Nole:
http://www.asapsports.com/show_interview.php?id=84933 ...
Q. You won without losing a match. Do you think you made Roger anxious, to try to hit so much, too much, because he made so many mistakes with the forehand? Do you think it was your patience?
NOVAK DJOKOVIC: The level was very high. I thought that we both played really well. The momentum was changing, coming to his side and my side throughout the match.
I knew that the only way for me to really win the match is to be consistently focused and committed to every point. You know, he's somebody that is very aggressive, that likes to finish his points very quickly. Especially when he's a break up, he's probably the best player I've played ever against. He comes up always with his A game when he's up. It's very difficult to handle that.
But, you know, I managed to get a lot of his shots back into the court, being passive, a couple meters behind the baseline, coming into an aggressive position. That was one of the goals tonight, to always try to get him into the longer rallies where I think I had the better chance.
...
---
Fed:
http://www.asapsports.com/show_interview.php?id=84934 ...
Q. Could you maybe try and explain to people what it's like being at the other end of the court from a guy who covers it so phenomenally well as Novak does and the problems that causes you every point.
ROGER FEDERER: I mean, it's no problem. I mean, I expect tough opponent, a guy who moves well. It's not like you're going into the match thinking, Wow, that's amazing he got that ball back. I mean, we've played 30 times, so you know what to expect.
And then there is many other guys moving very well on the tour, as well. It's not just him. But what he does well, you know, even in defense, he stays somewhat offensive. That's what I mentioned before the match, that, I think, is what separates him from the rest a little bit.
Maybe for some players it's easier if a guy defends this way than maybe another guy who just gets the ball back one more extra time and really keeps you doubting. He kinda stays on the offensive, so he really takes time away from you.
Yeah, so today we had times where we had longer rallies, we had times where we had shorter rallies. Like I mentioned, I think we had some great stuff out there. Yeah, it was good playing such points.
Obviously, you need a guy who retrieves well, such as Rafa or Ferrer or Andy or Novak, for that matter. It's great playing against those guys because the ball does come back a few more times than against other players from time to time and you get those great rallies going.
...
Q. When you were winning your original Masters Cups and these kinds of titles, we were talking about being attacking tennis being to the fore. Now we're talking about defensive tennis as the norm. Would you like to see or could you see a day when we talk more about attacking tennis than defensive tennis?
ROGER FEDERER: Yeah, I mean, it's easy fix. Just make quicker courts, then it's hard to defend. Attacking style is more important. It's only on this type of slow courts that you can defend the way we are all doing right now.
I think it's exciting, but no doubt about it, it's tough. What you don't want is that you hit 15 great shots and at the end, it ends up in an error.
So I think sometimes quicker courts do help the cause. I think it would help from time to time to move to something a bit faster. That would help to learn, as well, for many different players, different playing styles, to realize that coming to the net is a good thing, it's not a bad thing.
Then again, the tour has to decide, the tournament directors have a big say in it.
I'm happy with this court. It's faster. It's fine, too. I've played on all different speeds. But I think some variety would be nice, some really slow stuff and then some really fast stuff, instead of trying to make everything sort of the same. You sort of protect the top guys really by doing that because you have the best possible chance to have them in the semis at this point, I think.
But should that be the goal? I'm not sure.
...
> Nole:http://www.asapsports.com/show_interview.php?id=84933 > ...
> Q. You won without losing a match. Do you think you made Roger
> anxious, to try to hit so much, too much, because he made so many
> mistakes with the forehand? Do you think it was your patience?
> NOVAK DJOKOVIC: The level was very high. I thought that we both played
> really well. The momentum was changing, coming to his side and my side
> throughout the match.
> I knew that the only way for me to really win the match is to be
> consistently focused and committed to every point. You know, he's
> somebody that is very aggressive, that likes to finish his points very
> quickly. Especially when he's a break up, he's probably the best player
> I've played ever against. He comes up always with his A game when he's
> up. It's very difficult to handle that.
> But, you know, I managed to get a lot of his shots back into the court,
> being passive, a couple meters behind the baseline, coming into an
> aggressive position. That was one of the goals tonight, to always try
> to get him into the longer rallies where I think I had the better chance.
> ...
> ---
> Fed:http://www.asapsports.com/show_interview.php?id=84934 > ...
> Q. Could you maybe try and explain to people what it's like being at
> the other end of the court from a guy who covers it so phenomenally well
> as Novak does and the problems that causes you every point.
> ROGER FEDERER: I mean, it's no problem. I mean, I expect tough
> opponent, a guy who moves well. It's not like you're going into the
> match thinking, Wow, that's amazing he got that ball back. I mean,
> we've played 30 times, so you know what to expect.
> And then there is many other guys moving very well on the tour, as well.
> It's not just him. But what he does well, you know, even in defense,
> he stays somewhat offensive. That's what I mentioned before the match,
> that, I think, is what separates him from the rest a little bit.
> Maybe for some players it's easier if a guy defends this way than maybe
> another guy who just gets the ball back one more extra time and really
> keeps you doubting. He kinda stays on the offensive, so he really takes
> time away from you.
> Yeah, so today we had times where we had longer rallies, we had times
> where we had shorter rallies. Like I mentioned, I think we had some
> great stuff out there. Yeah, it was good playing such points.
> Obviously, you need a guy who retrieves well, such as Rafa or Ferrer or
> Andy or Novak, for that matter. It's great playing against those guys
> because the ball does come back a few more times than against other
> players from time to time and you get those great rallies going.
> ...
> Q. When you were winning your original Masters Cups and these kinds of
> titles, we were talking about being attacking tennis being to the fore.
> Now we're talking about defensive tennis as the norm. Would you like
> to see or could you see a day when we talk more about attacking tennis
> than defensive tennis?
> ROGER FEDERER: Yeah, I mean, it's easy fix. Just make quicker courts,
> then it's hard to defend. Attacking style is more important. It's only
> on this type of slow courts that you can defend the way we are all doing
> right now.
> I think it's exciting, but no doubt about it, it's tough. What you
> don't want is that you hit 15 great shots and at the end, it ends up in
> an error.
> So I think sometimes quicker courts do help the cause. I think it would
> help from time to time to move to something a bit faster. That would
> help to learn, as well, for many different players, different playing
> styles, to realize that coming to the net is a good thing, it's not a
> bad thing.
> Then again, the tour has to decide, the tournament directors have a big
> say in it.
> I'm happy with this court. It's faster. It's fine, too. I've played
> on all different speeds. But I think some variety would be nice, some
> really slow stuff and then some really fast stuff, instead of trying to
> make everything sort of the same. You sort of protect the top guys
> really by doing that because you have the best possible chance to have
> them in the semis at this point, I think.
> But should that be the goal? I'm not sure.
> ...
Fed quote:
"But I think some variety would be nice, some really slow stuff and
then some really fast stuff, instead of trying to make everything sort
of the same. You sort of protect the top guys really by doing that
because you have the best possible chance to have them in the semis at
this point, I think. But should that be the goal? I'm not sure."