The greatest match never played....
The group you are posting to is a
Usenet group . Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From:
"felangey" <oncl... @nine.com> Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 04:12:39 +0100
Local: Sat, Oct 6 2012 11:12 pm
Subject: The greatest match never played....
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From:
TennisGuy <Jeffery21... @yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 21:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Oct 7 2012 12:08 am
Subject: Re: The greatest match never played....
On Oct 6, 11:13 pm, "felangey" <oncl
... @nine.com> wrote:
Nicely done. But I have a problem with it.
Laver is/was not even close to Roger's height. :)
They could have done a better job with it.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From:
Whisper <beaver... @ozemail.com.au> Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 15:09:46 +1100
Local: Sun, Oct 7 2012 12:09 am
Subject: Re: The greatest match never played....
On 7/10/2012 2:12 PM, felangey wrote:
Looks like Rod is the winner & he's consoling Roger? Yeah, I can go
along with that.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From:
phamquangt... @optusnet.com.au Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 21:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Oct 7 2012 12:14 am
Subject: Re: The greatest match never played....
On Sunday, October 7, 2012 3:09:44 PM UTC+11, Whisper wrote:
> On 7/10/2012 2:12 PM, felangey wrote:
> > http://i47.tinypic.com/6ep40i.jpg
> > :)
> Looks like Rod is the winner & he's consoling Roger? Yeah, I can go
> along with that.
...but not with Pete vs Roger, boo hoo :)))
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From:
Whisper <beaver... @ozemail.com.au> Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 15:25:13 +1100
Local: Sun, Oct 7 2012 12:25 am
Subject: Re: The greatest match never played....
On 7/10/2012 3:14 PM, phamquangt
... @optusnet.com.au wrote:
> On Sunday, October 7, 2012 3:09:44 PM UTC+11, Whisper wrote:
>> On 7/10/2012 2:12 PM, felangey wrote:
>>> http://i47.tinypic.com/6ep40i.jpg
>>> :)
>> Looks like Rod is the winner & he's consoling Roger? Yeah, I can go
>> along with that.
> ...but not with Pete vs Roger, boo hoo :)))
Grow up.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From:
"arnab.z@gmail" <arnab.zah... @gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 00:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Oct 7 2012 3:46 am
Subject: Re: The greatest match never played....
On Sunday, October 7, 2012 10:08:41 AM UTC+6, TennisGuy wrote:
> On Oct 6, 11:13 pm, "felangey" <oncl
... @nine.com> wrote:
> > http://i47.tinypic.com/6ep40i.jpg
> > :)
> Nicely done. But I have a problem with it.
> Laver is/was not even close to Roger's height. :)
> They could have done a better job with it.
Exactly. It's like Laver vs. 75% Roger. Fed is 6 feet 2, not 5 feet 8. This photojob is literally belittling Federer's stature.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From:
Whisper <999bea... @ozemail.com.au> Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 19:51:29 +1100
Local: Sun, Oct 7 2012 4:51 am
Subject: Re: The greatest match never played....
On 7/10/2012 6:46 PM, arnab.z@gmail wrote:
> On Sunday, October 7, 2012 10:08:41 AM UTC+6, TennisGuy wrote:
>> On Oct 6, 11:13 pm, "felangey" <oncl
... @nine.com> wrote:
>>> http://i47.tinypic.com/6ep40i.jpg
>>> :)
>> Nicely done. But I have a problem with it.
>> Laver is/was not even close to Roger's height. :)
>> They could have done a better job with it.
> Exactly. It's like Laver vs. 75% Roger. Fed is 6 feet 2, not 5 feet 8. This photojob is literally belittling Federer's stature.
I see it as belittling the great Laver.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From:
"arnab.z@gmail" <arnab.zah... @gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 06:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Oct 7 2012 9:39 am
Subject: Re: The greatest match never played....
On Sunday, October 7, 2012 2:51:30 PM UTC+6, Whisper wrote:
> On 7/10/2012 6:46 PM, arnab.z@gmail wrote:
> > On Sunday, October 7, 2012 10:08:41 AM UTC+6, TennisGuy wrote:
> >> On Oct 6, 11:13 pm, "felangey" <oncl... @nine.com> wrote:
> >>> http://i47.tinypic.com/6ep40i.jpg
> >>> :)
> >> Nicely done. But I have a problem with it.
> >> Laver is/was not even close to Roger's height. :)
> >> They could have done a better job with it.
> > Exactly. It's like Laver vs. 75% Roger. Fed is 6 feet 2, not 5 feet 8. This photojob is literally belittling Federer's stature.
> I see it as belittling the great Laver.
See what as belittling the great Lave? How?
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From:
Court_1 <Olympia0... @yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 07:04:11 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Oct 7 2012 10:04 am
Subject: Re: The greatest match never played....
On Oct 7, 3:46 am, "arnab.z@gmail" <arnab.zah
... @gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, October 7, 2012 10:08:41 AM UTC+6, TennisGuy wrote:
> > On Oct 6, 11:13 pm, "felangey" <oncl
... @nine.com> wrote:
> > >http://i47.tinypic.com/6ep40i.jpg
> > > :)
> > Nicely done. But I have a problem with it.
> > Laver is/was not even close to Roger's height. :)
> > They could have done a better job with it.
> Exactly. It's like Laver vs. 75% Roger. Fed is 6 feet 2, not 5 feet 8. This photojob is literally belittling Federer's stature.
Who cares? It is just a stupid mock-up that somebody did, it doesn't
actually mean anything and is not supposed to be taken seriously.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From:
"arnab.z@gmail" <arnab.zah... @gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 07:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Oct 7 2012 10:21 am
Subject: Re: The greatest match never played....
On Sunday, October 7, 2012 8:04:11 PM UTC+6, Court_1 wrote:
> On Oct 7, 3:46 am, "arnab.z@gmail" <arnab.zah
... @gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sunday, October 7, 2012 10:08:41 AM UTC+6, TennisGuy wrote:
> > > On Oct 6, 11:13 pm, "felangey" <oncl... @nine.com> wrote:
> > > >http://i47.tinypic.com/6ep40i.jpg
> > > > :)
> > > Nicely done. But I have a problem with it.
> > > Laver is/was not even close to Roger's height. :)
> > > They could have done a better job with it.
> > Exactly. It's like Laver vs. 75% Roger. Fed is 6 feet 2, not 5 feet 8. This photojob is literally belittling Federer's stature.
> Who cares? It is just a stupid mock-up that somebody did, it doesn't
> actually mean anything and is not supposed to be taken seriously.
I think you are taking my post a bit too seriously.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From:
Whisper <beaver... @ozemail.com.au> Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 18:56:53 +1100
Local: Mon, Oct 8 2012 3:56 am
Subject: Re: The greatest match never played....
On 8/10/2012 12:39 AM, arnab.z@gmail wrote:
> On Sunday, October 7, 2012 2:51:30 PM UTC+6, Whisper wrote:
>> On 7/10/2012 6:46 PM, arnab.z@gmail wrote:
>>> On Sunday, October 7, 2012 10:08:41 AM UTC+6, TennisGuy wrote:
>>>> On Oct 6, 11:13 pm, "felangey" <oncl... @nine.com> wrote:
>>>>> http://i47.tinypic.com/6ep40i.jpg
>>>>> :)
>>>> Nicely done. But I have a problem with it.
>>>> Laver is/was not even close to Roger's height. :)
>>>> They could have done a better job with it.
>>> Exactly. It's like Laver vs. 75% Roger. Fed is 6 feet 2, not 5 feet 8. This photojob is literally belittling Federer's stature.
>> I see it as belittling the great Laver.
> See what as belittling the great Lave? How?
Comparing a guy who won 2, arguably 3 calendar slams with a guy who won
none.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From:
Whisper <beaver... @ozemail.com.au> Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 18:59:49 +1100
Local: Mon, Oct 8 2012 3:59 am
Subject: Re: The greatest match never played....
On 8/10/2012 1:21 AM, arnab.z@gmail wrote:
> On Sunday, October 7, 2012 8:04:11 PM UTC+6, Court_1 wrote:
>>> Exactly. It's like Laver vs. 75% Roger. Fed is 6 feet 2, not 5 feet 8. This photojob is literally belittling Federer's stature.
>> Who cares? It is just a stupid mock-up that somebody did, it doesn't
>> actually mean anything and is not supposed to be taken seriously.
> I think you are taking my post a bit too seriously.
They should mock one up of Rafa v Borg at FO.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From:
Joe Ramirez <josephmrami... @netzero.com> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 07:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Oct 8 2012 10:16 am
Subject: Re: The greatest match never played....
On Oct 8, 3:59 am, Whisper <beaver
... @ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> On 8/10/2012 1:21 AM, arnab.z@gmail wrote:
> > On Sunday, October 7, 2012 8:04:11 PM UTC+6, Court_1 wrote:
> >>> Exactly. It's like Laver vs. 75% Roger. Fed is 6 feet 2, not 5 feet 8. This photojob is literally belittling Federer's stature.
> >> Who cares? It is just a stupid mock-up that somebody did, it doesn't
> >> actually mean anything and is not supposed to be taken seriously.
> > I think you are taking my post a bit too seriously.
> They should mock one up of Rafa v Borg at FO.
http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/images_root/slides/photos/000/931/524/8...
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From:
"arnab.z@gmail" <arnab.zah... @gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 09:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Oct 8 2012 12:13 pm
Subject: Re: The greatest match never played....
On Monday, October 8, 2012 1:56:50 PM UTC+6, Whisper wrote:
> Comparing a guy who won 2, arguably 3 calendar slams with a guy who won
> none.
Interesting.
Who do you wager has made the following remarks?
"[Federer is] the greatest player that played the game, in my
"I'm a huge Laver fan and he had a few years in there where he didn't
Hint: You have posted 200 backhand videos of this guy, even though you are definitely NOT his fan.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
