Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Scotland V Aus spoiler

0 views
Skip to first unread message

dechucka

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 4:13:42 PM11/21/09
to
Well done Scotland, outstanding defence to secure the victory.

I had flashbacks to Aus in the UK in 1978 ? where they lost Tests because
their goal kicking let them down.

Two funny comments made during the game, Australia's scrum must now be
considered one of the best in the world ( Aus promptly penalized for
collapsing the scrum ) and if grow a moustache you must learn how to catch
the ball ( which was either an inane comment or a in Scottish joke ).

Anyhow apart from the result I quite enjoyed the match, technically not the
best but close and competitive.

Klitty

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 4:25:04 PM11/21/09
to
"dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com> writes:

> Well done Scotland, outstanding defence to secure the victory.


Sweet! The gracious convict loser!

>
> I had flashbacks to Aus in the UK in 1978 ? where they lost Tests because
> their goal kicking let them down.

And sure enough it doesn't last long. You didn't win. We lost
it. Hahahaha.

Nice one Chucky!

>
> Two funny comments made during the game, Australia's scrum must now be
> considered one of the best in the world ( Aus promptly penalized for
> collapsing the scrum ) and if grow a moustache you must learn how to catch
> the ball ( which was either an inane comment or a in Scottish joke ).
>
> Anyhow apart from the result I quite enjoyed the match, technically not the
> best but close and competitive.
>
>

--
What is New Zealands contribution to carbon emisions? Dropping off the Wallabies on the way home.

dechucka

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 4:49:41 PM11/21/09
to

"Klitty" <mitt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:he9lro$ob7$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

> "dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
>> Well done Scotland, outstanding defence to secure the victory.
>
>
> Sweet! The gracious convict loser!
>
>>
>> I had flashbacks to Aus in the UK in 1978 ? where they lost Tests because
>> their goal kicking let them down.
>
> And sure enough it doesn't last long. You didn't win. We lost
> it. Hahahaha.
>
> Nice one Chucky!

I assume that they call you klitty because you are close to a cunt. If you
can draw these conclusions from what I have posted you either didn't see the
game, are stupider than I thought or know nothing about rugby. Personally I
think all 3 suit you.

As I said well done Scotland, Aus goal kicking let them down ( you do
remember the missed conversion attempt that would have won Aus the game from
the only try of the match ) and I enjoyed the game.

Ponce Allbutt of Manacle

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 5:00:31 PM11/21/09
to
On Nov 21, 10:49 pm, "dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Klitty" <mitti...@gmail.com> wrote in message

its almost as if Oz were paid not to win the game.....

Klitty

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 5:03:27 PM11/21/09
to
"dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com> writes:

> "Klitty" <mitt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:he9lro$ob7$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>> "dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Well done Scotland, outstanding defence to secure the victory.
>>
>>
>> Sweet! The gracious convict loser!
>>
>>>
>>> I had flashbacks to Aus in the UK in 1978 ? where they lost Tests because
>>> their goal kicking let them down.
>>
>> And sure enough it doesn't last long. You didn't win. We lost
>> it. Hahahaha.
>>
>> Nice one Chucky!
>
> I assume that they call you klitty because you are close to a cunt. If you
> can draw these conclusions from what I have posted you either didn't see the
> game, are stupider than I thought or know nothing about rugby. Personally I
> think all 3 suit you.

Of course you do Chucky. You're parroting.


>
> As I said well done Scotland, Aus goal kicking let them down ( you do

Yes you did say "Well done". You then said immediately after:

,----


| >>> I had flashbacks to Aus in the UK in 1978 ? where they lost Tests because
| >>> their goal kicking let them down.

`----

> remember the missed conversion attempt that would have won Aus the game from
> the only try of the match ) and I enjoyed the game.

I was pulling your chain. Relax. But what did you think about the drugs
allegations on the tour?

dechucka

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 5:18:37 PM11/21/09
to

"Klitty" <mitt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:he9o3q$dlp$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

> "dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
>> "Klitty" <mitt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:he9lro$ob7$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> "dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Well done Scotland, outstanding defence to secure the victory.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sweet! The gracious convict loser!
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I had flashbacks to Aus in the UK in 1978 ? where they lost Tests
>>>> because
>>>> their goal kicking let them down.
>>>
>>> And sure enough it doesn't last long. You didn't win. We lost
>>> it. Hahahaha.
>>>
>>> Nice one Chucky!
>>
>> I assume that they call you klitty because you are close to a cunt. If
>> you
>> can draw these conclusions from what I have posted you either didn't see
>> the
>> game, are stupider than I thought or know nothing about rugby. Personally
>> I
>> think all 3 suit you.
>
> Of course you do Chucky. You're parroting.

parroting?


>>
>> As I said well done Scotland, Aus goal kicking let them down ( you do
>
> Yes you did say "Well done". You then said immediately after:
>
> ,----
> | >>> I had flashbacks to Aus in the UK in 1978 ? where they lost Tests
> because
> | >>> their goal kicking let them down.
> `----

Which is once again a fact ( although the rose coloured glasses may be
coming into play after 30 years)

>
>> remember the missed conversion attempt that would have won Aus the game
>> from
>> the only try of the match ) and I enjoyed the game.
>
> I was pulling your chain.

This is often called trolling on the internet. If you want to live under a
bridge so be it

>Relax. But what did you think about the drugs
> allegations on the tour?

Haven't heard them, you going to make some

dechucka

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 5:19:32 PM11/21/09
to

"Ponce Allbutt of Manacle" <michael...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fa2f4929-dd78-4d48...@o10g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...

==============================================

disagree as that would take away from Scotland's brilliant defence

Klitty

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 5:51:42 PM11/21/09
to
"dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com> writes:

Oh do fuck off you self righteous little apologist.


>
>>Relax. But what did you think about the drugs
>> allegations on the tour?
>
> Haven't heard them, you going to make some
>

I don't think your finished your last sentence.

Klitty

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 5:52:24 PM11/21/09
to
"dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com> writes:

Did Scotland's brilliant defense cause their penalty kicks to be missed too?

dechucka

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 5:56:34 PM11/21/09
to

"Klitty" <mitt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:he9qv9$313$3...@news.eternal-september.org...

no but it held Australia up over the line twice and kept them out when Aus
had the lions share of the possession. Please see my previous comments about
you and rugby

dechucka

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 5:58:25 PM11/21/09
to

"Klitty" <mitt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:he9qtv$313$2...@news.eternal-september.org...

Calm down klit is there a string under your chin at the moment

>>
>>>Relax. But what did you think about the drugs
>>> allegations on the tour?
>>
>> Haven't heard them, you going to make some
>>
>
> I don't think your finished your last sentence.

Please try again. That looks like something I'd post

Klitty

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 6:29:56 PM11/21/09
to
"dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com> writes:

What is it you think I do not understand here Chucky? Go on. Please be
specific. Hint : it's not rocket science and you have a huge hook
sticking out of your trembling upper lip.

You see Chucky it was YOU who mentioned in the same breath as "well
played and all that" that Australia's misses cost them the game.

dechucka

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 6:43:35 PM11/21/09
to

"Klitty" <mitt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:he9t5m$pbo$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

So how about you get back under your bridge then if you refuse to comprehend
what is being discussed

>
> You see Chucky it was YOU who mentioned in the same breath as "well
> played and all that" that Australia's misses cost them the game.

Scotland played very well and Australian misses cost them the game. As you
says it isn't rocket science. Did the better side win? Of course it did.


alvey

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 6:47:40 PM11/21/09
to
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:13:42 +1100, dechucka wrote:


Tremendous result.
It's a great day for Australia.

alvey

Klitty

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 6:56:32 PM11/21/09
to
alvey <al...@play.com> writes:

Not quite as shocking as the Springbok losing to Leicester but close!

Spizz

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 6:56:45 PM11/21/09
to
"dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:98adnTAI0NGWxZXW...@westnet.com.au...

Cheers Chucky, very gracious of you. It was indeed a fantastic defensive
effort and a great result for us. But I'll save you any in depth analysis
for the moment as I'm very drunk now and must lie down for a bit.

Spizz

Klitty

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 7:00:39 PM11/21/09
to
"Spizz" <y...@okay.com> writes:

It was indeed a great defencive marvel. But I wouldn't hope too much for
new dawns just yet : given the bounce (kicks!) then Australia would and
could have own easily as Chucky pointed out (:-;).

Fair play to Robinson though.

Kev or lou

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 7:13:35 PM11/21/09
to

"dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:98adnTAI0NGWxZXW...@westnet.com.au...

Weather conditions contributed, as they often do, to the competitiveness,
but by gawd that was some defensive effort. I recall at halftime that
scotland had roughly 10% territory.


dechucka

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 7:55:17 PM11/21/09
to

"Spizz" <y...@okay.com> wrote in message
news:he9uoe$6vo$1...@news.eternal-september.org...


advantage of the game being at 0400 e.a.summer t watch cold clean sober.
Didn't watch the game with mates as it was to early/late and didn't drink
the night before as I had to get up early to watch the match

Two Dogs

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 10:17:19 PM11/21/09
to

Chuckie is usually off base, but he's right this time. Bad goal
kicking lost Australia the game. Not that the Scottish effort wasn't
massive, it was, and good on them, but Gateaux was magnificently
horrific and his kicking cost Australia the game.

Two Dogs

Klitty

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 11:26:50 PM11/21/09
to
Two Dogs <nzr...@aol.com> writes:

Very clever reply Two Dogs. I wonder if Chucky will fall for it ....

Very clever indeed....

Massive Gonads

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 1:50:00 AM11/22/09
to
"dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:R5ednQb8Zs_n_ZXW...@westnet.com.au...

> "Klitty" <mitt...@gmail.com> wrote in message

> I assume that they call you klitty because you are close to a cunt.

lol

Paul

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 3:20:20 AM11/22/09
to
In article <Q82dnVr2ZOiw5pXW...@westnet.com.au>,
vo...@hotmail.com says...

>
> Scotland played very well and Australian misses cost them the game. As you
> says it isn't rocket science. Did the better side win? Of course it did.

I don't understand the "of course". Australia were ahead on territory
and possession. Giteau's misses didn't help, but I thought the decisive
moment was Cooper's forward pass to Mitchell and the subsequent
disallowed try. To be fair, Mitchell was calling for the ball, but if it
had gone down the line, Aus would have scored. If Ioane had been
playing, maybe Cooper would have passed to him.

Paul

BrritSki

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 3:38:16 AM11/22/09
to
Klitty wrote:
> "dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
>> "Klitty" <mitt...@gmail.com> wrote in message

>>> Relax. But what did you think about the drugs
>>> allegations on the tour?

>> Haven't heard them, you going to make some
>>
> I don't think your finished your last sentence.
>

Oh no, a punctuation flame from someone who has had a punctuation
mistake in his sig. for weeks (and who makes a speeling [1] mistake in
his flame) !

[1] Mandatory spelling error in spelling flame

Matua

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 4:35:56 AM11/22/09
to

"Paul" <som...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.257312ab1...@news.wanadoo.fr...

> In article <Q82dnVr2ZOiw5pXW...@westnet.com.au>,
> vo...@hotmail.com says...
>>
>> Scotland played very well and Australian misses cost them the game. As
>> you
>> says it isn't rocket science. Did the better side win? Of course it did.
>
> I don't understand the "of course". Australia were ahead on territory
> and possession. Giteau's misses didn't help,

I wasn't aware she was playing. What position, missionary ???

Charles

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 4:50:41 AM11/22/09
to
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:35:56 GMT, "Matua" <Matua@cOOps isawelcher.com>
wrote:

>
>"Paul" <som...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>news:MPG.257312ab1...@news.wanadoo.fr...
>> In article <Q82dnVr2ZOiw5pXW...@westnet.com.au>,
>> vo...@hotmail.com says...
>>>
>>> Scotland played very well and Australian misses cost them the game. As
>>> you
>>> says it isn't rocket science. Did the better side win? Of course it did.
>>
>> I don't understand the "of course". Australia were ahead on territory
>> and possession. Giteau's misses didn't help,
>
>I wasn't aware she was playing. What position, missionary ???

A welcome snippet of humour Pita, and a clever play on words. Nice one
mate.

Your team clinched it again at Twickenham yesterday, but despite the
dreadful weather we had a great day out and met up with, amongst many
others, a number of old Kiwi friends.

In fishing parlance we got a wet arse and no fish!!

Hope you had a great Sunday - I intend to! ;o)

Spizz

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 5:13:26 AM11/22/09
to
"Charles" <cha...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1u1ig5hn5jc9jf8fp...@4ax.com...

Gee, what a coincidence. That happened to Matty last night too.....

Spizz

Charles

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 5:41:41 AM11/22/09
to

... whatever may or may not have happened to Matty last night, you
must be well pleased with the Jocks' turn of fortune. It was a good
effort and long overdue.

That should shake up the Six Nations and with England hopefully
returning to full selection options, perhaps some good will have come
out of the AIs.

Have a great Sunday Spizz - you know I intend to! ;o)

Spizz

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 6:16:21 AM11/22/09
to
"Charles" <cha...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:c25ig5dg1i5epktqm...@4ax.com...

I'd say Saturday against the Argies is now our D-Day. Time to prove it
wasn't a shock and we now mean business. Indeed, a win will carry us nicely
into the 6N and might actually give our eternal optimism some grounding.

>
> Have a great Sunday Spizz - you know I intend to! ;o)

Thanks Charles. It's been my first full weekend off for months, it's 35
degrees C outside, my hangover has all but gone, and I'm off to the pool in
30 minutes to have a dip and a chilled beer (or three).

Spizz

Charles

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 6:53:25 AM11/22/09
to

I wish you well with that agenda. The Scots and English supporters
haven't had much to shout about for some time ...

>
>>
>> Have a great Sunday Spizz - you know I intend to! ;o)
>
>Thanks Charles. It's been my first full weekend off for months, it's 35
>degrees C outside, my hangover has all but gone, and I'm off to the pool in
>30 minutes to have a dip and a chilled beer (or three).
>

Lucky old toff - enjoy!

The sun is due to pass over the yardarm ere long, and we are all
meeting up for a HOTD and a wash-up of the events of yesterday. Soon
be 'high-spirited' (half-pissed) again!! ;o)

Klitty

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 8:06:07 AM11/22/09
to
"Matua" <Matua@cOOps isawelcher.com> writes:

> "Paul" <som...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.257312ab1...@news.wanadoo.fr...
>> In article <Q82dnVr2ZOiw5pXW...@westnet.com.au>,
>> vo...@hotmail.com says...
>>>
>>> Scotland played very well and Australian misses cost them the game. As
>>> you
>>> says it isn't rocket science. Did the better side win? Of course it did.
>>
>> I don't understand the "of course". Australia were ahead on territory
>> and possession. Giteau's misses didn't help,
>
> I wasn't aware she was playing. What position, missionary ???

?!?!?!? Excellent!

dechucka

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 3:17:44 PM11/22/09
to

"Paul" <som...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.257312ab1...@news.wanadoo.fr...

I said of course because I believe the purpose of the game is to score more
points than the other team. The team that achieves this is be definition the
better team

Klitty

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 3:52:26 PM11/22/09
to
"dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com> writes:

No Chucky.

The team with the most points is the winner. Not the "best" team
always. There is an old saying "may the best man win" : it hints that
they don't always. Lets pretend Scotland and Aus were to play a series
of 5 tests. Who would you put your money on? ...

Lodi

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 4:31:14 PM11/22/09
to
Klitty wrote:

Big lol to Matty :-)

Lodi

dechucka

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 4:34:58 PM11/22/09
to

"Spizz" <y...@okay.com> wrote in message
news:heb2sn$in0$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

However he did get some crabs

dechucka

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 4:37:07 PM11/22/09
to

"Klitty" <mitt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:hec8ac$1dt$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

Australia but than I would put my money on them to win the Bled Cup. However
the best team will win ie the team that won the most matches

JohnO

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 5:22:16 PM11/22/09
to
On Nov 23, 10:37 am, "dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Klitty" <mitti...@gmail.com> wrote in message

>
> news:hec8ac$1dt$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> >> "Paul" <some...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> >>news:MPG.257312ab1...@news.wanadoo.fr...
> >>> In article <Q82dnVr2ZOiw5pXWnZ2dnUVZ_hWdn...@westnet.com.au>,

> >>> vo...@hotmail.com says...
>
> >>>> Scotland played very well and Australian misses cost them the game. As
> >>>> you
> >>>> says it isn't rocket science. Did the better side win? Of course it
> >>>> did.
>
> >>> I don't understand the "of course".  Australia were ahead on territory
> >>> and possession.  Giteau's misses didn't help, but I thought the decisive
> >>> moment was Cooper's forward pass to Mitchell and the subsequent
> >>> disallowed try.  To be fair, Mitchell was calling for the ball, but if
> >>> it
> >>> had gone down the line, Aus would have scored.  If Ioane had been
> >>> playing, maybe Cooper would have passed to him.
>
> >> I said of course because I believe the purpose of the game is to score
> >> more
> >> points than the other team. The team that achieves this is be definition
> >> the
> >> better team
>
> > No Chucky.
>
> > The team with the most points is the winner. Not the "best" team
> > always. There is an old saying "may the best man win" : it hints that
> > they don't always. Lets pretend Scotland and Aus were to play a series
> > of 5 tests. Who would you put your money on? ...
>
> Australia but than I would put my money on them to win the Bled Cup. However
> the best team will win ie the team that won the most matches

Shirley it's the team with the RWC?

dechucka

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 6:52:26 PM11/22/09
to

"JohnO" <john...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:faf3950b-aaf0-4e65...@z10g2000prh.googlegroups.com...

===============================

I don't think either Scotland or Aus hav the RWC

dechucka

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 6:56:20 PM11/22/09
to

"Two Dogs" <nzr...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:70ca4e5f-a6bd-4767...@x31g2000yqx.googlegroups.com...

=============================================

Very insightful comments you are obviously highly intelligent, watched the
game and have knowledge of the game of rugby.

Klitty

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 7:22:23 PM11/22/09
to
"dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com> writes:

Heh. You've now managed a full 360 Chucky. I salute you....

dechucka

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 8:03:53 PM11/22/09
to

"Klitty" <mitt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:heckk0$c3j$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

Klit you obviously have your own little agenda in your own little world.
Unfortunately for this ng your agenda and little world under the bridge have
nothing to do with rugby.

;-)

Matua

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 8:52:15 PM11/22/09
to

"Spizz" <y...@okay.com> wrote in message
news:heb2sn$in0$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

Fuck off you haggis chewing blockhead, The wet arse was from your mothers
tongue rimming, and guess where the fish smell was from ??? Take a wild
guess spoof!!


Matua

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 8:54:58 PM11/22/09
to

"Klitty" <mitt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:heckk0$c3j$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

He's managed a few 69ers with the boys scouts as well!!!


dechucka

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 9:13:10 PM11/22/09
to

"Matua" <Matua@cOOps isawelcher.com> wrote in message
news:SXlOm.56834$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...


interesting insult but have a think about. 360 degrees would get you where?
>
>

Klitty

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 9:43:10 PM11/22/09
to
"dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com> writes:

The problem when you try to be smart Chucky is that you telegraph it a
mile off.

Lets rescan the thread:

1) I (trolling you) accuse you of claiming that Australia lost the game
because of poor kicking.
2) You deny this and said it only reminded you a little of those days.
3) Two Dogs "agrees" with you that you did indeed think that Scotland
didn't win - rather Australia gifted it to them.
4) I agree with him that you are right.
5) You then agree this is indeed the case.

Now listen up : this has nothing to do with "understanding rugby". There
is nothing to understand here : see my other post on Scotland being
brave and hanging on against the odds but how little can be drawn from
this other than they got a tad lucky because Giteau had an off day with
the boot.

Yes, You can join in with Buttski and SSB if you like with this "you
dont understand rugby" nonsense and I'm sure it will comfort you having
them in your corner.... Meanwhile I'll draw comfort from my usual
*cough+ high standards of picking correct results :-; Now if only Two
Dogs would get drunk before he picks ....


Klitty

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 9:44:00 PM11/22/09
to
"Matua" <Matua@cOOps isawelcher.com> writes:

Yes. He didn't do a reach around. He did two in succession to make the
full circle.


--

dechucka

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 10:01:57 PM11/22/09
to

"Klitty" <mitt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:hecsrv$4tf$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

Did someone upset you Klit. You tried to be smart and "funny?" you got shown
up. Either your comments were a troll ( as you claim ) just showing you up
as an under the bridge living thing or I can only conclude that you either
didn't see the game, are stupider than I thought or know nothing about rugby

dechucka

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 10:03:37 PM11/22/09
to

"Klitty" <mitt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:hecsth$4tf$2...@news.eternal-september.org...

You agree with Matau !!! That says allot about you, your attitude to rugby
and to life.

Matua

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 12:20:05 AM11/23/09
to

"Charles" <cha...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1u1ig5hn5jc9jf8fp...@4ax.com...

How are you Charlie, yea they won but they've still got a long way to go.
Hopefully next year and some new blood.
I think your team probably needs some new blood at the moment as well.
The ABs seem to be flat at the moment, and must learn to play for 80
minutes. Anyway good to hear from you and have a good week mate.

Matua.


Matua

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 12:23:24 AM11/23/09
to

"dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bbudnajvvKwMZpTW...@westnet.com.au...


Hey tosser, you don't seem to know "allot" about anything!


0 new messages