Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Crickets from Bert
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
BAR  
View profile  
 More options Nov 9 2012, 7:59 pm
Newsgroups: rec.sport.golf
From: BAR <sc...@you.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 19:59:04 -0500
Local: Fri, Nov 9 2012 7:59 pm
Subject: Re: Crickets from Bert
In article <c77r981cd2kctibstpqeqpk1p90t3g2...@4ax.com>,
bkni...@conramp.net says...

> On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 19:09:18 -0500, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:

> >In article <ab4r98t9q9amfc6brlbimtuvrv0tet6...@4ax.com>,
> >bkni...@conramp.net says...

> >> On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 18:16:59 -0500, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:

> >> >In article <p80q989a8veqon2rgu7faa3c1cqnvi0...@4ax.com>,
> >> >bkni...@conramp.net says...

> >> >> >> Czars....Didn't hear you bitching about Bush's and he nominated more
> >> >> >> than Obama.

> >> >> >More than Obama. You need to support that with some facts.

> >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._executive_branch_czars

> >> >> Notice that Bush appointed 49 and Obama 43.  How's that for a fact.
> >> >> Then look at how many were not confirmed.

> >> >> No response!  No surprise!

> >> >You stepped in it again, dumbass. Let's compare apples to apples.

> >> >Bush appointed 25 in his first term.

> >> >Obama appointed 42 in his first term.

> >> Try to spin it any way you want but Bush appointed  a total  of 49 and
> >> Obama 43.  That could change, but it's the way it stands now dumb
> >> shit.

> >Thanks for acknowledging that I was correct.

> I acknowledged that you didn't tell the whole story.  Usually you
> don't know the whole story, so this was just a little subterfuge.

I had to set the record straight for your absolutist view of the issue.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.