Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Crickets from Bert

35 views
Skip to first unread message

bkn...@conramp.net

unread,
Nov 9, 2012, 8:14:52 AM11/9/12
to
>> Czars....Didn't hear you bitching about Bush's and he nominated more
>> than Obama.
>
>More than Obama. You need to support that with some facts.
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._executive_branch_czars

Notice that Bush appointed 49 and Obama 43. How's that for a fact.
Then look at how many were not confirmed.

No response! No surprise!

BAR

unread,
Nov 9, 2012, 6:16:59 PM11/9/12
to
In article <p80q989a8veqon2rg...@4ax.com>,
bkn...@conramp.net says...
You stepped in it again, dumbass. Let's compare apples to apples.

Bush appointed 25 in his first term.

Obama appointed 42 in his first term.


bkn...@conramp.net

unread,
Nov 9, 2012, 6:29:16 PM11/9/12
to
Try to spin it any way you want but Bush appointed a total of 49 and
Obama 43. That could change, but it's the way it stands now dumb
shit.

BAR

unread,
Nov 9, 2012, 7:09:18 PM11/9/12
to
In article <ab4r98t9q9amfc6br...@4ax.com>,
bkn...@conramp.net says...
Thanks for acknowledging that I was correct.


bkn...@conramp.net

unread,
Nov 9, 2012, 7:18:44 PM11/9/12
to
I acknowledged that you didn't tell the whole story. Usually you
don't know the whole story, so this was just a little subterfuge.

BAR

unread,
Nov 9, 2012, 7:59:04 PM11/9/12
to
In article <c77r981cd2kctibst...@4ax.com>,
I had to set the record straight for your absolutist view of the issue.


bkn...@conramp.net

unread,
Nov 9, 2012, 8:11:10 PM11/9/12
to
I had no specific view Bert. Just facts that you can't deny, but can
try to spin.

MNMikeW

unread,
Nov 12, 2012, 11:25:50 AM11/12/12
to
By not stating Bush appointed 49 in TWO terms, compared to 43 for
Obama's ONE term, you are the one who didn't tell the whole story.

bkn...@conramp.net

unread,
Nov 12, 2012, 12:57:24 PM11/12/12
to
Tell me that after Obama's second term. Who knows?
0 new messages