... BUT FED WINS THE MATCH!
Julia Assange
If he'd improve his accuracy, he'd be like another del Potro.
felangey
Cilic @ only 22 seems again to have his shoit together and on the cusp of a
breakthrough. Fed was able to find another gear at the end of set 3....and
Cilic was about goosed by set 4. Great stuff from both guys....that is a
match a flakier Fed could easily have lost....but he hung tough in the
sections Cilic was playing better than him. Needs to serve better as he
progresses....mising too many first serves and Cilic was able to handle the
kicker easy in his rarified air. Overall, good stuff.
That level of Cilic is as hard as round 3 draws come for a top guy.
TT
>> If he'd improve his accuracy, he'd be like another del Potro.
>
> Cilic @ only 22 seems again to have his shoit together and on the cusp of a
> breakthrough. Fed was able to find another gear at the end of set 3...
Despite his bad back. Ah ha ha ha ha ha hah
...No, your analysis sucks, Cilic served double fault because of the
umpire and thus lost the set. After that he lost his head. Pascal game,
set, match.
BreaKBeaT®
"Julia Assange" <jism...@yahoo.com> ha scritto
> If he'd improve his accuracy, he'd be like another del Potro.
Cilic is pretty weak mentally, while Del Potro is a beast on that aspect.
While Del Potro often finds a way to win his match, Cilic finds a way to
loose it.
The only aspect in which the croat is better than the argentine it's health.
Patrick Kehoe
> Thanks in no small measure to Cilich's bad serving.
Ya, you think?
P
RzR
>Pascal game,
> set, match.
if thats the case, nadal would have 2-3 slams max, so you better be quiet
Mormon Mitt
> Thanks in no small measure to Cilich's bad serving.
>
> If he'd improve his accuracy, he'd be like another del Potro.
===========
I believe it's spelled Cilic
AliAsoag
Poor man, this TT.
Giovanna
> >Pascal game,
> > set, match.
>
> if thats the case, nadal would have 2-3 slams max, so you better be quiet
LOL