info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
OT: If the intelligence revealed to Russia was so benign...
4 views
Skip to first unread message
Alan Baker
May 17, 2017, 1:31:10 PM5/17/17
to
...why won't they just tell the media exactly what it was?
These guys had the very same thought I had:
'If McMaster and his White House colleagues continue to insist the
President’s disclosure was benign, the Post might consider calling their
bluff: “In that case, we assume you won’t object if we publish it on the
front page.”[1]'
<https://www.justsecurity.org/41024/why-trumps-disclosure-and-more-might-be-unlawful/>
These guys had the very same thought I had:
'If McMaster and his White House colleagues continue to insist the
President’s disclosure was benign, the Post might consider calling their
bluff: “In that case, we assume you won’t object if we publish it on the
front page.”[1]'
<https://www.justsecurity.org/41024/why-trumps-disclosure-and-more-might-be-unlawful/>
Alan Baker
May 17, 2017, 2:34:53 PM5/17/17
to
On 2017-05-17 11:31 AM, Moderate wrote:
> Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net> Wrote in message:
>> bluff: ?In that case, we assume you won?t object if we publish it on the
>> front page.?[1]'
>>
>> <https://www.justsecurity.org/41024/why-trumps-disclosure-and-more-might-be-unlawful/>
>>
>
> Bwaahaahaa. Why not post another lie. You guppies just suck it up.
>
What lie is there in what I posted, doofus?
If it's possible for you, be specific.
> Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net> Wrote in message:
>> ...why won't they just tell the media exactly what it was?
>>
>> These guys had the very same thought I had:
>>
>> 'If McMaster and his White House colleagues continue to insist the
>> President?s disclosure was benign, the Post might consider calling their
>>
>> These guys had the very same thought I had:
>>
>> 'If McMaster and his White House colleagues continue to insist the
>> bluff: ?In that case, we assume you won?t object if we publish it on the
>> front page.?[1]'
>>
>> <https://www.justsecurity.org/41024/why-trumps-disclosure-and-more-might-be-unlawful/>
>>
>
> Bwaahaahaa. Why not post another lie. You guppies just suck it up.
>
What lie is there in what I posted, doofus?
If it's possible for you, be specific.
B...@onramp.net
May 17, 2017, 5:26:17 PM5/17/17
to
On Wed, 17 May 2017 13:31:39 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
<nos...@noemail.com> wrote:
>Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net> Wrote in message:
<nos...@noemail.com> wrote:
>Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net> Wrote in message:
>> ...why won't they just tell the media exactly what it was?
>>
>> These guys had the very same thought I had:
>>
>> 'If McMaster and his White House colleagues continue to insist the
>>
>> These guys had the very same thought I had:
>>
>> 'If McMaster and his White House colleagues continue to insist the
>> President?s disclosure was benign, the Post might consider calling their
>> bluff: ?In that case, we assume you won?t object if we publish it on the
>> front page.?[1]'
>>
>> <https://www.justsecurity.org/41024/why-trumps-disclosure-and-more-might-be-unlawful/>
>>
>
>Bwaahaahaa. Why not post another lie. You guppies just suck it up.
Show the lie to which you refer. Certainly not that Trump's actions
>> bluff: ?In that case, we assume you won?t object if we publish it on the
>> front page.?[1]'
>>
>> <https://www.justsecurity.org/41024/why-trumps-disclosure-and-more-might-be-unlawful/>
>>
>
>Bwaahaahaa. Why not post another lie. You guppies just suck it up.
COULD be unlawful. It's possible and you lamebrains have to ignore
it or agree that you're FOS.
Alan Baker
May 17, 2017, 7:04:01 PM5/17/17
to
On 2017-05-17 3:59 PM, Moderate wrote:
> B...@Onramp.net Wrote in message:
> Please list the unlawful actions.
> :-)
>
Where does stating that his actions COULD be unlawful become a lie?
What's more, you posted your statement about lies before that was ever
posted to the thread.
So what lie did I post?
> B...@Onramp.net Wrote in message:
> :-)
>
Where does stating that his actions COULD be unlawful become a lie?
What's more, you posted your statement about lies before that was ever
posted to the thread.
So what lie did I post?
B...@onramp.net
May 17, 2017, 10:03:43 PM5/17/17
to
On Wed, 17 May 2017 17:59:13 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
<nos...@noemail.com> wrote:
>B...@Onramp.net Wrote in message:
look it up in a dictionary.
If reading it twice doesn't get through to you then you're dumber than
dirt.
<nos...@noemail.com> wrote:
>B...@Onramp.net Wrote in message:
>Please list the unlawful actions.:-)
Go back and see if you can find the CAPITALIZED word above. Then
look it up in a dictionary.
If reading it twice doesn't get through to you then you're dumber than
dirt.
0 new messages