On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:32:50 -0400, bob <stein...@comcast.net> wrote:AFAIR, this was not a Jaros suggestion back then, about 10 years ago
>On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 18:08:40 +1000, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>> On 20-Sep-2012, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> The ATP could either do this or simply increase the points available
>>>>> I think Olympics shouldn't award any points since it's not played every year
>>>> "Many feel that Federer....is not currently the true number one."
>>>> Who feels this way outside of the narrow confines of RST? I've not
>>>> Fed won Wimbledon, by far the most important tournament on the
>>> well if the olympics isn't counted as a major then the system would
>>Jaros previously suggested a 10,000 point allocation for each slam won.
>10,000pts/slam. hmmm. jaros a pretty smart guy actually. and i like
or something. It was made by Hops as a joke, but Jaros and Whisper
thought it was a good idea. This was the era of (extreme) slammist vs.
(extreme) anti-slammist wars on rst, which has long ago been replaced
by era of wars between fans of different players.
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.