Received: by 10.68.227.230 with SMTP id sd6mr10332764pbc.8.1334599981653;
        Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:13:01 -0700 (PDT)
Path: r9ni63650pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-A.news.volia.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: MNMikeW <mnmiik...@aol.com>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.golf
Subject: Re: NBC Misrepresents Facts of Zimmerman Call to 911
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:12:59 -0500
Lines: 69
Message-ID: <9v35pbFi2pU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <pan.2012.04.14.01.44.11@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> <MPG.29f33e3b9f0b31d47eb@news.giganews.com> <pan.2012.04.14.13.34.10@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> <MPG.29f351a9ef7eb5c87f2@news.giganews.com> <pan.2012.04.15.00.52.12@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> <MPG.29f48a9c14e436617f9@news.giganews.com> <pan.2012.04.15.13.26.48@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> <MPG.29f4a2a65dc50bfd7fc@news.giganews.com> <9a1mo7heum38j5sgfa88kb0plkn8g2gncu@4ax.com> <MPG.29f4f6fa69c26e0f80d@news.giganews.com> <qgkoo7hj2t1q1ek9pm6lbisqbqnuvj7u25@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: individual.net qC4qItg7y78njr2r01VRSQRZHSoS+uYj5bny/NBiszlvsKX7nk
Cancel-Lock: sha1:da/CGy5Nk5KaGHaKUbyAH8JF2jE=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Firefox/11.0 SeaMonkey/2.8
In-Reply-To: <qgkoo7hj2t1q1ek9pm6lbisqbqnuvj7u25@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Don Kirkman wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:17:53 -0400, BAR<sc...@you.com>  wrote:
>
>> In article<9a1mo7heum38j5sgfa88kb0plkn8g2g...@4ax.com>, donsno2
>> @charter.net says...
>>>
>>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 10:17:59 -0400, BAR<sc...@you.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article<pan.2012.04.15.13.26...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>,
>>>> nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 08:35:32 -0400, BAR wrote:
>>>>>> In article<pan.2012.04.15.00.52...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>,
>>>>>> nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 10:20:13 -0400, BAR wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article<pan.2012.04.14.13.34...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>,
>>>>>>>> nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 08:57:20 -0400, BAR wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article<pan.2012.04.14.01.44...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>,
>>>>>>>>>> nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> My bad, I went too fast. You see, earlier you asked why the John
>>>>>>>>>>> McNeil case wasn't on the news every night. My response was that
>>>>>>>>>>> in the South, where I live, the black guy is more likely to be
>>>>>>>>>>> assumed to be the guilty party. I referred to the Martin case,
>>>>>>>>>>> where the killer was not taken into custody as would normally
>>>>>>>>>>> happen as a matter of course.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In the Martin case the "killer" was taken into custody and he was
>>>>>>>>>> not charged because the prosecutor determining that there was
>>>>>>>>>> insufficient cause or evidence for to support the charge.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ...based upon initial police reports. Gosh, I hope they didn't just
>>>>>>>>> accept Zimmerman's largely uncorroborated testimony as fact.
>>>>>>>>> Because that kind of thing will inevitably come out at trial.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You lied, again. Zimmerman was taken into custody immediately
>>>>>>>> following the incident.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What a doofus. They took his statement and let him go.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When they bring you into the police station in handcuffs you are in
>>>>>> custody. In the Zimmerman video contemporary to the originating event
>>>>>> Zimmerman is in police custody.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not only did you lie once, buy you lied twice. It it typical of you
>>>>>> liberals to continue to lie in order to change the parameters of the
>>>>>> debate.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bert. They took his statement. Then they let him go. A kid was killed.
>>>>> At that point the police had Zimmerman's uncorroborated testimony and
>>>>> very little else.
>>>>
>>>> Was he brought into the police station in handcuffs in the backseat of a
>>>> police car?
>>>
>>> Yes; was he booked and jailed?
>>
>> Would you mind telling Carbon exactly what that means!
>
> No, Carbon clearly knows.  But if you care to understand, they brought
> him to the station (handcuffs are SOP during detention and transport),
> took his statement, and released him.  No fingerprints, no search, no
> custody.

You really think they put him in the cop car without a search? His 
fingerprints are already on file.