Received: by 10.14.204.3 with SMTP id g3mr13901112eeo.7.1350352607071;
        Mon, 15 Oct 2012 18:56:47 -0700 (PDT)
Path: q11ni134324916wiw.1!nntp.google.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.141.40.65.MISMATCH!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!border2.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.panservice.it!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Vari L. Cinicke" <variesn...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: Nish bagels Raonic
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 19:23:05 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <k52bo2$4l1$1@dont-email.me>
References: <f6e74113-aff4-40c0-b7da-aba2acf7d9c1@googlegroups.com> <k4s2il$4j0$1@dont-email.me> <k4s3kt$b22$1@dont-email.me> <2fc2262c-7e54-4dab-9e70-91b38babb5aa@y8g2000yqy.googlegroups.com> <3ee869d8-8b1e-4f98-a4b4-ac825d524a1b@googlegroups.com> <k4sgp8$a0$1@dont-email.me> <43facb45-1470-444c-b748-2b1280967aa5@googlegroups.com> <38f55176-0edd-4b2a-a427-8d58b47fc346@o8g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <k4vs9r$233$2@dont-email.me> <78b1cbd7-4c94-4e66-9543-228c5080aadc@n2g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <9eea1e98-acc7-456e-ad74-34f2ea85b5fa@n9g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <f2b1e2c4-2d5f-49d4-88d7-4b7c962abece@p22g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 23:24:51 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="19e925969ed047f7efcf22873a7e5fe5";
	logging-data="4769"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/pUE/OKQTjS39Vazbvu5eG"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
In-Reply-To: <f2b1e2c4-2d5f-49d4-88d7-4b7c962abece@p22g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RLn3/t4NLQiAnHMDD10+iu0ovl0=
Bytes: 2262
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 10/9/2012 6:18 PM, Court_1 wrote:
> I am not saying reaching the top ten isn't a milestone, I am saying
> that the players ranked 5-10 are weak in comparison to many past
> years. I can't see how anybody fails to see it.

Because it is not true?

You want to be systematic? Pick a calendar week and look at the Top 10 
that week over the years.

List them all along with how many slams each had at the time of the ranking.

Then get back if you have an actual finding worth ranting about.