Solving the debt problem

Howard Brazee

unread,

Nov 14, 2012, 12:01:31 PM11/14/12

to

Let them secede

http://www.politicususa.com/screw-negotiations-avoid-fiscal-cliff-letting-red-states-secede.html

MNMikeW

unread,

Nov 14, 2012, 12:19:41 PM11/14/12

to

Howard Brazee wrote:
> Let them secede
>
> http://www.politicususa.com/screw-negotiations-avoid-fiscal-cliff-letting-red-states-secede.html
>

LOL! They all you would be left with Howard is the 47%'ers.

unknown

unread,

Nov 14, 2012, 12:41:27 PM11/14/12

to

It is well-known that the red-states are the takers.

Facts and data don't matter to wingnut fools.

More ...

* Obama won 8 of the nation’s 10 wealthiest counties.
* Education http://static.happyplace.com/assets/images/2012/11/509bedacdc6e5.jpeg

* Check stats on divorce rate, teenage pregnancy, etc

.

unknown

unread,

Nov 14, 2012, 12:48:28 PM11/14/12

to

http://editorialcartoonists.com/cartoons/CroweJ/2012/CroweJ20121113_low.jpg

.

Frank Ketchum

unread,

Nov 14, 2012, 1:15:18 PM11/14/12

to

"Howard Brazee" <how...@brazee.net> wrote in message
news:uhj7a816ldgmpacuv...@4ax.com...

> Let them secede
>
> http://www.politicususa.com/screw-negotiations-avoid-fiscal-cliff-letting-red-states-secede.html
>

You are aware, aren't you that we have to borrow and print about 50 cents of
every dollar the federal government spends, right? Thus this unit of
measurment that these types of articles uses is pretty useless. America as
a whole is spending (or getting money spent on it depending on how you look
at it) an extra dollar for every dollar of revenue.

bkn...@conramp.net

unread,

Nov 14, 2012, 6:15:54 PM11/14/12

to

LMAO. the 47%ers who rejected Romney you mean.

BAR

unread,

Nov 14, 2012, 6:57:38 PM11/14/12

to

In article <50A3D2A...@aol.com>, mnmi...@aol.com says...

How will the fund their glorious programs then?

BAR

unread,

Nov 14, 2012, 7:27:21 PM11/14/12

to

In article <8g98a8leoftskfati...@4ax.com>,
bkn...@conramp.net says...

They ones who don't pay any taxes.

Federal income taxes.

MNMikeW

unread,

Nov 15, 2012, 11:16:25 AM11/15/12

to

And pay no fed taxes. But they will be the new rich right?

bkn...@conramp.net

unread,

Nov 15, 2012, 11:56:57 AM11/15/12

to

The fact that you bought that shit is enough to never listen to you.

MNMikeW

unread,

Nov 15, 2012, 12:21:39 PM11/15/12

to

Bought what exactly?

bkn...@conramp.net

unread,

Nov 15, 2012, 1:20:41 PM11/15/12

to

The 47% crap of Romney's.

MNMikeW

unread,

Nov 15, 2012, 1:41:42 PM11/15/12

to

Oh, you mean the truth. In 2011, 46.4% paid NO federal income taxes.

bkn...@conramp.net

unread,

Nov 15, 2012, 2:02:56 PM11/15/12

to

Oh, I mean the truth. That number includes who? See if you can go
back and find Romney's apology and exactly who that 47% includes and
why.

William Clark

unread,

Nov 15, 2012, 5:32:51 PM11/15/12

to

In article <t0faa8pmb23nggdui...@4ax.com>,

These guys are really not taking this election beating very well, are
they :-?

BAR

unread,

Nov 15, 2012, 7:00:07 PM11/15/12

to

In article <agkiqp...@mid.individual.net>, mnmi...@aol.com says...

They will think they are going to become rich but, they are just
expanding the 47% to the 100%.

BAR

unread,

Nov 15, 2012, 7:00:58 PM11/15/12

to

In article <t0faa8pmb23nggdui...@4ax.com>,
bkn...@conramp.net says...

The truth hurts doesn't it.

bkn...@conramp.net

unread,

Nov 15, 2012, 7:04:33 PM11/15/12

to

The truth is so elusive to you how would you know? You just make
shit up or change the subject.
>

BAR

unread,

Nov 15, 2012, 7:10:02 PM11/15/12

to

In article <clark-9C2BCA....@news.eternal-september.org>,
cl...@nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says...

297 to 240 is not a landslide.

489 to 49 is a landslide.

525 to 13 is an even bigger landslide.

426 to 111 is not a landslide.

370 to 168 is not a landslide.

379 to 159 is not a landslide.

271 to 266 is not a landslide.

281 to 251 is not a landslide.

365 to 173 is not a landslide.

332 to 206 is not a landslide.

bkn...@conramp.net

unread,

Nov 15, 2012, 7:14:39 PM11/15/12

to

What a wonderful and revealing post.

LOL

BAR

unread,

Nov 15, 2012, 7:33:25 PM11/15/12

to

In article <ua1ba8tstv5tgegqf...@4ax.com>,
bkn...@conramp.net says...

It figures you wouldn't understand it.

bkn...@conramp.net

unread,

Nov 15, 2012, 7:48:30 PM11/15/12

to

This was far more succinct, revealing and final.
I don't think you understood it.
>
>> GWB called his win a mandate.>
>He had a wider margin than Obama.

>I don't think so.

>Bush 50.74% Kerry 48.27% 2.47%

>Obama 50.5% Romney 47.9% 2.6%

I've seen even larger margins, so if Bush had a mandate Obama does
too.

William Clark

unread,

Nov 15, 2012, 8:48:19 PM11/15/12

to

In article <MPG.2b0f4e62...@news.giganews.com>,

BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:

> In article <clark-9C2BCA....@news.eternal-september.org>,
> cl...@nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says...

. . .snip, snip . .

> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> LMAO. the 47%ers who rejected Romney you mean.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>> And pay no fed taxes. But they will be the new rich right?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The fact that you bought that shit is enough to never listen to you.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>> Bought what exactly?
> > > >>
> > > >> The 47% crap of Romney's.
> > > >>
> > > >Oh, you mean the truth. In 2011, 46.4% paid NO federal income taxes.
> > >
> > > Oh, I mean the truth. That number includes who? See if you can go
> > > back and find Romney's apology and exactly who that 47% includes and
> > > why.
> >
> > These guys are really not taking this election beating very well, are
> > they :-?
>
> 297 to 240 is not a landslide.
>
> 489 to 49 is a landslide.
>
> 525 to 13 is an even bigger landslide.
>
> 426 to 111 is not a landslide.
>
> 370 to 168 is not a landslide.
>
> 379 to 159 is not a landslide.
>
> 271 to 266 is not a landslide.
>
> 281 to 251 is not a landslide.
>
> 365 to 173 is not a landslide.
>
> 332 to 206 is not a landslide.

Aaaaw, poor diddums. And here you all were thinking the election was
going to be close. Thank God for Nate Silver.

la...@pivotforpower.com

unread,

Nov 15, 2012, 9:50:29 PM11/15/12

to

The House had a bigger Mandate and they are going to block EVERYTHING Obama plans for the economy. So off the cliff we go.

My bear options will just make more $$ as the mkt dives.

Larry

Howard Brazee

unread,

Nov 16, 2012, 9:57:04 AM11/16/12

to

On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:50:29 -0800 (PST), "la...@pivotforpower.com"
<la...@pivotforpower.com> wrote:

>
>The House had a bigger Mandate and they are going to block EVERYTHING Obama plans for the economy. So off the cliff we go.

Ahh, but the sex scandal is the big story.

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison

bkn...@conramp.net

unread,

Nov 16, 2012, 10:42:57 AM11/16/12

to

On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 07:57:04 -0700, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net>
wrote:

>On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:50:29 -0800 (PST), "la...@pivotforpower.com"
><la...@pivotforpower.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>The House had a bigger Mandate and they are going to block EVERYTHING Obama plans for the economy. So off the cliff we go.
>
>
>Ahh, but the sex scandal is the big story.

Unfortunately, LLLLLarrry is right. The stupid dig-in-deeper thinking
after their loss will be the GOP's undoing. That helped them to lose
the election; spending four years only trying to make Obama a one-term
president rather than doing much to push the country forward.