I think its great if true. I had an RX 7 and the engines are great.
Reliable, fast, rev to the moon and are super duper smooth running. I
suppose they would get better fuel economy and lower polution? but I
dunno
Anyone verify this?
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
I think most everyone will have a four stroke out within two years.
Bill O'Neal
WCM
tarza...@yahoo.com wrote in message
<3b57bdea...@goliath.newsfeeds.com>...
greg
I dont know where Sea Doo is getting all her 4 stroke tech but a
1500cc motor sounds HEAVY.. 3 valves per cylinder?? hrm Ill take the 5
thank you. I just dont think SD has the proven motors on hand. If I
was SD I would work on a marine fuel injected rotary.. Something
amazingly smooth, quiet and the performance should be outstanding and
exceed these 4 strokers. I honestly cannot believe more automakers
didnt play with wankel/rotary motors. The people that have built home
aircraft with these enginers powering them rave about the reliability
and smooth power. My RX7 had 167,000 miles on it when I sold it. Still
running strong and never a problem with the engine.
Ok well here is for wishful thinking..But a rotary that revvs to 7200
rpm hooked directly to a jet pump sounds far better than any
recipricating motor could ever be... Talk about smooth!
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:24:00 -0500, BOOMZILLA <bbin...@ev1.net>
wrote:
>I
>suppose they would get better fuel economy and lower polution?
My understanding is just the opposite on both counts is why they stay
sheltered, rather than in the main stream. That was years ago, and maybe
changed?
Kelly
he probably meant compared to two cycle. The rotary should fall in
between two and four stroke tradional engines. But look, if it is just
slightly worse emissions than a four stroke the greenies will
continue to have something to gripe about, so it seems like a
dead end on that point.
tarza...@yahoo.com wrote:
> I look at it this way.. Yamaha had such a huge head start in 4 stroke
> tech having the R1 motor laying there and the expertise inhouse to
> convert that baby for marine use. 5 valves per cylinder, kills the
> competition in wieght savings ect. They just kicked the living shit
> out Honda I think and I am certain Honda is reevaluating whether or
> not they want to enter the market.
>
> I dont know where Sea Doo is getting all her 4 stroke tech but a
> 1500cc motor sounds HEAVY.. 3 valves per cylinder?? hrm Ill take the 5
> thank you. I just dont think SD has the proven motors on hand.
Bobardier's four stroke DS 650 beat Yamaha's four stroke 660 Raptor in the
Baja 1000 this year sea doo's four stroke technoligy will no doubt come from
BMW, or what ever that Austrian motor makers name is. The same people who make
rotax.
Ricky g
--
Laszlo Almasi
Carolina Watercraft Works, Inc.
2104 Langdon Road
Raleigh, NC 27604
loba...@mindspring.com
" George Jefferson " <gj...@one.net> wrote in message news:tlgqp74...@corp.supernews.com...
I think rotaries are the way to go for PWC. It's just gonna take more people
making them otherwise they will remain expensive. I checked with freedom and
the starting price was in the neighborhood of $10K
Oh well
-Rusty
'97 SD GSI
<tarza...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b57bdea...@goliath.newsfeeds.com...
Horse pucky !
Yamaha is no further ahead of the industry than Honda in Marine 4 strokes.
Yamaha introduced a 225 hp 6 clyinder outboard just 3 weeks before Hopnda
released their 225 hp 6 clyindered outboard. Guess which one the testers
liked the best. I'll give you a clue. It starts with "H".
Honda used the vetec technology from their F1 cars, later proven in their
autos, and now in the outboards. Varible valve timing. Also, a rpm sensitive
plenuim system for low rpm operation. Smooth as silk and quiet too. Same
peak power and torque, but smoother getting there.
Sea Doo's parent company, Bombardier, owns Rotax. One of Europe's oldest and
biggest engine building companies. If you think that they don't have enough
experence building 4 strokes, think again. They are second in small engine
production volume behind Briggs and Stratton in numbers produced, but miles
ahead of B&S in technology. They also own the engine manufactoring plants
of OMC, since the buyout last year. SD 's new 1500 modular is said to be "
the lightest 4 stroke of it's size ever built" by an engineer friend of
mine, whom some of you know, that has done some work on this project for
Bombardier. He used terms like "extremely lightweight" and "very powerfull".
I wouldn't be putting all my eggs into one basket just yet. We'll see who
comes out with affordable and reliable four strokes that produce decent
power for watercraft. Over the next two years, I expect to see many
different versions. I don't expect to see SD or Honda losing out on
anything......
Bill O'Neal
WCM
tarza...@yahoo.com wrote in message
<3b585fa2...@goliath.newsfeeds.com>...
Scott
How many Bombardier Quads have you rebuilt ? They have 4 strokes in them.
Bill O'Neal
WCM
KatScotBoo wrote in message
<20010720214544...@ng-fs1.aol.com>...
>Honda used the vetec technology from their F1 cars, later proven in their
>autos, and now in the outboards. Varible valve timing.
What do you know about the variable timing? This has always been a
design challenge I've kept in the back of my mind in many forms and am
curious about what form it uses in reality. And are you referring to
timing alone, or variable lift as well?
Hell, I only wished I had venues to apply some of my ideas. When I was a
kid, a fella I looked up to had an engine challenge in his head he was
stuck on using vanes in a rotary motion in place of pistons (ala radial)
but couldn't work out the linkage. Now that I worked it out, he's in
South America...
Kelly
BTW, who knows if the engines mentioned so far use any form of lower
needles or babit bearings on the rods? My last bike experience was about
20 years ago.
Kelly
Scott
Tom
Beesley's Point SeaDoo
609-390-1113
BMW used a Rotax motor in its 650 Dual Purpose bike , the same motor that is
used in the 650 DS Quad. BMW chose Rotax because they did not have a single
in their stable and they needed a motor that would continue their (BMW)
world-wide known reliability in motorcycle engines. The motor has proven to
be beyond bullet proof, winning many endurance races for BMW and the Baja
1000 for Bombardier. It is strictly a Rotax motor , not a BMW power plant.
Brad
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 08:12:24 -0500, Kelly Matchett <fl...@wcnet.net>
wrote: