The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:13:06 GMT
Local: Tues, Oct 9 2012 8:13 pm
Subject: Re: Nish bagels Raonic
On 9-Oct-2012, Court_1 <Olympia0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I don't believe that is the whole story. Sure today's top four are
The trouble is it's really difficult to objectively measure this. My take
> strong and have managed to build a blockage against the rest winning > slams but in my opinion that is also because 5-10 are fairly weak. is that it's much more *likely* to have a really excellent top 4 at any given time than to have a really poor 5+. My guess is an instance of a particularly weak field (in "absolute terms", whatever that is) would only occur in an exceptionally unusual period, such as during war or during the early days of the sport when it lacked participation and standardization. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||