On 16/07/2017 7:03 PM, Garvin Yee wrote:
> On 7/16/2017 12:57 AM, Darkfalz wrote:
>> On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 9:04:34 AM UTC+10, Garvin Yee wrote:
>>> On 7/15/2017 2:16 PM, Darkfalz wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 12:58:26 AM UTC+10, Garvin Yee wrote:
>>>>> On 7/15/2017 7:50 AM, soccerfan777 wrote:
>>>>>> Chill out. It was just a prediction!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A bad one at that, bitch!
>>>>>
>>>>> Keep your day job....Muguruza just bageled Venus Williams....
>>>>>
>>>>> I was hoping for a tight 3-setter, but oh well...
>>>>>
>>>>> Astounding.
>>>>
>>>> Women's tennis. Rare one can hold their nerve enough to make it a
>>>> tight 3 setter.
>>>>
>>>> 5 sets for semis onwards. It needs to happen. Yes, a 3 set beatdown
>>>> is still better than a 2 set beatdown.
>>>>
>>>
>>> A 3 setter is not a beatdown, by definition, as the opponent still
>>> won a set.
>>>
>>> But really weird how Venus' game completely collapsed after the
>>> first set....wow....
>>
>> I said a BO5 is necessary for women in slams from semis onwards, and
>> that I'd rather watch a 3 set beatdown (where the player needs to be
>> on fire for more than 1 hour) than a 2 set beatdown.
>>
>
> Again, if both players win at least one set, that's not a beatdown
> in my book.
>
He's suggesting they play bo5, in which case a 3 set beatdown is
something like 61 62 60.