SliceAndDice kirjoitti 18.7.2017 klo 17:51:
> On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 at 9:36:01 AM UTC-4, Court_1 wrote:
>> On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 at 9:26:20 AM UTC-4, TT wrote:
>>> Court_1 kirjoitti 18.7.2017 klo 16:14:
>>>> On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 at 8:59:11 AM UTC-4, TT wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So Nadal losing a 5 setter to big server; Cilic, Djokovic and Murray
>>>>> injured... typical Fed slam win.
>>>>
>>>> Good joke. Didn't Fed just beat Nadal at the AO
>>>
>>> No, that was 6 months ago.
>>
>> Nadal hasn't defeated Federer this year!
>>
>>
>>> Doesn't change the fact Fed is taking advantage of rest of the big four
>>> being off.
>>
>> So is Nadal! And again, Djokovic and Murray were NOT going to beat Federer at this Wimbledon.
>>
>>
>>> I agree that Fed does have his chances against Rafa... I think he still
>>> lost to Muller because of his nerves, really bad play on breakpoints.
>>
>> Nerves, lol. He's lost early at Wimbledon for SIX years! That ain't nerves.
>
Nadal won more points than Muller and wasted lots of breakpoints... nerves.
> Fed has played his biggest nemesis at almost every tournament he played in 2017 and come out on top. He did not meet him at Halle or Wimbledon, but he has the career edge against Nadal on grass anyway.
>
> Nadal, now, is a different story. His biggest nemesis, Djokovic has been completely out of sorts this year. Nadal avoided meeting peak Djokovic in Australia as well as at Roland Garros (Djokovic has owned Nadal on all surfaces lately). The way I see it, Nadal is the one who is vulturing.
>
Nadal would have beaten in form Djokovic at RG and hasn't won other
slams so he's not vulturing. Fed would have lost at AO if Rafa had not
been mentally weak and possibly at Wimbledon as well.
So Fed is vulturing, Rafa winning the minimum with his form.