Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Clash of the Nations (a game) - matchday 1 (group stage) [corrected post]

Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?Windows-1252?Q?Cl=E9ment?= <lcmello.lis...@terra.com.br>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.soccer
Subject: Re: Clash of the Nations (a game) - matchday 1 (group stage) [corrected post]
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 08:07:13 -0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <ia3kjq$p9q$1@news.eternal-september.org>
References: <ia2rhc$4jg$1@news.eternal-september.org> <ia2v96$h63$1@news.eternal-september.org> <b477361f-14eb-4c34-8dc5-3b6154ed2464@l17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <1024fd75-f52f-4e42-b9fe-ec9859a6522b@t8g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="Windows-1252";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:02:34 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx03.eternal-september.org; posting-host="rZfdBE3X2hzsRl2lH8gTIQ";
	logging-data="25914"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+HOBABfBOBayNuM0aShYEw"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18263
In-Reply-To: <1024fd75-f52f-4e42-b9fe-ec9859a6522b@t8g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 101024-1, 24/10/2010), Outbound message
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9nhPfAYFCi8g1Bwt829c+SzaxNM=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal

"milivella" escreveu:
>
> Hey, I've my third cent and it's already an idea for a future variant!
>
> - Cent #3: I don't know if it's necessary to spice up things, but a
> nice way would be implementing a rule such as: when a South American
> team plays against a European team, the South Americans start with 1
> goal extra; and similar rules for the other possible couplings, so
> that there is an overall balance (no confederation is favoured). It's
> a way (this one involving confederations is just an example, one could
> think of different ones) to make the game less opponent-agnostic, e.g.
> if my team is set to be 2nd in group A, I would be willing to do what
> I can to avoid that group B is topped by a South American team.

This sounds really interesting.

Abra�o,

Luiz Mello