On Oct 7, 9:31 am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 7, 1:23 am, Patrick Kehoe <pke...@telus.net> wrote:Murray himself stated the folllowing:
> > On Oct 6, 6:28 am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Oct 6, 7:09 am, "felangey" <oncl...@nine.com> wrote:
> > > > Anoothhhhher match for Milos! No hope servebot. ;)
> > > Remember no-one cares what Raonic does, this doesn't matter, what has
> > > He hasn't even won a masters ;-)
> > > You know how many years I had to listen to similar arguments ? ;-)
> > > Good win for MR... Murray only at 80% though. Wouldn't happen in a
> > > Remember MR also beat Murray in the clay season this year too... in
> > > So don't read too much into this one.
> > > Muzz will still take the YEC. But may well go out early in bercy and
> > FFS he's just getting over hip surgery and recovery at 21... this is
> > He is 2-1 head to head vs. Murray though... :)))))))))
> > P
> not really muzz has barely been trying outside the big 5 events this
> His results have been
> Early loss in miami, but IW final only because he got three walkovers.
> Early losses in all clay masters series an warmup events (one to
> Early loss at queens rnd1 then wimby F OG win
> Early losses / withdrawal in toronto/cincy then USO win
> Fail to defend tokyo, prob early losses in shangai too e.t.c then Muzz
> Muzz cba with the tuneups.
"I don't want to say I was obsessed with grand slams, but winning one
Don't try and minimize his loss against Raonic. True it was not a slam
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.