On Thu, 31 May 2018 08:57:00 -0500, StephenJ <
sjo...@cox.com> wrote:
>On 5/30/2018 5:04 PM, DavidW wrote:
>> On 31/05/2018 5:49 AM, StephenJ wrote:
>>> On 5/30/2018 12:43 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
>>>>> And your point is? Graf was already GOAT material before Seles won a
>>>>> slam. She had won 9 majors in 12 attempts. Thats Maureen Connolly
>>>>> territory. What if Steffi fell off a horse in March 1990?
>>>>
>>>> My point is clear and it's that what Graf achieved after the stabbing
>>>> will always be questioned if it'd have been achieved if the incident
>>>> wouldn't have happened.
>>>>
>>>> Selez was on the rise and she was simply eliminated from the Graf's
>>>> path.
>>>>
>>>> I was a Graf fan and simply realize the facts above.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You are a reasonable graf fan
>>
>> As another reasonable Graf fan, I point out that the stabbing has always
>> been viewed differently from, say, Seles being injured in a traffic
>> accident or falling down the stairs and being out for the same length of
>> time. The Graf anti-fans are far less accepting of Graf's achievements
>> because Seles was stabbed than they would have been had Seles not been
>> playing for any other reason. It is up to them to explain why.
>I explained this to bob some time ago: If Seles had been knocked out by
>a random car accident, I certainly would regard Steffi as having gotten
>an extremely fortunate and unearned lucky break, and would regard her
>subsequent 93-96 slams as less legitimate than if Seles had been there.
>So in that sense, a legacy sense, the effect would be similar, you'd
>have to view those later slams with a big grain of salt.
>That said, you are correct that the stabbing does generate a different
>feeling about Graf, and that has been explained before too: It's because
>a fall down the stairs or a traffic accident is random, not aimed at
>anyone. Yes, it might benefit some more than others, but again that
>benefit would be random, just luck. What Parche did was targeted to
>benefit Steffi. Whatever his mental state, he was smart and aware enough
>to know who he was stabbing, and why - because Seles was the player
>keeping Graf from being #1. So while Steffi had zero to do with the
>stabbing, she did benefit from it in a targeted manner, and that means
>moreso than she would have from a random accident.
>That was emphasized recently by the revelation that Parche also stalked
>ASV. As she said, if you were perceived as a threat to Graf winning
>slams and being #1, you were targeted by Parche, which created a fear
>that hurt her competitiveness during that time. There's nothing random
>about that so the benefit to Steffi was disproportionate. It truly was
>an extraordinary situation.
> From my POV, Steffi was also pretty crass in how she reacted to Seles.
>Personally, if I was a champ like Steffi locked in a big rivalry with
>another top player, and if a fan of mine knocked off that main rival to
>benefit me, I couldn't take advantage of it. I'd have withdrawn from the
>slams at least that year, to give my rival time to recover. My attitude
>would have been "I'm not letting this guy get away with this". But
>Steffi just plowed ahead and capitalized. That always seemed unseemly to
>me, still does.
i can understand that feeling. but we can never lump graf in with
tonya harding, something you almost do.
as for the actual # count, it wouldn't matter if it was a random
accident or a targeted attack.
as for the feelings of the non-grafans, i understand the difference,
always did.
bob