In article <MPG.2b0b636c548576cb1...@news.giganews.com>,
BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:You know what, Bert?
> In article <abi2a8tk1gnqfc50tjs9pcvrlp098fi...@4ax.com>,
> bkni...@conramp.net says...
> > On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 11:01:01 -0800, Alan Baker <alangba...@telus.net>
> > >> On Nov 12 2012 10:44 AM, FDK wrote:
> > >> http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/10/15/us-arms-usa-treaty-idUSTRE5...
> > >> In order for any treaty to go into effect, it must be ratified by 2/3 of
> > >And this isn't even a treaty yet: this is talks to create a treaty.
> > Actually what "this" is would be paranoia from the machos who think
> They should be in every home. The police have no duty to protect you.
I share the idea that being able to have the tools to defend oneself is
But going from there to "machine guns SHOULD be in every home" just
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.