Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Fluke v. Palin et al
7 views
Skip to first unread message
Don A Roof
Jun 2, 2012, 10:58:32 AM6/2/12
to
Look, wingnuts (read that att. Ken Pitts):
Fluke is a private citizen who tried to testify before congress and was
denied that opportunity by the wingnut Rs.
Palin is a public figure who came out of the box flame throwing and got
everything she deserved. Laura Ingram is a noxious bloviator who makes
a living bashing libs so she gets what she deserves when fire is
returned.
Limbaugh is a fat ass draft dodging racist who makes a living selling
horseshit to wingnuts. He deserves anything he gets thrown at him.
Maher is also on the make trying to ride the other side of the fence. He
is also out there and a public figure so take your shots.
Neither woman went through what Hillary did - and still does.
Nevertheless, Hillary is "out there" and also has to deal with whatever
return fire comes her way.
All this whining about "double standards" is nothing but partisan
bullshit. Whaddya expect?
Hypocrisy? Don't make me laugh. Of COURSE political bomb throwing is
hypocritical! You expected objectivity? LOL!
Fluke is a private citizen who tried to testify before congress and was
denied that opportunity by the wingnut Rs.
Palin is a public figure who came out of the box flame throwing and got
everything she deserved. Laura Ingram is a noxious bloviator who makes
a living bashing libs so she gets what she deserves when fire is
returned.
Limbaugh is a fat ass draft dodging racist who makes a living selling
horseshit to wingnuts. He deserves anything he gets thrown at him.
Maher is also on the make trying to ride the other side of the fence. He
is also out there and a public figure so take your shots.
Neither woman went through what Hillary did - and still does.
Nevertheless, Hillary is "out there" and also has to deal with whatever
return fire comes her way.
All this whining about "double standards" is nothing but partisan
bullshit. Whaddya expect?
Hypocrisy? Don't make me laugh. Of COURSE political bomb throwing is
hypocritical! You expected objectivity? LOL!
Ken Pitts
Jun 2, 2012, 12:05:32 PM6/2/12
to
who you are. I am not a "wing nut". I have supported myself my whole
life since I left the nest. My wife and I own a home. We pay our taxes
(all of them). We have outstanding credit and have never defaulted on
anything. I consider myself a mainstream conservative
.
Fluke testified didn't she? And part of it was BS because of the
inflated price she put on the cost of personal contraception. FWIW, it
is not up to the govt or the health services of an exclusive
university like Georgetown to provide for her needs in the area of
birth control. She and her partner can take care of that. Period. Or
they do not need to be having sex. In spite of all of that, she did
not deserve for Rush to call her a slut and all the rest. But I don't
claim him and I don't listen to him because he is on in the DFW area
from 1100 to 1400 M-F and I work for a living.
Rush is a draft dodger? Care to cite something about that? We already
know Bill Clinton is. I served during the VietNam conflict. For four
years. Care to share the nature of your service?
Sarah Palin does not deserve to be called a "cunt". And I don't know
who introduced Laura Ingraham to this, but she is one of my favs so
needless to say I don't agree with your assessment. What I will agree
with is that liberals need to be bashed. Here is what Sarah Palin has
been subjected to by liberals. She does not deserve this either.
http://michellemalkin.com/2011/01/10/the-progressive-climate-of-hate-an-illustrated-primer-2000-2010/
What makes Hillary Clinton so special?
Ken
BAR
Jun 2, 2012, 12:39:20 PM6/2/12
to
In article <8769-4F...@storefull-3113.bay.webtv.net>,
dona...@webtv.net says...
community organizer. She went to Georgetown Law School with two purposes
in mind, one to become a lawyer and two to fight the policy against
covering contraceptive services.
> Palin is a public figure who came out of the box flame throwing and got
> everything she deserved. Laura Ingram is a noxious bloviator who makes
> a living bashing libs so she gets what she deserves when fire is
> returned.
Isn't it sad that Palin pulls in more viewers than Katie Couric?
Why do you hate strong women?
> Limbaugh is a fat ass draft dodging racist who makes a living selling
> horseshit to wingnuts. He deserves anything he gets thrown at him.
Rush Limbaugh is an entertainer. He also has a pionodial cyst which
disqualifies you from military services. A guy I used to work with had
his appointment to the USNA pulled because he lost the tip of his finger
in a lawn mowing accident.
> Maher is also on the make trying to ride the other side of the fence. He
> is also out there and a public figure so take your shots.
Mahr is an entertainer just like Rush Limbaugh.
> Neither woman went through what Hillary did - and still does.
> Nevertheless, Hillary is "out there" and also has to deal with whatever
> return fire comes her way.
Hillary made a calculated move when she married Bill Clinton. It kind of
worked out because she was handed a Senate seat in NY and Obama gave her
the Sec of State to keep her from ragging on him from the Senate.
> All this whining about "double standards" is nothing but partisan
> bullshit. Whaddya expect?
Double standards do exist. The Democrat's are the pros at double
standards.
> Hypocrisy? Don't make me laugh. Of COURSE political bomb throwing is
> hypocritical! You expected objectivity? LOL!
There are none so blind as those who cannot see what is happening in
front of there own faces.
dona...@webtv.net says...
>
> Look, wingnuts (read that att. Ken Pitts):
>
> Fluke is a private citizen who tried to testify before congress and was
> denied that opportunity by the wingnut Rs.
Sandra Fluke is no more a private citizen than any other person who is a
> Look, wingnuts (read that att. Ken Pitts):
>
> Fluke is a private citizen who tried to testify before congress and was
> denied that opportunity by the wingnut Rs.
community organizer. She went to Georgetown Law School with two purposes
in mind, one to become a lawyer and two to fight the policy against
covering contraceptive services.
> Palin is a public figure who came out of the box flame throwing and got
> everything she deserved. Laura Ingram is a noxious bloviator who makes
> a living bashing libs so she gets what she deserves when fire is
> returned.
Why do you hate strong women?
> Limbaugh is a fat ass draft dodging racist who makes a living selling
> horseshit to wingnuts. He deserves anything he gets thrown at him.
disqualifies you from military services. A guy I used to work with had
his appointment to the USNA pulled because he lost the tip of his finger
in a lawn mowing accident.
> Maher is also on the make trying to ride the other side of the fence. He
> is also out there and a public figure so take your shots.
> Neither woman went through what Hillary did - and still does.
> Nevertheless, Hillary is "out there" and also has to deal with whatever
> return fire comes her way.
worked out because she was handed a Senate seat in NY and Obama gave her
the Sec of State to keep her from ragging on him from the Senate.
> All this whining about "double standards" is nothing but partisan
> bullshit. Whaddya expect?
standards.
> Hypocrisy? Don't make me laugh. Of COURSE political bomb throwing is
> hypocritical! You expected objectivity? LOL!
front of there own faces.
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 2, 2012, 1:14:33 PM6/2/12
to
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 12:39:20 -0400, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
>In article <8769-4F...@storefull-3113.bay.webtv.net>,
>dona...@webtv.net says...
>>
>> Look, wingnuts (read that att. Ken Pitts):
>>
>> Fluke is a private citizen who tried to testify before congress and was
>> denied that opportunity by the wingnut Rs.
>
>Sandra Fluke is no more a private citizen than any other person who is a
>community organizer. She went to Georgetown Law School with two purposes
>in mind, one to become a lawyer and two to fight the policy against
>covering contraceptive services.
>
>> Palin is a public figure who came out of the box flame throwing and got
>> everything she deserved. Laura Ingram is a noxious bloviator who makes
>> a living bashing libs so she gets what she deserves when fire is
>> returned.
>
>Isn't it sad that Palin pulls in more viewers than Katie Couric
BS. She isn't on air now. ABC announced that Couric signed a
>In article <8769-4F...@storefull-3113.bay.webtv.net>,
>dona...@webtv.net says...
>>
>> Look, wingnuts (read that att. Ken Pitts):
>>
>> Fluke is a private citizen who tried to testify before congress and was
>> denied that opportunity by the wingnut Rs.
>
>Sandra Fluke is no more a private citizen than any other person who is a
>community organizer. She went to Georgetown Law School with two purposes
>in mind, one to become a lawyer and two to fight the policy against
>covering contraceptive services.
>
>> Palin is a public figure who came out of the box flame throwing and got
>> everything she deserved. Laura Ingram is a noxious bloviator who makes
>> a living bashing libs so she gets what she deserves when fire is
>> returned.
>
>Isn't it sad that Palin pulls in more viewers than Katie Couric
record $40 million contract, and would begin hosting a daytime talk
show for its Disney-ABC Domestic Television arm that would debut in
September 2012.
You can be sure that she outdraws Sarah then.
<clip>
>> Neither woman went through what Hillary did - and still does.
>> Nevertheless, Hillary is "out there" and also has to deal with whatever
>> return fire comes her way.
>
>Hillary made a calculated move when she married Bill Clinton. It kind of
>worked out because she was handed a Senate seat in NY and Obama gave her
>the Sec of State to keep her from ragging on him from the Senate.
>
>> All this whining about "double standards" is nothing but partisan
>> bullshit. Whaddya expect?
>
>Double standards do exist. The Democrat's are the pros at double
>standards.
More BS. Neither party outdoes the other in this category.
>> Nevertheless, Hillary is "out there" and also has to deal with whatever
>> return fire comes her way.
>
>Hillary made a calculated move when she married Bill Clinton. It kind of
>worked out because she was handed a Senate seat in NY and Obama gave her
>the Sec of State to keep her from ragging on him from the Senate.
>
>> All this whining about "double standards" is nothing but partisan
>> bullshit. Whaddya expect?
>
>Double standards do exist. The Democrat's are the pros at double
>standards.
>
>> Hypocrisy? Don't make me laugh. Of COURSE political bomb throwing is
>> hypocritical! You expected objectivity? LOL!
>
>There are none so blind as those who cannot see what is happening in
>front of there own faces.
But there's a small hope that maybe you'll finally wake up and see
>> Hypocrisy? Don't make me laugh. Of COURSE political bomb throwing is
>> hypocritical! You expected objectivity? LOL!
>
>There are none so blind as those who cannot see what is happening in
>front of there own faces.
Bert.
>
Message has been deleted
Kenn Smith
Jun 2, 2012, 5:03:22 PM6/2/12
to
It is crass to call any woman a slut or a cunt. But, then, Limbaugh and
Maher are crass individuals so what can you expect. The lowest common
denominator.
I strongly suspect that any poster in this group who is married wouldn't
stand by and allow his wife to be called either. I know damned well
that I wouldn't. Or, for that matter, my daughter in law or any other
female relative. I might be old but I can still pick up a baseball bat.
Bobby, you were flat out wrong in calling Sarah Palin a cunt. She has a
vagina but she doesn't deserve the title of cunt. Bert, you were flat
out wrong in putting your own spin on Ms. Fluke's reasons for attending
law school. How could you possibly know what was in her mind. Simple
answer, you can't. Contraception issues probably weren't on her mind
when she took the LSAT.
Maher are crass individuals so what can you expect. The lowest common
denominator.
I strongly suspect that any poster in this group who is married wouldn't
stand by and allow his wife to be called either. I know damned well
that I wouldn't. Or, for that matter, my daughter in law or any other
female relative. I might be old but I can still pick up a baseball bat.
Bobby, you were flat out wrong in calling Sarah Palin a cunt. She has a
vagina but she doesn't deserve the title of cunt. Bert, you were flat
out wrong in putting your own spin on Ms. Fluke's reasons for attending
law school. How could you possibly know what was in her mind. Simple
answer, you can't. Contraception issues probably weren't on her mind
when she took the LSAT.
Ken Pitts
Jun 2, 2012, 5:21:41 PM6/2/12
to
We can certainly spin her demands for her contraception to be funded
by someone else at several times the standard price.
Ken
Kenn Smith
Jun 2, 2012, 6:13:27 PM6/2/12
to
Ken, I haven't been on my computer this afternoon. I'll be going up
there later and will respond if it has come in. You can't email me on
this thing because it is a spam funnel and I long ago let the mailbox
fill up.
I'm pretty sure you have my other address but just in case it is
ksmith10athot.rr.com.
there later and will respond if it has come in. You can't email me on
this thing because it is a spam funnel and I long ago let the mailbox
fill up.
I'm pretty sure you have my other address but just in case it is
ksmith10athot.rr.com.
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 2, 2012, 6:27:07 PM6/2/12
to
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 16:03:22 -0500, grizzl...@webtv.net (Kenn Smith)
wrote:
>Bobby, you were flat out wrong in calling Sarah Palin a cunt.
If it was anyone else but you Kenn I'd just ignore this. If you read
it in context you'll see that it was in jest. If that doesn't appease
you I'm sorry.
Bobby
wrote:
>Bobby, you were flat out wrong in calling Sarah Palin a cunt.
it in context you'll see that it was in jest. If that doesn't appease
you I'm sorry.
Bobby
Kenn Smith
Jun 2, 2012, 7:08:45 PM6/2/12
to
No problem, Bobby. I just expressed an opinion - jest or not it was
still crass. I don't really get all excited over things like this and I
respect many of your opinions, that post just struck me wrong.
still crass. I don't really get all excited over things like this and I
respect many of your opinions, that post just struck me wrong.
Frank Ketchum
Jun 2, 2012, 7:44:14 PM6/2/12
to
<bkn...@conramp.net> wrote in message
news:fk4ls7pkteacd9963...@4ax.com...
"Well, Palin IS a cunt and Fluke isn't a slut. :-)"
BAR
Jun 2, 2012, 7:47:08 PM6/2/12
to
In article <e6iks7h5evs7ma5r2...@4ax.com>,
bkn...@conramp.net says...
just get the money or is she going to have to pull in certain numbers of
viewers? If ABC was stupid enough to just give her the money then they
deserve the lose they will get from that deal.
Oprah Winfrey doesn't have the magic touch anymore. Word is that
Discover is ready to dump OWN. Discovery can't continue to lose hundreds
of millions of dollars on Oprah's attempt to have her own channel.
> <clip>
> >> Neither woman went through what Hillary did - and still does.
> >> Nevertheless, Hillary is "out there" and also has to deal with whatever
> >> return fire comes her way.
> >
> >Hillary made a calculated move when she married Bill Clinton. It kind of
> >worked out because she was handed a Senate seat in NY and Obama gave her
> >the Sec of State to keep her from ragging on him from the Senate.
> >
> >> All this whining about "double standards" is nothing but partisan
> >> bullshit. Whaddya expect?
> >
> >Double standards do exist. The Democrat's are the pros at double
> >standards.
>
> More BS. Neither party outdoes the other in this category.
> >
> >> Hypocrisy? Don't make me laugh. Of COURSE political bomb throwing is
> >> hypocritical! You expected objectivity? LOL!
> >
> >There are none so blind as those who cannot see what is happening in
> >front of there own faces.
>
> But there's a small hope that maybe you'll finally wake up and see
> Bert.
> >
I am fully awake. Your problem is that you are still in a haze and your
head hasn't cleared.
bkn...@conramp.net says...
>
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 12:39:20 -0400, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <8769-4F...@storefull-3113.bay.webtv.net>,
> >dona...@webtv.net says...
> >>
> >> Look, wingnuts (read that att. Ken Pitts):
> >>
> >> Fluke is a private citizen who tried to testify before congress and was
> >> denied that opportunity by the wingnut Rs.
> >
> >Sandra Fluke is no more a private citizen than any other person who is a
> >community organizer. She went to Georgetown Law School with two purposes
> >in mind, one to become a lawyer and two to fight the policy against
> >covering contraceptive services.
> >
> >> Palin is a public figure who came out of the box flame throwing and got
> >> everything she deserved. Laura Ingram is a noxious bloviator who makes
> >> a living bashing libs so she gets what she deserves when fire is
> >> returned.
> >
> >Isn't it sad that Palin pulls in more viewers than Katie Couric
>
> BS. She isn't on air now. ABC announced that Couric signed a
> record $40 million contract, and would begin hosting a daytime talk
> show for its Disney-ABC Domestic Television arm that would debut in
> September 2012.
> You can be sure that she outdraws Sarah then.
Katie Couric is a has been. Do you really believe that Katie is going to
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 12:39:20 -0400, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <8769-4F...@storefull-3113.bay.webtv.net>,
> >dona...@webtv.net says...
> >>
> >> Look, wingnuts (read that att. Ken Pitts):
> >>
> >> Fluke is a private citizen who tried to testify before congress and was
> >> denied that opportunity by the wingnut Rs.
> >
> >Sandra Fluke is no more a private citizen than any other person who is a
> >community organizer. She went to Georgetown Law School with two purposes
> >in mind, one to become a lawyer and two to fight the policy against
> >covering contraceptive services.
> >
> >> Palin is a public figure who came out of the box flame throwing and got
> >> everything she deserved. Laura Ingram is a noxious bloviator who makes
> >> a living bashing libs so she gets what she deserves when fire is
> >> returned.
> >
> >Isn't it sad that Palin pulls in more viewers than Katie Couric
>
> BS. She isn't on air now. ABC announced that Couric signed a
> record $40 million contract, and would begin hosting a daytime talk
> show for its Disney-ABC Domestic Television arm that would debut in
> September 2012.
> You can be sure that she outdraws Sarah then.
just get the money or is she going to have to pull in certain numbers of
viewers? If ABC was stupid enough to just give her the money then they
deserve the lose they will get from that deal.
Oprah Winfrey doesn't have the magic touch anymore. Word is that
Discover is ready to dump OWN. Discovery can't continue to lose hundreds
of millions of dollars on Oprah's attempt to have her own channel.
> <clip>
> >> Neither woman went through what Hillary did - and still does.
> >> Nevertheless, Hillary is "out there" and also has to deal with whatever
> >> return fire comes her way.
> >
> >Hillary made a calculated move when she married Bill Clinton. It kind of
> >worked out because she was handed a Senate seat in NY and Obama gave her
> >the Sec of State to keep her from ragging on him from the Senate.
> >
> >> All this whining about "double standards" is nothing but partisan
> >> bullshit. Whaddya expect?
> >
> >Double standards do exist. The Democrat's are the pros at double
> >standards.
>
> More BS. Neither party outdoes the other in this category.
> >
> >> Hypocrisy? Don't make me laugh. Of COURSE political bomb throwing is
> >> hypocritical! You expected objectivity? LOL!
> >
> >There are none so blind as those who cannot see what is happening in
> >front of there own faces.
>
> But there's a small hope that maybe you'll finally wake up and see
> Bert.
> >
head hasn't cleared.
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 2, 2012, 7:57:43 PM6/2/12
to
BAR
Jun 2, 2012, 7:59:48 PM6/2/12
to
In article <22271-4FC...@storefull-3172.bay.webtv.net>,
grizzl...@webtv.net says...
It wasn't my spin Kenn.
It is well known that Sandra Fluke went to Georgetown with the objective
of agitating against the university and Catholicism.
grizzl...@webtv.net says...
It is well known that Sandra Fluke went to Georgetown with the objective
of agitating against the university and Catholicism.
Lloyd
Jun 2, 2012, 8:05:03 PM6/2/12
to
In article <MPG.2a3472f...@news.giganews.com>,
Yes it was. She probably wasn't thinking about that when she took the
LSAT, but she sure was when she applied for Georgetown.
LSAT, but she sure was when she applied for Georgetown.
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 2, 2012, 8:07:24 PM6/2/12
to
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 19:59:48 -0400, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
>
>It is well known that Sandra Fluke went to Georgetown with the objective
>of agitating against the university and Catholicism.
>
>
Well known by whom? Other loonies like you? Try proving this one
>
>It is well known that Sandra Fluke went to Georgetown with the objective
>of agitating against the university and Catholicism.
>
>
Bert.
BAR
Jun 2, 2012, 8:22:20 PM6/2/12
to
In article <6kals7p974emog7p7...@4ax.com>,
bkn...@conramp.net says...
Try reading a newspaper once in a while.
bkn...@conramp.net says...
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 2, 2012, 8:39:22 PM6/2/12
to
regarding contraceptives and was accused of being anti-Catholic which
she's denied. One of the main points that she used was a woman who
had a disease which needed contraceptives to control, not for birth
control.
William Clark
Jun 2, 2012, 9:39:17 PM6/2/12
to
actually has some firm evidence for this nonsense? I'm not holding my
breath waiting for it, note.
William Clark
Jun 2, 2012, 9:40:01 PM6/2/12
to
In article <MPG.2a34784...@news.giganews.com>,
In other words, he doesn't have a scintilla of proof. As is always the
case with poor Bertie.
case with poor Bertie.
BAR
Jun 2, 2012, 10:00:34 PM6/2/12
to
In article <6bcls71umt5qmtvhi...@4ax.com>,
bkn...@conramp.net says...
That's right, Sandra Fluke went to Georgetown to agitate and effect
change in at a religious institution. The sad thing is that Sandra Fluke
lied about the cost of birth control pills. There is nothing that is
preventing her from paying for them herself.
Most insurance policies have exclusions which is not a new idea, it has
been going on for years and years. To be of the belief that anything and
everything medical is covered by your medical insurance is just plain
stupid.
What I want to know is why medical insurance doesn't cover dental care?
Why should your health suffer just because you can't afford a root-canal
or crown. Free dental care for everyone!
bkn...@conramp.net says...
change in at a religious institution. The sad thing is that Sandra Fluke
lied about the cost of birth control pills. There is nothing that is
preventing her from paying for them herself.
Most insurance policies have exclusions which is not a new idea, it has
been going on for years and years. To be of the belief that anything and
everything medical is covered by your medical insurance is just plain
stupid.
What I want to know is why medical insurance doesn't cover dental care?
Why should your health suffer just because you can't afford a root-canal
or crown. Free dental care for everyone!
BAR
Jun 2, 2012, 10:06:15 PM6/2/12
to
In article <clark-B54CD8....@news.eternal-september.org>,
cl...@nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
Bobby provided it in another post. He confirmed that Fluke went to
Georgetown to agitate against their policies.
cl...@nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
Georgetown to agitate against their policies.
BAR
Jun 2, 2012, 10:06:36 PM6/2/12
to
In article <clark-127BF9....@news.eternal-september.org>,
cl...@nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
Ask Bobby.
cl...@nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 2, 2012, 10:19:07 PM6/2/12
to
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 22:00:34 -0400, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
>In article <6bcls71umt5qmtvhi...@4ax.com>,
>bkn...@conramp.net says...
>> >> It is well known that Sandra Fluke went to Georgetown with the objective
>> >> of agitating against the university and Catholicism.
>
>The sad thing is that Sandra Fluke
>lied about the cost of birth control pills. There is nothing that is
>preventing her from paying for them herself.
The sad thing is that you're so stupid that you overlook the fact that
she never mentioned her own sex life, and as above used other's to
back her arguments. There are other uses for contraceptive drugs
than for birth control.
>What I want to know is why medical insurance doesn't cover dental care?
>Why should your health suffer just because you can't afford a root-canal
>or crown. Free dental care for everyone!
There are a lot of things you should want to know. But this one is
wrong too...for your umpteenth time. I have dental insurance which
covers root canals, all dental services, even cleaning.
Welcome to the 21st century.
>In article <6bcls71umt5qmtvhi...@4ax.com>,
>bkn...@conramp.net says...
>> >> It is well known that Sandra Fluke went to Georgetown with the objective
>> >> of agitating against the university and Catholicism.
>
>> From what I have read she attended Georgetown to fight their policy
>> regarding contraceptives and was accused of being anti-Catholic which
>> she's denied. One of the main points that she used was a woman who
>> had a disease which needed contraceptives to control, not for birth
>> control.
>
>That's right, Sandra Fluke went to Georgetown to agitate and effect
>change in at a religious institution.
But not against Catholicism Bert.
>> regarding contraceptives and was accused of being anti-Catholic which
>> she's denied. One of the main points that she used was a woman who
>> had a disease which needed contraceptives to control, not for birth
>> control.
>
>That's right, Sandra Fluke went to Georgetown to agitate and effect
>change in at a religious institution.
>The sad thing is that Sandra Fluke
>lied about the cost of birth control pills. There is nothing that is
>preventing her from paying for them herself.
she never mentioned her own sex life, and as above used other's to
back her arguments. There are other uses for contraceptive drugs
than for birth control.
>What I want to know is why medical insurance doesn't cover dental care?
>Why should your health suffer just because you can't afford a root-canal
>or crown. Free dental care for everyone!
wrong too...for your umpteenth time. I have dental insurance which
covers root canals, all dental services, even cleaning.
Welcome to the 21st century.
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 2, 2012, 10:24:47 PM6/2/12
to
50% is a great average for you though.
William Clark
Jun 2, 2012, 10:39:37 PM6/2/12
to
In article <9lils713vljplioma...@4ax.com>,
And he still can't produce his own cite, though. Good thing he has you
to prop him up :-)
to prop him up :-)
William Clark
Jun 2, 2012, 10:39:51 PM6/2/12
to
William Clark
Jun 2, 2012, 10:41:27 PM6/2/12
to
In article <MPG.2a348f4...@news.giganews.com>,
If you worked for a proper outfit, you would have dental insurance, too.
And vision insurance. All part of the package. No big deal
And vision insurance. All part of the package. No big deal
Don Kirkman
Jun 3, 2012, 1:39:19 AM6/3/12
to
dental implant a few years ago--pretty big bucks for one tooth.
>Welcome to the 21st century.
--
Don Kirkman
don...@charter.net
BAR
Jun 3, 2012, 8:01:41 AM6/3/12
to
In article <9lils713vljplioma...@4ax.com>,
faith and doctrine. You can't separate the two.
bkn...@conramp.net says...
>
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 22:06:15 -0400, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <clark-B54CD8....@news.eternal-september.org>,
> >cl...@nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
> >>
> >> In article <MPG.2a34784...@news.giganews.com>,
> >> BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > In article <6kals7p974emog7p7...@4ax.com>,
> >> > bkn...@conramp.net says...
> >> > >
> >> > > On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 19:59:48 -0400, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >It is well known that Sandra Fluke went to Georgetown with the objective
> >> > > >of agitating against the university and Catholicism.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > Well known by whom? Other loonies like you? Try proving this one
> >> > > Bert.
> >> >
> >> > Try reading a newspaper once in a while.
> >>
> >> In other words, he doesn't have a scintilla of proof. As is always the
> >> case with poor Bertie.
> >
> >Bobby provided it in another post. He confirmed that Fluke went to
> >Georgetown to agitate against their policies.
> >
> But you were wrong in that it wasn't to agitate against Catholicism.
> 50% is a great average for you though.
It is a Catholic institution and it is a policy based upon Catholic
>
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 22:06:15 -0400, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <clark-B54CD8....@news.eternal-september.org>,
> >cl...@nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
> >>
> >> In article <MPG.2a34784...@news.giganews.com>,
> >> BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > In article <6kals7p974emog7p7...@4ax.com>,
> >> > bkn...@conramp.net says...
> >> > >
> >> > > On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 19:59:48 -0400, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >It is well known that Sandra Fluke went to Georgetown with the objective
> >> > > >of agitating against the university and Catholicism.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > Well known by whom? Other loonies like you? Try proving this one
> >> > > Bert.
> >> >
> >> > Try reading a newspaper once in a while.
> >>
> >> In other words, he doesn't have a scintilla of proof. As is always the
> >> case with poor Bertie.
> >
> >Bobby provided it in another post. He confirmed that Fluke went to
> >Georgetown to agitate against their policies.
> >
> But you were wrong in that it wasn't to agitate against Catholicism.
> 50% is a great average for you though.
faith and doctrine. You can't separate the two.
BAR
Jun 3, 2012, 8:12:51 AM6/3/12
to
In article <hrhls7lkrjpgo7g6s...@4ax.com>,
bkn...@conramp.net says...
Christian institution. You cannot separate the faith from the
institution.
> >The sad thing is that Sandra Fluke
> >lied about the cost of birth control pills. There is nothing that is
> >preventing her from paying for them herself.
>
> The sad thing is that you're so stupid that you overlook the fact that
> she never mentioned her own sex life, and as above used other's to
> back her arguments. There are other uses for contraceptive drugs
> than for birth control.
She still lied about the cost of birth control pill. This supports my
assertion that she went there, Georgetown, to an agitator.
Really Bobby, birth control pills have other uses. I never would have
known that if you had told me, he said with dripping sarcasm. I have 4
sisters, 1 wife and 2 daughters. I am well versed in the cycles of women
and the alternate uses of birth control pills. However, this doesn't
mean that the Catholic Church nor other Catholic institutions should be
forced to pay for birth control pills.
> >What I want to know is why medical insurance doesn't cover dental care?
> >Why should your health suffer just because you can't afford a root-canal
> >or crown. Free dental care for everyone!
>
> There are a lot of things you should want to know. But this one is
> wrong too...for your umpteenth time. I have dental insurance which
> covers root canals, all dental services, even cleaning.
Why doesn't your medical insurance cover your oral health needs?
bkn...@conramp.net says...
>
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 22:00:34 -0400, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <6bcls71umt5qmtvhi...@4ax.com>,
> >bkn...@conramp.net says...
>
> >> >> It is well known that Sandra Fluke went to Georgetown with the objective
> >> >> of agitating against the university and Catholicism.
> >
> >> From what I have read she attended Georgetown to fight their policy
> >> regarding contraceptives and was accused of being anti-Catholic which
> >> she's denied. One of the main points that she used was a woman who
> >> had a disease which needed contraceptives to control, not for birth
> >> control.
> >
> >That's right, Sandra Fluke went to Georgetown to agitate and effect
> >change in at a religious institution.
>
> But not against Catholicism Bert.
It is a Catholic institution. Just like Liberty University is a
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 22:00:34 -0400, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <6bcls71umt5qmtvhi...@4ax.com>,
> >bkn...@conramp.net says...
>
> >> >> It is well known that Sandra Fluke went to Georgetown with the objective
> >> >> of agitating against the university and Catholicism.
> >
> >> From what I have read she attended Georgetown to fight their policy
> >> regarding contraceptives and was accused of being anti-Catholic which
> >> she's denied. One of the main points that she used was a woman who
> >> had a disease which needed contraceptives to control, not for birth
> >> control.
> >
> >That's right, Sandra Fluke went to Georgetown to agitate and effect
> >change in at a religious institution.
>
> But not against Catholicism Bert.
Christian institution. You cannot separate the faith from the
institution.
> >The sad thing is that Sandra Fluke
> >lied about the cost of birth control pills. There is nothing that is
> >preventing her from paying for them herself.
>
> The sad thing is that you're so stupid that you overlook the fact that
> she never mentioned her own sex life, and as above used other's to
> back her arguments. There are other uses for contraceptive drugs
> than for birth control.
assertion that she went there, Georgetown, to an agitator.
Really Bobby, birth control pills have other uses. I never would have
known that if you had told me, he said with dripping sarcasm. I have 4
sisters, 1 wife and 2 daughters. I am well versed in the cycles of women
and the alternate uses of birth control pills. However, this doesn't
mean that the Catholic Church nor other Catholic institutions should be
forced to pay for birth control pills.
> >What I want to know is why medical insurance doesn't cover dental care?
> >Why should your health suffer just because you can't afford a root-canal
> >or crown. Free dental care for everyone!
>
> There are a lot of things you should want to know. But this one is
> wrong too...for your umpteenth time. I have dental insurance which
> covers root canals, all dental services, even cleaning.
BAR
Jun 3, 2012, 8:15:42 AM6/3/12
to
In article <clark-695431....@news.eternal-september.org>,
cl...@nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
I have dental insurance. I work for a "proper outfit." What I want to
know is why medical and dental insurance isn't combined into one policy?
Why is vision a separate policy? Why shouldn't they all be combined into
a single health benefits policy. Isn't your ability to see, eat and
digest your food critical to your general well being?
cl...@nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
know is why medical and dental insurance isn't combined into one policy?
Why is vision a separate policy? Why shouldn't they all be combined into
a single health benefits policy. Isn't your ability to see, eat and
digest your food critical to your general well being?
William Clark
Jun 3, 2012, 11:59:12 AM6/3/12
to
In article <MPG.2a351f7...@news.giganews.com>,
Absolutely. Why don't you talk to your bosom buddies in the insurance
business and ask them why?
business and ask them why?
William Clark
Jun 3, 2012, 12:00:07 PM6/3/12
to
BAR
Jun 3, 2012, 12:25:31 PM6/3/12
to
In article <clark-63CB30....@news.eternal-september.org>,
I don't have any bosom buddies in the insurance business.
Message has been deleted
Don Kirkman
Jun 3, 2012, 4:48:42 PM6/3/12
to
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 08:12:51 -0400, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
>In article <hrhls7lkrjpgo7g6s...@4ax.com>,
>bkn...@conramp.net says...
>>
>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 22:00:34 -0400, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <6bcls71umt5qmtvhi...@4ax.com>,
>> >bkn...@conramp.net says...
>>
>> >> >> It is well known that Sandra Fluke went to Georgetown with the objective
>> >> >> of agitating against the university and Catholicism.
>> >
>> >> From what I have read she attended Georgetown to fight their policy
>> >> regarding contraceptives and was accused of being anti-Catholic which
>> >> she's denied. One of the main points that she used was a woman who
>> >> had a disease which needed contraceptives to control, not for birth
>> >> control.
>> >
>> >That's right, Sandra Fluke went to Georgetown to agitate and effect
>> >change in at a religious institution.
>>
>> But not against Catholicism Bert.
>
>It is a Catholic institution. Just like Liberty University is a
>Christian institution. You cannot separate the faith from the
>institution.
You can't separate "Catholic" from "Christian"? And you can't
>In article <hrhls7lkrjpgo7g6s...@4ax.com>,
>bkn...@conramp.net says...
>>
>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 22:00:34 -0400, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <6bcls71umt5qmtvhi...@4ax.com>,
>> >bkn...@conramp.net says...
>>
>> >> >> It is well known that Sandra Fluke went to Georgetown with the objective
>> >> >> of agitating against the university and Catholicism.
>> >
>> >> From what I have read she attended Georgetown to fight their policy
>> >> regarding contraceptives and was accused of being anti-Catholic which
>> >> she's denied. One of the main points that she used was a woman who
>> >> had a disease which needed contraceptives to control, not for birth
>> >> control.
>> >
>> >That's right, Sandra Fluke went to Georgetown to agitate and effect
>> >change in at a religious institution.
>>
>> But not against Catholicism Bert.
>
>It is a Catholic institution. Just like Liberty University is a
>Christian institution. You cannot separate the faith from the
>institution.
distinguish "universal" [the definition of "Catholic"] from a church
school with a narrow view of education that some may not even agree is
Christian.
--
Don Kirkman
don...@charter.net
Don Kirkman
Jun 3, 2012, 4:48:42 PM6/3/12
to
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 18:24:30 +0000 (UTC), Moderate <nos...@nomail.com>
wrote:
>You mean Obama's buddies in the insurance business. They wrote Obamacare.
Are they the same ones who wrote Mittcare?
--
Don Kirkman
don...@charter.net
wrote:
Are they the same ones who wrote Mittcare?
--
Don Kirkman
don...@charter.net
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 3, 2012, 5:15:14 PM6/3/12
to
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 3, 2012, 5:18:45 PM6/3/12
to
>
>> >What I want to know is why medical insurance doesn't cover dental care?
>> >Why should your health suffer just because you can't afford a root-canal
>> >or crown. Free dental care for everyone!
>>
>> There are a lot of things you should want to know. But this one is
>> wrong too...for your umpteenth time. I have dental insurance which
>> covers root canals, all dental services, even cleaning.
>
>Why doesn't your medical insurance cover your oral health needs?
\
>> >What I want to know is why medical insurance doesn't cover dental care?
>> >Why should your health suffer just because you can't afford a root-canal
>> >or crown. Free dental care for everyone!
>>
>> There are a lot of things you should want to know. But this one is
>> wrong too...for your umpteenth time. I have dental insurance which
>> covers root canals, all dental services, even cleaning.
>
>Why doesn't your medical insurance cover your oral health needs?
I can't afford private insurance and Medicare doesn't cover dental. So
I have a policy to cover that and optical.
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 3, 2012, 5:19:46 PM6/3/12
to
Tristan daCunha
Jun 3, 2012, 5:22:49 PM6/3/12
to
Good post Bar...
Tristan daCunha
Jun 3, 2012, 5:20:46 PM6/3/12
to
Billary is special cause she's a diesel dyke.
She uses a strap on for her fav g/f's.
Her daughter looks just like Harpo Marx!
Ellen refers to Hill as super clit!!
She uses a strap on for her fav g/f's.
Her daughter looks just like Harpo Marx!
Ellen refers to Hill as super clit!!
Carbon
Jun 3, 2012, 7:00:10 PM6/3/12
to
Message has been deleted
Don Kirkman
Jun 4, 2012, 1:47:11 AM6/4/12
to
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 23:39:54 +0000 (UTC), Moderate <nos...@nomail.com>
wrote:
>Dunno, was that ruled unconstitutional as well?
As well as which one that has been ruled unconstitutional by the SC?
We all know that the district courts are split.
--
Don Kirkman
don...@charter.net
wrote:
As well as which one that has been ruled unconstitutional by the SC?
We all know that the district courts are split.
--
Don Kirkman
don...@charter.net
Message has been deleted
0 new messages