(META) (OT) The Greatest AIM Log Ever, Starring Alex "Dink" Cain
Coltrane's Lamentation
Wow. Alex Cain, truly the biggest loser of all time?
(that log was pretty tragic. I feel bad for Cain)
-Coltrane
Cainman
Hey Lard-O :
Do you * seriously * think that I thought for an * instant * that this was
not you?
Fuck, you're pathetic.
Which is worse : You vying for attention for OVER AN HOUR, you
impersonating your "wife," you believing that I BELIEVED you were your
"wife," or you actually POSTING this log?
I have one from last week, Chubby Cheeks, where you impersonated a so-called
"girlfriend." Why didn't I post it? Because I knew it'd get you in a fit
like this.
This is sad...just sad.. Because I didn't post the one where you claim you
were your "girlfriend" you try AGAIN and then post one YOURSELF where you
claim you are your "wife."
Do feel free to die.
"Chad Bryant" <ch...@chadbryant.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:aj2hlq$59o$0...@pita.alt.net...
> This one defies description, yet explains itself perfectly.
>
> RSPW98 (1:00:22 AM): HI FATTY
> CBryant215 (1:00:41 AM): are you looking for Chad?
> RSPW98 (1:00:47 AM): Yep
> RSPW98 (1:00:49 AM): Is he there?
> CBryant215 (1:01:04 AM): he's in bed
> RSPW98 (1:01:21 AM): Really? Early for him to be in bed
> CBryant215 (1:01:41 AM): he has work at 5 in the morning
> RSPW98 (1:01:50 AM): Wow that's early
> CBryant215 (1:01:53 AM): this is his wife
> RSPW98 (1:02:16 AM): Ah. How is he doing
> CBryant215 (1:02:20 AM): he's fine
> CBryant215 (1:02:27 AM): a bit overworked, but he's ok
> CBryant215 (1:02:38 AM): are you from that RSPW group?
> RSPW98 (1:02:45 AM): Yea
> RSPW98 (1:02:51 AM): He knows me from there
> RSPW98 (1:02:57 AM): Ever read it?
> CBryant215 (1:03:05 AM): he's shown me a few posts
> CBryant215 (1:03:13 AM): some of those people are insane
> RSPW98 (1:03:46 AM): What time did he go to bed? He usually stays up late
> CBryant215 (1:04:10 AM): he went to bed about 15 minutes ago
> RSPW98 (1:04:41 AM): He has made some enemies in RSPW you know
> CBryant215 (1:04:54 AM): in what way?
> RSPW98 (1:05:26 AM): He has done some things and said some things that has
> not
> looked good for him.
> CBryant215 (1:05:46 AM): like what?
> RSPW98 (1:07:03 AM): Well-ell he has posted trying to get people to
harrass
> someone
> else's parents, he has bothered someone and gotten him fired, things like
> that.
> CBryant215 (1:07:36 AM): that doesn't sound like Chad
> CBryant215 (1:07:53 AM): he's been harassed by a couple of people from
that
> group,
> though
> CBryant215 (1:08:10 AM): some redneck kid from Georgia used to call all
> hours of the
> night when we lived in Utah
> RSPW98 (1:08:25 AM): hang on, i'll brb
> RSPW98 (1:09:22 AM): That's not how I heard it
> RSPW98 (1:09:33 AM): The way I heard it Chad was harrassing someone and
> that
> person
> was just harrassing him back. I could be wrong.
> CBryant215 (1:09:39 AM): do you know who Alex Cain is?
> RSPW98 (1:09:44 AM): No, I have no idea.
> RSPW98 (1:09:48 AM): I've heard the name
> RSPW98 (1:09:51 AM): But don't know who that person is.
> RSPW98 (1:09:59 AM): Is he a friend of Chad's?
> CBryant215 (1:10:18 AM): he's the redneck kid from Georgia that used to
> call
> us all the
> time
> CBryant215 (1:10:35 AM): Chad sais he was disturbed and psychotic
> RSPW98 (1:10:38 AM): Oh. I thought that was someone called Steven
> Signorelli
> CBryant215 (1:10:46 AM): and that he was really short or something
> CBryant215 (1:11:27 AM): be right back
> CBryant215 (1:12:21 AM): I'm back
> CBryant215 (1:12:28 AM): had to check on our youngest
> RSPW98 (1:12:52 AM): Chad seems to be somewhat unstable online. Have you
> ever
> heard of someone called Steven Signorelli
> CBryant215 (1:13:01 AM): I haven't
> RSPW98 (1:14:01 AM): Hmm that's odd, Chad supposedly harrassed that person
> over
> and over again
> CBryant215 (1:14:17 AM): I never heard anything about that
> CBryant215 (1:14:24 AM): but that does not sound like Chad
> RSPW98 (1:14:32 AM): What DOES sound like Chad
> CBryant215 (1:15:17 AM): mild-mannered, polite, although he can be a bit
> hot-headed
> and outspoken if he really believes in something
> CBryant215 (1:15:34 AM): he doesn't get along with either of my
> parents...he
> thinks
> they're racists
> RSPW98 (1:21:26 AM): Chad is a racist though.
> CBryant215 (1:21:51 AM): absolutely not
> RSPW98 (1:23:05 AM): Yes he is. Also he appears to have a problem with
> reality.
> RSPW98 (1:23:11 AM): And for some reason he doesn't like lawyers
> RSPW98 (1:23:21 AM): And I think he may have a problem with getting
> attention as well
> CBryant215 (1:23:23 AM): you must not like him much, and I have no idea
why
> RSPW98 (1:23:39 AM): I'm one of his friends. I'm just calling it as I see
> it.
> CBryant215 (1:23:53 AM): you certainly don't sound like a friend
> RSPW98 (1:25:48 AM): Then call me an "Acquaitance," Chad and I have known
> each
> other for a few years now. You ever hear of John Henry?
> CBryant215 (1:26:13 AM): yeah, John Henry is one of Chad's good friends
> RSPW98 (1:26:46 AM): I'm one of John's friends.
> RSPW98 (1:26:52 AM): I met chad through John, on the Internet.
> CBryant215 (1:27:29 AM): you are?
> RSPW98 (1:29:33 AM): Otto Schwanz
> RSPW98 (1:29:42 AM): I used to work for SCW
> CBryant215 (1:30:10 AM): ok
> RSPW98 (1:30:30 AM): Yea I went into a chat room on IRC one night and John
> introduced me to Chad.
> CBryant215 (1:30:31 AM): I don't know what SCW is
> CBryant215 (1:30:41 AM): is that a wrestling company?
> RSPW98 (1:30:47 AM): it is a wrestling federation, John used to help us
> take
> the ring
> down and sell tickets.
> CBryant215 (1:31:34 AM): Chad told me that John was a ring announcer and
> manager
> RSPW98 (1:32:10 AM): No he was never a manager, he did announce once but
> that was
> about it.
> CBryant215 (1:32:14 AM): I don't pay much attention to wrestling, though
> CBryant215 (1:32:37 AM): Chad took me to one of the Monday night shows
> before we
> were married, and I've seen him work at his own shows
> RSPW98 (1:33:05 AM): So how is he as a wrestler
> CBryant215 (1:33:12 AM): who, Chad?
> RSPW98 (1:33:52 AM): yea
> CBryant215 (1:34:03 AM): you're asking the wrong person
> CBryant215 (1:34:08 AM): I don't know much about it
> CBryant215 (1:34:16 AM): but I thought he was very entertaining
> RSPW98 (1:34:45 AM): How could he wrestle with his bad back though
> CBryant215 (1:35:03 AM): he worked through it
> CBryant215 (1:35:07 AM): he loved doing it
> RSPW98 (1:35:44 AM): By the way have you ever heard of a guy called Bob
> Barnett?
> RSPW98 (1:35:47 AM): Apparantly he lives near Chad
> RSPW98 (1:35:54 AM): And wants to talk to him but Chad wont let him
> CBryant215 (1:35:55 AM): I have not
> RSPW98 (1:35:58 AM): I don't know, it's something like that
> RSPW98 (1:37:20 AM): Chad has made some strange enemies online, if you
read
> some of
> those posts you will see them
> CBryant215 (1:37:21 AM): who is Bob Barnett?
> RSPW98 (1:37:38 AM): I don't know, some lawyer guy who claims to have
> Chad's
> birth
> certificate.
> CBryant215 (1:37:54 AM): why would he want Chad's birth certificate?
> RSPW98 (1:38:34 AM): Because apparantly Chad made him angry and so this
guy
> wants
> to show Chad up
> CBryant215 (1:39:07 AM): this is not the Chad I know
> RSPW98 (1:39:42 AM): Maybe you need to ask him then, I don't know. All I
> know is that
> this Barnett person claims he has Chad's birth certificate.
> RSPW98 (1:40:41 AM): He has mentioned something about a divorce
certificate
> too but I
> don't know what that is about.
> CBryant215 (1:40:49 AM): divorce?
> RSPW98 (1:40:57 AM): I don't know. Something about Chad being divorced.
> CBryant215 (1:41:14 AM): he's not
> CBryant215 (1:41:25 AM): afer all, I would know if he was
> RSPW98 (1:41:41 AM): Some people are saying that he is
> CBryant215 (1:42:00 AM): well, he's not
> RSPW98 (1:42:48 AM): What about him stopping a rape awhile back? I heard
> many
> people made fun about him making up some kind of story like that
> CBryant215 (1:43:04 AM): he didn't make that up
> RSPW98 (1:43:11 AM): really?
> CBryant215 (1:43:16 AM): he put some sicko in the hospital
> RSPW98 (1:43:24 AM): how long ago was that?
> CBryant215 (1:43:43 AM): about three years
> CBryant215 (1:43:51 AM): just before our oldest son was born
> RSPW98 (1:44:33 AM): A lot of people were talking about how he made that
> up.
> He got
> really attacked for that.
> CBryant215 (1:44:45 AM): well, he didn't make it up
> CBryant215 (1:45:04 AM): I thought it was a really heroic thing for him to
> do
> RSPW98 (1:45:26 AM): It just doesn't seem like the type of thing he would
> do
> thats all.
> He went on IRC and got a lot of teasing for that.
> RSPW98 (1:45:30 AM): do you ever go on IRC?
> RSPW98 (1:45:37 AM): Chad is on there a lot
> CBryant215 (1:46:00 AM): no
> CBryant215 (1:46:02 AM): what is IRC?
> RSPW98 (1:46:28 AM): Internet Relay Chat
> RSPW98 (1:46:30 AM): Chad is on there a lot
> CBryant215 (1:46:48 AM): does that have something to do with mirc?
> RSPW98 (1:47:03 AM): No I think you are thinking of something else.
> RSPW98 (1:47:09 AM): You should post to RSPW by the way
> RSPW98 (1:47:11 AM): Chad gets picked on a lot
> RSPW98 (1:47:15 AM): You could help defend him
> RSPW98 (1:47:19 AM): John defends him a lot
> RSPW98 (1:47:23 AM): John's a cool guy that way
> CBryant215 (1:47:23 AM): isn't RSPW about wrestling?
> RSPW98 (1:47:27 AM): no not always
> CBryant215 (1:48:02 AM): it doesn't sound very interesting
> RSPW98 (1:48:42 AM): It is. You should read it. I can give you a link to
> read chad's
> posts if you like
> RSPW98 (1:48:52 AM): Chads posts to RSPW get archived all the time.
> CBryant215 (1:49:24 AM): I'm not sure that would be all that fun to read
> RSPW98 (1:49:37 AM): Why not?
> CBryant215 (1:49:55 AM): if I want to know what Chad says, I'll talk to
him
> RSPW98 (1:50:18 AM): That sounds a little subserviant to me
> CBryant215 (1:50:32 AM): what is that supposed to mean?
> RSPW98 (1:50:57 AM): I mean it sounds like you need to know more about
what
> Chad
> does that's all. He has made some people mad online and you should know
> about it.
> RSPW98 (1:50:58 AM):
> http://groups.google.com/groups?as_epq=Chad%20Bryant&safe=images&ie=UTF-8&
> oe=UTF-8&as_ugroup=alt.bonehead.john-henry&lr=lang_en&num=50&as_scoring=d
> &hl=en
> RSPW98 (1:51:06 AM): Click that link and you can read Chad's posts.
> RSPW98 (1:51:33 AM): Don't get me wrong, I think Chad's a great guy. I'm
> just saying
> that if you're his better half that you need to know what he's up just
like
> he should know
> what you are up to. Equality of the sexes.
> RSPW98 (1:51:47 AM): Of course dont tell John Henry I said that * lol * He
> doesn't
> believe in that.
> CBryant215 (1:52:32 AM): I don't know that much about John Henry
> CBryant215 (1:53:06 AM): who is Cainman?
> RSPW98 (1:53:11 AM): John is a cool guy, he's just a little crazy. Some
> loser on the
> Internet keeps bothering him.
> RSPW98 (1:53:23 AM): Cainman? Probably some poster to the RSPW I guess.
> CBryant215 (1:53:42 AM): is he connected to Alex Cain?
> RSPW98 (1:53:55 AM): I don't know. I don't read the group much these days.
> Too busy
> as a wrestler.
> CBryant215 (1:54:51 AM): seems like all of this stuff is just Cainman
> insulting Chad
> CBryant215 (1:55:06 AM): and none of these articles seem to be from Chad
> CBryant215 (1:56:25 AM): whoever Cainman is, he sure seems like an idiot
> RSPW98 (2:06:01 AM): I don't know...when I read those it looks like that
> all
> he does is
> reply to them...that it's Chad's words.
> CBryant215 (2:06:34 AM): Cainman must be a pretty unhappy person
> RSPW98 (2:07:23 AM): I don't know. All I know is what I read on that
page.
> I usually
> don't even read the group directly anymore - I just read through there.
> CBryant215 (2:08:11 AM): I just don't seem to find any of Chad's
> posts...just responses
> from that Cainman idiot
> RSPW98 (2:08:38 AM): No you don't get what I'm saying. It looks like that
> the posts are
> from Chad. What Cainman is replying to is from Chad.
> CBryant215 (2:09:11 AM): I see Cainman replying to Chad and being
harassing
> and rude
> RSPW98 (2:09:28 AM): But are you reading Chad's part of the posts
> CBryant215 (2:09:55 AM): yes, and Cainman is quite rude
> RSPW98 (2:10:15 AM): What about Chad's behavior?
> CBryant215 (2:10:39 AM): seems like Chad is guilty of having an opinion
> that
> Cainman
> seems to disagree with
> CBryant215 (2:11:00 AM): and instead of sticking to trhe topic at hand, he
> just posts
> insults and profanities
> RSPW98 (2:11:14 AM): Chad does that all the time it seems.
> CBryant215 (2:11:35 AM): not that I have noticed
> CBryant215 (2:11:50 AM): Chad was a good debater in high school
> CBryant215 (2:11:56 AM): he can still argue
> RSPW98 (2:12:26 AM): Well I'm not one to say anything but from what I am
> reading in
> the webpage it seems to me that many people dislike Chad because he avoids
> the
> subject when it is given to him.
> RSPW98 (2:12:35 AM): Like I read one last week about how Chad had said
> there
> were
> lies about him on a webpage
> RSPW98 (2:12:42 AM): But when asked which lies were there he never
answered
> RSPW98 (2:12:48 AM): I saw that webpage too, it was funny
> CBryant215 (2:13:07 AM): I doubt it
> RSPW98 (2:13:42 AM): Well it would take me a few minutes but I could
> probably find the
> link
> RSPW98 (2:13:54 AM): Chad has said some stupid stuff on IRC, this even he
> will admit to
> * lol *
> RSPW98 (2:14:14 AM): But you know what? Chad has said some even stupider
> stuff on
> AIM. Seriously. Not to me of course.
> CBryant215 (2:14:46 AM): everyone says stupid things
> CBryant215 (2:14:54 AM): like whoever though me and Chad were divorced
> RSPW98 (2:15:26 AM): Well Chad says a lot of stupid stuff. Like I heard
> last week he
> said he had a girlfriend.
> CBryant215 (2:15:56 AM): when did he say this?
> RSPW98 (2:16:48 AM): I don't really remember. I think it was July 23 at
> 2:27 a.m.
> CBryant215 (2:17:05 AM): I doubt that
> RSPW98 (2:17:46 AM): Well supposedly he told someone that he had a
> girlfriend who
> was staying with him and had known him for about a year now. And that
Chad
> was
> asleep on the couch. I don't know really, I get most of my information
> from
> e-mail and
> the webpage. It was something like that.
> CBryant215 (2:17:53 AM): you don't seem like much of a friend
> RSPW98 (2:18:07 AM): I told you, I'm not really a friend, I'm an
> acquaintance. I've
> known him for awhile.
> CBryant215 (2:19:02 AM): maybe he was playing around with someone
> CBryant215 (2:19:15 AM): he doesn't have a girlfriend
> RSPW98 (2:19:40 AM): I don't know. Someone said in an e-mail, maybe that
> Barnett
> guy, that at the same time Chad was supposed to be sleeping on the couch,
> he
> was
> posting to the Internet.
> RSPW98 (2:19:46 AM): I've got that e-mail somewhere, I just need to find
> it.
> CBryant215 (2:20:01 AM): I have no idea what you're talking about
> CBryant215 (2:20:07 AM): Chad never sleeps on the couch
> CBryant215 (2:20:28 AM): is that all RSPW does?
> RSPW98 (2:20:35 AM): Well there's a log somewhere out there, I dont know
> where t
> hough
> CBryant215 (2:20:36 AM): make up lies about certain people?
> RSPW98 (2:20:53 AM): What do you mean
> CBryant215 (2:21:11 AM): if you don't have any proof, you shouldn't talk
> about it
> CBryant215 (2:21:21 AM): lest you bear false witness against thy neighbor
> CBryant215 (2:21:26 AM): that's what the Bible says
> RSPW98 (2:21:34 AM): Well I suppose I could try to find the e-mail
> CBryant215 (2:21:45 AM): maybe you should
> RSPW98 (2:22:21 AM): it might take a few minutes, brb
> CBryant215 (2:22:27 AM): ok
> RSPW98 (2:30:07 AM): CBryant215: this is chads girlfirend he is asleep
> right now
>
> RSPW98 (2:30:18 AM): CBryant215: he is not feelin to good
>
> RSPW98 (2:30:31 AM): that was probably fake though
> CBryant215 (2:30:43 AM): probably
> RSPW98 (2:30:51 AM): that was july 23 though
> CBryant215 (2:33:29 AM): who said that was real?
> RSPW98 (2:35:19 AM): I don't know, but why would he make that up?
> CBryant215 (2:35:35 AM): maybe it was that Alex Cain idiot
> CBryant215 (2:35:41 AM): he seems to hate Chad a lot
> RSPW98 (2:35:51 AM): Probably not. I haven't seen him in awhile on the
> Internet.
> RSPW98 (2:36:03 AM): I don't think he even posts anymore
> CBryant215 (2:36:06 AM): is he the same guy as Cainman?
> RSPW98 (2:36:14 AM): No, that's someone impersonating him I think
> CBryant215 (2:36:22 AM): ok
> RSPW98 (2:36:22 AM): I talked to Alex Cain once, he is a cool guy.
> RSPW98 (2:36:27 AM): Doesn't sound like the kind of thing he would do
> CBryant215 (2:36:44 AM): he used to call our house all the time
> CBryant215 (2:36:57 AM): he'd yell into the phone or stick it up to the TV
> RSPW98 (2:36:57 AM): I don't think he would do that.
> CBryant215 (2:37:05 AM): he did
> RSPW98 (2:37:19 AM): Doesn't sound like something he would do. That was
> probably
> just made up.
> CBryant215 (2:37:32 AM): I really doubt it
> CBryant215 (2:37:44 AM): especially since I saw him brag about it to
> Chad..Chad
> showed me
> RSPW98 (2:38:12 AM): Do you believe everything you see?
> CBryant215 (2:38:30 AM): I saw it with my own eyes
> CBryant215 (2:38:36 AM): he bragged about it
> RSPW98 (2:38:37 AM): What did he show you
> CBryant215 (2:38:44 AM): something in mirc
> RSPW98 (2:38:54 AM): Maybe he showed you wrong then.
> CBryant215 (2:39:18 AM): I don't think so
> CBryant215 (2:39:26 AM): Chad's pretty good with computer stuff
> CBryant215 (2:39:50 AM): what's that nickname for Alex Cain?
> CBryant215 (2:39:53 AM): do you know?
> CBryant215 (2:39:57 AM): Chad uses it a lot
> RSPW98 (2:40:06 AM): Hmmm I don't know offhand
> RSPW98 (2:40:19 AM): Check the webpage.
> CBryant215 (2:40:24 AM): something like Stink or Twink
> RSPW98 (2:40:39 AM): Someone said they stopped by Chad's workplace last
> week
> and
> that he had a bruise or something on his face.
> RSPW98 (2:40:42 AM): Did he hurt himself?
> RSPW98 (2:40:48 AM): Like fall down or whatever
>
> CBryant215 (2:41:21 AM): Chad didn't have a bruise or anything last week
> RSPW98 (2:41:38 AM): Oh, ok.
> RSPW98 (2:41:46 AM): Maybe it was just a scar then.
> CBryant215 (2:41:51 AM): was that another lie?
> CBryant215 (2:42:00 AM): Chad doesn't have any scars on his face, either
> RSPW98 (2:42:03 AM): I don't know. Chad lies a lot I think.
> CBryant215 (2:42:12 AM): well, except for a small mark above his eyebrow
> CBryant215 (2:42:30 AM): and a scar or two on his forehead from using a
> razor
> blade...some wrestling thing
> RSPW98 (2:42:52 AM): Crap, my phone is ringing, I need to go. Tell Chad
> that Otto said
> hi, he'll know who I mean. TTYL
> CBryant215 (2:43:00 AM): right
> CBryant215 (2:43:08 AM): can I show this to Chad?
> RSPW98 (2:43:13 AM): Surer
> RSPW98 (2:43:15 AM): Sure
> CBryant215 (2:43:18 AM): he'll probably want to read it
> RSPW98 (2:43:19 AM): tell him Otto says hi
> CBryant215 (2:43:22 AM): I will
> RSPW98 (2:44:23 AM): And ask him why he stays up so late impersonating
> fictional
> girlfriends and insulting people on the Internet. That makes him look
like
> an idiot.
> Somebody said he was fat too. I tend to agree. Don't tell him I said so
> but
> he looks like
> a bloated walrus. Just paint two bananas white and stuff them in his mouth
> and you have
> a good match * lol * goodnight.
> RSPW98 signed off at 2:44:29 AM.
>
>
> --
> Chad Bryant
> www.chadbryant.cjb.net
>
> "...a Mormon Lenny Bruce..." - General Calzone
>
> "An artist must know how to convince others of the truth of his lies."
> - Pablo Picasso
Cainman
"John Henry" <john...@lowgenius.com> wrote in message
news:Xns92662DB961790jo...@216.168.3.40...
> The other one was too long for me, Chad Bryant, so this is your
> attribution.
>
> Gotta get this one into APDD. Absolutely classic.
Classic in what sense? Do you honestly believe I thought he was who he said
he was for ONE SECOND?
Idiot.
I'm still waiting for whatever is supposed to happen to me over "the next
several days" as you claim.
> > =d &hl=en
> John Henry
> http://www.lowgenius.com
> Making High-Quality Holy Hamburger from
> Only The Finest USDA Prime Sacred Cows
> Serving Usenet Since 1996
Cainman
"Coltrane's Lamentation" <coltranes_lamenta...@hotmail.com>
wrote in message news:IM459.21246$X5.25...@news2.telusplanet.net...
Don't. Not for one moment did I believe any of what is in that log. See,
last week Chad and I had another AIM conversation where he claimed he was
"Chad's girlfriend" who had known him for "over a year." Chad was supposed
to be "asleep on the couch" yet posting times put him in RSPW. Quite a
talented fat man to be able to post in his sleep. I always wondered why some
of his posts made no fucking sense. Now we know -- he posts in his sleep.
Anyway, back to the point, because he DESPERATELY seeks attention, and I
absolutely REFUSED to post the AIM log of his "girlfriend" he posts this one
from the other night. Sad. Quite sad indeed. The only thing he "worked"
was himself in thinking that he was fooling me.
>
>
Drazic The No 1 Sickboy UA
- The fact that it went on for almost two hours.
- The fact that they both knew neither of them believed the other's "work",
which is actually pretty odd and creepy.
- The things The Chad threw in there to furthur his own little fantasies, for
example how he has scars on his head from blading.
- Dink for being Dink
- Me, for reading it
~~
DRAZIC THE #1 SICKBRAH - http://www.geocities.com/rspwsickboy
The New Deal The Living Legend CW
Nobody cares fatty.
®§åi¥å-jiñ Wîll®
> Don't. Not for one moment did I believe any of what is in that log. See,
> last week Chad and I had another AIM conversation
Why do you IM Chad?
--
I put my life up for yours, see I love that girl
Could you believe even my shadow's jealous
My skin is mad at my flesh, my flesh hates my own bones
My brain hates my heart, because my heart makes the songs...(Nas)
®§åi¥å-jiñ Wîll®
> Which is worse : You vying for attention for OVER AN HOUR, you
> impersonating your "wife," you believing that I BELIEVED you were your
> "wife," or you actually POSTING this log?
Or you actually initiating a conversation with your supposed "mortal enemy"
at 1 in the morning?
PetePanaro
Stoneco864
Tehawk
of the Hawk's fans, the person known only as "®§åi¥å-jiñ Wîll®"
<DBZi...@sowatchitontoonami.1830Eastern> mumbled some gaga:
>"Cainman" <noe...@here.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Which is worse : You vying for attention for OVER AN HOUR, you
>> impersonating your "wife," you believing that I BELIEVED you were your
>> "wife," or you actually POSTING this log?
>
>
>Or you actually initiating a conversation with your supposed "mortal enemy"
>at 1 in the morning?
And then continuing that "conversation" for over an hour.
Tehawk ©2002
The Master of Mind Games
ICQ #4610826
http://www.tehawk.com
http://home.earthlink.net/~tehawk
Check Out My Pics Of The 20th Annual Mermaid Parade
http://members.fortunecity.com/tehawk/mp02h1.html
Tehawk
Hawk's fans, the person known only as petep...@aol.com (PetePanaro)
mumbled some gaga:
You don't have a problem when Dink posts logs about Chad.
Tehawk
of the Hawk's fans, the person known only as "Cainman"
<noe...@here.invalid> mumbled some gaga:
>
>"John Henry" <john...@lowgenius.com> wrote in message
>news:Xns92662DB961790jo...@216.168.3.40...
>> The other one was too long for me, Chad Bryant, so this is your
>> attribution.
>>
>> Gotta get this one into APDD. Absolutely classic.
>
>Classic in what sense? Do you honestly believe I thought he was who he said
>he was for ONE SECOND?
>
>Idiot.
>
Yet you stayed online with him for an hour and 45 minutes.
BTW, I notice that this time you're not denying that you're RSPW98.
Tehawk
of the Hawk's fans, the person known only as "®§åi¥å-jiñ Wîll®"
<DBZi...@sowatchitontoonami.1830Eastern> mumbled some gaga:
>"Cainman" <noe...@here.invalid> wrote:
>> Don't. Not for one moment did I believe any of what is in that log. See,
>> last week Chad and I had another AIM conversation
>
>Why do you IM Chad?
Why doe's he IM a man he hates so much and then stays online with him
for an hour and 45 minutes?
PetePanaro
>From: Tehawk ha...@tehawk.com
>Date: 8/10/2002 12:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time
>Message-id: <66ealu84pfjmtg29j...@4ax.com>
>
>On 10 Aug 2002 14:37:53 GMT, one of the millions and millions of the
>Hawk's fans, the person known only as petep...@aol.com (PetePanaro)
>mumbled some gaga:
>
>>No one gives a shit Chad. Keep it to yourself.
>>----
>>RSPW Kook Central
>>www.geocities.com/shitcannedbylp
>
>You don't have a problem when Dink posts logs about Chad.
>
We're talking about Chad here, not Dink. Stop trying to change the subject
with "Oh yeah, what about when so-and-so does it?"
Whether or not I like what person A does has no bearing on disliking person B.
Bob Barnett
>
> The Flaming Faction of Fucktards still can't get over the fact that instead
> of staying in my parents' basement (as they do), I actually went out and
> got some ring time.
They threw you out-what alternative did you have?
Bob Barnett
> And that's why you're sitting there with a bad leg, and that's why I
> kicked your leg outta your leg, "Slob Barnutt"!
> When are you going to join your intellectual/ideological counterparts
> Reagan & Heston in Droolville, manwhore?
>
What a redundant dumbshit. I've never voted Republican in my life.
I've also never had to get up at 5a.m. to meet court ordered child
support obligations for some breeding experiment gone horribly wrong.
HitMan333
> - Me, for reading it
Chris "Hit Man" Thomas
Tehawk
Hawk's fans, the person known only as Chad Bryant
<ch...@chadbryant.cjb.net> mumbled some gaga:
>And that's why you're sitting there with a bad leg, and that's why I
>kicked your leg outta your leg, "Tehawk"!
>
>>>> Don't. Not for one moment did I believe any of what is in that log.
>>>> See, last week Chad and I had another AIM conversation
>>>
>>>Why do you IM Chad?
>>
>> Why doe's he IM a man he hates so much and then stays online with him
>> for an hour and 45 minutes?
>
>He can't help it. He's a sucker.
>
>And because he's a sucker, he got worked.
Too bad he didn't deny that any of this happened since you know months
from now he'll either try to claim it never happened or he'll try to
re-write what was said.
Stevie The No 11 Sickboy
> And that's why you're sitting there with a bad leg, and that's why I
> kicked your leg outta your leg, "Drazic The No 1 Sickboy UA"!
>
>> I'm not sure what was more pathetic.
>>
>> - The fact that it went on for almost two hours.
>> - The fact that they both knew neither of them believed the other's
>> "work", which is actually pretty odd and creepy.
>> - The things The Chad threw in there to furthur his own little
>> fantasies, for example how he has scars on his head from blading.
>
> The Flaming Faction of Fucktards still can't get over the fact that
> instead of staying in my parents' basement (as they do), I actually
> went out and got some ring time.
>
> Deal with it, Gilligan. Your bitterness is amusing.
Chad, getting some ring time won't make you cool. It won't make you over on
a newsgroup. It won't make you less obssessed with Alex Cain and it
definetly won't make you better than others who haven't got your
fantastical wrestling experience. Try to be the better man instead of
playing the jealousy card, or worse, the "I'm cooler than you" card; I know
you're capable and it sickens me when intelligent people act stupidly.
~~
STEVIE THE #11 SICKBOY - http//www.geocities.com/sjpantera
Emo, Tool, The Strokes, Andrew WK, Weezer and NIN SUCK
Stevie The No 11 Sickboy
>>> counterparts Reagan & Heston in Droolville, manwhore?
>>>
>>
>> What a redundant dumbshit. I've never voted Republican in my life.
>
I LOL'd at this. Bob says he isn't a republican. Chad's response: you're a
republican. It must be a battle of wills, 'cause it sure ain't a battle of
wits.
Bob Barnett
>
> > What a redundant dumbshit. I've never voted Republican in my life.
>
> Typical revisionist history from a Republican in denial.
C'mon DownsBoy-prove it
You're a fucking joke
Daniel Kolle
<snip>
Alexa Cain, sinks to new lows.
--
-Kolle (kohl-lee); 14. A.A.#2035.
Koji Kondo is my god.
EAC Fundie Roaster.
Bob Barnett
> The other one was too long for me, Stevie The No 11 Sickboy, so this is
> your attribution.
>
> >>>> When are you going to join your intellectual/ideological
> >>>> counterparts Reagan & Heston in Droolville, manwhore?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> What a redundant dumbshit. I've never voted Republican in my life.
> >>
> >> Typical revisionist history from a Republican in denial.
> >
> > I LOL'd at this. Bob says he isn't a republican. Chad's response:
> > you're a republican. It must be a battle of wills, 'cause it sure
> > ain't a battle of wits.
>
> But Chad's not the one running around waving a picture of himself with
> Doddering Ronnie as if it made him one of the 12 Apostles. Nor is Chad the
> one that's espoused conservative - indeed, hyperconservative - and classic
> Republican beliefs on topics ranging from immigration to the definition of
> "treason."
The same lies by the industrial strength bonehead.
I told you that photo was a joke, when an ex-secret service babe I was seeing
snuck me into his office.
Seems like you and your late nite lover use the same techniques-just keep
spreading the same old mulch because eventually someone will believe it.
>
>
> If Barnett isn't a republican, he's either a democrat or libertarian who
> set out long ago to create an online persona that made republicans look
> really really bad.
>
> Regardless, he sucks. Vampiro is all the evidence I need of that.
He's making $7000 this weekend in Mex Cty-and staying with boxing champ Juan
Antonio Barrera.
You're up all nite posting like a speed freak, and wagging your dick on your
website.
If I suck at what I do, then you're a friggin' industrial strength Hoover.
Where's your Cyclops of a boyfriend?
I expect a run-in any minute.
>
> --
> John Henry
> http://www.lowgenius.com
> Making High-Quality Holy Hamburger from
> Only The Finest USDA Prime Sacred Cows
> Serving Usenet Since 1996
-- Bob Barnett Video
http://www.bobbarnett.com
Message Board
http://pub75.ezboard.com/bbarnettspainintheassboard
And for the person who said that Bob Barnette and Feinstein are twins, not
even close. Bob is a first class dealer. He just has a very twisted sense
of humor that some folks on rspw don't get. If you are into buying a
monthly "best of" tape from Japan, or getting Pro Shot AAA shows from
Tijuana, Bob is your man. FWIW.
-Dave Scherer
Tehawk
of the Hawk's fans, the person known only as John Henry
<john...@lowgenius.com> mumbled some gaga:
>The other one was too long for me, The Mackerel, so this is your
>attribution.
>
>> Today, Sat, 10 Aug 2002 21:01:37 GMT, some person usenet,
>> Tehawk <ha...@tehawk.com> , decided to write:
>>
>>>On 10 Aug 2002 19:11:32 GMT, one of the millions and millions of the
>>>Hawk's fans, the person known only as Chad Bryant
>>><ch...@chadbryant.cjb.net> mumbled some gaga:
>>>
>> [SPANK!]
>>
>> Tehawk, why are you such a boring retard?
>>
>>
>>
>
>Hi dink.
>
>*plonk*
Note that I had kill filed him a couple of weeks ago and Dink rushed
to accuse me of being chickenshit for doing so.
After all why should I bother with a person that's usenet existence
consists of being nothing more than a drone for dink, a slurper for a
bottom feeder ?
Betcha he still replies to people that had kill filed him, oh wait,
according to your post, he already tried.
trippy
<aj2hlq$59o$0...@pita.alt.net>, said the following tripped out things....
{Snip}
> RSPW98 (2:16:48 AM): I don't really remember. I think it was July 23 at
> 2:27 a.m.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA !!!
Classic Dink, right there.
--
Trippy
tri...@XspamblockXthetrippy.com
"Leader of the Band" is easily one of my all-time favorite 70's acoustic
sensitive-guy wimp ballads." -- John Henry
Doobie Doobie Doo
trippy
<3kebluka6juf1ngr0...@4ax.com>, said the following tripped
out things....
> On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 00:37:27 -0000, one of the millions and millions
> of the Hawk's fans, the person known only as John Henry
> <john...@lowgenius.com> mumbled some gaga:
>
> >The other one was too long for me, The Mackerel, so this is your
> >attribution.
> >
> >> Today, Sat, 10 Aug 2002 21:01:37 GMT, some person usenet,
> >> Tehawk <ha...@tehawk.com> , decided to write:
> >>
> >>>On 10 Aug 2002 19:11:32 GMT, one of the millions and millions of the
> >>>Hawk's fans, the person known only as Chad Bryant
> >>><ch...@chadbryant.cjb.net> mumbled some gaga:
> >>>
> >> [SPANK!]
> >>
> >> Tehawk, why are you such a boring retard?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Hi dink.
> >
> >*plonk*
>
> Note that I had kill filed him a couple of weeks ago and Dink rushed
> to accuse me of being chickenshit for doing so.
> After all why should I bother with a person that's usenet existence
> consists of being nothing more than a drone for dink, a slurper for a
> bottom feeder ?
> Betcha he still replies to people that had kill filed him, oh wait,
> according to your post, he already tried.
This particular doofus is Mah-ty Hannigan, a blowhard cheerleader for
anyone who's against Snuh or St00pid. Just ignore him, everyone else
does.
Tehawk
of the Hawk's fans, the person known only as trippy
<tri...@spam.sucks> mumbled some gaga:
So that was Hannigan.
The guy's been taking occasional shots at me ever since I upset his
friend Danny what's his name (I forget his last name, Cujo's friend).
Anyhow he' just another kook. so his opinion doesn't matter.
ScottZf
> So that was Hannigan.
> The guy's been taking occasional shots at me ever since I upset
> his friend Danny what's his name (I forget his last name, Cujo's
> friend). Anyhow he' just another kook. so his opinion doesn't
> matter.
>
Although Hannigan and I have had our differences in the past, at least
he isn't a wrasslin' kook, whose opinion doesn't matter either.
Tehawk
Hawk's fans, the person known only as ScottZf <sco...@dwave.net>
mumbled some gaga:
If that were true you wouldn/t be spending so much time replying to
those so called rasslin' kooks.
ScottZf
> On 11 Aug 2002 17:23:01 GMT, one of the millions and millions of
> the
>Hawk's fans, the person known only as ScottZf <sco...@dwave.net>
> mumbled some gaga:
>
>>Tehawk <ha...@tehawk.com> posted this in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>
>>> So that was Hannigan.
>>> The guy's been taking occasional shots at me ever since I upset
>>> his friend Danny what's his name (I forget his last name, Cujo's
>>> friend). Anyhow he' just another kook. so his opinion doesn't
>>> matter.
>>>
>>Although Hannigan and I have had our differences in the past, at
>>least he isn't a wrasslin' kook, whose opinion doesn't matter
>>either.
>
> If that were true you wouldn/t be spending so much time replying
> to those so called rasslin' kooks.
Time? I rarely even read those threads, let alone reply, because
anything cross-posted to a wrestling group (or with "tehawk" in the
From: line) gets flagged.
Tehawk
So you're admitting that anything from me gets "flagged"?
I wonder why is that?
ScottZf
alt.usenet.kooks:
> you have something that "flag anything crossposted to a wrestling
> newsgroup?" ditto tehawk? buddy, you're about 3 steps away from
> Dink status.
>
It's flagged (by somthing built-into my reader - you should know as
you have the same reader) so I don't have to read it if I don't want
to. But a dumb wrasslin' fan like you can't figure that out so I'm
telling you for your future reference.
> get.
>
> a.
>
> life.
>
Say's the dope who took the time to respond to something I said to
Tehawk, being careful to misspell each word, and add groups to the
newsgroup line that don't exist. My ironically [sic] meter (thats a
trademark from one of you wrasslin fans) busted on that one.
Tehawk
>John Henry <john...@lowgenius.com> posted this in
>alt.usenet.kooks:
>
>> you have something that "flag anything crossposted to a wrestling
>> newsgroup?" ditto tehawk? buddy, you're about 3 steps away from
>> Dink status.
>>
>It's flagged (by somthing built-into my reader - you should know as
>you have the same reader) so I don't have to read it if I don't want
>to.
If you don't read it then how do you
reply to the posts?
>But a dumb wrasslin' fan like you can't figure that out so I'm
>telling you for your future reference.
Let me guess, a rasslin' fan took your lunch money.
>> get.
>>
>> a.
>>
>> life.
>>
>Say's the dope who took the time to respond to something I said to
>Tehawk,
Wow, stealing a line I just used on you.
Dink taught you well.
BTW boy, check the
>being careful to misspell each word, and add groups to the
>newsgroup line that don't exist.
Something which is also done by people in flame news groups all the
time.
BTW, if you bothered to check, he wasn't the first one to add groups
that didn't exist. Granted it is something I picked up from your
buddy, that rasslin' fan and also a former pizzaboy, Dink.
>My ironically [sic] meter (thats a
>trademark from one of you wrasslin fans) busted on that one.
Yes, you forget to mention that it was Dink who first used the "meter"
line.
BTW, in case you didn't know it, Dink is the nickname given to your
buddy Alex Cain. It was created by another rasslin' fan but has been
used all around usenet, including in AUK and APDD.
ScottZf
alt.usenet.kooks:
> What the hell is supposed to be clever, witty, or relative to this
> conversation about using the wrong variant of "irony?"
>
No, it isn't. A wrasslin fan made it up. Keep up, will you?
As for the rest of your post, the same level of reading comprehension
was shown so I won't bother addressing it.
Tehawk
>John Henry <john...@lowgenius.com> posted this in
>alt.usenet.kooks:
>
>> What the hell is supposed to be clever, witty, or relative to this
>> conversation about using the wrong variant of "irony?"
>>
>No, it isn't. A wrasslin fan made it up. Keep up, will you?
>
A rasslin' fan named Alex Cain.
Now why do you leave that part out, especially when you consider that
ever thread you jumped into was one where I was shooting at Cain.
It's almost like you're trying to stick up for him.
Tehawk
>The other one was too long for me, Tehawk, so this is your attribution.
>
>> On 12 Aug 2002 00:52:36 GMT, one of the millions and millions of the
>> Hawk's fans, the person known only as ScottZf <sco...@dwave.net>
>> mumbled some gaga:
>>
>>>John Henry <john...@lowgenius.com> posted this in
>>>alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>
>>>> you have something that "flag anything crossposted to a wrestling
>>>> newsgroup?" ditto tehawk? buddy, you're about 3 steps away from
>>>> Dink status.
>>>>
>>>It's flagged (by somthing built-into my reader - you should know as
>>>you have the same reader) so I don't have to read it if I don't want
>>>to.
>>
>> If you don't read it then how do you
>> reply to the posts?
>
>That's what I'm wondering. If this guys' talking straight, he never
>should have seen my message at all. Watta k00k.
>
>>>But a dumb wrasslin' fan like you can't figure that out so I'm
>>>telling you for your future reference.
>
>> Let me guess, a rasslin' fan took your lunch money.
>
>AND his woman
>
>>>> get.
>>>>
>>>> a.
>>>>
>>>> life.
>
>>>Say's the dope who took the time to respond to something I said to
>>>Tehawk,
>
>I never claimed to have a life this week, shirley.
>
>> Wow, stealing a line I just used on you.
>> Dink taught you well.
>> BTW boy, check the
>>
>>>being careful to misspell each word, and add groups to the
>>>newsgroup line that don't exist.
>> Something which is also done by people in flame news groups all the
>> time.
>
>I didn't add any groups to the newsgroups line. If anything, I would
>have taken some out because supernews has postfilter configured to auto-
>bounce any number of crosspost combos, including (for instance) RSPW and
>rec.sport.soccer
>
>> BTW, if you bothered to check, he wasn't the first one to add groups
>> that didn't exist. Granted it is something I picked up from your
>> buddy, that rasslin' fan and also a former pizzaboy, Dink.
>
>At least you can take consolation knowing to a certainty that Dink didn't
>think of it *first*.
>
>>>My ironically [sic] meter (thats a
>>>trademark from one of you wrasslin fans) busted on that one.
>
>What the hell is supposed to be clever, witty, or relative to this
>conversation about using the wrong variant of "irony?"
>
>> Yes, you forget to mention that it was Dink who first used the "meter"
>> line.
>> BTW, in case you didn't know it, Dink is the nickname given to your
>> buddy Alex Cain. It was created by another rasslin' fan but has been
>> used all around usenet, including in AUK and APDD.
>
>Not to mention GCSU and the Cain residence in Griffin, Ga.
>
>Bottom line - anyone stupid enough to think that they can make accurate
>blanket statements of ANY large group of people is either ignorant or
>being intentionally pedantic for the sake of an argument.
I noticed that in his reply he started doing another Dinkism, snipping
posts and claiming that it's nothing worth replying too.
He shoots at everyone who's flaming Dink.
He behaves like Dink, right down to doing the same things that Dink
does.
If it's not a Dink sock, then it's a new dink in training.
ScottZf
> A rasslin' fan named Alex Cain.
> Now why do you leave that part out, especially when you consider that
> ever thread you jumped into was one where I was shooting at Cain.
> It's almost like you're trying to stick up for him.
>
Do you see that first line in my message? Now try to wrap your little
brain around why the only threads I reply to you are those threads Cain
is in. The little love affair you have going on with Alex is none of
my business. I am calling you an idiot because you are one.
Rey Tehawk
<john...@lowgenius.com> wrote:
>The other one was too long for me, Tehawk, so this is your attribution.
>
>> On 12 Aug 2002 00:52:36 GMT, one of the millions and millions of the
>> Hawk's fans, the person known only as ScottZf <sco...@dwave.net>
>> mumbled some gaga:
>>
>>>John Henry <john...@lowgenius.com> posted this in
>>>alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>
>>>> you have something that "flag anything crossposted to a wrestling
>>>> newsgroup?" ditto tehawk? buddy, you're about 3 steps away from
>>>> Dink status.
>>>>
>>>It's flagged (by somthing built-into my reader - you should know as
>>>you have the same reader) so I don't have to read it if I don't want
>>>to.
>>
>> If you don't read it then how do you
>> reply to the posts?
>
>That's what I'm wondering. If this guys' talking straight, he never
>should have seen my message at all. Watta k00k.
>
>>>But a dumb wrasslin' fan like you can't figure that out so I'm
>>>telling you for your future reference.
>
>> Let me guess, a rasslin' fan took your lunch money.
>
>AND his woman
>
You're assuming he ever had a woman.
With the amount of nerdism he's thus far displayed, I'm betting that
the closest he's ever gotten to "bush" is the hair on his palms.
Tehawk ©2002
The Master of Mind Games
ICQ #4610826
http://www.tehawk.com
http://home.earthlink.net/~tehawk
http://home.earthlink.net/~bobo316/rspwh37.html
Tehawk
>Tehawk <ha...@tehawk.com> posted this in alt.usenet.kooks:
>
>> A rasslin' fan named Alex Cain.
>> Now why do you leave that part out, especially when you consider that
>> ever thread you jumped into was one where I was shooting at Cain.
>> It's almost like you're trying to stick up for him.
>>
>Do you see that first line in my message?
You mean the one where you said "No, it isn't. A wrasslin fan made it
up."?
>>
And I added what you left out or do you lack the intelligence to
understand that little piece?
>Now try to wrap your little
>brain around why the only threads I reply to you are those threads Cain
>is in. The little love affair you have going on with Alex is none of
>my business.
It's none of your business yet you claim that those are the only
threads, (out of all the other bullshit I usually crosspost) that you
are interested in? Furthermore you claim you flag everything that's
either crossposted from the wrestling NG's or posted by me.
Logic is not your strong point is it?
>I am calling you an idiot because you are one.
And you think your opinion of me actually matters to anyone other than
an obviously obsessive buffoon such as yourself?
ScottZf
> On 12 Aug 2002 14:40:31 GMT, one of the millions and millions of
> the
>Hawk's fans, the person known only as ScottZf <sco...@dwave.net>
> mumbled some gaga:
>
>>Tehawk <ha...@tehawk.com> posted this in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>
>>> A rasslin' fan named Alex Cain.
>>> Now why do you leave that part out, especially when you consider
>>> that ever thread you jumped into was one where I was shooting at
>>> Cain. It's almost like you're trying to stick up for him.
>>>
>>Do you see that first line in my message?
>
> You mean the one where you said "No, it isn't. A wrasslin fan
> made it up."?
No, you dimwitted boob. The *very first* line. The attribution line.
If you and Alex would keep your lovefest out of AUK I wouldn't even
know about it, and care even less.
> It's none of your business yet you claim that those are the only
> threads, (out of all the other bullshit I usually crosspost) that
> you are interested in? Furthermore you claim you flag everything
> that's either crossposted from the wrestling NG's or posted by me.
> Logic is not your strong point is it?
>
I don't read the other groups you cross-post to, nitwit. I do know
about you, from a bunch of whining babies that complain about you in
other groups that don't know how to use a killfile, but that is
neither here or there. And "flagging" your posts just alerts me. I
can choose to read them or not to read them. Since I have only posted
6 times (including this time) in this thread out of more than 40 total
posts, and you posted 14 times, do the math and draw your own
conclusions (and yes, I just wasted time actually counting the posts
still on my server. God that's pathetic).
Tehawk
>Tehawk <ha...@tehawk.com> posted this in alt.usenet.kooks:
>
>> On 12 Aug 2002 14:40:31 GMT, one of the millions and millions of
>> the
>>Hawk's fans, the person known only as ScottZf <sco...@dwave.net>
>> mumbled some gaga:
>>
>>>Tehawk <ha...@tehawk.com> posted this in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>
>>>> A rasslin' fan named Alex Cain.
>>>> Now why do you leave that part out, especially when you consider
>>>> that ever thread you jumped into was one where I was shooting at
>>>> Cain. It's almost like you're trying to stick up for him.
>>>>
>>>Do you see that first line in my message?
>>
>> You mean the one where you said "No, it isn't. A wrasslin fan
>> made it up."?
>
>No, you dimwitted boob. The *very first* line. The attribution line.
>If you and Alex would keep your lovefest out of AUK I wouldn't even
>know about it, and care even less.
>
If you didn't care then why do you waste your time replying?
But you're right, I'm so so sorry for distracting you from your
lovefest with Lurker which has been crossposted to both AUK and RSPW
in several threads.
>> It's none of your business yet you claim that those are the only
>> threads, (out of all the other bullshit I usually crosspost) that
>> you are interested in? Furthermore you claim you flag everything
>> that's either crossposted from the wrestling NG's or posted by me.
>> Logic is not your strong point is it?
>>
>I don't read the other groups you cross-post to, nitwit. I do know
>about you, from a bunch of whining babies that complain about you in
>other groups that don't know how to use a killfile,
So you call people a bunch of whining babies for not doing something
that you have also shown yourself incapable of doing.
>but that is
>neither here or there. And "flagging" your posts just alerts me. I
>can choose to read them or not to read them.
Apparently you always read them..
>Since I have only posted
>6 times (including this time) in this thread out of more than 40 total
>posts, and you posted 14 times, do the math and draw your own
>conclusions (and yes, I just wasted time actually counting the posts
>still on my server. God that's pathetic).
Even more pathetic that you're counting replies in a thread that
weren't directed towards you in order to strengthen your argument.
ScottZf
> On 13 Aug 2002 15:43:39 GMT, one of the millions and millions of
> the
>Hawk's fans, the person known only as ScottZf <sco...@dwave.net>
> mumbled some gaga:
>>I don't read the other groups you cross-post to, nitwit. I do
>>know about you, from a bunch of whining babies that complain about
>>you in other groups that don't know how to use a killfile,
>
> So you call people a bunch of whining babies for not doing
> something that you have also shown yourself incapable of doing.
>
I don't need to killfile you...yet. You are still mildly
enetertaining, and I called those that complain about you babies. I
have never complained about you. If you ever stop being entertaining,
I will just change your scorefile to -9999 and not bother saying
anything about it.
BTW...some of those babies are complaining about you on web message
boards. That is really pathetic, in my book; but a feather in your
cap. Congratulations.
C-C-C-Cainman
"John Henry" <john...@lowgenius.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9266D1D3DD89Djo...@216.168.3.40...
> The other one was too long for me, The Mackerel, so this is your
> attribution.
>
> > Today, Sat, 10 Aug 2002 21:01:37 GMT, some person usenet,
> > Tehawk <ha...@tehawk.com> , decided to write:
> >
> >>Hawk's fans, the person known only as Chad Bryant
> >><ch...@chadbryant.cjb.net> mumbled some gaga:
> >>
> >
> > Tehawk, why are you such a boring retard?
> >
> >
> >
>
> Hi dink.
>
> *plonk*
So because he thinks Tehawk is a fucking idiot, and disagrees with what
you've said, you think he's me and you "plonk" him.
OKIE DOKIE
You fucking idiot. You "plonked" me and yet you still piggyback responses.
Get a life you fucking drugged up name-dropping wanna-be prick.
http://www.geocities.com/nsomnia_98/crazyjohn.html
http://www.geocities.com/thejohnhenrykookmuseum
news://alt.bonehead.john-henry
C-C-C-Cainman
> The other one was too long for me, Tehawk, so this is your attribution.
>
> > On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 08:44:47 -0400, one of the millions and millions
> > of the Hawk's fans, the person known only as "Cainman"
> > <noe...@here.invalid> mumbled some gaga:> >>news:Xns92662DB961790jo...@216.168.3.40...
> >>> The other one was too long for me, Chad Bryant, so this is your
> >>> attribution.
> >>>
> >>> Gotta get this one into APDD. Absolutely classic.
> >>
> >>Classic in what sense? Do you honestly believe I thought he was who he
> >>said he was for ONE SECOND?
> >>
> >>Idiot.
> >>
> > Yet you stayed online with him for an hour and 45 minutes.
> > BTW, I notice that this time you're not denying that you're RSPW98.
> >
> >>I'm still waiting for whatever is supposed to happen to me over "the
> >>next several days" as you claim.
>
> Oh, well, then, let me clear up your confusion.
Pssst! Hey, Stumpy!? I'm over here! You can address your responses to me
directly TO me instead of taking the chickenshit way out and responding to
them through piggyback. You know Stumpy...the point of you having
"killfiled" me is so that you don't read or respond to my posts. You appear
to have overlooked this one important issue. But just to make sure that you
see this, I'm morphing -- just this once -- so that you can see me
bitch-slap you like your ex-hooker on a good day.
>
> First of all, I'd like to congratulate you on how quickly you shit on your
> own theory that Chad was divorced...you've been making this claim for
> months, and yet the minute Chad claimed to be his wife, you were all over
> it like white on rice.
Er, no. As I said Stumpy -- I never once believed it was his wife. Ever.
In fact, Chad actually tried to troll me a week before that by posing as his
"girlfriend." C'mon Stumpy -- don't be an idiot. Do you *seriously* think
that even if I for *one moment* that the AIM convo with his supposed
"girlfriend" was real, that I would believe his WIFE would be on the same
account later?
Even you, a proven idiot and paranoid schizophrenic, should have more sense
than that. Sheesh. You disappoint me.
> I guess now RSPW knows how seriously to take THAT
> ongoing ruse of yours.
So his divorce is a ruse? That's not what the certificate says. That's not
what the papers say.
> And I guess now RSPW knows how little you believe
> your own bullshit about everything else, too.
I believe that Chad is not divorced like I believe you are sane, successful,
and a good parent.
>
> Secondly, I'd like to point out that there is *no possible way* for you to
> reasonably claim that you believed this was anyone but Anna.
Secondly, I don't give a fuck what you point out. As I stated, I never once
believed that the person was who they claimed to be. I mean, c'mon you
stupid fuck -- read the log. The way he keeps bringing me up, it should be
obvious to even the most oblivious moron on the planet (read: Tehawk) that
it was Chad and not his "wife." Also, it's Annaleise, not Anna. You are on
a first name basis with her now? That is most interesting.
> You put
> yourself over as Otto Schwanz, lied your ass off about everything from who
> Alex Cain was to how long and how often I worked in the wrestling
business,
Personally I thought posing as Otto was mere genius myself. Look how it
riled you up, and look what attention it got. I knew the *instant* I said
that's who I was that I could expect some long-winded bullshit from you on
Usenet regarding the subject. I am playing you like a fiddle, you
needle-dicked cyberslut!
> and did your level best to convince "Anna" that Chad was some kind of
> Usenet Terrorist, stalking people and avoiding lawyers.
Well, of course nobody expects YOU to come down on Chad for his behavior.
But all one has to do is take a peek at the archives and what he did to
Matthew Gross, Stephen Signorelli and even me to know that he is a fucked up
version of what -- in your words -- is a "Usenet Terrorist." Of course,
your definition of a "terrorist" is slightly warped (you traitorous pussy).
>You even lied about
> Barnett "wanting to get in touch" with Chad - Barnett has never made this
> claim.
alt.flame.rspw says Hi.
> You even called me cool [RSPW98 (1:47:23 AM): John's a cool guy],
I bet you wet yourself when you read that, didn't you?
> and buried yourself as "some loser" - [RSPW98 (1:53:11 AM): John is a cool
> guy, he's just a little crazy. Some loser on the Internet keeps bothering
> him].
>
> You claimed to be a friend of mine, after "Anna" acted like she knew me
and
> thought well of me; you claimed to be a friend of chad's - at least until
> "Anna" noticed you weren't very friendly, at which point you demoted
> yourself quickly to "acquaintance." You were even careful enough to not
> over-defend "alex cain" against the barrage of insults "Anna" was hurling
> at him
* yawn * Do you have a point to this whole fucked-up rant or are you just
pounding the keyboard at random now?
>
> There is nothing in this log that indicates anything other than that you
> got your ignorant ass sucked in to the world's most transparent game of
> "what's my line." You bought it hook line and sinker, Dink - and in your
> mad rush to sabotage Chad Bryant's offline life at what you thought was
> your first real opportunity,
Chad has already "sabotaged" his own life enough. I *could* easily fuck it
up more, but since he's been a good Chickenshit lately and not gone after my
loved ones or my relatives, I've let him alone. The *instant* he steps
across that line again, he pays the price, just like he did with Breakers
Unlimited.
And despite what your paranoid rantings claim, I did not believe that was
his "wife" for one moment.
Why don't you call my parents house and tell them that I did though, if it
will make you feel better. Hell, you've already done it once, right?
> you have removed any chance of a mitigating
> circumstance with which you can absolve yourself of what is, in reality, a
> crime. Several of them actually, ranging from impersonation of a public
> figure (Bo Dupp) to attempted alienation of affection in trying to turn
> Chad's wife against him.
>
I read that three times, and I * still * can't figure out what the fuck you
were trying to say. Can you repeat that without "Bonehead Speak" please?
> And unlike your midnight telephone calls,
I have never called your house. *YOU* however have called *MY* house and
even ADMITTED to doing it.
> falsified police reports,
Ya know, last I checked, that was a crime. If you think I "falsified"
anything, then maybe you should put in a call to "Officer Swallow" or
"Officer Swaggart" and see what you can drum up for an arrest warrant.
Idiot.
>and
> repeated attempts to discern and contact both my and Chad's employers over
> the last 5 years, this one is fully documented.
And of course we all know that AIM logs have sent people to the gas chamber.
Oh, as for "contacting employers," I wish you would kindly get off your
fucking dildo and explain to me what it is you believe this to be. The only
thing I can think of is the whole "I dare you to get me fired" incident from
when you were employed at NCSU. In which case, I am not involved. Sure, I
lied to you and told you that I was going to e-mail them supporting you
after you whined to me on IRC about how they'd unfairly taken your job away
from you, but that was just to get you to shut the fuck up. I wish I still
had those logs...you were even more pitiful than usual that night. To the
point of whoever actually e-mailed them and their chancellor, I was never
one of them.
Now I * did * contact Chad's employer, Breaker's Unlimited, when Chad
started trying to go after my ex-girlfriend. I considered that taking it
over the line (as if him stealing my identity and trying to get me kicked
out of school wasn't enough?) and took steps to ensure he was corralled and
could not do anything of the sort. If he tries anything like that AGAIN, he
will experience the same thing. Not *my* fault they fired him for doing it,
and it wasn't *my* fault you got fired from NCSU. You've already admitted it
was YOU who fucked up and paid the price, and it was YOUR fault you got
fired. You can't back out of your own words, Stumpy. Well...you CAN, but
you'd get your ass kicked for doing so.
>
> I even had Chad paste the entire conversation to me as it happened.
oh MAN! Damn I wish I'd known that, I would have had a LOT more fun with
the whole "I'm Otto Schwanz" thing.
>Would
> you like to see THAT log, with identical timestamps from Chad's side, that
> reads verbatim, word for word, exactly what Chad posted here?
YES PLEASE
oh wait -- you have me "plonked!" How can I get a response to you? Tehawk?
Would you mind doing your usual slurping/stalking/obsessing/posting and
respond to this so that Stumpy DeJong here can once again piggyback a
response? Please? I promise to post at least six responses to you if you
do. I know how you like that -- especially the part where Scott from AUK
tears you a new asshole.
>I warn you,
> it will probably piss you off, because Chad and I spent that 90 minutes
> alternately laughing our asses off and being dumbfounded at the incredible
> depths of your ignorance, and the incredible driving lifelessness that has
> kept you trying to fuck up our offline lives for the last 5 years
Why would it piss me off? The two of you k00king out with each other in
your private little cyberchat room is a funny thought indeed. As for me
"trying to fuck up" your offline lives, what the fuck do you think Chad
tried to do in getting me kicked out of school, you hippie chickenshit
motherfucker?? What the HELL did you try to do when you called my parents
house DEMANDING they remove me from the Internet or you would "file
charges?"
Fuck you, you insane needle-dicked piece of shit. I have done NOTHING to
either of you on the scale that the two of you have tried to do to me. The
only thing is, you FAILED at it, whereas I SUCCEEDED. Dickhead.
Here, while we're discussing that, let me make the obligatory comments about
your daughter, so you'll feel the need to call my parents house again in the
middle of the night and threaten me and them with jail time if I don't stop
calling you an asshole:
Your daughter is such a hot piece of ass, when she walks by the meat counter
at the grocery store they try to package her.
Your daughter is selling her charms for food and shelter while you sit
around and cry about how the government is keeping you from getting a job as
you drool over your unemployment check.
Your daughter is going to knife you in your sleep and then flee to Mexico to
start a new life once she turns eighteen.
Your daughter gets fucked by the entire football team for each goal that
they score. Why do you think they've had such a winning streak lately?
There. Is THAT enough for you to call again, you ballless FUCK? You stupid
piece of shit. Get bent and go die, whichever one you find available first.
>- all
> because once upon a time, your sorry little Dink ass got TOSsed.
Once upon a time there was a needle-dicked idiot...
>
> Here's a little sample; you'll note that stuff pasted from Chad's IM
> session has a timestamp between 1 and 2:30 am - mine runs from 4 to 5:30
> am. Different time zones.
No shit! My but you're a bright boy! Too bad you can't use that obvious
intelligence to FIND YOURSELF A JOB.
> There's also about a slight difference in our
> clocks' "hour hand.":
>
> ---------------
> CBryant215 (1:08:10 AM): some redneck kid from Georgia used to call all
> hours of the night
> when we lived in Utah
> LowGeenyus (4:08:41 AM): *pops*
> CBryant215 (4:08:43 AM): RSPW98 (1:08:25 AM): hang on, i'll brb
> LowGeenyus (4:08:49 AM): lolol
> LowGeenyus (4:08:53 AM): dink goes a-googling
> CBryant215 (4:09:04 AM): a-googling dink will go
> CBryant215 (4:09:12 AM): a googling dink will go
> CBryant215 (4:09:18 AM): hi ho the mayyyyo
> LowGeenyus (4:09:23 AM): lol
> CBryant215 (4:09:24 AM): a googling dink will go
> CBryant215 (4:10:08 AM): RSPW98 (1:09:22 AM): That's not how I heard it
> RSPW98 (1:09:33 AM): The way I heard it Chad was harrassing someone and
> that person was
> just harrassing him back. I could be wrong.
> -----------------
>
> here's you denying who you were:
> -----------------
> CBryant215 (1:09:39 AM): do you know who Alex Cain is?
> RSPW98 (1:09:44 AM): No, I have no idea.
> RSPW98 (1:09:48 AM): I've heard the name
> RSPW98 (1:09:51 AM): But don't know who that person is.
> LowGeenyus (4:10:28 AM): hahahahhahahaahahahahahahahahahahahah
> CBryant215 (4:11:07 AM): RSPW98 (1:09:59 AM): Is he a friend of Chad's?
> CBryant215 (1:10:18 AM): he's the redneck kid from Georgia that used to
> call us all the time
> CBryant215 (1:10:35 AM): Chad sais he was disturbed and psychotic
> RSPW98 (1:10:38 AM): Oh. I thought that was someone called Steven
> Signorelli
> -----------------
>
> That's right, folks, Alex Cain is so ashamed of himself that he'd rather
be
> thought of as a known child rapist, than himself.
Holy shit. You are seriously losing it here.
>
> Here's me trying to give you the benefit of the doubt...
>
Wait wait wait wait wait...I thought it was CHAD giving me the "benefit of
the doubt." Can you PLEASE try to keep your insanity straight here?
> -----------
> RSPW98 (1:10:38 AM): Oh. I thought that was someone called Steven
> Signorelli
> CBryant215 (1:10:46 AM): and that he was really short or something
> CBryant215 (4:11:22 AM): my god...this is ***** all the way
> LowGeenyus (4:11:29 AM): lmao
> LowGeenyus (4:11:36 AM): he's gonna catch on pretty quick I think
> LowGeenyus (4:11:45 AM): what am I saying?
> LowGeenyus (4:12:08 AM): this is dink. he couldn't catch on to a napkin
in
> the street.
> ------------
>
> My thoughts at the time:
> ------------
> LowGeenyus (4:13:54 AM): wow, this is the uberclassic. There is no way he
> can possibly wriggle out of this later claiming to have known it was you.
> [NOTE WELL HOW PREDICTABLE YOU ARE, ALEXIS]
> CBryant215 (4:14:08 AM): oh hell no
> ------------
>
> CBryant215 (1:14:17 AM): I never heard anything about that
> CBryant215 (1:14:24 AM): but that does not sound like Chad
> LowGeenyus (4:15:02 AM): lol
> CBryant215 (4:15:59 AM): RSPW98 (1:14:32 AM): What DOES sound like Chad
> CBryant215 (1:15:17 AM): mild-mannered, polite, although he can be a bit
> hot-headed and
> outspoken if he really believes in something
> CBryant215 (1:15:34 AM): he doesn't get along with either of my
> parents...he thinks they're
> racists
> LowGeenyus (4:16:47 AM): another 5 minutes he'll be trying to hum[sic -
> meant 'hump] your leg
> --------------
>
> Which you proceeded to do for another hour and 15 minutes.
>
> Here's a good part - this is where Chad was going to cut you aff at the
20-
> minute mark, but I talked him out of it:
>
> --------------
> CBryant215 (4:20:12 AM): hmmm...should "Chad" do a run-in and tell DInk
off
> for harassing his wife?
> LowGeenyus (4:20:46 AM): no way, man, let him go as long it he'll keep
> going. At some point he'll probably start
> pretending to "figure it out" just out of covering his ass
> CBryant215 (4:21:04 AM): he's gotten *really* quiet
> LowGeenyus (4:21:13 AM): plus if you run in, he has that much more reason
> to think it's bs
> LowGeenyus (4:21:26 AM): he's probably posting th elog
> CBryant215 (4:21:28 AM): I think wifey will save this and send it to me
> CBryant215 (4:21:35 AM): ooh
> CBryant215 (4:21:38 AM): here he is again
> LowGeenyus (4:22:00 AM): catch of the season
> CBryant215 (4:22:24 AM): RSPW98 (1:21:26 AM): Chad is a racist though.
> CBryant215 (1:21:51 AM): absolutely not
> LowGeenyus (4:22:59 AM): "for a friend of his, you sure don't seem to
think
> very highly of him"
> LowGeenyus (4:23:20 AM): act like you're starting not to trust him - he'll
> try harder to turn you
> CBryant215 (4:23:48 AM): RSPW98 (1:23:05 AM): Yes he is. Also he appears
> to have a problem with reality.
> RSPW98 (1:23:11 AM): And for some reason he doesn't like lawyers
> RSPW98 (1:23:21 AM): And I think he may have a problem with getting
> attention as well
> CBryant215 (1:23:23 AM): you must not like him much, and I have no idea
why
> ----------------
>
> Coach John Henry:
> -----------------
> LowGeenyus (4:24:31 AM): RESIST THE URGE TO SAY 'YOU SOUND LIKE A BIT OF A
> DINK"
> ----------------
>
> Here's a favorite part, where you lie about what my job was in SCW, and I
> continue coaching Chad:
> ----------------
> CBryant215 (4:31:19 AM): RSPW98 (1:30:47 AM): it is a wrestling
federation,
> John used to help us take the ring down and sell tickets.
> LowGeenyus (4:31:21 AM): man oh man oh man
> LowGeenyus (4:31:23 AM): LMAO
> LowGeenyus (4:31:36 AM): Dink, ya dumb fucker, there's videotape of me all
> over the planet ring announcing
> CBryant215 (4:31:55 AM): CBryant215 (1:31:34 AM): Chad told me that John
> was a ring announcer and manager
> LowGeenyus (4:31:59 AM): "I thought he was a ring announcer or a manager
or
> something like that, I don't really pay much attention to the wrestling,
> that's chad's thing"
> LowGeenyus (4:32:23 AM): you don't want to know too much about wrestling -
> even if Anna's actually into it, it won't ring true to dink, his concept
of
> women doesn't stretch that far
> ----------------
>
> I could go on, but let's face it - this is the Usenet equivalent of
beating
> up a retarded 4-year-old.
>
> I take back everything I ever said about you, Dink - I've never come close
> to accurately describing *just how much of a dink you really are*. To be
> honest, even *I* didn't realize until this conversation took place just
how
> utterly pathetic a human being is Alex Cain of Griffin Ga. To call you a
> lifeless midget psycho redneck pedophile who tries everything he can to
> fuck with people's offline lives is an insult to Emmett Gulley and Richard
> the St00pid. You have surpassed their ignorance by light-years.
>
Why, thank you Stumpy! Your endorsement means so much to me!
> It kinda makes me wonder what would have happened if you'd ever gotten my
> daughter's AIM address.
Hmmm probably given it to Signorelli, since that would have pissed you off
past whatever breaking point you kept/keep dodging.
>
> Face it, Dink - this is the WMIII of RSPW AIM logs, and you've just been
> cast in the role of prelim jobber.
Really? Oh cool!
> 93 thousand fans are literally hanging
> from the rafters watching you get squashed like Duane Gill on an old
> Superstars show.
>
> This is the equivalent of re-enacting the Silverdome show with Billy Barty
> playing the part of Andre.
>
> Of course, I harbor no illusions that this will somehow rid us
collectively
> of you - you have neither the requisite self-pride, nor the requisite
sense
> of shame, to know when you're beat. But make no mistake about it, Dink -
> you are beat. This log puts the lie to all of your claims that you've
> never done this or that, that you don't go offline, that's not your thing,
> musta been someone else. Watching you damnce around this log trying to
> come up with anything approaaching a believable excuse for it is not only
> entertaining as hell, it also served the higher purpose of showing people,
> once and for all, that you *do* go offline, you *do* try to fuck with
> people's lives and you *do* have a bone-deep obsession with both myself
and
> Chad Bryant (and I'm sure we're not the only ones) that leads you to stop
> at *nothing* to try and fuck with our offline lives.
>
> Now, I *could* post my copy of those logs, but at this point I won't - yet
> - because you haven't been dumb enough to cry forgery - yet.
>
> But I'll tellya this much:
>
> If this log doesn't earn you CENKOCII status and a nice RtS-style
> enshrinement as one of the two biggest, sickest idiots to ever set foot on
> Usenet, I'm going to have to wonder how much AUK have let themselves go
> since 1999.
John you and AUK go together like white on rice.
>
> And the nice thing is, you've given them *such* a great body of mertieral
> to work with. A dozen or more posting addresses, 5 years of stalking and
> threats and harassment through Usenet...claims ranging from lies about who
> you are to the Brazillian National Language of Dinks, Spanish (Spankish?)
> to your never-ending insistence that you are some kind of "journalist," in
> spite of never having gotten a fact right yet AND your amazing propensity
> for murdering the English language, can now be taken in toto as the
> building blocks upon which your digital and eternally-burning pyre will be
> constructed.
>
> Game over, Dink.
>
> You lose.
>
> Just like you *always* do.
>
> And the nice thing is, now, four full years after I blocked you on AIM and
> ignored every known IP block you log in to IRC from, as well as having to
> periodically damage my screen when you nymshift and I have to actually
> click on one of your messages in order to killfile you AGAIN..
You still respond.
Enough said. Please kill yourself before your daughter is forced to.
Thank you, have a nice day!
.there is
> nothing else that needs to be said. Thank you, Dink, for once and for all
> ensuring that nobody, ever, with the sense god gave a yellow squash, will
> ever, every take anything you say seriously again.
>
> I can finally stop defending myself and worrying that someone will take
you
> seriously - finally, I can say with confidence, "nobody who's opinion I
> have any concern for will ever take this person at their word again."
>
> Free at last, free at last, thank God Almighty, I am free at last.
>
> Welcome to your obsolescence, Alex.
C-C-C-Cainman
> The other one was too long for me, C-C-C-Cainman, so this is your
> attribution.
>
> >
> > "John Henry" <john...@lowgenius.com> wrote in message
> > news:Xns9266D1D3DD89Djo...@216.168.3.40...
> >> The other one was too long for me, The Mackerel, so this is your
> >> attribution.
> >>
> >> > Today, Sat, 10 Aug 2002 21:01:37 GMT, some person usenet,
> >> > Tehawk <ha...@tehawk.com> , decided to write:
> >> >
> >> >>On 10 Aug 2002 19:11:32 GMT, one of the millions and millions of
> >> >>the Hawk's fans, the person known only as Chad Bryant
> >> >><ch...@chadbryant.cjb.net> mumbled some gaga:
> >> >>
> >> > [SPANK!]
> >> >
> >> > Tehawk, why are you such a boring retard?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> Hi dink.
> >>
> >> *plonk*
> >
> > So because he thinks Tehawk is a fucking idiot, and disagrees with
> > what you've said, you think he's me and you "plonk" him.
> >
> > OKIE DOKIE
> >
> > You fucking idiot. You "plonked" me and yet you still piggyback
> > responses. Get a life you fucking drugged up name-dropping wanna-be
> > prick.
>
>
I notice that you completely dodge my point of you piggybacking responses to
me despite having "plonked" me.
>
> Don't you have someone's wife to harass, you midget psycho pedo?
Don't you have a daughter to care for, you poor excuse for a father?
C-C-C-Cainman
"®§åi¥å-jiñ Wîll®" <DBZi...@sowatchitontoonami.1830Eastern> wrote in
message news:aj34vh$t0$1...@news.umbc.edu...
> "Cainman" <noe...@here.invalid> wrote:
> > Don't. Not for one moment did I believe any of what is in that log.
See,
> > last week Chad and I had another AIM conversation
>
> Why do you IM Chad?
For the hell of it.
>
> --
> I put my life up for yours, see I love that girl
> Could you believe even my shadow's jealous
> My skin is mad at my flesh, my flesh hates my own bones
> My brain hates my heart, because my heart makes the songs...(Nas)
>
>
>
>
>
FunkyM
C'MON, BABY!!
> "Chad Bryant" <ch...@chadbryant.cjb.net> wrote in message
> news:aj2hlq$59o$0...@pita.alt.net...
> > This one defies description, yet explains itself perfectly.
> >
> > RSPW98 (1:00:22 AM): HI FATTY
> > CBryant215 (1:00:41 AM): are you looking for Chad?
> > RSPW98 (1:00:47 AM): Yep
> > RSPW98 (1:00:49 AM): Is he there?
> > CBryant215 (1:01:04 AM): he's in bed
> > RSPW98 (1:01:21 AM): Really? Early for him to be in bed
> > CBryant215 (1:01:41 AM): he has work at 5 in the morning
> > RSPW98 (1:01:50 AM): Wow that's early
> > CBryant215 (1:01:53 AM): this is his wife
> > RSPW98 (1:02:16 AM): Ah. How is he doing
> > CBryant215 (1:02:20 AM): he's fine
> > CBryant215 (1:02:27 AM): a bit overworked, but he's ok
> > CBryant215 (1:02:38 AM): are you from that RSPW group?
> > RSPW98 (1:02:45 AM): Yea
> > RSPW98 (1:02:51 AM): He knows me from there
> > RSPW98 (1:02:57 AM): Ever read it?
> > CBryant215 (1:03:05 AM): he's shown me a few posts
> > CBryant215 (1:03:13 AM): some of those people are insane
> > RSPW98 (1:03:46 AM): What time did he go to bed? He usually stays up late
> > CBryant215 (1:04:10 AM): he went to bed about 15 minutes ago
> > RSPW98 (1:04:41 AM): He has made some enemies in RSPW you know
> > CBryant215 (1:04:54 AM): in what way?
> > RSPW98 (1:05:26 AM): He has done some things and said some things that has
> > not
> > looked good for him.
> > CBryant215 (1:05:46 AM): like what?
> > RSPW98 (1:07:03 AM): Well-ell he has posted trying to get people to
> harrass
> > someone
> > else's parents, he has bothered someone and gotten him fired, things like
> > that.
> > CBryant215 (1:07:36 AM): that doesn't sound like Chad
> > CBryant215 (1:07:53 AM): he's been harassed by a couple of people from
> that
> > group,
> > though
> > CBryant215 (1:08:10 AM): some redneck kid from Georgia used to call all
> > hours of the
> > night when we lived in Utah
> > RSPW98 (1:08:25 AM): hang on, i'll brb
> > RSPW98 (1:09:22 AM): That's not how I heard it
> > RSPW98 (1:09:33 AM): The way I heard it Chad was harrassing someone and
> > that
> > person
> > was just harrassing him back. I could be wrong.
> > CBryant215 (1:09:39 AM): do you know who Alex Cain is?
> > RSPW98 (1:09:44 AM): No, I have no idea.
> > RSPW98 (1:09:48 AM): I've heard the name
> > RSPW98 (1:09:51 AM): But don't know who that person is.
> > RSPW98 (1:09:59 AM): Is he a friend of Chad's?
> > CBryant215 (1:10:18 AM): he's the redneck kid from Georgia that used to
> > call
> > us all the
> > time
> > CBryant215 (1:10:35 AM): Chad sais he was disturbed and psychotic
> > RSPW98 (1:10:38 AM): Oh. I thought that was someone called Steven
> > Signorelli
> > CBryant215 (1:10:46 AM): and that he was really short or something
> > CBryant215 (1:11:27 AM): be right back
> > CBryant215 (1:12:21 AM): I'm back
> > CBryant215 (1:12:28 AM): had to check on our youngest
> > RSPW98 (1:12:52 AM): Chad seems to be somewhat unstable online. Have you
> > ever
> > heard of someone called Steven Signorelli
> > CBryant215 (1:13:01 AM): I haven't
> > RSPW98 (1:14:01 AM): Hmm that's odd, Chad supposedly harrassed that person
> > over
> > and over again
> > CBryant215 (1:14:17 AM): I never heard anything about that
> > CBryant215 (1:14:24 AM): but that does not sound like Chad
> > RSPW98 (1:14:32 AM): What DOES sound like Chad
> > CBryant215 (1:15:17 AM): mild-mannered, polite, although he can be a bit
> > hot-headed
> > and outspoken if he really believes in something
> > CBryant215 (1:15:34 AM): he doesn't get along with either of my
> > parents...he
> > thinks
> > they're racists
> > RSPW98 (1:21:26 AM): Chad is a racist though.
> > CBryant215 (1:21:51 AM): absolutely not
> > RSPW98 (1:23:05 AM): Yes he is. Also he appears to have a problem with
> > reality.
> > RSPW98 (1:23:11 AM): And for some reason he doesn't like lawyers
> > RSPW98 (1:23:21 AM): And I think he may have a problem with getting
> > attention as well
> > CBryant215 (1:23:23 AM): you must not like him much, and I have no idea
> why
> > RSPW98 (1:23:39 AM): I'm one of his friends. I'm just calling it as I see
> > it.
> > CBryant215 (1:23:53 AM): you certainly don't sound like a friend
> > RSPW98 (1:25:48 AM): Then call me an "Acquaitance," Chad and I have known
> > each
> > other for a few years now. You ever hear of John Henry?
> > CBryant215 (1:26:13 AM): yeah, John Henry is one of Chad's good friends
> > RSPW98 (1:26:46 AM): I'm one of John's friends.
> > RSPW98 (1:26:52 AM): I met chad through John, on the Internet.
> > CBryant215 (1:27:29 AM): you are?
> > RSPW98 (1:29:33 AM): Otto Schwanz
> > RSPW98 (1:29:42 AM): I used to work for SCW
> > CBryant215 (1:30:10 AM): ok
> > RSPW98 (1:30:30 AM): Yea I went into a chat room on IRC one night and John
> > introduced me to Chad.
> > CBryant215 (1:30:31 AM): I don't know what SCW is
> > CBryant215 (1:30:41 AM): is that a wrestling company?
> > RSPW98 (1:30:47 AM): it is a wrestling federation, John used to help us
> > take
> > the ring
> > down and sell tickets.
> > CBryant215 (1:31:34 AM): Chad told me that John was a ring announcer and
> > manager
> > RSPW98 (1:32:10 AM): No he was never a manager, he did announce once but
> > that was
> > about it.
> > CBryant215 (1:32:14 AM): I don't pay much attention to wrestling, though
> > CBryant215 (1:32:37 AM): Chad took me to one of the Monday night shows
> > before we
> > were married, and I've seen him work at his own shows
> > RSPW98 (1:33:05 AM): So how is he as a wrestler
> > CBryant215 (1:33:12 AM): who, Chad?
> > RSPW98 (1:33:52 AM): yea
> > CBryant215 (1:34:03 AM): you're asking the wrong person
> > CBryant215 (1:34:08 AM): I don't know much about it
> > CBryant215 (1:34:16 AM): but I thought he was very entertaining
> > RSPW98 (1:34:45 AM): How could he wrestle with his bad back though
> > CBryant215 (1:35:03 AM): he worked through it
> > CBryant215 (1:35:07 AM): he loved doing it
> > RSPW98 (1:35:44 AM): By the way have you ever heard of a guy called Bob
> > Barnett?
> > RSPW98 (1:35:47 AM): Apparantly he lives near Chad
> > RSPW98 (1:35:54 AM): And wants to talk to him but Chad wont let him
> > CBryant215 (1:35:55 AM): I have not
> > RSPW98 (1:35:58 AM): I don't know, it's something like that
> > RSPW98 (1:37:20 AM): Chad has made some strange enemies online, if you
> read
> > some of
> > those posts you will see them
> > CBryant215 (1:37:21 AM): who is Bob Barnett?
> > RSPW98 (1:37:38 AM): I don't know, some lawyer guy who claims to have
> > Chad's
> > birth
> > certificate.
> > CBryant215 (1:37:54 AM): why would he want Chad's birth certificate?
> > RSPW98 (1:38:34 AM): Because apparantly Chad made him angry and so this
> guy
> > wants
> > to show Chad up
> > CBryant215 (1:39:07 AM): this is not the Chad I know
> > RSPW98 (1:39:42 AM): Maybe you need to ask him then, I don't know. All I
> > know is that
> > this Barnett person claims he has Chad's birth certificate.
> > RSPW98 (1:40:41 AM): He has mentioned something about a divorce
> certificate
> > too but I
> > don't know what that is about.
> > CBryant215 (1:40:49 AM): divorce?
> > RSPW98 (1:40:57 AM): I don't know. Something about Chad being divorced.
> > CBryant215 (1:41:14 AM): he's not
> > CBryant215 (1:41:25 AM): afer all, I would know if he was
> > RSPW98 (1:41:41 AM): Some people are saying that he is
> > CBryant215 (1:42:00 AM): well, he's not
> > RSPW98 (1:42:48 AM): What about him stopping a rape awhile back? I heard
> > many
> > people made fun about him making up some kind of story like that
> > CBryant215 (1:43:04 AM): he didn't make that up
> > RSPW98 (1:43:11 AM): really?
> > CBryant215 (1:43:16 AM): he put some sicko in the hospital
> > RSPW98 (1:43:24 AM): how long ago was that?
> > CBryant215 (1:43:43 AM): about three years
> > CBryant215 (1:43:51 AM): just before our oldest son was born
> > RSPW98 (1:44:33 AM): A lot of people were talking about how he made that
> > up.
> > He got
> > really attacked for that.
> > CBryant215 (1:44:45 AM): well, he didn't make it up
> > CBryant215 (1:45:04 AM): I thought it was a really heroic thing for him to
> > do
> > RSPW98 (1:45:26 AM): It just doesn't seem like the type of thing he would
> > do
> > thats all.
> > He went on IRC and got a lot of teasing for that.
> > RSPW98 (1:45:30 AM): do you ever go on IRC?
> > RSPW98 (1:45:37 AM): Chad is on there a lot
> > CBryant215 (1:46:00 AM): no
> > CBryant215 (1:46:02 AM): what is IRC?
> > RSPW98 (1:46:28 AM): Internet Relay Chat
> > RSPW98 (1:46:30 AM): Chad is on there a lot
> > CBryant215 (1:46:48 AM): does that have something to do with mirc?
> > RSPW98 (1:47:03 AM): No I think you are thinking of something else.
> > RSPW98 (1:47:09 AM): You should post to RSPW by the way
> > RSPW98 (1:47:11 AM): Chad gets picked on a lot
> > RSPW98 (1:47:15 AM): You could help defend him
> > RSPW98 (1:47:19 AM): John defends him a lot
> > RSPW98 (1:47:23 AM): John's a cool guy that way
> > CBryant215 (1:47:23 AM): isn't RSPW about wrestling?
> > RSPW98 (1:47:27 AM): no not always
> > CBryant215 (1:48:02 AM): it doesn't sound very interesting
> > RSPW98 (1:48:42 AM): It is. You should read it. I can give you a link to
> > read chad's
> > posts if you like
> > RSPW98 (1:48:52 AM): Chads posts to RSPW get archived all the time.
> > CBryant215 (1:49:24 AM): I'm not sure that would be all that fun to read
> > RSPW98 (1:49:37 AM): Why not?
> > CBryant215 (1:49:55 AM): if I want to know what Chad says, I'll talk to
> him
> > RSPW98 (1:50:18 AM): That sounds a little subserviant to me
> > CBryant215 (1:50:32 AM): what is that supposed to mean?
> > RSPW98 (1:50:57 AM): I mean it sounds like you need to know more about
> what
> > Chad
> > does that's all. He has made some people mad online and you should know
> > about it.
> > RSPW98 (1:50:58 AM):
> > http://groups.google.com/groups?as_epq=Chad%20Bryant&safe=images&ie=UTF-8&
> > oe=UTF-8&as_ugroup=alt.bonehead.john-henry&lr=lang_en&num=50&as_scoring=d
> > &hl=en
> > RSPW98 (1:51:06 AM): Click that link and you can read Chad's posts.
> > RSPW98 (1:51:33 AM): Don't get me wrong, I think Chad's a great guy. I'm
> > just saying
> > that if you're his better half that you need to know what he's up just
> like
> > he should know
> > what you are up to. Equality of the sexes.
> > RSPW98 (1:51:47 AM): Of course dont tell John Henry I said that * lol * He
> > doesn't
> > believe in that.
> > CBryant215 (1:52:32 AM): I don't know that much about John Henry
> > CBryant215 (1:53:06 AM): who is Cainman?
> > RSPW98 (1:53:11 AM): John is a cool guy, he's just a little crazy. Some
> > loser on the
> > Internet keeps bothering him.
> > RSPW98 (1:53:23 AM): Cainman? Probably some poster to the RSPW I guess.
> > CBryant215 (1:53:42 AM): is he connected to Alex Cain?
> > RSPW98 (1:53:55 AM): I don't know. I don't read the group much these days.
> > Too busy
> > as a wrestler.
> > CBryant215 (1:54:51 AM): seems like all of this stuff is just Cainman
> > insulting Chad
> > CBryant215 (1:55:06 AM): and none of these articles seem to be from Chad
> > CBryant215 (1:56:25 AM): whoever Cainman is, he sure seems like an idiot
> > RSPW98 (2:06:01 AM): I don't know...when I read those it looks like that
> > all
> > he does is
> > reply to them...that it's Chad's words.
> > CBryant215 (2:06:34 AM): Cainman must be a pretty unhappy person
> > RSPW98 (2:07:23 AM): I don't know. All I know is what I read on that
> page.
> > I usually
> > don't even read the group directly anymore - I just read through there.
> > CBryant215 (2:08:11 AM): I just don't seem to find any of Chad's
> > posts...just responses
> > from that Cainman idiot
> > RSPW98 (2:08:38 AM): No you don't get what I'm saying. It looks like that
> > the posts are
> > from Chad. What Cainman is replying to is from Chad.
> > CBryant215 (2:09:11 AM): I see Cainman replying to Chad and being
> harassing
> > and rude
> > RSPW98 (2:09:28 AM): But are you reading Chad's part of the posts
> > CBryant215 (2:09:55 AM): yes, and Cainman is quite rude
> > RSPW98 (2:10:15 AM): What about Chad's behavior?
> > CBryant215 (2:10:39 AM): seems like Chad is guilty of having an opinion
> > that
> > Cainman
> > seems to disagree with
> > CBryant215 (2:11:00 AM): and instead of sticking to trhe topic at hand, he
> > just posts
> > insults and profanities
> > RSPW98 (2:11:14 AM): Chad does that all the time it seems.
> > CBryant215 (2:11:35 AM): not that I have noticed
> > CBryant215 (2:11:50 AM): Chad was a good debater in high school
> > CBryant215 (2:11:56 AM): he can still argue
> > RSPW98 (2:12:26 AM): Well I'm not one to say anything but from what I am
> > reading in
> > the webpage it seems to me that many people dislike Chad because he avoids
> > the
> > subject when it is given to him.
> > RSPW98 (2:12:35 AM): Like I read one last week about how Chad had said
> > there
> > were
> > lies about him on a webpage
> > RSPW98 (2:12:42 AM): But when asked which lies were there he never
> answered
> > RSPW98 (2:12:48 AM): I saw that webpage too, it was funny
> > CBryant215 (2:13:07 AM): I doubt it
> > RSPW98 (2:13:42 AM): Well it would take me a few minutes but I could
> > probably find the
> > link
> > RSPW98 (2:13:54 AM): Chad has said some stupid stuff on IRC, this even he
> > will admit to
> > * lol *
> > RSPW98 (2:14:14 AM): But you know what? Chad has said some even stupider
> > stuff on
> > AIM. Seriously. Not to me of course.
> > CBryant215 (2:14:46 AM): everyone says stupid things
> > CBryant215 (2:14:54 AM): like whoever though me and Chad were divorced
> > RSPW98 (2:15:26 AM): Well Chad says a lot of stupid stuff. Like I heard
> > last week he
> > said he had a girlfriend.
> > CBryant215 (2:15:56 AM): when did he say this?
> > RSPW98 (2:16:48 AM): I don't really remember. I think it was July 23 at
> > 2:27 a.m.
> > CBryant215 (2:17:05 AM): I doubt that
> > RSPW98 (2:17:46 AM): Well supposedly he told someone that he had a
> > girlfriend who
> > was staying with him and had known him for about a year now. And that
> Chad
> > was
> > asleep on the couch. I don't know really, I get most of my information
> > from
> > e-mail and
> > the webpage. It was something like that.
> > CBryant215 (2:17:53 AM): you don't seem like much of a friend
> > RSPW98 (2:18:07 AM): I told you, I'm not really a friend, I'm an
> > acquaintance. I've
> > known him for awhile.
> > CBryant215 (2:19:02 AM): maybe he was playing around with someone
> > CBryant215 (2:19:15 AM): he doesn't have a girlfriend
> > RSPW98 (2:19:40 AM): I don't know. Someone said in an e-mail, maybe that
> > Barnett
> > guy, that at the same time Chad was supposed to be sleeping on the couch,
> > he
> > was
> > posting to the Internet.
> > RSPW98 (2:19:46 AM): I've got that e-mail somewhere, I just need to find
> > it.
> > CBryant215 (2:20:01 AM): I have no idea what you're talking about
> > CBryant215 (2:20:07 AM): Chad never sleeps on the couch
> > CBryant215 (2:20:28 AM): is that all RSPW does?
> > RSPW98 (2:20:35 AM): Well there's a log somewhere out there, I dont know
> > where t
> > hough
> > CBryant215 (2:20:36 AM): make up lies about certain people?
> > RSPW98 (2:20:53 AM): What do you mean
> > CBryant215 (2:21:11 AM): if you don't have any proof, you shouldn't talk
> > about it
> > CBryant215 (2:21:21 AM): lest you bear false witness against thy neighbor
> > CBryant215 (2:21:26 AM): that's what the Bible says
> > RSPW98 (2:21:34 AM): Well I suppose I could try to find the e-mail
> > CBryant215 (2:21:45 AM): maybe you should
> > RSPW98 (2:22:21 AM): it might take a few minutes, brb
> > CBryant215 (2:22:27 AM): ok
> > RSPW98 (2:30:07 AM): CBryant215: this is chads girlfirend he is asleep
> > right now
> >
> > RSPW98 (2:30:18 AM): CBryant215: he is not feelin to good
> >
> > RSPW98 (2:30:31 AM): that was probably fake though
> > CBryant215 (2:30:43 AM): probably
> > RSPW98 (2:30:51 AM): that was july 23 though
> > CBryant215 (2:33:29 AM): who said that was real?
> > RSPW98 (2:35:19 AM): I don't know, but why would he make that up?
> > CBryant215 (2:35:35 AM): maybe it was that Alex Cain idiot
> > CBryant215 (2:35:41 AM): he seems to hate Chad a lot
> > RSPW98 (2:35:51 AM): Probably not. I haven't seen him in awhile on the
> > Internet.
> > RSPW98 (2:36:03 AM): I don't think he even posts anymore
> > CBryant215 (2:36:06 AM): is he the same guy as Cainman?
> > RSPW98 (2:36:14 AM): No, that's someone impersonating him I think
> > CBryant215 (2:36:22 AM): ok
> > RSPW98 (2:36:22 AM): I talked to Alex Cain once, he is a cool guy.
> > RSPW98 (2:36:27 AM): Doesn't sound like the kind of thing he would do
> > CBryant215 (2:36:44 AM): he used to call our house all the time
> > CBryant215 (2:36:57 AM): he'd yell into the phone or stick it up to the TV
> > RSPW98 (2:36:57 AM): I don't think he would do that.
> > CBryant215 (2:37:05 AM): he did
> > RSPW98 (2:37:19 AM): Doesn't sound like something he would do. That was
> > probably
> > just made up.
> > CBryant215 (2:37:32 AM): I really doubt it
> > CBryant215 (2:37:44 AM): especially since I saw him brag about it to
> > Chad..Chad
> > showed me
> > RSPW98 (2:38:12 AM): Do you believe everything you see?
> > CBryant215 (2:38:30 AM): I saw it with my own eyes
> > CBryant215 (2:38:36 AM): he bragged about it
> > RSPW98 (2:38:37 AM): What did he show you
> > CBryant215 (2:38:44 AM): something in mirc
> > RSPW98 (2:38:54 AM): Maybe he showed you wrong then.
> > CBryant215 (2:39:18 AM): I don't think so
> > CBryant215 (2:39:26 AM): Chad's pretty good with computer stuff
> > CBryant215 (2:39:50 AM): what's that nickname for Alex Cain?
> > CBryant215 (2:39:53 AM): do you know?
> > CBryant215 (2:39:57 AM): Chad uses it a lot
> > RSPW98 (2:40:06 AM): Hmmm I don't know offhand
> > RSPW98 (2:40:19 AM): Check the webpage.
> > CBryant215 (2:40:24 AM): something like Stink or Twink
> > RSPW98 (2:40:39 AM): Someone said they stopped by Chad's workplace last
> > week
> > and
> > that he had a bruise or something on his face.
> > RSPW98 (2:40:42 AM): Did he hurt himself?
> > RSPW98 (2:40:48 AM): Like fall down or whatever
> >
> > CBryant215 (2:41:21 AM): Chad didn't have a bruise or anything last week
> > RSPW98 (2:41:38 AM): Oh, ok.
> > RSPW98 (2:41:46 AM): Maybe it was just a scar then.
> > CBryant215 (2:41:51 AM): was that another lie?
> > CBryant215 (2:42:00 AM): Chad doesn't have any scars on his face, either
> > RSPW98 (2:42:03 AM): I don't know. Chad lies a lot I think.
> > CBryant215 (2:42:12 AM): well, except for a small mark above his eyebrow
> > CBryant215 (2:42:30 AM): and a scar or two on his forehead from using a
> > razor
> > blade...some wrestling thing
> > RSPW98 (2:42:52 AM): Crap, my phone is ringing, I need to go. Tell Chad
> > that Otto said
> > hi, he'll know who I mean. TTYL
> > CBryant215 (2:43:00 AM): right
> > CBryant215 (2:43:08 AM): can I show this to Chad?
> > RSPW98 (2:43:13 AM): Surer
> > RSPW98 (2:43:15 AM): Sure
> > CBryant215 (2:43:18 AM): he'll probably want to read it
> > RSPW98 (2:43:19 AM): tell him Otto says hi
> > CBryant215 (2:43:22 AM): I will
> > RSPW98 (2:44:23 AM): And ask him why he stays up so late impersonating
> > fictional
> > girlfriends and insulting people on the Internet. That makes him look
> like
> > an idiot.
> > Somebody said he was fat too. I tend to agree. Don't tell him I said so
> > but
> > he looks like
> > a bloated walrus. Just paint two bananas white and stuff them in his mouth
> > and you have
> > a good match * lol * goodnight.
> > RSPW98 signed off at 2:44:29 AM.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Chad Bryant
> > www.chadbryant.cjb.net
> >
> > "...a Mormon Lenny Bruce..." - General Calzone
> >
> > "An artist must know how to convince others of the truth of his lies."
> > - Pablo Picasso
C-C-C-Cainman
> And that's why you're sitting there with a bad leg, and that's why I
> kicked your leg outta your leg, "John Henry"!
>
> >>>I'm still waiting for whatever is supposed to happen to me over "the
> >>>next several days" as you claim.
> >
> > Oh, well, then, let me clear up your confusion.
> >
> > your own theory that Chad was divorced...you've been making this claim
> > for months, and yet the minute Chad claimed to be his wife, you were
> > to take THAT ongoing ruse of yours. And I guess now RSPW knows how
> > little you believe your own bullshit about everything else, too.
>
concerning
> the 'facts' he knows abut my personal life - namely, I can slip in damn
> near anything remotely scandalous about myself into a post (or IM :) ),
and
> Dink will run around in circles for weeks.
Not if it's proven true. Guess who's got a copy of your divorce
certificate, fat boy?
>
> It's a public service I'm happy to perform - every minute he spends holed
> up in front of his computer obsessing over me is a minute where some
> underage person in Georgia isn't being ogled by Milledgeville's Midget
> Menace.
Wow, another pedophile reference and the gratituous "midget" remark to boot!
How predictable you are, Chickenshit.
>
> > Secondly, I'd like to point out that there is *no possible way* for
> > you to reasonably claim that you believed this was anyone but Anna.
>
> He's wanted to talk to my wife for years
Not really. Actually all I want to know is what she could possibly have
been drinking on your wedding day to marry you. I'm guessing whiskey or a
really strong type of liquor. I don't think there's enough beers on the
planet to get someone hammered enough to wed you.
> - he was threatening for several
> months in 2000 to be in the midst of "preparing" a packet of information"
> that would somehow make its way to her, and caue her to divorce me.
Really? Cool.
>In the
> absence of his own long-term relationship (one which ended with his
live-in
> fucking a 7-11 manager in their one-bedroom hovel while Dink was relegated
> to couch patrol),
Bzzzt! Wrong again, Fatlee. Try obsessing a little harder, maybe you'll get
lucky and come across a snippet of truth.
>he longed to sabotage mine. He thought he finally had his
> chance, but alas, Dink fell short again. Such is the story of his life -
> always falling short.
Says the Amazing Lard-O.
>
> My wife does know who Dink is, since she answered several phone calls
> placed by him over Dialpad (chickenshit was too scared and cheap to use a
> real phone for his interstate harassment),
Got proof?
> and had to listen to his
> retarded redneck drawl make obscene statements. Of course, ever since Dink
> has thought I got a divorce, he's laid off the phone calls (he doesn't
have
> my numbers anyway),
You keep on believing that.
>so there hasn't been any harassment. Don't think that
> wasn't a desired result.
True. You don't think.
>
> > There is nothing in this log that indicates anything other than that
> > you got your ignorant ass sucked in to the world's most transparent
> > game of "what's my line." You bought it hook line and sinker, Dink -
> > and in your mad rush to sabotage Chad Bryant's offline life at what
> > you thought was your first real opportunity, you have removed any
> > chance of a mitigating circumstance with which you can absolve
> > yourself of what is, in reality, a crime. Several of them actually,
> > ranging from impersonation of a public figure (Bo Dupp) to attempted
> > alienation of affection in trying to turn Chad's wife against him.
>
> His own stupidity did him in, and he can't weasel his midget ass out of
> this one.
>
There's no need to "weasel" out of anything. You acted like an idiot, plain
and simple. You trolled no one. I didn't believe you for a minute. Do you
*seriously* think that even if I *did* believe it was Annaliese on the other
end, that I would believe that she'd be on the same account as your
"girlfriend?"
Of course you completely fucked up the "girlfriend" AIM -- your posts timed
you to be online when your "girlfriend" said you were "asleep." And of
course since I refused to give you attention through that you got attention
another way. You are such a dumbass Chad.
> > And unlike your midnight telephone calls, falsified police reports,
> > and repeated attempts to discern and contact both my and Chad's
> > employers over the last 5 years, this one is fully documented.
>
> Documented, time-stamped, etc.
>
> > That's right, folks, Alex Cain is so ashamed of himself that he'd
> > rather be thought of as a known child rapist, than himself.
>
> Read the thread from last year that Dink had with RtS where he
> mentioned/flaunted having seen his younger sisters naked, and someday
> having the opportunity to see children naked again if he were to join a
> nudist colony (disgusting, but apparently true - Dink is a practicing
> "naturist", at least within the confines of his own trailer).
news://rec.nude
Try reading it sometime, Lard-Ass.
>He's a
> psychosexual timebomb, waiting to explode.
* ROFL * Out of all the obsessive bullshit you've ever said about me,
that's definitely near the top of the list.
>
> > Here's a good part - this is where Chad was going to cut you aff at
> > the 20- minute mark, but I talked him out of it:
(snip the rest of Captain Obsesso's unbelievably bullshit-filled posting)
C-C-C-Cainman
"ScottZf" <sco...@dwave.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9267CA1E73407emykatdomjil@emykatdomjil...
> John Henry <john...@lowgenius.com> posted this in
> alt.usenet.kooks:
>
> > you have something that "flag anything crossposted to a wrestling
> > newsgroup?" ditto tehawk? buddy, you're about 3 steps away from
> > Dink status.
> >
> It's flagged (by somthing built-into my reader - you should know as
> you have the same reader) so I don't have to read it if I don't want
> to. But a dumb wrasslin' fan like you can't figure that out so I'm
> telling you for your future reference.
He's not a dope -- he's just stupid.
http://www.geocities.com/thejohnhenrykookmuseum
http://www.geocities.com/nsomnia_98/dejongnuts.html
Allan J. Benson
[Snipped.]
I didn't read all of this, but am I the only one who
thinks it seemed like Cain was just playing along
for whatever reason? It certainly read to me like
he was humouring Bryant for however many hours on end,
which I suppose is reason enough to laugh at this.
OTOH, I can't believe Bryant would actually believe
Dink was being taken in and keep pretending to be
his own wife for so long, which just makes him
appear to be obsessed and delusional. Unless that's
his current "gimmick"? I lost track on my week off.
Oh well, at least it was slightly entertaining this
time. :-)
--
If I can be serious for a moment...
******************************************************
"You can speak your mind, but not on my time."
- Billy Joel
Coltrane's Lamentation
news:ajm699$bc1$1...@freenet9.carleton.ca...
> John Henry (john...@lowgenius.com) writes:
> [Snipped.]
>
> I didn't read all of this, but am I the only one who
> thinks it seemed like Cain was just playing along
> for whatever reason?
Allan, this is Alex Cain. I think it's pretty obvious that he was getting
worked.
Yep, I'd say you're the only one, besides Alex.
-Coltrane
C-C-C-Cainman
> The other one was too long for me, C-C-C-Cainman, so this is your
> attribution.
>
> as you tried to "turn" his wife against him.
Cool! You're going to show the circle jerk between the two of you, and post
a bunch of unnecessary bullshit trying to somehow "prove" that you were "in"
on everything the whole time.
You truly are an insane idiot.
I guess this also puts to rest the idea of you having "killfiled" me, huh?
Fucking coward.
>
> As promised, I present to the wonderful denizens of Usenet....Behind The
> Dink, or, How We Laughed When Dink Finally Went Overboard For Good. As
> before, Chad and Dink runs from 1am to 3am (PST), Chad and John runs from
> 4am to 6am (EST).
>
(snip)
C-C-C-Cainman
> The other one was too long for me, C-C-C-Cainman, so this is your
> attribution.
So much for you having "killfiled" me huh Stumpy?
> You still trying to pass off those obvious fakes as legit?
Yea, obvious fakes. That's right. They're all fakes. Fakes. Yea. Right.
Gawd, you're a clueless fuck, Stumpy.
> God you're a
> moron, Dink. And from what I've seen of Scott, he's just as ignorant.
But both of us agree on one thing -- you're a dumbass.
>
> God help us, but there will never be a shortage of egoboosters on Usenet.
> Thanks for making sure that I'll never feel like the *biggest* idiot on
> the face of th eplanet, guys.
Not until you acknowledge it at least.
>
> --
> John Henry
> http://www.lowgenius.com
> Making High-Quality Holy Hamburger from
> Only The Finest USDA Prime Sacred Cows
> Serving Usenet Since 1996
> What luck for rulers, that men do not think - Adolf Hitler
Allan J. Benson
> And that's why you're sitting there with a bad leg, and that's why I kicked
>
> When did you become the Bitchy Little Apologist for every kook and half-wit
> on this newsgroup?
It never ceases to amaze me that so many on this
newsgroup always have the same reaction whenever
someone posts a negative opinion about their
behaviour here. I call it the 3Ds: Dodge the issue;
Defame those who disagree; claim Defeat.
The difference between Bryant and Cain really is less
than a nickle.
Krusty's other account
> newsgroup always have the same reaction whenever
> someone posts a negative opinion about their
> behaviour here. I call it the 3Ds: Dodge the issue;
> Defame those who disagree; claim Defeat.
>
> The difference between Bryant and Cain really is less
> than a nickle.
The funny thing is, these are the very same people crying endlessly about
wanting people to think for themselves, then the instant someone does, they
label them a sheep, dodge the issue completely, then claim you're part of a
whole groupwide conspiracy against them and that they've owned you.
The best is when they 'killfile' you, then rant about you by proxy. Reply to
the reply, yet claim you're "over it". Best...dodge...ever...
Kudos to Benson for using his head and saying what he thinks succinctly
without pasting anything or exceeding 800+ lines to talk circles around you.
MikeyJericholic
>wanting people to think for themselves, then the instant someone does, they
>label them a sheep, dodge the issue completely,
John Henry completely dodged the issue I brought up about how he thinks America
is the defender of freedom, yet he doesn't want the USA to use any force in
order to defend freedom.
"I say to our enemys, we are coming, God may show you mercy, we will not. "
Senator John McCain
C-C-C-Cainman
"MikeyJericholic" <mikeyje...@aol.comnojunk> wrote in message
news:20020818184546...@mb-mq.aol.com...
> >The funny thing is, these are the very same people crying endlessly about
> >wanting people to think for themselves, then the instant someone does,
they
> >label them a sheep, dodge the issue completely,
>
> John Henry completely dodged the issue I brought up about how he thinks
America
> is the defender of freedom, yet he doesn't want the USA to use any force
in
> order to defend freedom.
Of course he did. That's just what John does. Remember, if you don't think
like he does, you're wrong.
Allan J. Benson
> And that's why you're sitting there with a bad leg, and that's why I
> kicked your leg outta your leg, "Allan J. Benson"!
>
>>> When did you become the Bitchy Little Apologist for every kook and
>>> half-wit on this newsgroup?
>>
>> It never ceases to amaze me that so many on this
>> newsgroup always have the same reaction whenever
>> someone posts a negative opinion about their
>> behaviour here. I call it the 3Ds: Dodge the issue;
>> Defame those who disagree; claim Defeat.
>>
>> The difference between Bryant and Cain really is less
>> than a nickle.
>
> the mindless scum that posts here.
As the section of my post that you edited out clearly
shows, I am not an Alex Cain fan and I wasn't defending
him, I was just calling it like I read it.
> Colour me very disappointed by your downfall.
That mirrors my thoughts about you, troll.
Marco262
C-C-C-Cainman <noe...@what.are.you.nuts> wrote in message
news:um0a6q2...@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "MikeyJericholic" <mikeyje...@aol.comnojunk> wrote in message
> news:20020818184546...@mb-mq.aol.com...
> > >The funny thing is, these are the very same people crying endlessly
about
> > >wanting people to think for themselves, then the instant someone does,
> they
> > >label them a sheep, dodge the issue completely,
> >
> > John Henry completely dodged the issue I brought up about how he thinks
> America
> > is the defender of freedom, yet he doesn't want the USA to use any force
> in
> > order to defend freedom.
>
> Of course he did. That's just what John does. Remember, if you don't
think
> like he does, you're wrong.
Presidents have historically used the America's economic power instead of
our military power to enforce issues. I'd quote exactly which ones, but I
don't have my history notes handy, and I'm leaving in 5 minutes.
C-C-C-Cainman
"Allan J. Benson" <cc...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote in message
news:ajpeb8$asi$1...@freenet9.carleton.ca...
> Chad Bryant (ch...@chadbryant.cjb.net) writes:
> > And that's why you're sitting there with a bad leg, and that's why I
> > kicked your leg outta your leg, "Allan J. Benson"!
> >
> >>> When did you become the Bitchy Little Apologist for every kook and
> >>> half-wit on this newsgroup?
> >>
> >> It never ceases to amaze me that so many on this
> >> newsgroup always have the same reaction whenever
> >> someone posts a negative opinion about their
> >> behaviour here. I call it the 3Ds: Dodge the issue;
> >> Defame those who disagree; claim Defeat.
> >>
> >> The difference between Bryant and Cain really is less
> >> than a nickle.
> >
> > It never ceases to amaze me how some people will actually attempt to
defend
> > the mindless scum that posts here.
>
> As the section of my post that you edited out clearly
> shows, I am not an Alex Cain fan and I wasn't defending
> him, I was just calling it like I read it.
Of course you weren't, and you don't have to. He's just a cowardly loser
who doesn't like getting bitch-slapped.
>
> > Colour me very disappointed by your downfall.
>
> That mirrors my thoughts about you, troll.
ooooo!
C-C-C-Cainman
> And that's why you're sitting there with a bad leg, and that's why I
> kicked your leg outta your leg, "Allan J. Benson"!
>
> >>>> When did you become the Bitchy Little Apologist for every kook and
> >>>> half-wit on this newsgroup?
> >>>
> >>> It never ceases to amaze me that so many on this
> >>> newsgroup always have the same reaction whenever
> >>> someone posts a negative opinion about their
> >>> behaviour here. I call it the 3Ds: Dodge the issue;
> >>> Defame those who disagree; claim Defeat.
> >>>
> >>> The difference between Bryant and Cain really is less
> >>> than a nickle.
> >>
> >> It never ceases to amaze me how some people will actually attempt to
> >> defend the mindless scum that posts here.
> >
> > As the section of my post that you edited out clearly
> > shows, I am not an Alex Cain fan and I wasn't defending
> > him, I was just calling it like I read it.
>
So when he makes a valid point of how you removed information which helped
to prove the point that he just reiterated, the BEST you can do is call him
names and infer that he's a possible racist?
Pathetic. Just pathetic.
>
> >> Colour me very disappointed by your downfall.
> >
> > That mirrors my thoughts about you, troll.
>
> The t-word holds none of the power and meaning it once did.
Not to you perhaps.
> You can top
> using it now.
You can never top yourself. You're always going to be an idiot.
Allan J. Benson
> And that's why you're sitting there with a bad leg, and that's why I
> kicked your leg outta your leg, "Allan J. Benson"!
>
>>>> newsgroup always have the same reaction whenever
>>>> someone posts a negative opinion about their
>>>> behaviour here. I call it the 3Ds: Dodge the issue;
>>>> Defame those who disagree; claim Defeat.
>>>>
>>>> The difference between Bryant and Cain really is less
>>>> than a nickle.
>>>
>>> It never ceases to amaze me how some people will actually attempt to
>>> defend the mindless scum that posts here.
>>
>> As the section of my post that you edited out clearly
>> shows, I am not an Alex Cain fan and I wasn't defending
>> him, I was just calling it like I read it.
>
Ah, here we have the 3Ds again:
1. Dodge the issue. Which you have by ignoring that
I said Cain is pretty much as bad as you, IMO.
2. Defame those who disagree with you. Which you did
by saying I somehow misrepresented your argument and
defend people of poor character.
3. Claim defeat. Which you did by by saying I'm
somehow acting differently than I used to, which
anyone who's been here more than a few months knows
is a complete fallacy.
All I did was offer my opinion on how I read the log
in question and you now make up crap like you claim
others do to you. You play the hypocrite very well.
Is that also part of your "gimmick"?
>>> Colour me very disappointed by your downfall.
>>
>> That mirrors my thoughts about you, troll.
>
> The t-word holds none of the power and meaning it once did. You can top
> using it now.
Nonetheless, I think it's still accurate in your case.
You make ad hominem attacks rather than address the
issues and you've already claimed your posts are
designed to elicit an angry response from people
for your own amusement. But if you throw away your
morals and self respect because a newsgroup goes
to crap, that's your choice, I suppose.
I hope someday you decide to stop being a "tard"
as you so elloquently put it, as you used to be
a pretty good poster.
C-C-C-Cainman
*sniff*
That was beautiful, man.
FunkyM
Well we're living here in Allantown
And he calls all the posters here clowns
Out in Vegas Chad is killing time
Saying "manwhore"
Posting all night
Well they fought like it was another World War
Let each other know how much they deplore
Al said Chad turned into a troll
Made everyone dance
His posts started to blow
And we're living here in Allantown
But the Chad didn't stay lying down
And he started posting lots of flames
Well we're waiting here in Allantown
For old Allan J. to start tapping out
Because Chad told him he has changed
His posts suck hard
Defended Alex Cain
So the newsgroup sat backs to the wall
But they never cared about it at all
No they never thought that it was real
Chad was a joke
Al's not a big deal
And we're waiting here in Allantown
But they're still running this into the ground
And the newsgroup yawned away
Chad thought he got some pretty good shots
Al said Chad always gave out what he got
But the group doesn't care this thread takes place
Cause Chad posted the American flag is a disgrace
Well I'm living here in Allantown
And I don't think he's wearing a frown
But he doesn't like Chad kooking out
And we're living here in Allantown
C'MON, BABY!!
Allan J. Benson
> "Allan J. Benson" <cc...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote in message
> news:ajpjq9$hn4$1...@freenet9.carleton.ca...
>
>
> That was beautiful, man.
Don't patronize me. I've only ignored you because it's
always been clear exactly what you are and why you
aren't worth the time and aggrivation.
Allan J. Benson
> Here's one for the Allan Benson vs Chad Bryant flamewar:
Good song. Keep it up and one day maybe you'll
write a line as good as Satyr.
MikeyJericholic
>to prove the point that he just reiterated, the BEST you can do is call him
>names and infer that he's a possible racist?
>
I'm getting sick and tired of Chad calling me a bigot, and racist. If I am a
bigot for stating that he is fat, so be it. But I am not racist, and if the
past is any indication, Chad is the racist.
Tehawk
Hawk's fans, the person known only as cc...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Allan
J. Benson) mumbled some gaga:
>John Henry (john...@lowgenius.com) writes:
>[Snipped.]
>
>I didn't read all of this, but am I the only one who
>thinks it seemed like Cain was just playing along
>for whatever reason?
Judging by the responses of everyone else who replied, yes.
Tehawk ©2002
The Master of Mind Games
ICQ #4610826
http://www.tehawk.com
http://home.earthlink.net/~tehawk
Check Out My Pics Of The 20th Annual Mermaid Parade
http://members.fortunecity.com/tehawk/mp02h1.html
C-C-C-Cainman
> "C-C-C-Cainman" (noe...@what.are.you.nuts) writes:
> > "Allan J. Benson" <cc...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote in message
> > news:ajpjq9$hn4$1...@freenet9.carleton.ca...
> >
> > *sniff*
> >
> > That was beautiful, man.
>
> Don't patronize me.
I'm not patronizing you. Pass the salt.
>I've only ignored you because it's
> always been clear exactly what you are and why you
> aren't worth the time and aggrivation.
Really? Cool.
C-C-C-Cainman
"MikeyJericholic" <mikeyje...@aol.comnojunk> wrote in message
> >So when he makes a valid point of how you removed information which
helped
> >to prove the point that he just reiterated, the BEST you can do is call
him
> >names and infer that he's a possible racist?
> >
>
> I'm getting sick and tired of Chad calling me a bigot, and racist. If I
am a
> bigot for stating that he is fat, so be it. But I am not racist, and if
the
> past is any indication, Chad is the racist.
>
Don't expect him to change his attitude on that anytime soon. It's kind of
like how he kept claiming that Barnett distributed porn to minors, but
nowhere in the post in question could someone conclude that the person who
posted was a minor. Even after this was pointed out to Chad both on Usenet
and in e-mail, he still kept it up. You'll find that one thing about Chad
is that he is just *desperate* for attention. A good example is the log
which started this thread. See, a week prior, Chad posed as his
"girlfriend" who had known him for "over a year." Chad was supposed to be
"asleep on the couch" as the girlfriend in question was on his CBryant215
AIM account. He fucked that up (badly) by posting to Usenet during the
times he was supposed to be "asleep."
Well, he waited a week or so, and when the log didn't show up (since I saw
it for the pathetic troll that it was), he tried again and what the thread
in question is what went down. Of course, I didn't believe it for an
instant (c'mon -- even if I bought the bullshit of him sharing his AIM
account with his girlfriend [just forget about the whole "online while
asleep" thing], why would his wife be on the same account a week later?) and
so since I *still* wouldn't post it, Chad had to post the log himself.
Essentially with Chad, if he finds something that he thinks he can "use" to
"work" (read : lie about and look like an idiot) people then he will hold
onto it as much as he can. Pete Panaro graduated from NYU almost two years
ago but Chad still uses "fry cook" as an insult, the same way he uses
"midget" for me. You have about as much of a chance as getting him to drop
the namecalling towards you as he has as much of a chance of getting
remarried.
C-C-C-Cainman
"Tehawk" <ha...@tehawk.com> wrote in message
news:r5u0mu0r0dgco6cga...@4ax.com...
> On 17 Aug 2002 18:56:41 GMT, one of the millions and millions of the
> Hawk's fans, the person known only as cc...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Allan
> J. Benson) mumbled some gaga:
>
> >John Henry (john...@lowgenius.com) writes:
> >[Snipped.]
> >
> >I didn't read all of this, but am I the only one who
> >thinks it seemed like Cain was just playing along
> >for whatever reason?
>
> Judging by the responses of everyone else who replied, yes.
Sherlock Tehawk on the case! Everybody give him room, and mind the bubbles
from the pipe!
MikeyJericholic
>ago but Chad still uses "fry cook" as an insult, the same way he uses
>"midget" for me.
Ha! Yet he calls me the bigot. :-) Chad was making light of the death of
Drowning Pool's lead singer earlier today. How low can he go?
C-C-C-Cainman
"MikeyJericholic" <mikeyje...@aol.comnojunk> wrote in message
> > Pete Panaro graduated from NYU almost two years
> >ago but Chad still uses "fry cook" as an insult, the same way he uses
> >"midget" for me.
>
> Ha! Yet he calls me the bigot. :-) Chad was making light of the death
of
> Drowning Pool's lead singer earlier today. How low can he go?
Oh you'd be surprised. He hasn't gone as low as Stumpy DeJong yet (Stumpy
admitted to pranking his own MOTHER over the phone, and awhile back said he
would slap someone in a wheelchair), but I honestly don't think we've seen
Chad hit absolute bottom yet. Stumpy DeJong has hit it and stuck to the
floor, but I think Chad still has a few feet to go. He's getting a LOT
closer as of late though, and I have to wonder if the anniversary of 9-11
won't cause him to get down there and join Stumpy DeJong like a freshly
chewed-piece of gum.
The Anvil
> >So when he makes a valid point of how you removed information which helped
> >to prove the point that he just reiterated, the BEST you can do is call him
> >names and infer that he's a possible racist?
> >
>
> I'm getting sick and tired of Chad calling me a bigot, and racist. If I am a
> bigot for stating that he is fat, so be it. But I am not racist, and if the
> past is any indication, Chad is the racist.
Anyone who would defend Pete Panaro is a bigot and racist by proxy.
FunkyM
> FunkyM (fun...@my-deja.com) writes:
> > Here's one for the Allan Benson vs Chad Bryant flamewar:
>
> Good song. Keep it up and one day maybe you'll
> write a line as good as Satyr.
Oops! Sorry, maybe FunkyM should have chosen "You're always a woman"!
Hahaha!!
C'MON, BABY!!
Stefan
just retarded. Let it go if you hate this. If you really get off on these
feuds -- just admit it.
Stefan
"John Henry" <john...@lowgenius.com> wrote in message
news:Xns926D703129A9Ejo...@216.168.3.40...
> The other one was too long for me, C-C-C-Cainman, so this is your
> attribution.
>
> You were warned, cunt. Now, see how hard Chad and I were laughing at you
> as you tried to "turn" his wife against him.
>
> As promised, I present to the wonderful denizens of Usenet....Behind The
> Dink, or, How We Laughed When Dink Finally Went Overboard For Good. As
> before, Chad and Dink runs from 1am to 3am (PST), Chad and John runs from
> 4am to 6am (EST).
>
> Hey, can someone post this to Dink's new group? I forgot the name of it.
>
>
> CBryant215 (4:03:00 AM): RSPW98 (1:00:22 AM): HI FATTY
> CBryant215 (1:00:41 AM): are you looking for Chad?
> RSPW98 (1:00:47 AM): Yep
> RSPW98 (1:00:49 AM): Is he there?
> CBryant215 (1:01:04 AM): he's in bed
> RSPW98 (1:01:21 AM): Really? Early for him to be in bed
> CBryant215 (1:01:41 AM): he has work at 5 in the morning
> RSPW98 (1:01:50 AM): Wow that's early
> CBryant215 (1:01:53 AM): this is his wife
> LowGeenyus (4:03:27 AM): haaaaahhahahahahaha
> LowGeenyus (4:03:34 AM): *crickets chirping*
> CBryant215 (4:03:57 AM): RSPW98 (1:02:16 AM): Ah. How is he doing
> CBryant215 (1:02:20 AM): he's fine
> CBryant215 (1:02:27 AM): a bit overworked, but he's ok
> CBryant215 (1:02:38 AM): are you from that RSPW group?
> RSPW98 (1:02:45 AM): Yea
> RSPW98 (1:02:51 AM): He knows me from there
> RSPW98 (1:02:57 AM): Ever read it?
> CBryant215 (1:03:05 AM): he's shown me a few posts
> CBryant215 (1:03:13 AM): some of those people are insane
> LowGeenyus (4:04:15 AM): lolol
> CBryant215 (4:04:28 AM): dude
> LowGeenyus (4:04:32 AM): $5 says this is posted before 4amPST
> CBryant215 (4:04:35 AM): he's buying this
> CBryant215 (4:04:49 AM): or doing a good job of bluffing
> LowGeenyus (4:05:39 AM): you gotta keep pasting this so there's a backup
> for the eventual "hmnidaibw" post
> CBryant215 (4:05:39 AM): oh, this should be good
> CBryant215 (4:05:46 AM): RSPW98 (1:03:46 AM): What time did he go to bed?
> He usually stays up late
> CBryant215 (1:04:10 AM): he went to bed about 15 minutes ago
> RSPW98 (1:04:41 AM): He has made some enemies in RSPW you know
> CBryant215 (1:04:54 AM): in what way?
> CBryant215 (4:06:05 AM): RSPW98 (1:05:26 AM): He has done some things and
> said some things that has not looked good for him.
>
> [NOTE: See the journalist's fine command of the english language!
> Cluebomb, Dink - "have" is plural, "has" is singular. "He has done some
> things which have." Fuckin idiot.]
>
> CBryant215 (1:05:46 AM): like what?
> CBryant215 (4:07:33 AM): RSPW98 (1:07:03 AM): Well-ell he has posted
> trying to get people to harrass
> someone else's parents, he has bothered someone and gotten him fired,
> things like that.
> LowGeenyus (4:07:48 AM): haaahahahaha
> CBryant215 (4:08:26 AM): CBryant215 (1:07:36 AM): that doesn't sound like
> Chad
> CBryant215 (1:07:53 AM): he's been harassed by a couple of people from
> that group, though
> CBryant215 (1:08:10 AM): some redneck kid from Georgia used to call all
> hours of the night when we lived in Utah
> LowGeenyus (4:08:41 AM): *pops*
> CBryant215 (4:08:43 AM): RSPW98 (1:08:25 AM): hang on, i'll brb
> LowGeenyus (4:08:49 AM): lolol
> LowGeenyus (4:08:53 AM): dink goes a-googling
> CBryant215 (4:09:04 AM): a-googling dink will go
> CBryant215 (4:09:12 AM): a googling dink will go
> CBryant215 (4:09:18 AM): hi ho the mayyyyo
> LowGeenyus (4:09:23 AM): lol
> CBryant215 (4:09:24 AM): a googling dink will go
> CBryant215 (4:10:08 AM): RSPW98 (1:09:22 AM): That's not how I heard it
> RSPW98 (1:09:33 AM): The way I heard it Chad was harrassing someone and
> that person was just harrassing him back. I could be wrong.
>
> [SEE ALEX CAIN DENY BEING ALEX CAIN. Let's face it, Dink. If you
> thought this was Chad, you wouldn't have even considered trying to say
> that you weren't you]
>
> CBryant215 (1:09:39 AM): do you know who Alex Cain is?
> RSPW98 (1:09:44 AM): No, I have no idea.
> RSPW98 (1:09:48 AM): I've heard the name
> RSPW98 (1:09:51 AM): But don't know who that person is.
> LowGeenyus (4:10:28 AM): hahahahhahahaahahahahahahahahahahahah
> CBryant215 (4:11:07 AM): RSPW98 (1:09:59 AM): Is he a friend of Chad's?
> CBryant215 (1:10:18 AM): he's the redneck kid from Georgia that used to
> call us all the time
> CBryant215 (1:10:35 AM): Chad sais he was disturbed and psychotic
> RSPW98 (1:10:38 AM): Oh. I thought that was someone called Steven
> Signorelli
>
> [SEE Dink demonstrate that he would rather be a known, admitted child
> rapist, than admit to who he actually is]
>
> CBryant215 (1:10:46 AM): and that he was really short or something
> CBryant215 (4:11:22 AM): my god...this is ***** all the way
> LowGeenyus (4:11:29 AM): lmao
> LowGeenyus (4:11:36 AM): he's gonna catch on pretty quick I think
> LowGeenyus (4:11:45 AM): what am I saying?
> LowGeenyus (4:12:08 AM): this is dink. he couldn't catch on to a napkin
> in the street.
> CBryant215 (4:12:44 AM): CBryant215 (1:11:27 AM): be right back
> CBryant215 (1:12:21 AM): I'm back
> CBryant215 (1:12:28 AM): had to check on our youngest
> LowGeenyus (4:12:54 AM): lol
> CBryant215 (4:13:16 AM): RSPW98 (1:12:52 AM): Chad seems to be somewhat
> unstable online. Have you ever heard of someone called Steven Signorelli
> CBryant215 (1:13:01 AM): I haven't
>
> [SEE John Henry accurately predict how Dink will try to weasel out of the
> fact that he's trying to convince an RSPWer's *wife* that he's a racist
> psychotic!]
>
> LowGeenyus (4:13:54 AM): wow, this is the uberclassic. There is no way
> he can possibly wriggle out of this later claiming to have known it was
> you.
> CBryant215 (4:14:08 AM): oh hell no
> CBryant215 (4:14:44 AM): RSPW98 (1:14:01 AM): Hmm that's odd, Chad
> supposedly harrassed that person over and over again
> CBryant215 (1:14:17 AM): I never heard anything about that
> CBryant215 (1:14:24 AM): but that does not sound like Chad
> LowGeenyus (4:15:02 AM): lol
> CBryant215 (4:15:59 AM): RSPW98 (1:14:32 AM): What DOES sound like Chad
> CBryant215 (1:15:17 AM): mild-mannered, polite, although he can be a bit
> hot-headed and outspoken if he really believes in something
> CBryant215 (1:15:34 AM): he doesn't get along with either of my
> parents...he thinks they're racists
> LowGeenyus (4:16:47 AM): another 5 minutes he'll be trying to hump your
> leg
> CBryant215 (4:16:55 AM): lol
> CBryant215 (4:17:22 AM): this f'n RULES
> LowGeenyus (4:18:01 AM): yeah, this is definitely turning into a main
> event evening
> CBryant215 (4:18:15 AM): it's March 1999 all over again
> LowGeenyus (4:18:32 AM): which episode was that?
> CBryant215 (4:19:13 AM): "dinkster", Wu's outing, the beginning of the
> Avenger saga
> LowGeenyus (4:19:29 AM): ah yes
> CBryant215 (4:19:35 AM): Dinker got quiet
> LowGeenyus (4:19:56 AM): I wonder if he realizes that if he isn't very
> careful, he's going to cross a line into being legitimately vulnerable to
> a civil suit.
>
> [SEE John Henry discourage Chad Bryant from showing mercy~!]
>
> CBryant215 (4:20:12 AM): hmmm...should "Chad" do a run-in and tell DInk
> off for harassing his wife?
> LowGeenyus (4:20:46 AM): no way, man, let him go as long it he'll keep
> going. At some point he'll probably start pretending to "figure it out"
> just out of covering his ass
> CBryant215 (4:21:04 AM): he's gotten *really* quiet
> LowGeenyus (4:21:13 AM): plus if you run in, he has that much more reason
> to think it's bs
> LowGeenyus (4:21:26 AM): he's probably posting th elog
> CBryant215 (4:21:28 AM): I think wifey will save this and send it to me
> CBryant215 (4:21:35 AM): ooh
> CBryant215 (4:21:38 AM): here he is again
> LowGeenyus (4:22:00 AM): catch of the season
> CBryant215 (4:22:24 AM): RSPW98 (1:21:26 AM): Chad is a racist though.
> CBryant215 (1:21:51 AM): absolutely not
> LowGeenyus (4:22:59 AM): "for a friend of his, you sure don't seem to
> think very highly of him"
> LowGeenyus (4:23:20 AM): act like you're starting not to trust him -
> he'll try harder to turn you
> CBryant215 (4:23:48 AM): RSPW98 (1:23:05 AM): Yes he is. Also he appears
> to have a problem with reality.
> RSPW98 (1:23:11 AM): And for some reason he doesn't like lawyers
> RSPW98 (1:23:21 AM): And I think he may have a problem with getting
> attention as well
> CBryant215 (1:23:23 AM): you must not like him much, and I have no idea
> why
> CBryant215 (4:24:09 AM): RSPW98 (1:23:39 AM): I'm one of his friends. I'm
> just calling it as I see it.
> CBryant215 (1:23:53 AM): you certainly don't sound like a friend
> LowGeenyus (4:24:31 AM): RESIST THE URGE TO SAY 'YOU SOUND LIKE A BIT OF
> A DINK"
> LowGeenyus (4:24:33 AM): lol yeah
> LowGeenyus (4:25:39 AM): is he still going?
> CBryant215 (4:25:49 AM): he's on pause
> LowGeenyus (4:25:52 AM): lol
> CBryant215 (4:25:58 AM): I think the Dinkbox is changing records
> LowGeenyus (4:26:07 AM): you know what you need to do?
> LowGeenyus (4:26:29 AM): post *both* of these logs. Just because...well,
> because this is too fucking funny for me not to get into somehow :-D
>
> [SEE Dink claim to be my friend!]
>
> CBryant215 (4:26:32 AM): RSPW98 (1:25:48 AM): Then call me an
> "Acquaitance," Chad and I have known each other for a few years now. You
> ever hear of John Henry?
> CBryant215 (1:26:13 AM): yeah, John Henry is one of Chad's good friends
> CBryant215 (4:27:03 AM): I want him to think it's Anna that he's talking
> to
> LowGeenyus (4:27:21 AM): classic Dink, top to bottom. Stepping in on a
> man's wife to talk shit online. Who were those losers asking about why
> *we* don't like Dink.
> CBryant215 (4:27:21 AM): oh my f'n Lord
> LowGeenyus (4:27:26 AM): ?
> CBryant215 (4:27:30 AM): RSPW98 (1:26:46 AM): I'm one of John's friends.
> RSPW98 (1:26:52 AM): I met chad through John, on the Internet.
> LowGeenyus (4:27:56 AM): baaaahahahahaha dink you conniving little fuck.
> I ought to drive down there and beat your ass while you're having this
> conversation.
> CBryant215 (4:28:55 AM): this is the greatest IM conversation ever
> LowGeenyus (4:29:01 AM): oooh but yes
> CBryant215 (4:29:01 AM): and not a tribute
> LowGeenyus (4:29:59 AM): I'd rather not sprae the lil fucker a thought,
> but when he comes and hands himself over to you to be used like a puppy
> with a chewtoy, what the hell? I gotta laugh at that.
> CBryant215 (4:30:01 AM): oh John
> CBryant215 (4:30:05 AM): ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh John
> LowGeenyus (4:30:14 AM): lol it gets better?
>
> [SEE Dink claim to be a televised professional wrestler, once with WWF
> and now with NWATNA~! A man twice as tall as Dink, and probably three
> times as heavy! Say butta, Dink~! Say Beans! Say your house! Say My
> House! Say Bacon! Say LASSSSITERRRRRRRRR!]
>
> CBryant215 (4:30:28 AM): RSPW98 (1:29:33 AM): Otto Schwanz
> RSPW98 (1:29:42 AM): I used to work for SCW
> LowGeenyus (4:30:37 AM): is this where he tells your wife I'm like some
> big heroin smuggler of I produce KP with my kid's friends or something?
>
> [SEE John Henry's jaw drop at the utter insanity that is Dink~!]
>
> LowGeenyus (4:30:38 AM): oh shit
> LowGeenyus (4:30:42 AM): you MUST be kidding me
> CBryant215 (4:30:58 AM): oh hell no
> CBryant215 (4:31:03 AM): CBryant215 (1:30:10 AM): ok
> RSPW98 (1:30:30 AM): Yea I went into a chat room on IRC one night and
> John introduced me to Chad.
> CBryant215 (1:30:31 AM): I don't know what SCW is
> CBryant215 (1:30:41 AM): is that a wrestling company?
> LowGeenyus (4:31:09 AM): hah
>
> [SEE Dink try and lie about my three-year career in the wrestling
> business~!]
>
> CBryant215 (4:31:19 AM): RSPW98 (1:30:47 AM): it is a wrestling
> federation, John used to help us take the ring down and sell tickets.
> LowGeenyus (4:31:21 AM): man oh man oh man
> LowGeenyus (4:31:23 AM): LMAO
> LowGeenyus (4:31:36 AM): Dink, ya dumb fucker, there's videotape of me
> all over the planet ring announcing
> CBryant215 (4:31:55 AM): CBryant215 (1:31:34 AM): Chad told me that John
> was a ring announcer and manager
> LowGeenyus (4:31:59 AM): "I thought he was a ring announcer or a manager
> or something like that, I don't really
> pay much attention to the wrestling, that's chad's thing"
> LowGeenyus (4:32:23 AM): you don't want to know too much about wrestling
> - even if Anna's actually into it, it
> won't ring true to dink, his concept of women doesn't stretch that far
> LowGeenyus (4:32:45 AM): oh christ this is too good.
> LowGeenyus (4:32:50 AM): I could convert for shit like this
> CBryant215 (4:32:59 AM): RSPW98 (1:32:10 AM): No he was never a manager,
> he did announce once but
> that was about it.
> CBryant215 (1:32:14 AM): I don't pay much attention to wrestling, though
> CBryant215 (1:32:37 AM): Chad took me to one of the Monday night shows
> before we were married, and I've seen him work at his own shows
> LowGeenyus (4:33:18 AM): I guess it's time for me to rip that ricky
> morton clip, eh?
> CBryant215 (4:33:26 AM): oh yeah
> LowGeenyus (4:33:36 AM): I gotta find it though :-(
> LowGeenyus (4:34:14 AM): aall my vids are packed in storage I don't even
> have my TV right now - although I don't *need* that to rip the clip, I
> can watch it onscreen
> CBryant215 (4:34:32 AM): RSPW98 (1:33:05 AM): So how is he as a wrestler
> CBryant215 (1:33:12 AM): who, Chad?
> RSPW98 (1:33:52 AM): yea
> CBryant215 (1:34:03 AM): you're asking the wrong person
> CBryant215 (1:34:08 AM): I don't know much about it
> CBryant215 (1:34:16 AM): but I thought he was very entertaining
> LowGeenyus (4:34:48 AM): of course you did, you're his wife~!
> LowGeenyus (4:34:52 AM): HAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> LowGeenyus (4:34:54 AM): what
> LowGeenyus (4:34:55 AM): a
> LowGeenyus (4:34:57 AM): fucking
> LowGeenyus (4:34:59 AM): DINK
> CBryant215 (4:35:23 AM): RSPW98 (1:34:45 AM): How could he wrestle with
> his bad back though
> CBryant215 (1:35:03 AM): he worked through it
> CBryant215 (1:35:07 AM): he loved doing it
> LowGeenyus (4:36:07 AM): Claiming to be f'n Bo Dupp. Dink, the 5'3"
> virgin midget psycho claiming to be a trained professional wrestler that
> stands legit about 6'7"and goes maybe 300 pounds
>
> [SEE Dink incriminate Bob Barnett! Throw your buddy to the wolves, Dink,
> that's what you do~! That's why you have no friends, because you can't
> be trusted~!]
>
> CBryant215 (4:36:17 AM): RSPW98 (1:35:44 AM): By the way have you ever
> heard of a guy called Bob Barnett?
> RSPW98 (1:35:47 AM): Apparantly he lives near Chad
> RSPW98 (1:35:54 AM): And wants to talk to him but Chad wont let him
> CBryant215 (1:35:55 AM): I have not
> RSPW98 (1:35:58 AM): I don't know, it's something like that
> LowGeenyus (4:36:28 AM): I hate to admit it, but I r MTFO
> LowGeenyus (4:36:49 AM): since when does barnett want to talk to you?
> CBryant215 (4:36:50 AM): me too
> CBryant215 (4:36:59 AM): he's done dug a big deeo hole
> CBryant215 (4:37:04 AM): er, deep
> CBryant215 (4:37:13 AM): he's not going to paste this to the group
> CBryant215 (4:37:20 AM): he'd be nuts to
> LowGeenyus (4:37:37 AM): fuck, since when does Barnett want to talk to
> anyone? he just rips people off and quotes Reagan and Don Rickles. I'm
> surprised he hasn't slipped into calling anyone a hockey puck yet.
> LowGeenyus (4:37:40 AM): yeah
> LowGeenyus (4:37:45 AM): but you'd be nuts NOT to :-D
> CBryant215 (4:38:20 AM): RSPW98 (1:37:20 AM): Chad has made some strange
> enemies online, if you read some of those posts you will see them
> CBryant215 (1:37:21 AM): who is Bob Barnett?
> RSPW98 (1:37:38 AM): I don't know, some lawyer guy who claims to have
> Chad's birth certificate.
> CBryant215 (1:37:54 AM): why would he want Chad's birth certificate?
>
>
> [SEE John Henry accurately analyze this entire log in one sentence~!]
>
> LowGeenyus (4:38:22 AM): the ultimate in smoking guns - clear,
> incontrovertible evidence that Dink fucked with your offline life without
> the least bit of provocation.
> LowGeenyus (4:38:57 AM): which mens of course, that I'll be saving my own
> copy, starting with his first line, and posting it right behind yours as
> confirmation of your story.
> LowGeenyus (4:39:08 AM): In fact, I should turn on my timestamp just to
> double-cover it
> LowGeenyus (4:39:40 AM): hm, the timestamp appears automatically on every
> line - I wonder if it saves?
> LowGeenyus (4:40:11 AM): he still at it?
> CBryant215 (4:41:02 AM): yeah
> LowGeenyus (4:41:10 AM): man
> CBryant215 (4:41:10 AM): timestamps save, BTW
> LowGeenyus (4:41:22 AM): I knew he was stoopid, but I didn't knwo he was
> st00pidER
> LowGeenyus (4:41:27 AM): yeah, i saw that
> CBryant215 (4:42:00 AM): CBryant215 (1:37:54 AM): why would he want
> Chad's birth certificate?
> RSPW98 (1:38:34 AM): Because apparantly Chad made him angry and so this
> guy wants to show Chad up
> CBryant215 (1:39:07 AM): this is not the Chad I know
> RSPW98 (1:39:42 AM): Maybe you need to ask him then, I don't know. All I
> know is that this Barnett person claims he has Chad's birth certificate.
>
> [SEE Dink admit that he doesn't even believe Chad's divorced~!]
>
> RSPW98 (1:40:41 AM): He has mentioned something about a divorce
> certificate too but I don't know what that is about.
> CBryant215 (1:40:49 AM): divorce?
> RSPW98 (1:40:57 AM): I don't know. Something about Chad being divorced.
> CBryant215 (1:41:14 AM): he's not
> CBryant215 (1:41:25 AM): afer all, I would know if he was
> RSPW98 (1:41:41 AM): Some people are saying that he is
> LowGeenyus (4:42:09 AM): you gotta keep pasting, man - that way there's
> two different copies from two different computers that say the same shit,
> so there's no backing out or trying to say it's a "clever froggery" or
> something.
> LowGeenyus (4:42:23 AM): "He might have told people that to get that
> idiot from georgia to stop calling us"
> LowGeenyus (4:42:34 AM): total innocence
> LowGeenyus (4:42:41 AM): man
> LowGeenyus (4:43:09 AM): I feel like roscoe p. f'n coletrain goin
> "gitgitgit i luv it i luv it" Never in a million years did I think Dink
> was THIS fucking dumb.
> LowGeenyus (4:43:24 AM): almost makes me wish I'd unblocked him at some
> point since 1997
> LowGeenyus (4:43:29 AM): er 98 I guess
> CBryant215 (4:43:38 AM): RSPW98 (1:42:48 AM): What about him stopping a
> rape awhile back? I heard many people made fun about him making up some
> kind of story like that
> CBryant215 (1:43:04 AM): he didn't make that up
> RSPW98 (1:43:11 AM): really?
> CBryant215 (1:43:16 AM): he put some sicko in the hospital
> LowGeenyus (4:44:02 AM): this is where he'll decide he's talking to you
> and not your wife
> CBryant215 (4:44:14 AM): RSPW98 (1:43:24 AM): how long ago was that?
> CBryant215 (1:43:43 AM): about three years
> CBryant215 (1:43:51 AM): just before our oldest son was born
> LowGeenyus (4:45:00 AM): he's checking his concordance
> CBryant215 (4:45:20 AM): RSPW98 (1:44:33 AM): A lot of people were
> talking about how he made that up. He got really attacked for that.
> CBryant215 (1:44:45 AM): well, he didn't make it up
> CBryant215 (1:45:04 AM): I thought it was a really heroic thing for him
> to do
> LowGeenyus (4:46:01 AM): holy shit chad
> LowGeenyus (4:46:11 AM): is it possible for one human being to be THIS
> dumb?
> LowGeenyus (4:46:15 AM): I guess one thing's for sure
> CBryant215 (4:46:31 AM): RSPW98 (1:44:33 AM): A lot of people were
> talking about how he made that up. He got really attacked for that.
> CBryant215 (1:44:45 AM): well, he didn't make it up
> CBryant215 (1:45:04 AM): I thought it was a really heroic thing for him
> to do
> RSPW98 (1:45:26 AM): It just doesn't seem like the type of thing he would
> do thats all. He went on IRC and got a lot of teasing for that.
> RSPW98 (1:45:30 AM): do you ever go on IRC?
> RSPW98 (1:45:37 AM): Chad is on there a lot
> CBryant215 (1:46:00 AM): no
> CBryant215 (1:46:02 AM): what is IRC?
> LowGeenyus (4:46:42 AM): the quickness with which he swalloed the idea
> that he was talking to your wife sure says a lot about how muchof HIS OWN
> bullshit about "your divorce" he actually believes.
> CBryant215 (4:47:13 AM): he figures it was all a work now
> LowGeenyus (4:47:19 AM): Yeh, this is definitely the AIM log to end all
> AIM logs, no question.
> LowGeenyus (4:47:28 AM): he did, or you figure he will?
> CBryant215 (4:47:43 AM): he did
> LowGeenyus (4:47:50 AM): bout fuckin time
> CBryant215 (4:47:56 AM): CBryant215 (1:46:48 AM): does that have
> something to do with mirc?
> RSPW98 (1:47:03 AM): No I think you are thinking of something else.
> RSPW98 (1:47:09 AM): You should post to RSPW by the way
> RSPW98 (1:47:11 AM): Chad gets picked on a lot
> RSPW98 (1:47:15 AM): You could help defend him
> RSPW98 (1:47:19 AM): John defends him a lot
>
> [SEE Dink admit that I'm a cool guy~!'
>
> RSPW98 (1:47:23 AM): John's a cool guy that way
> CBryant215 (1:47:23 AM): isn't RSPW about wrestling?
> RSPW98 (1:47:27 AM): no not always
> LowGeenyus (4:48:31 AM): oooh, I see. You figure he's playing along now?
> CBryant215 (4:48:55 AM): I figure he was stopped in his tracks by "Me &
> Chad Bryant"
> LowGeenyus (4:49:00 AM): Neat. Five years the little asshole stalks my
> kid, now all of a sudden I'm a "cool guy?"
> CBryant215 (4:49:10 AM): CBryant215 (1:48:02 AM): it doesn't sound very
> interesting
> RSPW98 (1:48:42 AM): It is. You should read it. I can give you a link to
> read chad's posts if you like
> RSPW98 (1:48:52 AM): Chads posts to RSPW get archived all the time.
> LowGeenyus (4:49:17 AM): lolololol
> LowGeenyus (4:49:27 AM): that doesn't sound to me like he's catching on
> very quick
> CBryant215 (4:50:16 AM): CBryant215 (1:49:24 AM): I'm not sure that would
> be all that fun to read
> RSPW98 (1:49:37 AM): Why not?
> CBryant215 (1:49:55 AM): if I want to know what Chad says, I'll talk to
> him
>
> [SEE Dink insinuate that trusting your husband = subservience~!]
>
> CBryant215 (4:50:50 AM): RSPW98 (1:50:18 AM): That sounds a little
> subserviant to me
> CBryant215 (1:50:32 AM): what is that supposed to mean?
> LowGeenyus (4:51:11 AM): YES! Perfect play - make him try to convince
> you to read. Everything is about how actively Dink is willing to try and
> influence the families and friends of people with whom he has developed
> an obsession.
> LowGeenyus (4:51:30 AM): that's supposed to mean the journalist doesn't
> know how to spell "subservient"
>
> [SEE Dink admit that his goal is to fuck with someone's family over a
> flamewar~!]
>
> CBryant215 (4:51:30 AM): RSPW98 (1:50:57 AM): I mean it sounds like you
> need to know more about what Chad does that's all. He has made some
> people mad online and you should know about it.
> RSPW98 (1:50:58 AM):
> http://groups.google.com/groups?as_epq=Chad%20Bryant&safe=images&ie=UTF-8
> &oe=UTF-8&as_ugroup=alt.bonehead.john-henry&lr=lang_en&num=50
> &as_scoring=d&hl=en
> RSPW98 (1:51:06 AM): Click that link and you can read Chad's posts.
>
> [SEE Dink admit Chad's a great guy AND SEE Dink the Misogynist pretend
> that he sees women as anything but "people who run screaming when he
> approaches~!]
>
> CBryant215 (4:52:02 AM): RSPW98 (1:51:33 AM): Don't get me wrong, I think
> Chad's a great guy. I'm just saying that if you're his better half that
> you need to know what he's up just like he should know what you are up
> to. Equality of the sexes.
>
> [SEE Dink lie his ass off about what I believe~!]
>
> RSPW98 (1:51:47 AM): Of course dont tell John Henry I said that * lol *
> He doesn't believe in that.
> LowGeenyus (4:52:20 AM): lmao
> LowGeenyus (4:52:35 AM): those aren't even you rposts, they're mostly his
> own
>
> (Note: They were, I looked later)
>
> LowGeenyus (4:53:32 AM): fucker doesn't even know how to use the Google
> search engine properly. He just gave a link to everything in
> alt.bonehead.john-henry with "chad bryant" in it.
> CBryant215 (4:54:07 AM): CBryant215 (1:52:32 AM): I don't know that much
> about John Henry
> CBryant215 (1:53:06 AM): who is Cainman?
>
> [SEE Dink admit AGAIN that I'm a "cool guy" AND SEE Dink admit that he's
> a psycho midget~!]
>
> RSPW98 (1:53:11 AM): John is a cool guy, he's just a little crazy. Some
> loser on the Internet keeps bothering him.
> RSPW98 (1:53:23 AM): Cainman? Probably some poster to the RSPW I guess.
> CBryant215 (1:53:42 AM): is he connected to Alex Cain?
>
> [SEE John Henry quickly assess the situation and determine yet one more
> way to keep Dink on the hook~!]
>
> LowGeenyus (4:54:24 AM): dude, this is perfect...there are so many of his
> own posts in there flaming you, you can look totally legit focussing on
> them.
>
> [SEE Dink claim to be a wrestler AGAIN~! Better stay away from them
> Hardbody Harrison shows, Dink - REAL wrestlers don't like it when some
> 5'2" psychomidget claims to be one of them. You'll get your ass beat
> like a circus midg...oh, wait, you ARE a circus midget, but no circus is
> scam enough to hire you~!]
>
> CBryant215 (4:54:32 AM): RSPW98 (1:53:55 AM): I don't know. I don't read
> the group much these days. Too busy as a wrestler.
> LowGeenyus (4:54:48 AM): Dink admits he's a loser, too. Amazing.
> LowGeenyus (4:55:14 AM): BAAAAHAHAHAHAHA TOO BUSY AS A WRESTLER? FUCK
> THE REAL OTTO ISN'T EVEN TOO BUSY AS A WRESTLER TO READ RSPW!
> LowGeenyus (4:55:16 AM): Jesus.
> CBryant215 (4:55:29 AM): CBryant215 (1:54:51 AM): seems like all of this
> stuff is just Cainman insulting Chad
> CBryant215 (1:55:06 AM): and none of these articles seem to be from Chad
>
> [SEE John Henry break kayfabe on HHH~!]
>
> LowGeenyus (4:55:31 AM): If fuckin helmsley can read it, so can Otto.
> CBryant215 (4:56:39 AM): CBryant215 (1:56:25 AM): whoever Cainman is, he
> sure seems like an idiot
> LowGeenyus (4:56:42 AM): you should ask him more about his career. Where
> he wrestles, who he's worked with, etc
> CBryant215 (4:57:12 AM): I don't know much about wrestling, remember?
> LowGeenyus (4:57:38 AM): yeah, true. Maybe you could get something off
> like "So do you work with the WWF now?" Don't say "WWE"
> LowGeenyus (4:58:46 AM): /me lights up one big fatty (cig) for the mormon
> pimp daddy
> CBryant215 (4:58:52 AM): I'll see if it works in
> CBryant215 (4:58:54 AM): lol
> LowGeenyus (4:58:58 AM): yeah, cool
> CBryant215 (4:59:08 AM): lighting one up for the brethren?
> LowGeenyus (4:59:20 AM): just make sure you paste shit, I dont' want
> there to be a line's difference between what MY log sys he said, and what
> YOUR log says he said.
> LowGeenyus (4:59:26 AM): indeed
> CBryant215 (4:59:34 AM): I'm pasting it all
> LowGeenyus (4:59:44 AM): killer
> CBryant215 (4:59:54 AM): he got quiet again
> LowGeenyus (5:00:12 AM): it's about time we finally got his ass painted
> into a corner. There is no way he can possibly bullshit his way out of
> this.
> LowGeenyus (5:00:26 AM): lol think we should post the logs while he's
> still going, just to add insult to injury?
> CBryant215 (5:00:42 AM): this'll get posted to AUK, AIAC, AIACMRC, etc.
> LowGeenyus (5:00:48 AM): hell yes
> CBryant215 (5:00:50 AM): nah
> LowGeenyus (5:00:53 AM): this should be posted to the AFL-CIO
> CBryant215 (5:00:57 AM): wait until it's done
> LowGeenyus (5:00:58 AM): the UAW
> LowGeenyus (5:01:13 AM): the 4th Estate, and the fuckig Bilderburgers or
> whoever is running the world this week
> CBryant215 (5:01:23 AM): lol
> LowGeenyus (5:01:31 AM): think of ever non-federal acronym you can, they
> all get copies
> CBryant215 (5:01:37 AM): lol
> LowGeenyus (5:01:52 AM): especially the ones that start with GCSU <evil
> grin>
> CBryant215 (5:02:07 AM): lol
> CBryant215 (5:02:14 AM): like the GCSUKKK?
>
> [SEE John Henry be the better man - AS USUAL~!]
>
> LowGeenyus (5:02:15 AM): I couldn't do that tho, even to a dink like him.
> LowGeenyus (5:02:24 AM): lmao that's dink's room, he'll already have a
> copy
> CBryant215 (5:02:29 AM): lol
> LowGeenyus (5:03:13 AM): just for a little sidebar joke while u wait...
> LowGeenyus (5:03:33 AM): the Henderson, NC telephone book white pages
> under "fraternal
> organizations" lists the KKK right under the FOP
> LowGeenyus (5:03:42 AM): er yellow pages rather
> CBryant215 (5:03:44 AM): ror
> CBryant215 (5:04:10 AM): shouldn't the KKK be in the white pages?
> CBryant215 (5:04:26 AM): that just seems like a given
> LowGeenyus (5:04:36 AM): I called it once, just out of morbid curiousity
> and because I could't believe that any human being would dare answer the
> phone. I was right, it was a machine. and 4* for "white pages" lol
> LowGeenyus (5:04:58 AM): is he done yet?
> CBryant215 (5:05:14 AM): when I did telemarketing, one of my calls was
> the "Righteous Brotherhood of the Knights of the ku Klux Klan"
> CBryant215 (5:05:23 AM): I wanted to copy that # down so bad
> LowGeenyus (5:05:24 AM): yeeehah
> LowGeenyus (5:05:27 AM): lol
> LowGeenyus (5:05:32 AM): the address would be more...useful
> CBryant215 (5:05:41 AM): I only had a phone #
> CBryant215 (5:05:48 AM): that would have been great to post to RSPW
> LowGeenyus (5:05:50 AM): damn the luck
> LowGeenyus (5:05:57 AM): and the lack of SSMs
> CBryant215 (5:07:17 AM): RSPW98 (2:06:01 AM): I don't know...when I read
> those it looks like that all he does is reply to them...that it's Chad's
> words.
> CBryant215 (2:06:34 AM): Cainman must be a pretty unhappy person
> CBryant215 (5:07:38 AM): I was looking in the LV white pages today
> CBryant215 (5:07:48 AM): found a listing fior "Donald Dokken"
> LowGeenyus (5:07:52 AM): no shit
> LowGeenyus (5:08:00 AM): last I knew he was living in Phoenix
> LowGeenyus (5:08:22 AM): you should call him up and ask him if he's still
> rokken, and if he blames Dana Carvey for effectively ending his career?
>
> [SEE Dink lie some more~!]
>
> CBryant215 (5:08:28 AM): RSPW98 (2:07:23 AM): I don't know. All I know
> is what I read on that page. I usually don't even read the group
> directly anymore - I just read through there.
> CBryant215 (2:08:11 AM): I just don't seem to find any of Chad's
> posts...just responses from that Cainman idiot
> CBryant215 (5:08:36 AM): and LOL
> CBryant215 (5:08:47 AM): BREAKING THE CHAINS THAT BIND YOUUUUUUUUUUUUU
> LowGeenyus (5:09:22 AM): I actually used to do a couple o fDokken tunes
> back in the day..."Alone Again," "Lightning Strikes Again," "Mr. Scary,"
> and something else
> CBryant215 (5:09:34 AM): CBryant215 (2:08:11 AM): I just don't seem to
> find any of Chad's posts...just responses from that Cainman idiot
>
> [SEE Dink desperately try to avoid the obvious no-sell from Chad's Wife
> of the alt.bonehead.john-henry archives~!]
>
> RSPW98 (2:08:38 AM): No you don't get what I'm saying. It looks like
> that the posts are from Chad. What Cainman is replying to is from Chad.
> CBryant215 (2:09:11 AM): I see Cainman replying to Chad and being
> harassing and rude
>
> [SEE John Henry force a hideous memory of his esteemed hairmetal history
> on the world~!]
>
> LowGeenyus (5:09:50 AM): of course that was during the brief period that
> men were allowed to wear zebra-striped spandex and lots of eyeliner
> CBryant215 (5:10:11 AM): RSPW98 (2:09:28 AM): But are you reading Chad's
> part of the posts
> CBryant215 (2:09:55 AM): yes, and Cainman is quite rude
> LowGeenyus (5:10:17 AM): lol
> LowGeenyus (5:10:36 AM): geez, does he really think your wife is going to
> see the world the same way his warped ass does?
> LowGeenyus (5:10:57 AM): I can't believe he's not catching on at this
> point.
>
> [SEE Chad's "wife" put Dink in his place~!]
>
> CBryant215 (5:11:15 AM): RSPW98 (2:10:15 AM): What about Chad's behavior?
> CBryant215 (2:10:39 AM): seems like Chad is guilty of having an opinion
> that Cainman seems to disagree with
> CBryant215 (2:11:00 AM): and instead of sticking to trhe topic at hand,
> he just posts insults and profanities
> LowGeenyus (5:11:23 AM): but I can't imagine any reason why he'd continue
> going on if he is. It's not as if this makes him look good or anything.
> CBryant215 (5:12:14 AM): RSPW98 (2:11:14 AM): Chad does that all the time
> it seems.
> CBryant215 (2:11:35 AM): not that I have noticed
> CBryant215 (2:11:50 AM): Chad was a good debater in high school
> CBryant215 (2:11:56 AM): he can still argue
> LowGeenyus (5:12:21 AM): well, I guess there's always the "sheer flat-out
> fucking ignorance" factor that I tend to under-consider
> CBryant215 (5:12:32 AM): lol
> CBryant215 (5:12:37 AM): they're not all as smart as us
> CBryant215 (5:13:05 AM): RSPW98 (2:12:26 AM): Well I'm not one to say
> anything but from what I am reading in the webpage it seems to me that
> many people dislike Chad because he avoids the subject when it is given
> to him.
> RSPW98 (2:12:35 AM): Like I read one last week about how Chad had said
> there were lies about him on a webpage
> RSPW98 (2:12:42 AM): But when asked which lies were there he never
> answered
> RSPW98 (2:12:48 AM): I saw that webpage too, it was funny
> LowGeenyus (5:13:08 AM): I've coem to accept that as fairly normal what
> with the whole gifted child thing and all...but christ, *half* as smart
> would be nice.
> LowGeenyus (5:13:37 AM): LMAO Dink as WCW Debra aping whatshername from
> In Living Color! "Now, you didn't hear this from me, but...."
> LowGeenyus (5:14:41 AM): Jesus, this couldn't possibly get any funnier if
> it was written by sam kinison himself. I'm literally LMAO. I knew Dink
> was dumber than a box of rocks....but holy shit.
> CBryant215 (5:15:27 AM): CBryant215 (2:13:07 AM): I doubt it
> RSPW98 (2:13:42 AM): Well it would take me a few minutes but I could
> probably find the link
> RSPW98 (2:13:54 AM): Chad has said some stupid stuff on IRC, this even he
> will admit to * lol *
> RSPW98 (2:14:14 AM): But you know what? Chad has said some even stupider
> stuff on AIM. Seriously. Not to me of course.
> CBryant215 (2:14:46 AM): everyone says stupid things
> CBryant215 (2:14:54 AM): like whoever though me and Chad were divorced
> LowGeenyus (5:15:43 AM): lolol
> LowGeenyus (5:15:53 AM): you just...keep...hitting....him
> CBryant215 (5:15:53 AM): RSPW98 (2:15:26 AM): Well Chad says a lot of
> stupid stuff. Like I heard last week he said he had a girlfriend.
> LowGeenyus (5:16:17 AM): the poor little bastard simply has no concept of
> how badly he is being strung here.
> LowGeenyus (5:16:27 AM): LMAO now you have a girlfriend. His ass will
> stop at nothing, won't it?
> CBryant215 (5:16:33 AM): this is the log to end all logs
> LowGeenyus (5:16:41 AM): Yep. You can't follow this up.
>
> [SEE Dink contradict himself~!]
>
> CBryant215 (5:17:21 AM): CBryant215 (2:15:56 AM): when did he say this?
> RSPW98 (2:16:48 AM): I don't really remember. I think it was July 23 at
> 2:27 a.m.
> CBryant215 (2:17:05 AM): I doubt that
>
> [SEE Dink project his own pathetic relationship onto Chad~! Yes, it was
> DINK who got his ass dumped for a 7-11 manager and had to sleep on the
> couch listening to his "girlfriend" being serviced by Apu~!]
>
> CBryant215 (5:18:11 AM): RSPW98 (2:17:46 AM): Well supposedly he told
> someone that he had a girlfriend who was staying with him and had known
> him for about a year now. And that Chad was asleep on the couch. I
> don't know really, I get most of my information from e-mail and the
> webpage. It was something like that.
> CBryant215 (2:17:53 AM): you don't seem like much of a friend
> CBryant215 (5:18:55 AM): RSPW98 (2:18:07 AM): I told you, I'm not really
> a friend, I'm an acquaintance. I've known him for awhile.
> LowGeenyus (5:18:57 AM): what's sad is that if you look at
> altmbonehead.john-henry, it looks like he's been reposting everything
> either of us say in there for mnths and months, just waiting for this
> moment to destroy your life with his responses to your posts. What an
> indefinably pathetic human being. If someone in AUK doens't set up a
> Dinkseum rught next to CENKOC, I'm gonna have to take away some of their
> cool points or something.
> CBryant215 (5:19:37 AM): CBryant215 (2:19:02 AM): maybe he was playing
> around with someone
> CBryant215 (2:19:15 AM): he doesn't have a girlfriend
> CBryant215 (5:20:24 AM): RSPW98 (2:19:40 AM): I don't know. Someone said
> in an e-mail, maybe that Barnett guy, that at the same time Chad was
> supposed to be sleeping on the couch, he was posting to the Internet.
> RSPW98 (2:19:46 AM): I've got that e-mail somewhere, I just need to find
> it.
> CBryant215 (2:20:01 AM): I have no idea what you're talking about
> CBryant215 (2:20:07 AM): Chad never sleeps on the couch
> LowGeenyus (5:20:50 AM): besides, even if you did, you're mormons -
> ploygamy ain't easy lmao
> CBryant215 (5:20:57 AM): CBryant215 (2:20:28 AM): is that all RSPW does?
> RSPW98 (2:20:35 AM): Well there's a log somewhere out there, I dont know
> where t hough
> CBryant215 (2:20:36 AM): make up lies about certain people?
> LowGeenyus (5:21:17 AM): not that polygamy is stil common practice, but I
> wouldn't expect Dink to know that.
> CBryant215 (5:21:44 AM): RSPW98 (2:20:53 AM): What do you mean
> CBryant215 (2:21:11 AM): if you don't have any proof, you shouldn't talk
> about it
> CBryant215 (2:21:21 AM): lest you bear false witness against thy neighbor
> CBryant215 (2:21:26 AM): that's what the Bible says
> LowGeenyus (5:21:53 AM): after all, he still practices it with his
> sisters! (badumpbump)
> CBryant215 (5:21:57 AM): ror
> LowGeenyus (5:22:11 AM): that one was for the benefit of the post
> LowGeenyus (5:22:17 AM): :-D
> CBryant215 (5:22:18 AM): ror
> CBryant215 (5:22:39 AM): RSPW98 (2:21:34 AM): Well I suppose I could try
> to find the e-mail
> CBryant215 (2:21:45 AM): maybe you should
> RSPW98 (2:22:21 AM): it might take a few minutes, brb
> CBryant215 (2:22:27 AM): ok
> LowGeenyus (5:22:48 AM): un
> LowGeenyus (5:22:50 AM): be
> LowGeenyus (5:22:52 AM): fucking
> LowGeenyus (5:22:55 AM): lievable
> LowGeenyus (5:23:02 AM): he must be off his meds
> LowGeenyus (5:23:15 AM): NOBODY in their right mind is this
> fu...nevermind
> CBryant215 (5:23:22 AM): FOR SALE - One owned midget fucktard, answers to
> the name "Dink"
> LowGeenyus (5:23:24 AM): I keep forgetting, it's dink
> LowGeenyus (5:23:28 AM): lmao
> LowGeenyus (5:23:46 AM): VERY LITTLE WEAR ON THE COMPUTER, BUT HAS BEEN
> OWNED BY SEVERAL HUNDRED THOUSAND PEOPLE INTERNATIONALLY
> LowGeenyus (5:24:06 AM): (persistent whine under the hood)
> CBryant215 (5:24:08 AM): "Has 'AUK' tattooed on posterior"
> LowGeenyus (5:24:12 AM): lmao
>
> [SEE Great Minds Thinking Alike~!]
>
> CBryant215 (5:24:31 AM): "boot prints on other side of posterior"
> LowGeenyus (5:24:33 AM): and RSPW's bootprint permanently emblazoned in
> his forehead like the ugly results of a football cleating accident
> CBryant215 (5:24:39 AM): LMFAO
> LowGeenyus (5:26:01 AM): if this were IRL, right about now is when they'd
> start trying to figure out how they were going to put his face back
> together while some nurse is screaming CLEAR and defibrillating his
> heart. The boy is going down like the Hindenberg (or you prefer, like
> his mother in a honky-tonk) and he doesn't eve know it.
> LowGeenyus (5:27:22 AM): I feel kinda lifeless even laughing at his sorry
> ass...but you have to admit, this is one absolutely *classic* AIM log.
> This makes everything previously posted collectively look like a
> pillowfight at a girlscout camp
> CBryant215 (5:28:04 AM): he's Pamela Anderson, I'm Tommy Lee
>
> [Hey, this one eve puts the whole thing in a temporal context, I had
> eminem on the brain because I was in the middle of a discussion abou thim
> here. Obviously, this was before I figured out that I had my head up my
> ass on the "Smack My Bitch Up" thing. Actually, right here is where I
> realized it...]
>
> LowGeenyus (5:28:19 AM): you should change yoru name to eminem
> LowGeenyus (5:28:30 AM): can't imagine any point at which "smack my bitch
> up" would be MORE f'n appropos
> CBryant215 (5:28:54 AM): "Smack My Bitch Up" was The Prodigy
> LowGeenyus (5:29:02 AM): was it?
> CBryant215 (5:29:04 AM): change my pitch up
> LowGeenyus (5:29:04 AM): lol
> CBryant215 (5:29:10 AM): smack my bitch up
> LowGeenyus (5:29:27 AM): I've been bitching abot that song in Eminem
> threads for three days and nobody corrected me. Now I understand why
> it's been going on for so long lol
> LowGeenyus (5:30:01 AM): ah well
> CBryant215 (5:30:18 AM): I used to use Prodigy
> LowGeenyus (5:30:25 AM): that's still not even in the same galazy as
> IM'ing someone, thinking it's their wife, and then going on an all-out
> campaign to convince her you have a girlfriend
> CBryant215 (5:30:27 AM): "Smack My Bitch Up" would work
> LowGeenyus (5:30:37 AM): lol
>
> [SEE Dink prove that he has a local archive of everything Chad Bryant has
> ever said~!]
>
> CBryant215 (5:30:58 AM): RSPW98 (2:30:07 AM): CBryant215: this is chads
> girlfirend he is asleep right now
>
> RSPW98 (2:30:18 AM): CBryant215: he is not feelin to good
>
> RSPW98 (2:30:31 AM): that was probably fake though
> CBryant215 (2:30:43 AM): probably
> LowGeenyus (5:30:59 AM): wasn't there a brief rumor for a short while
> that you were actually bob ryder, or was that someone else?
> CBryant215 (5:31:06 AM): I don't remember
> LowGeenyus (5:31:40 AM): mighta been someone else, I think Ryder was
> already mostly gone when you showed up
> CBryant215 (5:32:02 AM): heh
> CBryant215 (5:32:20 AM): I was using AOL when I went full-time
> CBryant215 (5:32:33 AM): then I had USWest/Qwest for YEARS
> CBryant215 (5:32:46 AM): sometimes rotating to a work account
> LowGeenyus (5:32:50 AM): ah, almost certainly soemone else then.
> LowGeenyus (5:32:59 AM): yeah, we don't do THAT shit no mo
> CBryant215 (5:33:05 AM): heh
> LowGeenyus (5:33:08 AM): geez
> LowGeenyus (5:33:43 AM): I bet if Marye Anne Foxe (why does that woman
> have so many f'n e's in her name? It's ridicuous. Or ridiculouse, of
> you prefer) had AIM, he'd *still* be harassing her about me.
> CBryant215 (5:34:05 AM): who?
> LowGeenyus (5:34:32 AM): chancellor @ ncsu when I worked there
> CBryant215 (5:34:39 AM): oh, yes
> LowGeenyus (5:35:20 AM): you have entered a dimension of odd angles,
> round squares, and divorced wives. You have entered...the DINK ZONE
> CBryant215 (5:35:58 AM): RSPW98 (2:30:51 AM): that was july 23 though
> CBryant215 (2:33:29 AM): who said that was real?
> RSPW98 (2:35:19 AM): I don't know, but why would he make that up?
> CBryant215 (2:35:35 AM): maybe it was that Alex Cain idiot
> CBryant215 (2:35:41 AM): he seems to hate Chad a lot
> LowGeenyus (5:36:10 AM): lmao
> CBryant215 (5:36:23 AM): RSPW98 (2:35:51 AM): Probably not. I haven't
> seen him in awhile on the Internet.
> RSPW98 (2:36:03 AM): I don't think he even posts anymore
> CBryant215 (2:36:06 AM): is he the same guy as Cainman?
> LowGeenyus (5:36:24 AM): he is so going to crack into a zillion pieces if
> you keep that shit up
> CBryant215 (5:36:38 AM): RSPW98 (2:36:14 AM): No, that's someone
> impersonating him I think
> CBryant215 (2:36:22 AM): ok
> RSPW98 (2:36:22 AM): I talked to Alex Cain once, he is a cool guy.
> LowGeenyus (5:36:48 AM): lmao
> CBryant215 (5:37:19 AM): RSPW98 (2:36:22 AM): I talked to Alex Cain once,
> he is a cool guy.
> RSPW98 (2:36:27 AM): Doesn't sound like the kind of thing he would do
> CBryant215 (2:36:44 AM): he used to call our house all the time
> CBryant215 (2:36:57 AM): he'd yell into the phone or stick it up to the
> TV
> RSPW98 (2:36:57 AM): I don't think he would do that.
> CBryant215 (2:37:05 AM): he did
> RSPW98 (2:37:19 AM): Doesn't sound like something he would do. That was
> probably just made up.
> CBryant215 (2:37:32 AM): I really doubt it
> CBryant215 (2:37:44 AM): especially since I saw him brag about it to
> Chad..Chad showed me
> LowGeenyus (5:38:51 AM): yeah because you were pregnant at the time and
> you kept getting these damn phone calls, so he wanted you to understand
> where they were coming from
> CBryant215 (5:39:02 AM): RSPW98 (2:38:12 AM): Do you believe everything
> you see?
> CBryant215 (2:38:30 AM): I saw it with my own eyes
> CBryant215 (2:38:36 AM): he bragged about it
> RSPW98 (2:38:37 AM): What did he show you
> CBryant215 (2:38:44 AM): something in mirc
> CBryant215 (5:39:44 AM): RSPW98 (2:38:54 AM): Maybe he showed you wrong
> then.
> CBryant215 (2:39:18 AM): I don't think so
> CBryant215 (2:39:26 AM): Chad's pretty good with computer stuff
> CBryant215 (5:40:13 AM): CBryant215 (2:39:50 AM): what's that nickname
> for Alex Cain?
> CBryant215 (2:39:53 AM): do you know?
> CBryant215 (2:39:57 AM): Chad uses it a lot
> CBryant215 (5:40:39 AM): RSPW98 (2:40:06 AM): Hmmm I don't know offhand
> RSPW98 (2:40:19 AM): Check the webpage.
> CBryant215 (2:40:24 AM): something like Stink or Twink
> LowGeenyus (5:41:11 AM): if he says it I will so mark
> CBryant215 (5:41:37 AM): RSPW98 (2:40:39 AM): Someone said they stopped
> by Chad's workplace last week and that he had a bruise or something on
> his face.
> RSPW98 (2:40:42 AM): Did he hurt himself?
> RSPW98 (2:40:48 AM): Like fall down or whatever
> CBryant215 (2:41:21 AM): Chad didn't have a bruise or anything last week
> LowGeenyus (5:41:54 AM): wtf?
> LowGeenyus (5:42:40 AM): No dink, unlke you, my husband doesn't spend a
> great deal of time running full-speed head-first into brick walls. He
> has other hobbies
> CBryant215 (5:42:54 AM): CBryant215 (2:41:51 AM): was that another lie?
> CBryant215 (2:42:00 AM): Chad doesn't have any scars on his face, either
> RSPW98 (2:42:03 AM): I don't know. Chad lies a lot I think.
> CBryant215 (2:42:12 AM): well, except for a small mark above his eyebrow
> CBryant215 (2:42:30 AM): and a scar or two on his forehead from using a
> razor blade...some wrestling thing
> CBryant215 (5:43:44 AM): RSPW98 (2:42:52 AM): Crap, my phone is ringing,
> I need to go. Tell Chad that Otto said hi, he'll know who I mean. TTYL
> CBryant215 (2:43:00 AM): right
> CBryant215 (2:43:08 AM): can I show this to Chad?
> RSPW98 (2:43:13 AM): Surer
> RSPW98 (2:43:15 AM): Sure
> CBryant215 (2:43:18 AM): he'll probably want to read it
> RSPW98 (2:43:19 AM): tell him Otto says hi
> CBryant215 (2:43:22 AM): I will
> LowGeenyus (5:44:35 AM): I haven't seen anything this spectacularly
> obtuse since Jethro Tull took home the grammy for Best Heavy Metal
> Album...beating Metallica's "..And Justice For All"
> CBryant215 (5:44:56 AM): RSPW98 (2:44:23 AM): And ask him why he stays up
> so late impersonating fictional girlfriends and insulting people on the
> Internet. That makes him look like an idiot. Somebody said he was fat
> too. I tend to agree. Don't tell him I said so but he looks like a
> bloated walrus. Just paint two bananas white and stuff them in his mouth
> and you
> have a good match * lol * goodnight.
> LowGeenyus (5:45:12 AM): lmao
> CBryant215 (5:45:17 AM): Dink = worked
> LowGeenyus (5:45:19 AM): what
> LowGeenyus (5:45:20 AM): a
> LowGeenyus (5:45:22 AM): TARD
>
> fin.
The Super Intellignet Silverfish
Maybe I'll be in a better mood next week.
The Super Intellignet Silverfish - Founder of the Glass Ceiling World Order
ultimate sin
****
U.A. 4 L
"Mass prediction, unification
Breathing life into out lungs
EVERY creed and EVERY kind
To give us depth for strength" -Pantera