On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:43:45 -0700 (PDT), Professor X
<sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Muzz played an awful match, patchy and inconsistent. Broken loads,
>couldn't make a first - serve. Yet still only dropped 7 games.
grabbed his hamstring in the 3rd set, hopefully nothing serious.
On Aug 27, 11:23 pm, bob <stein...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:43:45 -0700 (PDT), Professor X
> <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >Muzz played an awful match, patchy and inconsistent. Broken loads,
> >couldn't make a first - serve. Yet still only dropped 7 games.
> grabbed his hamstring in the 3rd set, hopefully nothing serious.
On Aug 27, 8:39 pm, Ulysses <ulys...@mscomm.com> wrote:
> On Aug 27, 3:54 pm, "felangey" <oncl...@nine.com> wrote:
> > Yes, big gap between the world no.4 and the world no.73....69 places! ;)
> Exactly. What's the gap between Roger and anyone else? 17 slams
> compared to:
> Djoker: 5 slams
> Nadal: 11 slams
> Muzz: Um... a big fat zero. Which ain't changing anytime soon (like
> never). So sorry.
Yes it was rather sneaky of ProfX to slip Murray into the 'top' like
that.
If there is such a huge gap between Murray and the rest, just think
how big the gap is between Federer and the rest!
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:37:09 -0700 (PDT), Professor X
<sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Aug 27, 11:23 pm, bob <stein...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:43:45 -0700 (PDT), Professor X
>> <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >Muzz played an awful match, patchy and inconsistent. Broken loads,
>> >couldn't make a first - serve. Yet still only dropped 7 games.
>> grabbed his hamstring in the 3rd set, hopefully nothing serious.
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:37:09 -0700 (PDT), Professor X
> <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Aug 27, 11:23 pm, bob <stein...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:43:45 -0700 (PDT), Professor X
> >> <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >Muzz played an awful match, patchy and inconsistent. Broken loads,
> >> >couldn't make a first - serve. Yet still only dropped 7 games.
> >> grabbed his hamstring in the 3rd set, hopefully nothing serious.
> >> bob
> >just cramp apparently.
> that's serious.
> bob
Can anyone name a match where Murray hasn't grabbed his hamstring,
calf, stomach, forearm, ankle or foot during a match?
No takers?
Didn't think so.
The only time he never grabs an appendage is when he's playing someone
outside the top 30 and he's up 6-2, 5-2.
> On Aug 27, 6:00 pm, bob <stein...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:37:09 -0700 (PDT), Professor X
> > <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >On Aug 27, 11:23 pm, bob <stein...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:43:45 -0700 (PDT), Professor X
> > >> <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >Muzz played an awful match, patchy and inconsistent. Broken loads,
> > >> >couldn't make a first - serve. Yet still only dropped 7 games.
> > >> grabbed his hamstring in the 3rd set, hopefully nothing serious.
> > >> bob
> > >just cramp apparently.
> > that's serious.
> > bob
> Can anyone name a match where Murray hasn't grabbed his hamstring,
> calf, stomach, forearm, ankle or foot during a match?
> No takers?
> Didn't think so.
> The only time he never grabs an appendage is when he's playing someone
> outside the top 30 and he's up 6-2, 5-2.
Hey Uly, obviously ProfX and bob know this and were simply joking.
They're not _THAT dense! ;)
>On Aug 27, 6:00 pm, bob <stein...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:37:09 -0700 (PDT), Professor X
>> <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Aug 27, 11:23 pm, bob <stein...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:43:45 -0700 (PDT), Professor X
>> >> <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >Muzz played an awful match, patchy and inconsistent. Broken loads,
>> >> >couldn't make a first - serve. Yet still only dropped 7 games.
>> >> grabbed his hamstring in the 3rd set, hopefully nothing serious.
>> >> bob
>> >just cramp apparently.
>> that's serious.
>> bob
>Can anyone name a match where Murray hasn't grabbed his hamstring,
>calf, stomach, forearm, ankle or foot during a match?
>No takers?
>Didn't think so.
>The only time he never grabs an appendage is when he's playing someone
>outside the top 30 and he's up 6-2, 5-2.
he was up 2 sets + break when he grabbed the hamstring and grimaced in
pain.
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:05:41 -0700 (PDT), Ulysses <ulys...@mscomm.com>
> wrote:
> >On Aug 27, 6:00 pm, bob <stein...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:37:09 -0700 (PDT), Professor X
> >> <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Aug 27, 11:23 pm, bob <stein...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:43:45 -0700 (PDT), Professor X
> >> >> <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >Muzz played an awful match, patchy and inconsistent. Broken loads,
> >> >> >couldn't make a first - serve. Yet still only dropped 7 games.
> >> >> grabbed his hamstring in the 3rd set, hopefully nothing serious.
> >> >> bob
> >> >just cramp apparently.
> >> that's serious.
> >> bob
> >Can anyone name a match where Murray hasn't grabbed his hamstring,
> >calf, stomach, forearm, ankle or foot during a match?
> >No takers?
> >Didn't think so.
> >The only time he never grabs an appendage is when he's playing someone
> >outside the top 30 and he's up 6-2, 5-2.
> he was up 2 sets + break when he grabbed the hamstring and grimaced in
> pain.
> bob
Good to hear, Bob. That means Andy won't even make it to the semis to
bother Roger. Ivan needs to administer an ass whoopin' to that Brit
git.
> > >> >Muzz played an awful match, patchy and inconsistent. Broken loads,
> > >> >couldn't make a first - serve. Yet still only dropped 7 games.
> > >> grabbed his hamstring in the 3rd set, hopefully nothing serious.
> > >> bob
> > >just cramp apparently.
> > that's serious.
> > bob
> Can anyone name a match where Murray hasn't grabbed his hamstring,
> calf, stomach, forearm, ankle or foot during a match?
> No takers?
> Didn't think so.
> The only time he never grabs an appendage is when he's playing someone
> outside the top 30 and he's up 6-2, 5-2.
Correct. It's also an attempt to take away the opponent's rhythm and momentum. Much like Rafa being bothered by his knees whenever he's in trouble. They're basically always degrading their opponents by suggesting they can't possibly be struggling against them while fully fit... It's gamesmanship.
On Aug 28, 3:23 am, bob <stein...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:43:45 -0700 (PDT), Professor X
> <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >Muzz played an awful match, patchy and inconsistent. Broken loads,
> >couldn't make a first - serve. Yet still only dropped 7 games.
> grabbed his hamstring in the 3rd set, hopefully nothing serious.
> > > >> >Muzz played an awful match, patchy and inconsistent. Broken loads,
> > > >> >couldn't make a first - serve. Yet still only dropped 7 games.
> > > >> grabbed his hamstring in the 3rd set, hopefully nothing serious.
> > > >> bob
> > > >just cramp apparently.
> > > that's serious.
> > > bob
> > Can anyone name a match where Murray hasn't grabbed his hamstring,
> > calf, stomach, forearm, ankle or foot during a match?
> > No takers?
> > Didn't think so.
> > The only time he never grabs an appendage is when he's playing someone
> > outside the top 30 and he's up 6-2, 5-2.
> Correct. It's also an attempt to take away the opponent's rhythm and momentum. Much like Rafa being bothered by his knees whenever he's in trouble. They're basically always degrading their opponents by suggesting they can't possibly be struggling against them while fully fit... It's gamesmanship.
wow you guys really are scared of Murray making the semis.
What will you do if he whoops roger 6-2 6-1 6-4 again..... remember
before the olympics you were on about how great Roger was again...
then BANG
now after Cinci you are still doing the same things.... then BANG.
>> > > >> >Muzz played an awful match, patchy and inconsistent. Broken loads,
>> > > >> >couldn't make a first - serve. Yet still only dropped 7 games.
>> > > >> grabbed his hamstring in the 3rd set, hopefully nothing serious.
>> > > >> bob
>> > > >just cramp apparently.
>> > > that's serious.
>> > > bob
>> > Can anyone name a match where Murray hasn't grabbed his hamstring,
>> > calf, stomach, forearm, ankle or foot during a match?
>> > No takers?
>> > Didn't think so.
>> > The only time he never grabs an appendage is when he's playing someone
>> > outside the top 30 and he's up 6-2, 5-2.
>> Correct. It's also an attempt to take away the opponent's rhythm and momentum. Much like Rafa being bothered by his knees whenever he's in trouble. They're basically always degrading their opponents by suggesting they can't possibly be struggling against them while fully fit... It's gamesmanship.
>wow you guys really are scared of Murray making the semis.
>What will you do if he whoops roger 6-2 6-1 6-4 again..... remember
>before the olympics you were on about how great Roger was again...
>then BANG
>now after Cinci you are still doing the same things.... then BANG.
>10-8 to the Muzz.
Just promise that you Muzz divers will all go back to sleep when Fed
once again blitzes Andy's ass at a slam.
<iceberg.ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Aug 28, 10:12 am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Aug 28, 1:39 am, Ulysses <ulys...@mscomm.com> wrote:
>> > On Aug 27, 3:54 pm, "felangey" <oncl...@nine.com> wrote:
>> > > Yes, big gap between the world no.4 and the world no.73....69 places! ;)
>> > Exactly. What's the gap between Roger and anyone else? 17 slams
>> > compared to:
>> > Djoker: 5 slams
>> > Nadal: 11 slams
>> > Muzz: Um... a big fat zero. Which ain't changing anytime soon (like
>> > never). So sorry.
>> Murray 1
>> Nadal 1
>> Federer 0
>> Djokovic 0
>> At the biggest tournament of all.
>> Can Federer win less than 7 games in the semis this year. I think Muzz
>> will probably bagel and breadstick him here this year.
>Fed's whole problem is this year's Australian Open vs Nadal. Nadal won
>in a decisive four. The Fedfans want to erase this from history.
why ? it was a watershed event. Rafa will never beat Fed in a slam
again.
> What will you do if he whoops roger 6-2 6-1 6-4 again..... remember
> before the olympics you were on about how great Roger was again...
> then BANG
> now after Cinci you are still doing the same things.... then BANG.
> 10-8 to the Muzz.
I find that if one stops running about the boat so much, it is much easier to keep an even keel.....ya know what I mean? :)) Only weeks ago you had written "the Muzz" off as a no slam winner....just pay heed to the more wisened heads around here: Murray seems to have found the path (or *a* path)....but the road to glory is still long....and Murray has a sore leg....and his gps is broken. If he gets his shizzle together, there is every chance he can make it....but there are no guarantees....even for Muzz v1.86.
On Aug 28, 2:14 pm, kayto <3centr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 28, 10:55 am, drew <d...@technologist.com> wrote:
> > Does Murray ever complete a match without clutching at his leg or his
> > back as if he will need an ambulance at any moment?
> Most win their first slams before 25. He has USO and AO as last
> chances.
Most do. But there's no 'expiry date' stamped on his forehead.
Murray's problem is not that he's a notch below Federer, Nadal and
Djokovic..that's a given...the stars
can sometimes align and eliminate these guys...his problem is that he
isn't consistently
better than the other guys in the top10....so he has a good chance of
getting whacked
in any tournament.
> On Aug 28, 2:14 pm, kayto <3centr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Aug 28, 10:55 am, drew <d...@technologist.com> wrote:
> > > Does Murray ever complete a match without clutching at his leg or his
> > > back as if he will need an ambulance at any moment?
> > Most win their first slams before 25. He has USO and AO as last
> > chances.
> Most do. But there's no 'expiry date' stamped on his forehead.
> Murray's problem is not that he's a notch below Federer, Nadal and
> Djokovic..that's a given...the stars
> can sometimes align and eliminate these guys...his problem is that he
> isn't consistently
> better than the other guys in the top10....so he has a good chance of
> getting whacked
> in any tournament.
ummmm hasn't Murray made the semis of better of like 8 of the last 9
slams or something. I mean Murrays losses since 2010 in slams off the
top of my head. Only one real disappointment against Wawrinka at USO
2010, so he is basically only losing to nadal/fed and djoker other
than at FO.
Moreover if you actually looked at tour win% Murray is like at no.6/7
all-time amongst pro players for his win record vs the top 10 which
was posted here a while ago.
So you are really VERY very wrong on this occassion ... sorry :-(
2012
Wimbledon - Federer --- final
French Open --- Ferrer ---- quarter final
AO ---- Djokovic --- Semifinal
2011
USO ---- Nadal semifinal
Wimby ----- Nadal Semifinal
FO ----- Nadal Semifinal
AO ----- Djokovic Final
2010
USO ----- 3rd Round Wawrinka
WIMBY --- SF Nadal
FO ---- 4th rnd Berdych
AO ----- Final Federer
