Nine Times God Emperor Trump Criticized Others For Mishandling Classified Info

[Jason Todd!!!]

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/15/trump-classified-information-238420


President Donald Trump's handling of classified information has come under scrutiny following reports he divulged "highly classified" information during a meeting with Russian officials last week at the White House.

The president, though, has a history of routinely lashing out at political opponents, detractors and even former members of his own administration for mishandling closely guarded intelligence in the past.


Here are nine times Trump has slammed others for their handling of classified information.

1. Trump accuses Yates of leaking classified intelligence

"Ask Sally Yates, under oath, if she knows how classified information got into the newspapers soon after she explained it to W.H. Counsel," Trump tweeted on May 8, following Yates' testimony before Congress on Russian election interference and potential ties to the Trump administration.


2. Trump calls for leakers in federal government to be found

"The real story that Congress, the FBI and all others should be looking into is the leaking of Classified information. Must find leaker now!" the president said on social media in response to continuing coverage of the ongoing probe into potential collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.



3. Trump calls for increased scrutiny of 'illegal leaks'

After Attorney General Jeff Sessions' March recusal from the Trump-Russia investigation, the president said on Twitter that the "real story" was rather "all of the illegal leaks of classified and other information. It is a total 'witch hunt!'"




4. Trump: Classified information given to media 'could have a devastating effect on U.S.'

Trump slammed the FBI on Twitter in late-March following reports that Chief of Staff Reince Priebus had asked the bureau to push back on negative stories tying Trump campaign associates and Russia. The president said the FBI was "totally unable" to stop leakers and said the result "have a devastating effect on U.S."



5. Trump calls on The New York Times to apologize for publishing 'illegal classified' leaks

After new reports of contacts between Trump campaign and Russian officials, the president demanded that the Times apologize for unearthing relevant details.



6. Trump: Classified intel given out 'like candy'

After new reports of contacts between Trump campaign and Russian officials, the president said the "real scandal" was that "classified information is illegally given out by intelligence like candy."


7. Trump accuses State Department of seeking to 'cover up classified emails' for Clinton

In the throes of a heated general election bout, Trump cited a Washington Examiner article accusing the State Department of "quid pro quo" as part of an attempt to cover up details regarding the Hillary Clinton email controversy.


8. Trump, hailing WikiLeaks, rips 'Crooked' Clinton for her handling of classified information

Following the release of a trove of emails from the Hillary Clinton campaign through WikiLeaks, then-candidate Trump blasted "Crooked" Clinton for mishandling intelligence while in office.


9. Trump: Clinton 'not fit' for presidency due to 'extremely careless' handling of intel

Trump, just weeks out from officially clinching the Republican nomination at the Republican National Convention in July, said Clinton was "not fit" for office due to her "extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."

[Trijcomm]

Fake news, Trump didn't do this and there were eyewitnesses who swear to it. I love how you liberals swoon and fawn over anything the fake news outlets who are simply looking at a way to hit at Trump -- true or fake -- just gobble up what they say as gospel truth. Unbelievable!

[hobb...@yahoo.com]

On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 10:15:49 AM UTC-4, Trijcomm wrote:
> Fake news, Trump didn't do this and there were eyewitnesses who swear to it. I love how you liberals swoon and fawn over anything the fake news outlets who are simply looking at a way to hit at Trump -- true or fake -- just gobble up what they say as gospel truth. Unbelievable!

And you'd be wrong, Rev. Dittohead. The more President Manchild continues to rant and rave like a spoiled little boy who needs to have things go his way, the worse it's going to get.

[robert stickler]

dude, you think crooked hillary could do better?

[Trijcomm]

Baloney. The only sources that these liberals are throwing around are described as "anonymous." Anonymous sources cited by newspapers who DEFINITELY have an agenda and narrative that they have been putting forth for years? If you believe those sources, then it would be YOU who would be wrong.

[hobb...@yahoo.com]

Swillary shouldn't have been running, but the reason she was the nominee, and not Bernie Sanders, was because the media was already very familiar with her dating back to her husband's administration. They were hoping she'd be the antidote to Dumb Donald, but she wasn't.

Here's a problem I have. You have two 3rd party candidates also vying for the office, but they were never permitted to participate in the debates, largely because they'd take face time away from Swillary and Dumb Donald. The networks didn't want that. That particular system needs improvement.

[me]

and the only source you get your "news" from is garbage right wing rags like the blaze and brietbart

[Trijcomm]

On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 11:37:39 AM UTC-5, hobb...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 11:27:28 AM UTC-4, robert stickler wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 11:09:00 AM UTC-4, hobb...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 10:15:49 AM UTC-4, Trijcomm wrote:
> > > > Fake news, Trump didn't do this and there were eyewitnesses who swear to it. I love how you liberals swoon and fawn over anything the fake news outlets who are simply looking at a way to hit at Trump -- true or fake -- just gobble up what they say as gospel truth. Unbelievable!
> > >
> > > And you'd be wrong, Rev. Dittohead. The more President Manchild continues to rant and rave like a spoiled little boy who needs to have things go his way, the worse it's going to get.
> >
> > dude, you think crooked hillary could do better?
>
> Swillary shouldn't have been running,

Wait a minute. What is all this immature, name-calling stuff you do here? It is NOT clever, it is NOT funny, and it is demeaning not only to the people you are referring to but to yourself. It is not good sarcasm, just immature. You do this way, way too often.

[Trijcomm]

If you even dare consider the NYT, Washington Post or CNN as "reliable" sources then you are a bigger clown than Doink was.

[me]

Keep swallowing everything Trump tells you. What an imbecile.

[Trijcomm]

On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 12:56:29 PM UTC-5, me wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 1:53:58 PM UTC-4, Trijcomm wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 12:40:10 PM UTC-5, me wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 12:36:54 PM UTC-4, Trijcomm wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 10:09:00 AM UTC-5, hobb...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 10:15:49 AM UTC-4, Trijcomm wrote:
> > > > > > Fake news, Trump didn't do this and there were eyewitnesses who swear to it. I love how you liberals swoon and fawn over anything the fake news outlets who are simply looking at a way to hit at Trump -- true or fake -- just gobble up what they say as gospel truth. Unbelievable!
> > > > >
> > > > > And you'd be wrong, Rev. Dittohead. The more President Manchild continues to rant and rave like a spoiled little boy who needs to have things go his way, the worse it's going to get.
> > > >
> > > > Baloney. The only sources that these liberals are throwing around are described as "anonymous." Anonymous sources cited by newspapers who DEFINITELY have an agenda and narrative that they have been putting forth for years? If you believe those sources, then it would be YOU who would be wrong.
> > >
> > > and the only source you get your "news" from is garbage right wing rags like the blaze and brietbart

It really isn't hard to spell, "Breitbart" which is something I don't read, BTW.

> >
> > If you even dare consider the NYT, Washington Post or CNN as "reliable" sources then you are a bigger clown than Doink was.
>
> Keep swallowing everything Trump tells you. What an imbecile.

Trump is there. The NSA is there. WaPo, the NYT, CNN -- NOT there. Unnamed, anonymous sources ALWAYS! And you believe THEM? Comic books aren't true, fables aren't true and the narratives that CNN, WaPo and the NYT put out are nothing but fairy tales. They should introduce each and every story they put out with "Once upon a time."

[Freezer]

If I don't reply to this robert stickler <rjs...@aol.com> post,
the terroists win.

> dude, you think crooked hillary could do better?

CHELSEA could do better.

--
My name is Freezer and my anti-drug is porn.
http://mst3kfreezer.livejournal.com/
@allhailfreezer

[Freezer]

If I don't reply to this hobb...@yahoo.com post, the terroists
win.

> Swillary shouldn't have been running, but the reason she was
> the nominee, and not Bernie Sanders,

Was because she was the stronger candidate. Period. Put down the
Bernie Kool-Aid.

[me]

keep living in your fantasy world. I think in your world it begins "Once upon a time, the man I blindly follow as president wasn't a treasonous coward." Here in the real world, he is. Keep listening to your garbage sources Skipster. This is going to be fun.

[Freezer]

If I don't reply to this hobb...@yahoo.com post, the terroists
win.

> Here's a problem I have. You have two 3rd party candidates
> also vying for the office, but they were never permitted to
> participate in the debates, largely because they'd take face
> time away from Swillary and Dumb Donald.

Or because one's a crackpot anti-vaxxer who thinks we can just
close all our international military bases just like that, and the
other is a leatherfaced isolationist offering Reaganomics with a
side of legal weed.

[hobb...@yahoo.com]

On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 2:17:44 PM UTC-4, Freezer wrote:
> If I don't reply to this hobb...@yahoo.com post, the terroists
> win.
>
> > Swillary shouldn't have been running, but the reason she was
> > the nominee, and not Bernie Sanders,
>
> Was because she was the stronger candidate. Period. Put down the
> Bernie Kool-Aid.
>

More established is more like it. Sanders came out of nowhere, whereas Swillary had years of experience, and it was on name alone that she was a carpetbagging senator from NY and secretary of state. I call it like I see it, yo.

[robert stickler]

She was a proven criminal and known liar. How was she a strong candidate?

[Freezer]

If I don't reply to this hobb...@yahoo.com post, the terroists
win.

> On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 2:17:44 PM UTC-4, Freezer wrote:
>> If I don't reply to this hobb...@yahoo.com post, the
>> terroists win.
>>
>> > Swillary shouldn't have been running, but the reason she
>> > was the nominee, and not Bernie Sanders,
>>
>> Was because she was the stronger candidate. Period. Put down
>> the Bernie Kool-Aid.
>>
> More established is more like it. Sanders came out of nowhere,
> whereas Swillary had years of experience, and it was on name
> alone that she was a carpetbagging senator from NY and
> secretary of state. I call it like I see it, yo.
>

Bernie had no platform outside of economics, ignored the south the
way he claimed Clinton ignored the midwest, was stunningly tone
deaf when it came to minority outreach and did nothing to convince
the Democrat base that he was anything other than a DINO.

And if you think Cult 45 brought their misogyny A-Game against
Clinton, what you think they'd do about a Jewish socialist?

[Freezer]

If I don't reply to this robert stickler <rjs...@aol.com> post,
the terroists win.

> She was a proven criminal and known liar.

He said, unironically, as he defends Donald "Litigation Still
Pending" Trump.

[robert stickler]

Trump has never broken the law

[Trijcomm]

> > dude, you think crooked hillary could do better?
>
> CHELSEA could do better.
>

No she couldn't and mama CERTAINLY couldn't! You are accusing Trump of falsely doing things that are WAY, WAY less egregious than what Hillary did. Don't be such a hack.

[robert]

Hillary should be rotting in prison

[Trijcomm]

On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 4:27:23 PM UTC-5, robert wrote:
> Hillary should be rotting in prison

There is still hope. After all, I bet Comey thought he was in the clear.

[me]

YOU are the only one who thinks it's false accusations. If Hillary had done a FRACTION of what Trump has done, you would be screaming for her execution. You are the biggest hypocrite I have ever seen

[Freezer]

If I don't reply to this robert stickler <rjs...@aol.com> post,
the terroists win.

> Trump has never broken the law
>

That is just ADORABLE.

[robert stickler]

Hillary is getting locked up!

[Jason Todd!!!]

PARSING!! PARSING!! PARSING!!! INVALID!!!! INVALID!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

Jason

[Trijcomm]

Stop crying like the middle schooler you are. These are false allegations coming from a source that has an agenda and trying to set a narrative. Anyone with a brain can see through this.

[Trijcomm]

>
> > Trump has never broken the law
> >
>
> That is just ADORABLE.
>

False accusations are NOT enough to claim someone broke the law.

[Jason Todd!!!]

HOLY FUCKING SHIT.

Let...let me read that again!!

"False accusations are NOT enough to claim someone broke the law."

HOLY*FUCKING*SHIT*, Trijcomm DID in fact just say that!! HOLY FUCKING SHIT!!!


Jason (I don't often use the word "flabbergasted", but there's a first time for everything!)

[Trijcomm]

Is THIS the kind of vocabulary they use in comic books nowadays? You sound like a kid who needs his mouth washed out with soap.

[Freezer]

If I don't reply to this Trijcomm post, the terroists win.

>> > Trump has never broken the law
>> >
>>
>> That is just ADORABLE.
>>
> False accusations are NOT enough to claim someone broke the law.

You two think I'm just talking about *President* Trump?

[Freezer]

If I don't reply to this Jason Todd!!! post, the terroists win.

>> False accusations are NOT enough to claim someone broke the
>> law.
>
> HOLY FUCKING SHIT.
>
> Let...let me read that again!!
>
> "False accusations are NOT enough to claim someone broke the
> law."

I must be off my game today, because that flew right past me.

[me]

Let's see
1. Middle school fantasies, again
2. Fake news

That's a double tap out! All we needed was comic books for the tirfecta! Once again Skippy disappoints. You are so deep in denial it is amusing as hell

[me]

seriously, the self awareness of a brick. How many times has Skippy accused Obama of crimes without an ounce of legitimate proof?

[robert stickler]

Obama was arrested for wire tapping

[hobb...@yahoo.com]

On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 5:58:20 PM UTC-4, robert stickler wrote:
> Obama was arrested for wire tapping

No he wasn't.

[Trijcomm]

I think we've been over this before. The fact that you don't learn means you will be in middle school longer than normal.

[me]

That's rich coming from a guy who believes Trump's "fake news" bullshit

[robert stickler]

yeah huh