Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Bert

99 views
Skip to first unread message

bkn...@conramp.net

unread,
Oct 6, 2012, 9:27:23 PM10/6/12
to
This is a snip regarding me from a post this morning that is an
absolute lie.


"Your bigotry and racism shines through your posts illuminating your
horrible and disgusting character".

I didn't respond with enough force to it then, but now I'm
challenging you to show ANY proof of this. Actually I'm calling you a
fucking liar who has no integrity at all, much less "upper class". You
have no class.

There will be nothing but crickets from you. you yellow
son-of-a-bitch, because there is no proof forthcoming.

KenPitts

unread,
Oct 6, 2012, 9:36:59 PM10/6/12
to
LOL! Your blood pressure Bobby!

Ken

BAR

unread,
Oct 6, 2012, 10:31:09 PM10/6/12
to
In article <vam178t8qic89bupj...@4ax.com>,
bkn...@conramp.net says...
:)

bkn...@conramp.net

unread,
Oct 6, 2012, 11:00:38 PM10/6/12
to
A proper response would be "sorry, I shouldn't say things that are
untrue". But you gave the one of a proven liar. What a surprise. LOL

Carbon

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 2:37:15 AM10/7/12
to
There's never proof with Bert. He's a monkey throwing feces at the wall.
He's not worth getting upset over.

Frank Ketchum

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 9:14:22 AM10/7/12
to

"Carbon" <nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2012.10...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com...
That's true. What puzzles me is why Bobby insists on standing in front of
that wall.


BAR

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 9:41:16 AM10/7/12
to
In article <oqr1789sncmqc0i8n...@4ax.com>,
bkn...@conramp.net says...
I responded with a shit eating grin.

You won't receive an apology from me because I believe that you are a
bigot and a racist.

Moderate

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 10:15:59 AM10/7/12
to

<bkn...@conramp.net> wrote in message
news:vam178t8qic89bupj...@4ax.com...
How is this any different than your posts to people?



FDK

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 10:25:14 AM10/7/12
to


wrote in message news:vam178t8qic89bupj...@4ax.com...

>This is a snip regarding me from a post this morning that is an
>absolute lie.


>"Your bigotry and racism shines through your posts illuminating your
>horrible and disgusting character".

>I didn't respond with enough force to it then, but now I'm
>challenging you to show ANY proof of this. Actually I'm calling you
>a
>fucking liar who has no integrity at all, much less "upper class".
>You
>have no class.


Widdle baby seems werry upset now that he's on the receiving end
rather than the giving. Widdle baby should realize that others bite
back. If it's too hot widdle baby, get out. Douchebag.

bkn...@conramp.net

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 10:27:54 AM10/7/12
to
No you don't because there has never been a scintilla of that from me.
You're just going the sophomoric route of lying about me to try and
retaliate for the dozens of times that you've been humiliated. You're
scum as evinced by those who have nailed you over and over. Check out
the ones in the past couple of days. Live on in your dream world of
upper class but you represent the dregs of life. I'm through with
this.

bkn...@conramp.net

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 10:33:03 AM10/7/12
to
It has been just for kicks because Bert is such an easy target with
his over-the-top issuances and stupidity. This last one though is
personal because it goes to my integrity. There is not a prejudiced
atom in me and saying so for no reason represents his base makeup.
Next I expect to see his butt buddy jump in too. They're exactly
alike....no moral values. As I said, scum.

bkn...@conramp.net

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 10:35:08 AM10/7/12
to
On Sun, 7 Oct 2012 09:15:59 -0500, "Moderate" <fa...@fakeemail.com>
wrote:
LOL. The butt-buddy on cue.

KenPitts

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 10:41:49 AM10/7/12
to
There is no difference. Could he have been any nastier with me? And he was supposedly a friend of mine for about 15 years. Friends usually deal in things called understanding and forgiveness.

If you looked up arrogant in the dictionary, there would be a picture of Knight.

Ken

Carbon

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 10:50:12 AM10/7/12
to
On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 09:41:16 -0400, BAR wrote:

> You won't receive an apology from me because I believe that you are a
> bigot and a racist.

You're lying. Also, bigot and racist amount to the same thing.

KenPitts

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 10:59:18 AM10/7/12
to
Actual friends I have made in RSG.

John Pflum.
David Laville.
dene.
Kenn Smith (but I knew him from Golf On Line Grillroom before he came here).
The nurse in Atlanta whose name escapes me. Eric ? I had him and his wife as guests at Woodhaven when they came for a RSG DFW event.
Dr Hamilton (frostback). We met at Tunica a couple of times when I was going there a lot. He has consistently been a nice person - even when we disagree.

Other people I have met have been nice to me, but there was no real connection. Sorry if there should have been a mention. My memory is really bad lately.

I met Dan King when he held an event at Pasatiempo in Santa Cruz. We also played Links at Spanish Bay. I wonder how he is doing. Very nice guy.

Scott Newell was nice to me when we visited Bremerton. Introduced me to golf in Kitsap County. He has since soured on me. Not sure of the reasons. No big loss.

I played in a member guest with Cal once. I think our history is well documented since. No big loss either.

Bellomy was the first person I actuall met in RSG - 1996. He has decided since that I am a bad person. We were actually members of Woodhaven together for a number of years.

Ken

KenPitts

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 11:03:36 AM10/7/12
to
Again you are showing your ignorance. A person can be bigotted without it having a racial component.


big·ot - noun - a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.

hmmmm... Sounds like liberals to me.

Ken

Carbon

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 11:14:33 AM10/7/12
to
I will defer to your expertise in this area.

KenPitts

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 11:35:04 AM10/7/12
to
Another personal attack. What a surprise!

Ken

Rog

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 11:44:47 AM10/7/12
to
RSG, the best place on earth for entertainment.
Rog

Carbon

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 11:48:29 AM10/7/12
to
I was being kind. I snipped your "hmmmm... Sounds like liberals to me"
slur, which by your own definition (above) is as bigoted as hell. As far
as I could tell this little act of comedy was completely unconscious.

bkn...@conramp.net

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 12:10:11 PM10/7/12
to
On 07 Oct 2012 15:48:29 GMT, Carbon <nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>
wrote:

>On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 08:35:04 -0700, KenPitts wrote:
>> On Sunday, October 7, 2012 10:14:34 AM UTC-5, Carbon wrote:
>>> On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 08:03:36 -0700, KenPitts wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, October 7, 2012 9:50:13 AM UTC-5, Carbon wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 09:41:16 -0400, BAR wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You won't receive an apology from me because I believe that you
>>>>>> are a bigot and a racist.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're lying. Also, bigot and racist amount to the same thing.
>>>>
>>>> Again you are showing your ignorance. A person can be bigotted
>>>> without it having a racial component.
>>>>
>>>> big�ot - noun - a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing
>>>> creed, belief, or opinion.
>>>
>>> I will defer to your expertise in this area.
>>
>> Another personal attack. What a surprise!
>
>I was being kind. I snipped your "hmmmm... Sounds like liberals to me"
>slur, which by your own definition (above) is as bigoted as hell. As far
>as I could tell this little act of comedy was completely unconscious.

Ken has complained bitterly about attacks and why ex-friends have
parted ways with him. The fact that he exhibits no introspection is
that underlying reason and it escapes him. He's oblivious to how he
offends others. Unintentional, but consistent.

BAR

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 12:33:34 PM10/7/12
to
In article <uu3378lg37ue4dm06...@4ax.com>,
bkn...@conramp.net says...
No, you are not through with this. you can't help yourself. You need to
degrade, demean and disparage anyone that disagrees you. You are the one
who mounts his high horse as often as you can to look down upon anyone
you deem to not up to your standards.


bkn...@conramp.net

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 12:46:06 PM10/7/12
to
>Onmounts his high horse as often as you can to look down upon anyone
>you deem to not up to your standards.
>
LOL.

William Clark

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 1:44:07 PM10/7/12
to
In article <_9qdnYemQIVmM-zN...@giganews.com>,
Actually, that is quite unnecessary. You do a bang-up job in being able
to "degrade, demean and disparage" yourself all on your own. Every post
you make does exactly that point about you.

BAR

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 2:35:33 PM10/7/12
to
In article <clark-4E5563....@news.eternal-september.org>,
cl...@nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
Have you paid off your wagers, welcher?

William Clark

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 6:42:23 PM10/7/12
to
In article <Gt6dnUa6OO05VuzN...@giganews.com>,
QED.

Bertie proves the point.

BAR

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 7:06:33 PM10/7/12
to
In article <clark-C5A62D....@news.eternal-september.org>,
Have you paid of you wagers, welcher?

bkn...@conramp.net

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 7:14:15 PM10/7/12
to
He has to lose the bet first.

I sure wish that you'd give your evidence Bill. Otherwise this kind
of crap is going on forever.

Asking them for what they want isn't getting anywhere. Give them what
you want.

Alan Baker

unread,
Oct 8, 2012, 12:12:53 AM10/8/12
to
In article <bc54d07b-d540-44a0...@googlegroups.com>,
You make 'em all the time, but think that because you cast your net
wider, it somehow makes it alright.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

William Clark

unread,
Oct 8, 2012, 7:55:48 AM10/8/12
to
In article <u134785piif1bg4od...@4ax.com>,
Because if I do without some conditions, it will simply start a birther
denial of authenticity. What is the point of that?

BAR

unread,
Oct 8, 2012, 8:02:03 AM10/8/12
to
In article <clark-60B1DB....@news.eternal-september.org>,
cl...@nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
Just as I figured, you don't have proof.

Release the records Billie.


William Clark

unread,
Oct 8, 2012, 8:50:39 AM10/8/12
to
In article <zIednYtULehrXe_N...@giganews.com>,
Oh, I do. What I don't have is an assurance that we won't just get a
birther denial of authenticity from you and Little Tweet, and waste
everybody's time.

Want to provide it?

bkn...@conramp.net

unread,
Oct 8, 2012, 9:48:04 AM10/8/12
to
That's a cop-out Bill. You're saying that you'll never offer any
proof then. What possible condition would be proffered? None.

bkn...@conramp.net

unread,
Oct 8, 2012, 9:50:12 AM10/8/12
to
You don't think this exchange has been a waste of time?
>
>Want to provide it?

Alan Baker

unread,
Oct 8, 2012, 11:55:13 AM10/8/12
to
In article <clark-60B1DB....@news.eternal-september.org>,
You got the conditions under which the evidence would be considered
sufficient: the consensus of the group.

Dene

unread,
Oct 8, 2012, 1:52:54 PM10/8/12
to
On Oct 7, 4:14 pm, bkni...@conramp.net wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Oct 2012 19:06:33 -0400, BAR <Nob...@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> >In article <clark-C5A62D.18422307102...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> >cl...@nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
>
> >> In article <Gt6dnUa6OO05VuzNnZ2dnUVZ_ogAA...@giganews.com>,
> >>  BAR <Nob...@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> >> > > Actually, that is quite unnecessary. You do a bang-up job in being able
> >> > > to "degrade, demean and disparage" yourself all on your own. Every post
> >> > > you make does exactly that point about you.
>
> >> > Have you paid off your wagers, welcher?
>
> >> QED.
>
> >> Bertie proves the point.
>
> >Have you paid of you wagers, welcher?
>
> He has to lose the bet first.
>
> I sure wish that you'd give your evidence Bill.  Otherwise this kind
> of crap is going on forever.
>
> Asking them for what they want isn't getting anywhere.  Give them what
> you want.

The marathon man loves the marathon attention he's getting.

-Greg

BAR

unread,
Oct 8, 2012, 6:51:48 PM10/8/12
to
In article <u134785piif1bg4od...@4ax.com>,
bkn...@conramp.net says...
>
> On Sun, 7 Oct 2012 19:06:33 -0400, BAR <Nob...@NoWhere.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <clark-C5A62D....@news.eternal-september.org>,
> >cl...@nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
> >>
> >> In article <Gt6dnUa6OO05VuzN...@giganews.com>,
> >> BAR <Nob...@NoWhere.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > Actually, that is quite unnecessary. You do a bang-up job in being able
> >> > > to "degrade, demean and disparage" yourself all on your own. Every post
> >> > > you make does exactly that point about you.
> >> >
> >> > Have you paid off your wagers, welcher?
> >>
> >> QED.
> >>
> >> Bertie proves the point.
> >
> >Have you paid of you wagers, welcher?
>
> He has to lose the bet first.

He has failed to provide proof of his claim, he is a welcher.

> I sure wish that you'd give your evidence Bill. Otherwise this kind
> of crap is going on forever.

Most likely he is negotiating the acceptance of a grainy photo with an
"Fin..." in the picture along with fuzzy numbers on a clock.

> Asking them for what they want isn't getting anywhere. Give them what
> you want.

Mod said to post it to the group and let the group decide. The problem
is that Billie doesn't have proof, therefore, Billie is a welcher
because he refuses to pay off his wager.

BAR

unread,
Oct 8, 2012, 8:33:36 PM10/8/12
to
In article <mfm578p1kpi6r7317...@4ax.com>,
bkn...@conramp.net says...
No, because it gave you something to do.

William Clark

unread,
Oct 8, 2012, 8:36:21 PM10/8/12
to
In article <d8m578538nvc17gna...@4ax.com>,
No it is not. I suggested a neutral third party to judge the evidence -
imModerate refused to respond to that. I'm not going to waste my time
posting proof positive, only to have him scream that it's a fake, just
like he has with Obama's birth certificate., and so welch on the bet
that way. Get real.

William Clark

unread,
Oct 8, 2012, 8:38:41 PM10/8/12
to
In article <mfm578p1kpi6r7317...@4ax.com>,
Of course. Point me to any exchanges on this ng that are not. No one was
interested in talking Ryder Cup, they were too busy blathering
bull-headed partisan crap. We only come here for a mild bit of
entertaining diversion, don't we?

William Clark

unread,
Oct 8, 2012, 8:41:44 PM10/8/12
to
In article <x9-dnTcW2sWPxO7N...@giganews.com>,
"The group decide"? And who, exactly, is "the group"? LLLLLarry? Your
other wingnut fruitcakes like Kenny? Sure - and when the "group
decides", and imModerate doesn't hear what he wants to hear, he still
just says "fake" and refuses to pay up. What a great idea.

Moderate

unread,
Oct 8, 2012, 9:00:27 PM10/8/12
to

"William Clark" <cl...@nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
news:clark-7C5541....@news.eternal-september.org...
I suggested a third party as well. The group in RSG.

I never said Obama's birth certificate was fake.

More lies from the Welsher.


William Clark

unread,
Oct 8, 2012, 9:40:16 PM10/8/12
to
In article <k4vsvb$2gn$1...@speranza.aioe.org>,
"The group". That, I suppose would be your butt-buddy Bertie, Lllllarry,
Kenny and a few other nutjobs. No one with either an IQ or any
integrity, I'm sure.

You are a joke.

Dene

unread,
Oct 8, 2012, 11:08:13 PM10/8/12
to
On Oct 8, 5:44 pm, William Clark <cl...@nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu>
wrote:
> In article <x9-dnTcW2sWPxO7NnZ2dnUVZ_gOdn...@giganews.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  BAR <Nob...@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> > In article <u134785piif1bg4odqth759j4ea3h12...@4ax.com>,
> > bkni...@conramp.net says...
>
> > > On Sun, 7 Oct 2012 19:06:33 -0400, BAR <Nob...@NoWhere.com> wrote:
>
> > > >In article <clark-C5A62D.18422307102...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> > > >cl...@nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
>
> > > >> In article <Gt6dnUa6OO05VuzNnZ2dnUVZ_ogAA...@giganews.com>,
Let BK see and decide the evidence. He's neutral, in that he despises
everyone. :-)

-Greg

Moderate

unread,
Oct 9, 2012, 6:33:10 AM10/9/12
to

"William Clark" <cl...@nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
news:clark-123297....@news.eternal-september.org...
Well if that is how you see all the posters on RSG. If you don't have
evidence that a cross section of people can validate then you have no
evidence. Pay up.


William Clark

unread,
Oct 9, 2012, 7:52:53 AM10/9/12
to
In article
<90e97160-35e2-4a3c...@p5g2000pbs.googlegroups.com>,
Dene <gds...@aol.com> wrote:

> On Oct 8, 5:44嚙緘m, William Clark <cl...@nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu>
> wrote:
> > In article <x9-dnTcW2sWPxO7NnZ2dnUVZ gOdn...@giganews.com>,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 嚙畿AR <Nob...@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> > > In article <u134785piif1bg4odqth759j4ea3h12...@4ax.com>,
> > > bkni...@conramp.net says...
> >
> > > > On Sun, 7 Oct 2012 19:06:33 -0400, BAR <Nob...@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > >In article <clark-C5A62D.18422307102...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> > > > >cl...@nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
> >
> > > > >> In article <Gt6dnUa6OO05VuzNnZ2dnUVZ ogAA...@giganews.com>,
> > > > >> 嚙畿AR <Nob...@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > >> > > Actually, that is quite unnecessary. You do a bang-up job in
> > > > >> > > being
> > > > >> > > able
> > > > >> > > to "degrade, demean and disparage" yourself all on your own.
> > > > >> > > Every
> > > > >> > > post
> > > > >> > > you make does exactly that point about you.
> >
> > > > >> > Have you paid off your wagers, welcher?
> >
> > > > >> QED.
> >
> > > > >> Bertie proves the point.
> >
> > > > >Have you paid of you wagers, welcher?
> >
> > > > He has to lose the bet first.
> >
> > > He has failed to provide proof of his claim, he is a welcher.
> >
> > > > I sure wish that you'd give your evidence Bill. 嚙瞌therwise this kind
> > > > of crap is going on forever.
> >
> > > Most likely he is negotiating the acceptance of a grainy photo with an
> > > "Fin..." in the picture along with fuzzy numbers on a clock.
> >
> > > > Asking them for what they want isn't getting anywhere. 嚙瘦ive them what
> > > > you want.
> >
> > > Mod said to post it to the group and let the group decide. The problem
> > > is that Billie doesn't have proof, therefore, Billie is a welcher
> > > because he refuses to pay off his wager.
> >
> > "The group decide"? And who, exactly, is "the group"? LLLLLarry? Your
> > other wingnut fruitcakes like Kenny? Sure - and when the "group
> > decides", and imModerate doesn't hear what he wants to hear, he still
> > just says "fake" and refuses to pay up. What a great idea.
>
> Let BK see and decide the evidence. He's neutral, in that he despises
> everyone. :-)
>
> -Greg

I asked him to do just that, but he declined to be the arbiter.

William Clark

unread,
Oct 9, 2012, 7:54:18 AM10/9/12
to
In article <k50uh3$75f$1...@speranza.aioe.org>,
A "cross-section" is how many, and who? What must the weight of opinion
be before you pay up?

bkn...@conramp.net

unread,
Oct 9, 2012, 9:07:16 AM10/9/12
to
I like you Greg. But I could be wrong. :-)
0 new messages