Message from discussion Crickets from Bert
Received: by 10.66.85.166 with SMTP id i6mr4790760paz.13.1352503757302;
Fri, 09 Nov 2012 15:29:17 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Crickets from Bert
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 17:29:16 -0600
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <MPG.email@example.com>
X-Trace: individual.net RL8YBWcwKE6Te9c2vUVY1gHQZXB3YPpQ9OiiHQ5kzIQX9IPmaXtC6LqlNmiWnKLmdc
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 18:16:59 -0500, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
>In article <p80q989a8veqon2rgu7faa3c1cqnvi0...@4ax.com>,
>> >> Czars....Didn't hear you bitching about Bush's and he nominated more
>> >> than Obama.
>> >More than Obama. You need to support that with some facts.
>> Notice that Bush appointed 49 and Obama 43. How's that for a fact.
>> Then look at how many were not confirmed.
>> No response! No surprise!
>You stepped in it again, dumbass. Let's compare apples to apples.
>Bush appointed 25 in his first term.
>Obama appointed 42 in his first term.
Try to spin it any way you want but Bush appointed a total of 49 and
Obama 43. That could change, but it's the way it stands now dumb