> > On 8 Okt., 16:18, Vlado <vlado2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Oct 8, 10:00 am, Sakari Lund <sakari.l...@welho.com> wrote:

> >>> On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 23:02:48 +0300, TT <as...@dprk.kp> wrote:
> >>>> 7.10.2012 16:59, Sakari Lund kirjoitti:
> >>>>> On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 06:19:12 +0300, TT <as...@dprk.kp> wrote:

> >>>>>> My opinion:

> >>>>>> abc says Romney won... I didn't see it that way. A gridlock at best.
> >>>>>> Romney was pretty much how I expected, did look a bit uncomfortable at
> >>>>>> moments, did go for his attacks... while Obama was more into details.

> >>>>>> Obama was civil and pointed out Romney's lack of specifics. He did miss
> >>>>>> out mentioning 47% while mentioning Romney's partisan agenda to repel
> >>>>>> Obamacare.

> >>>>>> I think the moderator did a lousy job. Also, why can't they do a
> >>>>>> factcheck on the run...

> >>>>>> Romney is wrong, big time, with his plan for healthcare. Reducing
> >>>>>> government involvement makes healthcare more expensive. Capitalism
> >>>>>> doesn't work for low cost healthcare, private healthcare will try and
> >>>>>> milk as much profit as they can.

> >>>>> I watched the debate later, after I had read all the stories saying
> >>>>> Romney won, that Obama was unconvincing and stuttered and whatever.

> >>>>> So I was kind of expecting to see Obama do badly, but it didn't look
> >>>>> like that. I haven't followed US politics and economy enough to really
> >>>>> comment on the substance, but both appeared pretty convincing to me. I
> >>>>> hadn't really seen Romney before, at least he doesn't seem like a
> >>>>> Sarah Palin type who doesn't understand anything about anything. I
> >>>>> suspect he was a bit like "Timo Soini", i.e. criticizing all existing
> >>>>> policies, but doesn't have any realistic alternatives.

> >>>>> So my impression was, again not having followed US politics or economy
> >>>>> or the campaign much, that "image-wise" they seemed pretty equal, but
> >>>>> I suspect Obama had more actual substance.

> >>>> Well if your impression from the debate only was that Romney criticizes
> >>>> but doesn't have the cure himself - then I think Obama succeeded on
> >>>> exactly what he wanted to succeed at...

> >>> Well not really. It doesn't help him at all if I get that impression,
> >>> but majority of US people think Romney won the debate  :-)

> >> Romney didn't "win" , Obama was just exposed with his body language
> >> and I think it's to his credit. I don't follow mainstream media but
> >> Obama was always
> >> just a media made icon to make people forget about Bush years and now
> >> that he is on his own he can't hide the emptiness and the
> >> uncomfortable feeling
> >> of not being your own man.Probably subconciously he can't stand for
> >> the
> >> things his masters want him to do and he doesn't want to prolong his
> >> own
> >> suffering.

> > Who are his masters?
> > David Axelrod and Chris Matthews??

> > Max

> The Jew?