So BOB... how do you like Trump's presidency so far?

[TT]

Well?

And how does it feel to live in banana republic?

[*skriptis]

TT <as...@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:

> Well?
>
> And how does it feel to live in banana republic?
>

So a country that anyone can enter, is a solid country, but a
country that takes care who enters it, is a banana
republic?

Nice perverse way of thinking. What's good is actually bad, and
what's bad is actually god.
Total subversion.




--


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

[TT]

31.1.2017, 13:12, *skriptis kirjoitti:
> TT <as...@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:
>> Well?
>>
>> And how does it feel to live in banana republic?
>>
>
>
> So a country that anyone can enter, is a solid country, but a
> country that takes care who enters it, is a banana
> republic?
>

I was referring to Trump firing US attorney general.

[*skriptis]

TT <as...@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:
> 31.1.2017, 13:12, *skriptis kirjoitti:
>> TT <as...@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:
>>> Well?
>>>
>>> And how does it feel to live in banana republic?
>>>
>>
>>
>> So a country that anyone can enter, is a solid country, but a
>> country that takes care who enters it, is a banana
>> republic?
>>
>
> I was referring to Trump firing US attorney general.

Well what's wrong with that?

I am not sure I am well informed, but from what I've seen wasn't
she appointed by Obama and was meant to be there temporarily
until Trump's man gets approval and takes over from
her?

So she was a sitting duck on that duty yet acted in a partisan
manner, interfering with Trump's policy.

Totally low. Classless.

Now Obama goes classless as well stepping out into the public.

So low.

[Guypers]

Fukkoffcommie, how many did putie kil today???

[TT]

31.1.2017, 19:31, *skriptis kirjoitti:
> TT <as...@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:
>> 31.1.2017, 13:12, *skriptis kirjoitti:
>>> TT <as...@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:
>>>> Well?
>>>>
>>>> And how does it feel to live in banana republic?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So a country that anyone can enter, is a solid country, but a
>>> country that takes care who enters it, is a banana
>>> republic?
>>>
>>
>> I was referring to Trump firing US attorney general.
>
>
>
> Well what's wrong with that?

What's wrong with firing highest justice official because she thinks
that what you're doing is illegal? You figure it out.

>
> I am not sure I am well informed,

I'm sure you aren't.

Btw, the executive order on immigrants WAS illegal... and indeed, a law
professor did compare Trump government to being a banana republic with a
dictator - the government ignored law even after knowing their order was
against it...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkADj0TPrJA

[TT]

And here's the correct link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeG8TiLCYIE

[DavidW]

On 1/02/2017 9:52 AM, TT wrote:
> Btw, the executive order on immigrants WAS illegal...

Didn't Trump criticize Obama during the campaign for all his executive
orders and promise he wouldn't use them?

[soccerfan777]

He said executive orders were unconstitutional! Apparently only when a democrat uses it.

[stephenJ]

On 1/31/2017 4:52 PM, TT wrote:
> 31.1.2017, 19:31, *skriptis kirjoitti:
>> TT <as...@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:
>>> 31.1.2017, 13:12, *skriptis kirjoitti:
>>>> TT <as...@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:
>>>>> Well?
>>>>>
>>>>> And how does it feel to live in banana republic?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So a country that anyone can enter, is a solid country, but a
>>>> country that takes care who enters it, is a banana
>>>> republic?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I was referring to Trump firing US attorney general.
>>
>>
>>
>> Well what's wrong with that?
>
> What's wrong with firing highest justice official because she thinks
> that what you're doing is illegal? You figure it out.
>
>>
>> I am not sure I am well informed,
>
> I'm sure you aren't.
>
> Btw, the executive order on immigrants WAS illegal...

So why is it largely still in effect?


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[*skriptis]

TT <as...@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:
> 31.1.2017, 19:31, *skriptis kirjoitti:
>> TT <as...@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:
>>> 31.1.2017, 13:12, *skriptis kirjoitti:
>>>> TT <as...@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:
>>>>> Well?
>>>>>
>>>>> And how does it feel to live in banana republic?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So a country that anyone can enter, is a solid country, but a
>>>> country that takes care who enters it, is a banana
>>>> republic?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I was referring to Trump firing US attorney general.
>>
>>
>>
>> Well what's wrong with that?
>
> What's wrong with firing highest justice official because she thinks
> that what you're doing is illegal? You figure it out.
>
>>
>> I am not sure I am well informed,
>
> I'm sure you aren't.
>
> Btw, the executive order on immigrants WAS illegal...

That's utterly imbecilic.

Borders are barriers. If they aren't barriers, then they don't
really exist and are purely cosmetic. I say they do exist.


Or would you like 10 million Russians to cross your border and
"move in"?


So think wisely before answering.


If it's illegal to close your borders, it would mean it's illegal
to have them in the first place.


It's such a radical concept.

[DavidW]

On 1/02/2017 10:43 AM, *skriptis wrote:
> TT <as...@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:
>

>> Btw, the executive order on immigrants WAS illegal...
>
> That's utterly imbecilic.

>...

> If it's illegal to close your borders, it would mean it's illegal
> to have them in the first place.

The issue is not whether it's legal for the U.S. to close its borders,
but whether it's legal to do it by presidential decree in the way that
Trump has done it.

[*skriptis]

DavidW <n...@email.provided> Wrote in message:

OK. I'll pass on that one. It could be ilrgsl.
But hey what if there was Ebola epidemic in Canada? You need to
act quickly and close the border? Who does or how is it done?
Surely president is doing it somehow. Not the congress. So he's
probably done it legally.

He's smart enough not to break laws, has many advisers, lawyers
etc so I am sure that at worst, it was in a grey zone.



But back to the point, I don't think that all these protesters who
protest are protesting over alleged illegitimacy of this act in
the manner you complained. They don't look like constitutionalist
to me on TV with their hijabs or SJW feces.

Actually, I haven't heard a single articulate person being
interviewed that focuses on the way that this decision has been
made or on the whole process. Maybe I haven't watched enough.


They're mostly moaning on how un-American, or racist it was, and I
skip that.

[DavidW]

On 1/02/2017 12:10 PM, *skriptis wrote:
>
> He's smart enough not to break laws

Are you serious???

[Garvin Yee]

On 1/30/2017 11:42 PM, TT wrote:
> Well?
>
> And how does it feel to live in banana republic?

Uh oh.....now that AO is over, it will be back to
politics as usual....

:/


--
https://www.flickr.com/photos/34735015@N03/sets/72157623566520134/

http://fineartamerica.com/art/all/garvin+yee/all

https://www.facebook.com/garvin.yee.37

[TT]

Unfortunately yes. He thinks the orange clown with tiny orange brain is
smart.

As if he would understand anything he signs...
Skriptis probably thinks Trump wrote those executive orders too.

[DavidW]

Mostly I was thinking that he wouldn't care about breaking the law.

[bmo...@nyx.net]

http://usuncut.com/politics/trump-obama-executive-orders/

Trump attacked Obama for signing executive orders. He’s signing them 20 times faster.