Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

So Court1 said a year ago that Thiem is no good

91 views
Skip to first unread message

soccerfan777

unread,
Jun 7, 2017, 10:30:48 AM6/7/17
to
I was the first to point out that he is talented and could be a future champion. He hasnt won it yet... but he has destroyed Djoker. So can't be as bad as what Court1 thought.

grif

unread,
Jun 7, 2017, 12:18:54 PM6/7/17
to
On 07/06/2017 15:30, soccerfan777 wrote:
> I was the first to point out that he is talented and could be a future champion. He hasnt won it yet... but he has destroyed Djoker. So can't be as bad as what Court1 thought.
>

Someone said that Thiem had no weapons. How odd.

Patrick Kehoe

unread,
Jun 7, 2017, 3:12:42 PM6/7/17
to
On Wednesday, June 7, 2017 at 7:30:48 AM UTC-7, soccerfan777 wrote:
> I was the first to point out that he is talented and could be a future champion. He hasnt won it yet... but he has destroyed Djoker. So can't be as bad as what Court1 thought.

If memory serves, he's now beaten Nole, Rafa, Andy and Feds... so, having beaten the Fab4-ish could be seen a marker of merit...

P

soccerfan777

unread,
Jun 7, 2017, 3:32:29 PM6/7/17
to
He is super talented. He has a huge backswing. Which means he wouldn't be as successful on grass and Fast hardcourts. He should do better at AO and FO

Court_1

unread,
Jun 8, 2017, 12:01:17 AM6/8/17
to
On Wednesday, June 7, 2017 at 10:30:48 AM UTC-4, soccerfan777 wrote:
> I was the first to point out that he is talented and could be a future champion. He hasnt won it yet... but he has destroyed Djoker. So can't be as bad as what Court1 thought.

He's got weapons but normally in matches he ball bashes and has no plan B. That's been my problem with him in the past.

Did Thiem win the title yet? He has to beat Nadal and then Murray/Stan. I don't think he'll be able to do that and if he does, I'll be impressed. So far he beat a terrible Djokovic who tanked.
0 new messages