as houses
for months.

> 3. Azarenka 6520
> 4. Sharapova 6510
>
> There is basically one week in Australia that affects the AO seedings.
> So yes, Kvitova is safe at #2. Don't know if she even has a chance for
> #1 before AO.

She won Brisbane this year, so she would have to defend those and get more
points or Wozniacki would have to lose points. Kvitova doesn't strike me as
someone who would feel comfortable at no. 1, so maybe I don't want her to get
there before the AO. She sounds confident here, though:
''I will be No. 2 and next season will be different, and I will be actually
favourite maybe all the time,'' Kvitova, 21, said after earning a $1.63 million
winner's cheque and second spot in the year-end rankings for her 7-5, 4-6, 6-3
defeat of Victoria Azarenka.
http://www.smh.com.au/sport/tennis/kvitova-may-take-crown-at-open-20111031-1ms5
5.html

> I am now really hoping for the Kim - Kvitova match at AO too. That
> could be great.

Yes, for the final preferably (if Kim can make it that far).

DavidW

unread,

Nov 1, 2011, 10:12:46 PM11/1/11

to

Sakari Lund wrote:
> I am now really hoping for the Kim - Kvitova match at AO too. That
> could be great.

I see that Petra won their last meeting.

Court_1

unread,

Nov 1, 2011, 11:19:12 PM11/1/11

to

I think if Kvitova can be consistent and keep her wits about her(again
big if these days) she will defeat Kim (if Kim in fact makes it that
far.)

I hope Kvitova does not waste the talent she has.

Sakari Lund

unread,

Nov 2, 2011, 8:45:31 AM11/2/11

to

We have been through their matches many times.

But it would be great matchup, because Kvitova is probably the only
player now who can beat Kim even if Kim plays a really good match. But
still, the odds of Kvitova playing really well are much lower.

Court_1

unread,

Nov 2, 2011, 8:51:34 AM11/2/11

to

Why is that? I would say the opposite will be true more than likely.

Sakari Lund

unread,

Nov 2, 2011, 8:59:45 AM11/2/11

to

Sorry, I meant "higher" of course...

Court_1

unread,

Nov 2, 2011, 9:04:01 AM11/2/11

to

On Nov 2, 8:59 am, Sakari Lund <sakari.l...@welho.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 05:51:34 -0700 (PDT), Court_1
>

> <Olympia0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Nov 2, 8:45 am, Sakari Lund <sakari.l...@welho.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 13:12:46 +1100, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
> >> >Sakari Lund wrote:
>
> >But still, the odds of Kvitova playing really well are much lower.
>
> >Why is that? I would say the opposite will be true more than likely.
>
> Sorry, I meant "higher" of course...

Are you changing your opinion, lol(just kidding!) Hopefully Kvitova
will not be a headcase.