Message from discussion Raonic def Murray: 6-3 6-7 7-6
Received: by 10.66.72.73 with SMTP id b9mr4420128pav.9.1349777729139;
Tue, 09 Oct 2012 03:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 05:15:28 -0500
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 21:15:33 +1100
From: Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
Subject: Re: Raonic def Murray: 6-3 6-7 7-6
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <c9idnX5NfK8wc-3NnZ2dnUVZ_tKdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <xfSdnRkORqohNu_NnZ2dnUVZ_s2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <email@example.com>
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 9/10/2012 2:44 AM, Vari L. Cinicke wrote:
> On 10/8/2012 6:32 AM, Whisper wrote:
>> His 'junkball' style is a conscious decision to play that way. He
>> clearly has the ability to smack the bejeesus out of the ball. Won't be
>> long before he snaps these 2 facets together & bamboozles the field.
> He is very inconsistent in the bejeesus department due to fundamental
> problems due to his chosen junkball play.
> He is big man and what worked against boys is not working against the
> men. His overall IQ (tennis IQ + actual IQ) is not in the genius category.
> The sad part is that his estimate of himself agrees with your worship of
> him but the players are playing against what he brings to court and
> doing fine.
> Are both Nadal and Tomic co-favorites in your book in every slam they
> enter in 2013? ROFL!
Look, no one is going to argue about Tomic's current results. I'm not
going to defend his current performance either.
I think he has huge untapped potential, & it's just a matter of
time/maturity before everyone sees it.