Received: by 10.66.81.98 with SMTP id z2mr1427389pax.19.1353138402243; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 23:46:42 -0800 (PST) Path: s9ni19810pbb.0!nntp.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news1 From: Don Kirkman Newsgroups: rec.sport.golf Subject: Re: Gun control now a reality. Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 23:46:15 -0800 Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $19.95 Lines: 71 Message-ID: <2tdea895tga02d91gf8r3gqtvok5qedlnm@4ax.com> References: Reply-To: dons...@charter.net NNTP-Posting-Host: pa2d10a2a6ce2ee117441be2718b9bac74ad6670fd05809b0.newsdawg.com Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.00.32.1200 X-Received-Bytes: 3951 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:08:11 -0500, BAR wrote: >In article , donsno2 >@charter.net says... >> >> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:51:24 -0500, BAR wrote: >> >> >In article , donsno2 >> >@charter.net says... >> >> >> >> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 07:47:45 -0500, BAR wrote: >> >> >> >> >In article , donsno2 >> >> >@charter.net says... >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 19:42:54 -0500, BAR wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >In article , donsno2 >> >> >> >@charter.net says... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:06:51 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Don Kirkman wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:54:01 -0500, "Frank Ketchum" >> >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> "Howard Brazee" wrote in message >> >> >> >> >>> news:te55a8hjoebkejfqe4u0hisviu70olk8g7@4ax.com... >> >> >> >> >>>> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:52:20 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Never say never. Well, I sure would like a Barrett M107 50 cal. A full >> >> >> >> >>>>> auto would be fun, but would never happen in the liberal shithole called >> >> >> >> >>>>> MN. I CAN get the Barrett, but it's around $13,000. >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >>>> The 2nd amendment isn't about fun. >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> What is it about? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> National defense. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Not entirely. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Not entirely what, and why? >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Dig a little deeper into English law. >> >> >> >> >> >> For what? English law hasn't been part of the American experience >> >> >> since the Revolution. >> >> > >> >> >Read the Federalist Papers. >> >> >> >> Where I went to school the Federalist Papers were part of the >> >> curriculum. They explain the reasons the Constitution needed to be >> >> ratified, but that doesn't mean they automatically still apply to the >> >> current national issues. Maybe you need to re-read them yourself. >> > >> >The provided arguments for the inclusion and exclusion of specific >> >language. >> >> That still doesn't mean that their thoughts automatically still apply >> to our current national issues, does it? > >Freedom, liberty, limiting government and the supremacy of the >individual are not relevant in this day and age. Welcome to serfdom. Who said that? I said their thoughts don't automatically apply, not that they should be forgotten. Argumentum ad absurdum. -- Don Kirkman dons...@charter.net