Scheduling question

[stephenJ]

why on earth have they scheduled a men's QF tomorrow *before* a men's
4th round match? What if the QF finishes and then rain washes out the
4th rounder?

The players whose 4R matches got washed out today are already at a
significant disadvantage compared to those who got theirs in yesterday.
Why make it worse?

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[Court_1]

On Monday, May 30, 2016 at 4:29:52 PM UTC-4, StephenJ wrote:

> why on earth have they scheduled a men's QF tomorrow *before* a men's
> 4th round match?

What are you talking about? The R4 matches are scheduled before the QF matches on four different courts.

[*skriptis]

stephenJ <sja...@cox.net> Wrote in message:

What are you talking about?

--


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

[Whisper]

I think Jaros is shagging someone's 'beautiful wife' or something so is
a bit foggy?

[stephenJ]

I misread my phone app as to the court assignments. Caught the mistake
seconds after I posted here but there is no message 'delete' button.

As for shagging a beautiful wife, the only one I do is mine , she's tops
in the looks department, still objectively a 9+, no adjustments for age. ;)

[bob]

On Tue, 31 May 2016 08:43:49 -0500, stephenJ <sja...@cox.net> wrote:

>On 5/31/2016 4:40 AM, Whisper wrote:
>> On 31/05/2016 7:38 AM, Court_1 wrote:
>>> On Monday, May 30, 2016 at 4:29:52 PM UTC-4, StephenJ wrote:
>>>
>>>> why on earth have they scheduled a men's QF tomorrow *before* a men's
>>>> 4th round match?
>>>
>>> What are you talking about? The R4 matches are scheduled before the QF
>>> matches on four different courts.
>>>
>>
>>
>> I think Jaros is shagging someone's 'beautiful wife' or something so is
>> a bit foggy?
>
>I misread my phone app as to the court assignments. Caught the mistake
>seconds after I posted here but there is no message 'delete' button.
>As for shagging a beautiful wife, the only one I do is mine , she's tops
>in the looks department, still objectively a 9+, no adjustments for age. ;)

yep, she is you lucky guy. if only she were a sampras fan she'd make
you see the light. :-)

bob

[Gracchus]

His post looks like it was ghost-written by Trump and you just endorsed it. Force of habit I guess.

[bob]

lol. nah, steve's a lucky gu in the real world..

bob

[Gracchus]

On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 at 9:31:19 AM UTC-7, bob wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2016 09:28:46 -0700 (PDT), Gracchus

> >His post looks like it was ghost-written by Trump and you just endorsed it. Force of habit I guess.

> lol. nah, steve's a lucky gu in the real world..

I'll take your word for it since you know him personally, but crotch-grabbing posts like that are still bad form IMHO.

Speaking of political news, big surprise--did you see how the ever-irrelevant Jerry Brown served his lowly role for the Democrats a endorsed Hillary? As if any Californians are going to change their votes on his say-so.

[soccerfan777]

And Whisper has a beautiful wife too, I bet. And you have met both Whisper and Roast's wives to positively confirm that. What about your wife? A 9 plus? Or you rate Whisper's wife and Roast's wife higher?

[stephenJ]

LOL ... You know she is a FedFan all the way. That's her flaw. :)

[stephenJ]

On 5/31/2016 11:52 AM, Gracchus wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 at 9:31:19 AM UTC-7, bob wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 May 2016 09:28:46 -0700 (PDT), Gracchus
>
>>> His post looks like it was ghost-written by Trump and you just endorsed it. Force of habit I guess.
>
>> lol. nah, steve's a lucky gu in the real world..
>
> I'll take your word for it since you know him personally, but crotch-grabbing posts like that are still bad form IMHO.

Chill out dude. I've made about 40,000 posts on this forum and maybe two
have mentioned the wife. Only mentioned her here because for some reason
whisper alluded to marriage. Anyone but a prude would regard this whole
exchange as innocuous.

[Thomas R. Kettler]

In article <3ldrkblp30ljsejur...@4ax.com>,

I'm curious to know if it is another case of male judgment being smarter
than female judgment since he married her and she married him.
--
Remove blown from email address to reply.

[bob]

i did see it. nobody listens to brown, even in the 70s few did. he's
more of a curiosity than anything else. the establishment is having a
bad month: trump kicking the tar out of the bushes and bernie still
bothering hillary, and obama's own appointed IG saying hillary's a
crook. :-)

bob

[bob]

On Tue, 31 May 2016 12:16:58 -0500, stephenJ <sja...@cox.net> wrote:

>On 5/31/2016 11:52 AM, Gracchus wrote:
>> On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 at 9:31:19 AM UTC-7, bob wrote:
>>> On Tue, 31 May 2016 09:28:46 -0700 (PDT), Gracchus
>>
>>>> His post looks like it was ghost-written by Trump and you just endorsed it. Force of habit I guess.
>>
>>> lol. nah, steve's a lucky gu in the real world..
>>
>> I'll take your word for it since you know him personally, but crotch-grabbing posts like that are still bad form IMHO.
>
>Chill out dude. I've made about 40,000 posts on this forum and maybe two
>have mentioned the wife. Only mentioned her here because for some reason
>whisper alluded to marriage. Anyone but a prude would regard this whole
>exchange as innocuous.

it's my fault, i called her out, but she's so darned good lookin!
sorry, you lucky bastard!

bob

[bob]

don't know whisp's. steve's is a beauty. mine too. yours ain't bad
either...

bob

[Whisper]

On 31/05/2016 11:43 PM, stephenJ wrote:
> On 5/31/2016 4:40 AM, Whisper wrote:
>> On 31/05/2016 7:38 AM, Court_1 wrote:
>>> On Monday, May 30, 2016 at 4:29:52 PM UTC-4, StephenJ wrote:
>>>
>>>> why on earth have they scheduled a men's QF tomorrow *before* a men's
>>>> 4th round match?
>>>
>>> What are you talking about? The R4 matches are scheduled before the QF
>>> matches on four different courts.
>>>
>>
>>
>> I think Jaros is shagging someone's 'beautiful wife' or something so is
>> a bit foggy?
>
> I misread my phone app as to the court assignments. Caught the mistake
> seconds after I posted here but there is no message 'delete' button.
>
> As for shagging a beautiful wife, the only one I do is mine , she's tops
> in the looks department, still objectively a 9+, no adjustments for age. ;)
>
>
>

'objectively' is not really possible in physical appearance - always
subjective.

eg most people rated Julia Roberst & Elle McPherson at their peak as
super babes, but in all honesty I didn't rate either much above 2 or 3
out of 10. I'm a staunch heterosexual but they did nothing for me at
all. What matters is what 'you' think - if you rate your partner 8+
then who cares what anyone else thinks?

: )

[Whisper]

I do alright;

http://postimg.org/image/gvp5p9qln/

[stephenJ]

On 6/1/2016 4:56 AM, Whisper wrote:
> On 31/05/2016 11:43 PM, stephenJ wrote:
>> On 5/31/2016 4:40 AM, Whisper wrote:
>>> On 31/05/2016 7:38 AM, Court_1 wrote:
>>>> On Monday, May 30, 2016 at 4:29:52 PM UTC-4, StephenJ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> why on earth have they scheduled a men's QF tomorrow *before* a men's
>>>>> 4th round match?
>>>>
>>>> What are you talking about? The R4 matches are scheduled before the QF
>>>> matches on four different courts.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I think Jaros is shagging someone's 'beautiful wife' or something so is
>>> a bit foggy?
>>
>> I misread my phone app as to the court assignments. Caught the mistake
>> seconds after I posted here but there is no message 'delete' button.
>>
>> As for shagging a beautiful wife, the only one I do is mine , she's tops
>> in the looks department, still objectively a 9+, no adjustments for
>> age. ;)
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> 'objectively' is not really possible in physical appearance - always
> subjective.
>
> eg most people rated Julia Roberst & Elle McPherson at their peak as
> super babes, but in all honesty I didn't rate either much above 2 or 3
> out of 10.

2 or 3 is a bit harsh. IMO those girls were in the 5 - 6 range, barely
above average. Nothing like the hotties the media made them out to be. I
suspect most males agree they were way, way overrated by the media.

[stephenJ]

i won't disagree. Cute girl. :)

[Whisper]

Yep - I see hotter chicks at Subway.

[stephenJ]

No problem, this is all in good fun except for Grachus, LOL. We both are
pretty lucky. :)

[bob]

whisp a lucky man, jaros a lucky man, i feel i'm a lucky man, even
dipshit like raja a lucky man.

damn, everyone posts pics here but courty!

bob

[bob]

On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 19:56:36 +1000, Whisper <beav...@ozemail.com.au>
wrote:

you've got an attractive wife i'm sure she gets hit on a lot. i like
women (models, movie stars, etc) that have a little edge on them, not
perfect - say scarlett johansson or jennifer connolly.

bob

[John Liang]

Pretty average at best deserve a 1.

[soccerfan777]

Yeah by Caucasian standards, she aint a beauty. I would give her a 5. 1 is just a too mean... haha.

[soccerfan777]

Okay now I know how Jaros' wife looks like... lol. There is no accounting for taste.

[soccerfan777]

She considers herself luckier and considers me the attractive one. You can check with her. She is still looking more or less the same even after a baby and 5 years into marriage. I could posts pics of her but then you will have the Hazelnut types saying bad stuff. So not worth it...

>
> damn, everyone posts pics here but courty!

You don't wanna see that.

>
> bob

[soccerfan777]

On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 7:51:30 AM UTC-5, bob wrote:

That pic is from the late 70s or 80s for sure. Look at the hair style. Unless Whisper and his family is living in the 80s...

[soccerfan777]

On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 4:56:40 AM UTC-5, Whisper wrote:
> On 31/05/2016 11:43 PM, stephenJ wrote:
> > On 5/31/2016 4:40 AM, Whisper wrote:
> >> On 31/05/2016 7:38 AM, Court_1 wrote:
> >>> On Monday, May 30, 2016 at 4:29:52 PM UTC-4, StephenJ wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> why on earth have they scheduled a men's QF tomorrow *before* a men's
> >>>> 4th round match?
> >>>
> >>> What are you talking about? The R4 matches are scheduled before the QF
> >>> matches on four different courts.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> I think Jaros is shagging someone's 'beautiful wife' or something so is
> >> a bit foggy?
> >
> > I misread my phone app as to the court assignments. Caught the mistake
> > seconds after I posted here but there is no message 'delete' button.
> >
> > As for shagging a beautiful wife, the only one I do is mine , she's tops
> > in the looks department, still objectively a 9+, no adjustments for age. ;)
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> 'objectively' is not really possible in physical appearance - always
> subjective.
>
> eg most people rated Julia Roberst

She is not only not hot but also super annoying. My close friends call her a horse-face. Also that female from Sex and the City.

> & Elle McPherson

Nothing wrong with her. She was not super beautiful as such but great body.

>at their peak as
> super babes, but in all honesty I didn't rate either much above 2 or 3
> out of 10. I'm a staunch heterosexual but they did nothing for me at
> all.

I like many supermodel but Elle is not one of them. I wouldn't call her ugly though.

> What matters is what 'you' think - if you rate your partner 8+
> then who cares what anyone else thinks?

Good point.

>
> : )

[stephenJ]

Let's see a pic of rajarocker's wife. I bet anything she's a 4 at best.
Even though it was an arranged marriage and she was forced into it, LOL.

[soccerfan777]

a) It was not an arranged marriage
b) She is more like 4*2
c) Everyone in rst has seen her pics which I posted 5 years back
d) You won't be seeing her pics, creep

[stephenJ]

> On 6/1/2016 9:32 AM, soccerfan777 wrote:

> She .... considers me the attractive one.


Since you're about a 2.5, the only way that is possible is if she's a 2
or less, eh?

[Whisper]

That's what I mean about it not being 'objective'. Racial issues too, &
of course trolling. When even Monica Belluci/Amber Herd are considered
average by some you know it's never gonna be universal. What I do know
is the vast majority of people are more attractive in real life than in
photos. I know a few very attractive young women who look amazing in
real life (double-take attractive), but then in pics it's like their
aunt or a completely different person who doesn't stand out at all. You
can never really trust photos - need to see video at least to make
informed opinion - & even then people have genuinely different tastes.
But in real life we all know who the really attractive people are -
everyone says they're hot behind their backs etc, get hit on a lot etc

[Thomas R. Kettler]

In article <9qmdnY8ZsJob3tLK...@westnet.com.au>,

Well, attractiveness can be negated by other factors.

As examples,

Isla Fisher may be pretty, but I find her questionable since she married
Sacha Baron Cohen whom I find utterly distasteful.

Similarly, many things I've read about Amber Heard make me find her
someone I dislike.

Furthermore, while Lindsey Lohan, Paris Hilton or Miley Cyrus may rate
well on physical attractiveness, they are overall ugly due to their
personalities, etc.

Melissa McCarthy may not the physical beauty of any of the above women,
but everything else that she has makes her overall far more worthy than
all of them.

[soccerfan777]

On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 3:11:21 PM UTC-5, StephenJ wrote:
> > On 6/1/2016 9:32 AM, soccerfan777 wrote:
>
> > She .... considers me the attractive one.
>
>
> Since you're about a 2.5, the only way that is possible is if she's a 2
> or less, eh?
>

I am a solid 8 for sure.

[soccerfan777]

On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 3:11:21 PM UTC-5, StephenJ wrote:

> > On 6/1/2016 9:32 AM, soccerfan777 wrote:
>
> > She .... considers me the attractive one.
>
>
> Since you're about a 2.5, the only way that is possible is if she's a 2
> or less, eh?
>

Even if you saw me in pics, I look a whole lot better in person. 2.5??? WTF!

[soccerfan777]

I find Isla Fischer distasteful. Sascha Cohen is an intelligent guy.

>
> Similarly, many things I've read about Amber Heard make me find her
> someone I dislike.
>
> Furthermore, while Lindsey Lohan, Paris Hilton or Miley Cyrus may rate
> well on physical attractiveness,

No they don't.

>they are overall ugly due to their
> personalities, etc.
>
> Melissa McCarthy may not the physical beauty of any of the above women,
> but everything else that she has makes her overall far more worthy than
> all of them.
> --

Her persona is annoying.

[bob]

he posted it 5 yrs ago. she was pretty cute actually, because he told
us back then his family arranged it for him.

i said he should tell her they're moving to mumbai, not texas, and see
how long she stayed?.

hazelwood thought she was fat, and called her porky, but i thought she
was just curvy and nice looking. but i prefer kind of tight fit women,
like the one i have. but no doubt you've got a looker steve.

bob

[bob]

you told us back then your family found her for you. you never met her
before.

>b) She is more like 4*2
>c) Everyone in rst has seen her pics which I posted 5 years back
>d) You won't be seeing her pics, creep

bob

[soccerfan777]

No I didn't bob

[bob]

On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:53:22 -0700 (PDT), soccerfan777
<zepf...@gmail.com> wrote:

>No I didn't bob

bullshit, you had a long conversation in here about going to meet her
and bring her back to houston. that's when i suggested to test if she
really loves you just tell her you're moving to india...you don't
remember that????

bob

[stephenJ]

On 6/1/2016 4:18 PM, soccerfan777 wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 3:11:21 PM UTC-5, StephenJ wrote:
>>> On 6/1/2016 9:32 AM, soccerfan777 wrote:
>>
>>> She .... considers me the attractive one.
>>
>>
>> Since you're about a 2.5, the only way that is possible is if she's a 2
>> or less, eh?
>>
> I am a solid 8

You mean the square root of 8? That's the only way we can reconcile your
words, mathematically. :)

[stephenJ]

I knew it! LOL. :)

[stephenJ]

On 6/1/2016 3:20 PM, Whisper wrote:
> On 2/06/2016 12:32 AM, soccerfan777 wrote:
>> On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 7:49:11 AM UTC-5, bob wrote:
>>> On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 07:03:31 -0500, stephenJ <sja...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/1/2016 5:43 AM, Whisper wrote:
>>>>>>>> bob
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And Whisper has a beautiful wife too, I bet. And you have met both
>>>>>>> Whisper and Roast's wives to positively confirm that. What about
>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>> wife? A 9 plus? Or you rate Whisper's wife and Roast's wife higher?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> don't know whisp's. steve's is a beauty. mine too. yours ain't bad
>>>>>> either...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> bob
>>>>
>>>>> I do alright;
>>>>>
>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/gvp5p9qln/
>>>>
>>>> i won't disagree. Cute girl. :)
>>>
>>> whisp a lucky man, jaros a lucky man, i feel i'm a lucky man, even
>>> dipshit like raja a lucky man.
>>
>> She considers herself luckier and considers me the attractive one. You
>> can check with her. She is still looking more or less the same even
>> after a baby and 5 years into marriage. I could posts pics of her but
>> then you will have the Hazelnut types saying bad stuff. So not worth
>> it...
>>
>>
>
>
>
> That's what I mean about it not being 'objective'.

OK, then a better term would be "intersubjective". Because it's not
like this is always purely subjective/random. We don't see equal numbers
of women saying Danny Devito is as attractive as Brad Pitt, or Roseanne
Barr is as hot as Monica Belluci. There are situations where, if it's
not exactly 'objective' in a mathematical sense, there still is a
massive consensus. E.g., with Barr vs Belluci, the only straight men who
will find them equally attractive are either legally blind, or have an
extreme fat fetish, real at the margins stuff.

That's what I meant about my wife - basically 99%+ of all straight males
will identify her as "hot" within a 1/4 second of glancing at her. Sure,
if you drill down some might say she's as low as an 8, others may say
she's as high as a 9.4, but all will have her at the "very good looking"
level at least. The 99% confidence interval would be about 8 - 9.5. It's
that type of consensus. :)

[bob]

yeah, i'd agree with that.

bob

[soccerfan777]

We saw our profiles online. Met each other during by business trip to India and then kept keeping the relationship long distance until I decided to propose. I did not meet her parents until the wedding and my parents met her just few days before that.

How many times I have to repeat this? I am fed up!

[jdeluise]

soccerfan777 <zepf...@gmail.com> writes:

>
> We saw our profiles online. Met each other during by business trip to
> India and then kept keeping the relationship long distance until I
> decided to propose. I did not meet her parents until the wedding and
> my parents met her just few days before that.
>
> How many times I have to repeat this? I am fed up!

You should make a FAQ like Whisper is threatening to do.

[bob]

people prodded you to find out if your parents arranged it and you
claimed you hadn't met her and were very nervous, recall? you also
said it was long distance and you were going to india to get married
and bring her to houston.

bob

[Guypers]

FAQ for a MOB!

[soccerfan777]

LOL, yeah I should

[soccerfan777]

WTF is wrong with you? I explained it clearly above. Is it too hard for you to comprehend plain English.

[bob]

On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 17:35:34 -0700 (PDT), soccerfan777

your explanation doesn't match what you said then. anyway, i don't
care, it's your life.

bob

[soccerfan777]

You have shit memory.

[*skriptis]

stephenJ <sja...@cox.net> Wrote in message:

Does she have better legs than Graf?
--


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

[Gracchus]

On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 5:57:20 PM UTC-7, soccerfan777 wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 7:45:49 PM UTC-5, bob wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 17:35:34 -0700 (PDT), soccerfan777

> > >WTF is wrong with you? I explained it clearly above. Is it too hard for you to comprehend plain English.

> > your explanation doesn't match what you said then. anyway, i don't
> > care, it's your life.

> You have shit memory.

Court 1 is our unofficial archivist. Ask her and maybe she can find it once the eye-rolling is done.

[soccerfan777]

I am surprised she hasnt looked at Whisper's wife pic yet and rated her. She is usually very good at it ;-)

[soccerfan777]

Haha no wonder Jaros hates Graf

[Whisper]

Good points.

[Whisper]

On 2/06/2016 7:29 AM, soccerfan777 wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 3:32:50 PM UTC-5, Thomas R. Kettler wrote:
>> In article <9qmdnY8ZsJob3tLK...@westnet.com.au>,

>> Well, attractiveness can be negated by other factors.
>>
>> As examples,
>>
>> Isla Fisher may be pretty, but I find her questionable since she married
>> Sacha Baron Cohen whom I find utterly distasteful.
>
> I find Isla Fischer distasteful. Sascha Cohen is an intelligent guy.

Bet she fawns over him - intelligent guys aren't averse to pretty women
throwing themselves at them.

>>
>> Similarly, many things I've read about Amber Heard make me find her
>> someone I dislike.
>>
>> Furthermore, while Lindsey Lohan, Paris Hilton or Miley Cyrus may rate
>> well on physical attractiveness,
>
> No they don't.

Not Paris or Miley, but is Lohan's rack real? I'd never consider a
serious relationship with her as it's guaranteed to end badly, but
hypothetically I'd give Lindsay a couple 'dates' maybe? Bad girls are
good now & again.

[Thomas R. Kettler]

In article <574ff7e4$0$45345$b1db1813$2411...@news.astraweb.com>,

Thank you.
--

[bob]

do you not remember hazelwood calling your wife fat porky pig and me
defending her saying she was pretty and curvy? and you blowing a hissy
fit thinking me calling her curvy was calling her fat (which it
wasn't)?

i have a shit memory, eh? :-)

bob

[soccerfan777]

Curvy is used to describe fat women. Unless you are living under a cave you will know. Serena calls herself curvy

[Whisper]

On 2/06/2016 9:39 PM, soccerfan777 wrote:
> Curvy is used to describe fat women. Unless you are living under a cave you will know. Serena calls herself curvy
>

Fat is a misshapen blob with 3 chins. Some call curvy fat, others call
it curvy. Imo a few extra pounds looks good on women as it usually
accentuates their womanly bits - far better than pretty skinny girls
with figure of a young boy.

[soccerfan777]

On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 8:52:14 AM UTC-5, Whisper wrote:
> On 2/06/2016 9:39 PM, soccerfan777 wrote:
> > Curvy is used to describe fat women. Unless you are living under a cave you will know. Serena calls herself curvy
> >
>
>
> Fat is a misshapen blob with 3 chins.

There are different standards of fat in various parts of the World. In US, you have to be really obese to be called fat. In fact, if you are a young girl and above 130 pounds, you are fat.

[Whisper]

On 3/06/2016 12:19 AM, soccerfan777 wrote:
> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 8:52:14 AM UTC-5, Whisper wrote:
>> On 2/06/2016 9:39 PM, soccerfan777 wrote:
>>> Curvy is used to describe fat women. Unless you are living under a cave you will know. Serena calls herself curvy
>>>
>>
>>
>> Fat is a misshapen blob with 3 chins.
>
> There are different standards of fat in various parts of the World. In US, you have to be really obese to be called fat. In fact, if you are a young girl and above 130 pounds, you are fat.
>
>

The goal shouldn't be weight, but overall looks. Like I said plenty of
pretty looking skinny chicks with fake boobs who are a complete turn off
for me. Skinny is great on girls who are naturally thin as they have
curves in all the right places as well as being slim (like my Mrs), but
that doesn't mean all girls should aspire to that. Plenty of larger
girls out there who take care of their appearance & look pretty good -
much better/healthier then if they drastically dieted to be as thin as
possible.

I find I'm generally attracted to brunette euro types, but it would be
pretty boring if they all looked the same.

[bob]

On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 04:39:57 -0700 (PDT), soccerfan777
<zepf...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Curvy is used to describe fat women. Unless you are living under a cave you will know. Serena calls herself curvy

i call beyonce curvy.

bob