Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion IF USO had switched to RED CLAY in 1978 how many slams would Sampras have?

Received: by 10.66.87.73 with SMTP id v9mr1439404paz.46.1353117086264;
        Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:51:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.222.132 with SMTP id qm4mr160733igc.5.1353117086224; Fri,
 16 Nov 2012 17:51:26 -0800 (PST)
Path: s9ni20179pbb.0!nntp.google.com!kt20no7062404pbb.1!postnews.google.com!i7g2000pbf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:51:26 -0800 (PST)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: i7g2000pbf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=173.36.196.10; posting-account=_TMChAoAAACb-dREJECRZ-3lsoH_SytN
NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.36.196.10
References: <8d562c40-4694-45a8-9455-c8f6a43ae4e1@m4g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <c6addd61-46a3-4aa3-b175-a08810185e35@nl3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <83eb0532-f587-4d8e-8c42-a9a6cc7ccfbf@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 sjce-dmz-wsa-5.cisco.com:80 (Cisco-IronPort-WSA/7.5.0-833)
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:16.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Firefox/16.0,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <36828db6-dcb8-40fb-8553-07f26e60341f@i7g2000pbf.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: IF USO had switched to RED CLAY in 1978 how many slams would
 Sampras have?
From: Shakes <kvcsh...@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 01:51:26 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Nov 16, 5:12=A0pm, phamquangt...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
> On Saturday, November 17, 2012 4:54:44 AM UTC+11, Ulysses wrote:
> > On Nov 16, 9:04=A0am, soccerfan777 <zepflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > My guess is 9!
>
> > > I am sure Connors and McEnroe would have figured out a way to win a
>
> > > red clay USO, but Sampras simply wouldn't have since he was overly
>
> > > dependant on his big serve which was negated on red-clay. He didnt
>
> > > have the groundstrokes or the ability to tackle topspin at the FO and
>
> > > it would have been the same at the USO, if it was played on red-clay.
>
> > "He didnt have the groundstrokes..."
>
> > You appparently have never seen a Sampras match. His groundstrokes
>
> > were awesome. He had the greatest running FH the game has ever seen.
>
> > His DTL backhand was also an incredible shot.
>
> At best I'd say Pete's groundstrokes were on a par with Hewitt or less,

Are you serious ?