Received: by 10.66.84.7 with SMTP id u7mr1371975pay.26.1353109936972;
        Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:52:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.50.222.132 with SMTP id qm4mr111234igc.5.1353109936730; Fri,
 16 Nov 2012 15:52:16 -0800 (PST)
Path: s9ni12298pbb.0!nntp.google.com!kr7no7113073pbb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:52:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8d562c40-4694-45a8-9455-c8f6a43ae4e1@m4g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.173.160.182;
 posting-account=pwtBzAoAAABg9b58PUXem9M06_wwfb_M
NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.173.160.182
References: <8d562c40-4694-45a8-9455-c8f6a43ae4e1@m4g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <53c34d75-1d00-4b25-ae37-84046d3ad6f5@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: IF USO had switched to RED CLAY in 1978 how many slams would
 Sampras have?
From: ca1houn <vageta95...@yahoo.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 23:52:16 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Friday, November 16, 2012 9:04:38 AM UTC-8, soccerfan777 wrote:
> My guess is 9!
> 
> 
> 
> I am sure Connors and McEnroe would have figured out a way to win a
> 
> red clay USO, but Sampras simply wouldn't have since he was overly
> 
> dependant on his big serve which was negated on red-clay. He didnt
> 
> have the groundstrokes or the ability to tackle topspin at the FO and
> 
> it would have been the same at the USO, if it was played on red-clay.

How many viewer? Were not going to watch that shit