Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
On 9-Oct-2012, Court_1 <Olympia0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I don't believe that is the whole story. Sure today's top four areThe trouble is it's really difficult to objectively measure this. My take
> strong and have managed to build a blockage against the rest winning
> slams but in my opinion that is also because 5-10 are fairly weak.
is that it's much more *likely* to have a really excellent top 4 at any
given time than to have a really poor 5+. My guess is an instance of a
particularly weak field (in "absolute terms", whatever that is) would only
occur in an exceptionally unusual period, such as during war or during the
early days of the sport when it lacked participation and standardization.
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.