Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion A Brief History of the Presidency
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
John B.  
View profile  
 More options Apr 24 2012, 10:47 am
Newsgroups: rec.sport.golf
From: "John B." <johnb...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Apr 24 2012 10:47 am
Subject: Re: A Brief History of the Presidency
On Apr 24, 7:50 am, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:

> In article <0mnbp7d9k7satunkjbl69p78d0bf6lu...@4ax.com>,
> how...@brazee.net says...

> > On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 06:51:00 -0600, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net>
> > wrote:

> > >Just because this happens with Democrats doesn't change what I said.

> > Speaking of which, it's funny to see the Democrats are now the ones
> > objecting to judicial activism.    It's not the concept that a party
> > objects to - unless the court rules the other party's way.

> > What goes around, comes around.

> Judicial activism is a call to arms and has no real meaning anymore.

Judicial activism is any ruling that someone disagrees with.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.