Flea Party

[Hollis2]

The group of people who are occupying Wall Street will soon be known as
the Flea Party and the people are called fleabaggers.

This is because some of the demonstrators actually have fleas and some of
them are blood sucking parasites.

------ 

[Alan Baker]

In article <tqc3n8x...@app-01.ezprovider.com>,

Seriously: you just don't get it.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>

[Loudon Briggs]

Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net> wrote:

>In article <tqc3n8x...@app-01.ezprovider.com>,
> "Hollis2" <a3a...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>
>> The group of people who are occupying Wall Street will soon be known as
>> the Flea Party and the people are called fleabaggers.
>>
>> This is because some of the demonstrators actually have fleas and some of
>> them are blood sucking parasites.
>>
>> ------ 
>
>Seriously: you just don't get it.

and, seriously, I don't think you do either, Alan!

I'm 91, and over those many years I've seen many demonstrations and
been part of a few. The one thing that was always apparent was that a
large segment of the assemblages had no idea what they were
representing. They were there for the food, or anything else that was
"free," including the chance to perform for the TV cameras, and in the
"old days" Paramount or Pathe news.

What I've seen does NOT demean the causes, nor should it in this case
but, it does support the reasoning of some that these demonstrators
are far less than what they claim. It's unfortunate, but true!
--

Loudon R. Briggs lar...@bbz.net Phoenix, AZ

"How Can You Not Like A Game Where It's Okay To
Get Teed Off, Tote A Six-Iron, Shoot Birdies,
and If You're Under Par It's A Great Day!"

(from "Frank & Ernest" by Bob Thaves -- used with permission)

[Alan Baker]

In article <363u97hhmg0ijo45u...@4ax.com>,

Loudon Briggs <lar...@bbz.net> wrote:

> Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <tqc3n8x...@app-01.ezprovider.com>,
> > "Hollis2" <a3a...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> The group of people who are occupying Wall Street will soon be known as
> >> the Flea Party and the people are called fleabaggers.
> >>
> >> This is because some of the demonstrators actually have fleas and some of
> >> them are blood sucking parasites.
> >>
> >> ------ 
> >
> >Seriously: you just don't get it.
>
> and, seriously, I don't think you do either, Alan!
>
> I'm 91, and over those many years I've seen many demonstrations and
> been part of a few. The one thing that was always apparent was that a
> large segment of the assemblages had no idea what they were
> representing. They were there for the food, or anything else that was
> "free," including the chance to perform for the TV cameras, and in the
> "old days" Paramount or Pathe news.
>
> What I've seen does NOT demean the causes, nor should it in this case
> but, it does support the reasoning of some that these demonstrators
> are far less than what they claim. It's unfortunate, but true!

Do you really think that that was what Hollis was trying to say?

[bkn...@conramp.net]

On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:14:17 -0700, Loudon Briggs <lar...@bbz.net>
wrote:

>Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net> wrote:
>
>>In article <tqc3n8x...@app-01.ezprovider.com>,
>> "Hollis2" <a3a...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> The group of people who are occupying Wall Street will soon be known as
>>> the Flea Party and the people are called fleabaggers.
>>>
>>> This is because some of the demonstrators actually have fleas and some of
>>> them are blood sucking parasites.
>>>
>>> ------ 
>>
>>Seriously: you just don't get it.
>
>and, seriously, I don't think you do either, Alan!
>
>I'm 91, and over those many years I've seen many demonstrations and
>been part of a few. The one thing that was always apparent was that a
>large segment of the assemblages had no idea what they were
>representing. They were there for the food, or anything else that was
>"free," including the chance to perform for the TV cameras, and in the
>"old days" Paramount or Pathe news.
>
>What I've seen does NOT demean the causes, nor should it in this case
>but, it does support the reasoning of some that these demonstrators
>are far less than what they claim. It's unfortunate, but true!

I agree with you Loudon, and that includes the Tea Party.

BK

[kommienezuspadt]

"Hollis2" wrote in message news:tqc3n8x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...

and you support the massive bloodsucking wall street crowd?

man -- what a waste of a brain you are.

[Horva...@net.net]

On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:14:17 -0700, Loudon Briggs <lar...@bbz.net>

wrote this crap:

>
>I'm 91, and over those many years I've seen many demonstrations and
>been part of a few. The one thing that was always apparent was that a
>large segment of the assemblages had no idea what they were
>representing. They were there for the food, or anything else that was
>"free," including the chance to perform for the TV cameras, and in the
>"old days" Paramount or Pathe news.
>
>What I've seen does NOT demean the causes, nor should it in this case
>but, it does support the reasoning of some that these demonstrators
>are far less than what they claim. It's unfortunate, but true!

I agree. These people are NOT what they say. I went downtown with my
sign and was yelled at, and kicked out, and told not to come back.
They tore my sign to bits and stomped on it and spit on it. All it
said was, "Down with Obama."

Vote for Romney. Repeal the nightmares.

[BAR]

In article <bKInq.10899$UI7....@newsfe11.iad>, noth...@nospam.com
says...

Yes, I support the wall street crowd. The crowd that works on wall
street. The capital markets have been one of the greatest generators of
jobs in this country.

Visionaries create jobs. Governments collect taxes.

[bkn...@conramp.net]

Whoosh. Wall street has NOT been a generator of jobs. The companies
whose stocks they sell have.

>
>Visionaries create jobs. Governments collect taxes.

Agreed. But Wall street is not full of visionaries.

BK

[Hollis2]

Most of the bloodsuckers who work on Wall Street are lawyers. Other than
that, the financial services industry provides the oil that keeps the
wheels of industry moving.

Wall Street is not to blame for the financial collapse. The sub-prime
mortgage market was created by the government, not the bankers. The
fleabaggers should be demonstrating at House and Senate Banking Committee
meetings in Washington. That's where the crisis was created.

---- 

[Hollis2]

Get this.

"Occupy Wall Street protesters said yesterday that packs of brazen crooks
within their ranks have been robbing their fellow demonstrators blind,
making off with pricey cameras, phones and laptops -- and even a hefty
bundle of donated cash and food.

“Stealing is our biggest problem at the moment,” said Nan Terrie, 18, a
kitchen and legal-team volunteer from Fort Lauderdale.

“I had my Mac stolen -- that was like $5,500. Every night, something else
is gone. Last night, our entire [kitchen] budget for the day was stolen,
so the first thing I had to do was . . . get the message out to our
supporters that we needed food!”

Crafty cat burglars sneaked into the makeshift kitchen at Zuccotti Park
overnight and swiped as much as $2,500 in donated greenbacks from right
under the noses of volunteers who’d fallen asleep after a long day
whipping up meals for the hundreds of hungry protesters, the volunteers
said.

“The worst thing is there’s people sleeping in the kitchen when they come,
and they don’t even know about it! There are some really smart and sneaky
thieves here,” Terrie said.

“I had umbrellas stolen, a fold-up bed I brought because my back is bad --
they took that, too!”

Security volunteer Harry Wyman, 22, of Brooklyn was furious about the
thievery -- and vowed to get tough with the predatory perps.

“I’m not getting paid, but I’m not gonna stand for it. Why people got to
come here and do stupid stuff? All it does is make people not wanna come
here anymore,” Wyman fumed.

At one point yesterday, Wyman and other volunteers briefly scuffled with a
man who was standing near a park entrance with a pail calling out:
“Donations! Donations!” -- and pocketing the cash people tossed in the
bucket.

Read more:
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/criminal_occupation_oh3CnKANUqYHrGPCaZaLRK#ixzz1bHMeIrxK"

I don't understand why these people are so upset. Isn't this just a form
of income redistribution?

_____________________________________________________________________ 

[Hollis2]

Why would these people object to an anti-Obama sign? Obama fully
supported TARP and even voted for it in the senate. His biggest
contributors, after the unions, were from Wall Street.

________________________________________________________________________ 

[Howard Brazee]

On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:03:43 -0700, "Hollis2"
<a3a...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:

>Why would these people object to an anti-Obama sign? Obama fully
>supported TARP and even voted for it in the senate. His biggest
>contributors, after the unions, were from Wall Street.

And when you combine his Wall Street contributors, they added up with
significantly more money that he got from unions.

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison

[Howard Brazee]

On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:50:34 -0700, "Hollis2"
<a3a...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:

>Most of the bloodsuckers who work on Wall Street are lawyers. Other than
>that, the financial services industry provides the oil that keeps the
>wheels of industry moving.
>
>Wall Street is not to blame for the financial collapse. The sub-prime
>mortgage market was created by the government, not the bankers. The
>fleabaggers should be demonstrating at House and Senate Banking Committee
>meetings in Washington. That's where the crisis was created.

Places like Texas which had stricter government regulations survived
the housing crisis much better. But we've had decades of
de-regulation for most of the country.

[BAR]

In article <90pu97573ls23t89a...@4ax.com>,
bkn...@conramp.net says...

Bobby you are a tool.

You haven't got a clue as to how a business operate or expand.

[bkn...@conramp.net]

LOL. First, I've owned three of them. Then,regarding Wall street,
when you get a Series 7 license as I do get back to me.

Stick to computers. Something you know.

BK

[Moderate]

BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
>
> Bobby you are a tool.
>
> You haven't got a clue as to how a business operate or expand.

Sadly Obama doesn't know either.

[Moderate]

"Hollis2" <a3a...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>
> Why would these people object to an anti-Obama sign? Obama fully
> supported TARP and even voted for it in the senate. His biggest
> contributors, after the unions, were from Wall Street.
>

Reported yesterday: Obama received more cash contributions from financial
sector than all Republican candidates combined.

[kommienezuspadt]

"BAR" wrote in message news:MPG.2909579...@news.giganews.com...

===

Tell us Master of running businesses about YOUR experience ---

Can't wait.....

[kommienezuspadt]

wrote in message news:uf3v979o21gf2tkok...@4ax.com...

---

Yeah -- BAR shoots himself in the foot again

[BAR]

In article <uf3v979o21gf2tkok...@4ax.com>,

Where are they, your companies now?

Which firm sponsors your Series 7 license? Or, has it expired and your
ability to give advice become null and void?

[kommienezuspadt]

"Hollis2" wrote in message news:qr74n8x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...

You care to prove the statement that most of the bloodsuckers are lawyers?

I will agree that they should be in DC too but to dismiss the Wall Street
crowd is just more Murdoch talking through you.

[kommienezuspadt]

"Hollis2" wrote in message news:fk84n8x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...

I think the safe to do is simply not believe a thing Hor posts ---

[kommienezuspadt]

"Moderate" wrote in message
news:1747170918340800630.6...@news.aioe.org...

===

In what period?

I won't be shocked if it is the recent periods since the Repugs are still
picking a different laughing stock each week that the money is not flowing
until things are settled.

[kommienezuspadt]

"Hollis2" wrote in message news:me84n8x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...

So if someone has something stolen during your church service it will be
proof that all of you are the same?

[bkn...@conramp.net]

Actually four. Sold two, Deregulation broke one and ex-wife got the
Title company. A few years later she received a felony conviction for
insurance theft. :-)

>
>Which firm sponsors your Series 7 license? Or, has it expired and your
>ability to give advice become null and void?
>

Don't use it any more, it expired after two years. I could renew it if
I wanted to come out of retirement. The operative thing is that you
never had one and I doubt that you could pass the test. Plus it's
apparent that no one would, or should, take financial advice from you.

>> Stick to computers. Something you know.

As I suggested.....stick to computers.

BK

[Howard Brazee]

On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:56:54 +0000 (UTC), Moderate <nos...@nomail.com>
wrote:

He knows that when they give him a lot of money, he does what they
tell him to do, same as the Republicans know.

[Moderate]

"kommienezuspadt" <noth...@nospam.com> wrote:
> "Moderate" wrote in message

>
> Reported yesterday: Obama received more cash contributions from financial
> sector than all Republican candidates combined.
>
> ===
>
> In what period?
>
> I won't be shocked if it is the recent periods since the Repugs are still
> picking a different laughing stock each week that the money is not
> flowing until things are settled.

This year. I am not shocked either, but I don't see why you feel OWS is not
targeting Obama as well.

[Moderate]

"kommienezuspadt" <noth...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> You care to prove the statement that most of the bloodsuckers are lawyers?
>
> I will agree that they should be in DC too but to dismiss the Wall Street
> crowd is just more Murdoch talking through you.

I am not sure what the OWS is protesting against. There are mixed messages
and no unified cause. Just a general complain-fest?

The American Nazi Party has thrown their support behind OWS. I dismiss
them.

[kommienezuspadt]

"Moderate" wrote in message
news:1023748993340811195.9...@news.aioe.org...

===

did I say they were not?

[kommienezuspadt]

wrote in message news:do50a7h0nsn4f6mog...@4ax.com...

===

I see he ducked my request for him to give us his vast business experience.

[bkn...@conramp.net]

Only because he has none. However he knows all about everything. :-)
BK

[Hollis2]

On Oct 19 2011 9:30 PM, Howard Brazee wrote:

> On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:50:34 -0700, "Hollis2"
> <a3a...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>
> >Most of the bloodsuckers who work on Wall Street are lawyers. Other than
> >that, the financial services industry provides the oil that keeps the
> >wheels of industry moving.
> >
> >Wall Street is not to blame for the financial collapse. The sub-prime
> >mortgage market was created by the government, not the bankers. The
> >fleabaggers should be demonstrating at House and Senate Banking Committee
> >meetings in Washington. That's where the crisis was created.
>
> Places like Texas which had stricter government regulations survived
> the housing crisis much better. But we've had decades of
> de-regulation for most of the country.
>

It wasn't deregulation, it was forcing banks to issue mortgages to people
who never should have gotten them to meet the CRA requirements and
requiring F & F to have half of their portfolio in the sub-prime market.

The financial crisis was created by the government interfering with the
market in order to help the poor to be able to own homes. As is typical
of liberal policies, it's another case of good intentions gone bad.

Now, most of the poor people who bought homes don't have them anymore and
lots of legitimate homeowners have lost a lot of equity. This is the
result of government interference with the free market.

______________________________________________________________________ 

[Howard Brazee]

On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:40:08 -0700, "Hollis2"
<a3a...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:

>> Places like Texas which had stricter government regulations survived
>> the housing crisis much better. But we've had decades of
>> de-regulation for most of the country.
>>
>
>It wasn't deregulation, it was forcing banks to issue mortgages to people
>who never should have gotten them to meet the CRA requirements and
>requiring F & F to have half of their portfolio in the sub-prime market.

I've heard that claim from the right - but my son-in-law is the
president of a bank, and he says that was not the problem.

And the regulation that Texas has always had to not allow mortgages of
greater than 80% of the home value worked.

[Hollis2]

Wall St. companies are privately owned businesses. As long as they don't
break the law, they can do whatever they want.

People act like Wall Street wasn't effected by this crisis. Take a look at
bank stocks in Oct 2007 and see where they are today. The banks took a
huge beating and so did the brokerage houses. And none of it was their
fault.

______________________________________________________________________ 

[kommienezuspadt]

"Moderate" wrote in message
news:261028063340810765.75...@news.aioe.org...

==


now that is sign of a deep thinker! /sarcasm

[kommienezuspadt]

"Hollis2" wrote in message news:u006n8x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...

none of it was their fault --- your opinion (& one that I am laughing at)

[Alan Baker]

In article <lcUnq.8445$xY3....@newsfe04.iad>,

Thank you.

I just couldn't put up with his idiocy enough to answer that post.

[Lloyd E Parsons]

On 10/20/11 11:40 AM, Hollis2 wrote:
> On Oct 19 2011 9:30 PM, Howard Brazee wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:50:34 -0700, "Hollis2"
>> <a3a...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Most of the bloodsuckers who work on Wall Street are lawyers. Other than
>>> that, the financial services industry provides the oil that keeps the
>>> wheels of industry moving.
>>>
>>> Wall Street is not to blame for the financial collapse. The sub-prime
>>> mortgage market was created by the government, not the bankers. The
>>> fleabaggers should be demonstrating at House and Senate Banking Committee
>>> meetings in Washington. That's where the crisis was created.
>>
>> Places like Texas which had stricter government regulations survived
>> the housing crisis much better. But we've had decades of
>> de-regulation for most of the country.
>>
>
> It wasn't deregulation, it was forcing banks to issue mortgages to people
> who never should have gotten them to meet the CRA requirements and

> requiring F& F to have half of their portfolio in the sub-prime market.

>
> The financial crisis was created by the government interfering with the
> market in order to help the poor to be able to own homes. As is typical
> of liberal policies, it's another case of good intentions gone bad.
>
> Now, most of the poor people who bought homes don't have them anymore and
> lots of legitimate homeowners have lost a lot of equity. This is the
> result of government interference with the free market.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>

Nice rewrite of some things. The poor default rate on homes bought to
be homes, was about the same as it was for those other good borrowers.
Or at least it was when the crisis started cranking up.

The ones losing their homes and such in the earlier stages of the
meltdown were those that were getting the liar loans and other
shenanigans. And those loans were NOT the gov'ts desire, but it was the
excessively greedy mortgage bankers desires.

Later, of course, after all those poor that were ok with their mortgages
lost their jobs, they then started losing them. But it was because of
the meltdown that happened, their loans were not the cause of the meltdown.



--
Lloyd

[Moderate]

I asked a question. You seem to have made up your mind, no questions asked.

[bkn...@conramp.net]

On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:53:17 +0000 (UTC), Moderate <nos...@nomail.com>
wrote:

So did the Communist Party USA. Go figure.

BK

[kommienezuspadt]

"Moderate" wrote in message
news:994948162340833794.12...@news.aioe.org...

+++

True enough --- I did ask you a question --- here it is ---

You care to prove the statement that most of the bloodsuckers are lawyers?

Do you care to pretend you answered the question?

[Howard Brazee]

On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:47:06 -0600, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net>
wrote:

>>It wasn't deregulation, it was forcing banks to issue mortgages to people
>>who never should have gotten them to meet the CRA requirements and
>>requiring F & F to have half of their portfolio in the sub-prime market.
>
>I've heard that claim from the right - but my son-in-law is the
>president of a bank, and he says that was not the problem.
>
>And the regulation that Texas has always had to not allow mortgages of
>greater than 80% of the home value worked.

I should have mentioned - he *hates* the costs of regulation - but he
mainly blames the banks that screwed up a good thing.

[Howard Brazee]

On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:49:02 -0700, "Hollis2"
<a3a...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:

>
>People act like Wall Street wasn't effected by this crisis. Take a look at
>bank stocks in Oct 2007 and see where they are today. The banks took a
>huge beating and so did the brokerage houses. And none of it was their
>fault.

They sold mortgages without adequate collateral. They were not
forced to do that, they were hoping for short term profits, and
someone else would be holding the paper when things turned sour.

Bad business decisions *are* their fault.

[Moderate]

I figure the Nazi's and Communist's recognize a socialist movement when the
see it.

I dismiss Communists also.

It was reported that Obama supports OWS.

[BAR]

In article <nCYnq.3187$cK3....@newsfe20.iad>, noth...@nospam.com
says...

What laws did they break? Please be specific.

[BAR]

In article <b7h0a7tj919igamdb...@4ax.com>,
bkn...@conramp.net says...

Keep giving each other a reach around.

[BAR]

In article <81k0a7phnberqoso7...@4ax.com>,
how...@brazee.net says...

>
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:40:08 -0700, "Hollis2"
> <a3a...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>
> >> Places like Texas which had stricter government regulations survived
> >> the housing crisis much better. But we've had decades of
> >> de-regulation for most of the country.
> >>
> >
> >It wasn't deregulation, it was forcing banks to issue mortgages to people
> >who never should have gotten them to meet the CRA requirements and
> >requiring F & F to have half of their portfolio in the sub-prime market.
>
> I've heard that claim from the right - but my son-in-law is the
> president of a bank, and he says that was not the problem.
>
> And the regulation that Texas has always had to not allow mortgages of
> greater than 80% of the home value worked.

Who was pushing greater than 80% loans?

[kommienezuspadt]

"BAR" wrote in message news:MPG.290a763...@news.giganews.com...

===

got to do something while waiting for you make a fool of yourself -- once
again -- or are you going to keep being a wuss and avoid the question
because you know the answer is more damaging?

[kommienezuspadt]

"Moderate" wrote in message
news:2138502548340844509.5...@news.aioe.org...

===

who reported this? but then I'm still waiting for your proof from
earlier --- so -- I'll not hold my breath

[kommienezuspadt]

"BAR" wrote in message news:MPG.290a759...@news.giganews.com...

+++

I will answer that question when you give us your vast business resume ---

[bkn...@conramp.net]

Sorry Bert, you just make it so easy.
BK

[Howard Brazee]

On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:19:58 -0400, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:

>> I've heard that claim from the right - but my son-in-law is the
>> president of a bank, and he says that was not the problem.
>>
>> And the regulation that Texas has always had to not allow mortgages of
>> greater than 80% of the home value worked.
>
>Who was pushing greater than 80% loans?

I don't know. But we would be much better off without them.

[William Clark]

In article <bKInq.10899$UI7....@newsfe11.iad>,

"kommienezuspadt" <noth...@nospam.com> wrote:

> "Hollis2" wrote in message news:tqc3n8x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...
>
> The group of people who are occupying Wall Street will soon be known as
> the Flea Party and the people are called fleabaggers.
>
> This is because some of the demonstrators actually have fleas and some of
> them are blood sucking parasites.
>
> ------
>
> and you support the massive bloodsucking wall street crowd?
>
> man -- what a waste of a brain you are.

Yup, and he "claims" to have a PhD. Unbelievable.

[Lloyd E Parsons]

Oh, it's only half vast.... ;)


--
Lloyd

[Kommienezuspadt]

"Lloyd E Parsons" wrote in message news:j7qhmu$lob$1...@dont-email.me...

===

I've had him for a half wit for some time -- I think you are on to him.

[Kommienezuspadt]

"William Clark" wrote in message
news:clark-838BCA....@news.eternal-september.org...

===

Yeah -- in the same thread we have BAR acting like he has business
experience we should trust.

[BAR]

In article <lz5oq.6170$UK6....@newsfe06.iad>, NoTh...@NoSpam.com
says...

You can trust it or not. However business will not survive and expande
with out capital markets.

[bkn...@conramp.net]

You're trying to move the goalposts again Bert.

BK

[kommienezuspadt]

wrote in message news:65u2a71aqs0oki6gu...@4ax.com...

=== only trick he knows

[MNMikew]

"Hollis2" <a3a...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message

news:tqc3n8x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...
> The group of people who are occupying Wall Street will soon be known as
> the Flea Party and the people are called fleabaggers.
>
> This is because some of the demonstrators actually have fleas and some of
> them are blood sucking parasites.
>

I think the Wisconsin Democrats already have fleebagger status.

[MNMikew]

"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-84456...@news.shawcable.net...

> In article <tqc3n8x...@app-01.ezprovider.com>,
> "Hollis2" <a3a...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>

>> The group of people who are occupying Wall Street will soon be known as
>> the Flea Party and the people are called fleabaggers.
>>
>> This is because some of the demonstrators actually have fleas and some of
>> them are blood sucking parasites.
>>

>> ------
>
> Seriously: you just don't get it.
>

The majority of the protestors sure don't get it.

[MNMikew]

"Hollis2" <a3a...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message

news:me84n8x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...
> On Oct 19 2011 1:14 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
>

>> In article <tqc3n8x...@app-01.ezprovider.com>,
>> "Hollis2" <a3a...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> > The group of people who are occupying Wall Street will soon be known as
>> > the Flea Party and the people are called fleabaggers.
>> >
>> > This is because some of the demonstrators actually have fleas and some
>> > of
>> > them are blood sucking parasites.
>> >
>> > ------
>>
>> Seriously: you just don't get it.
>>

Leave it to one of these morons to bring a $5000 Mac to a protest. Five
grand for a Mac, really?

[MNMikew]

<bkn...@conramp.net> wrote in message
news:90pu97573ls23t89a...@4ax.com...

> On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:12:35 -0400, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
>
>>In article <bKInq.10899$UI7....@newsfe11.iad>, noth...@nospam.com
>>says...
>>>

>>> "Hollis2" wrote in message news:tqc3n8x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...

>>>
>>> The group of people who are occupying Wall Street will soon be known as
>>> the Flea Party and the people are called fleabaggers.
>>>
>>> This is because some of the demonstrators actually have fleas and some
>>> of
>>> them are blood sucking parasites.
>>>
>>> ------
>>>

>>> and you support the massive bloodsucking wall street crowd?
>>>
>>> man -- what a waste of a brain you are.
>>

>>Yes, I support the wall street crowd. The crowd that works on wall
>>street. The capital markets have been one of the greatest generators of
>>jobs in this country.
>
> Whoosh. Wall street has NOT been a generator of jobs. The companies
> whose stocks they sell have.
>>
>>Visionaries create jobs. Governments collect taxes.
>
> Agreed. But Wall street is not full of visionaries.
>

> BK

Steve Jobs probably turning over in his grave right about now.

[MNMikew]

"kommienezuspadt" <noth...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:hf2oq.3430$nY1...@newsfe14.iad...

You couldn't answer it if you tried.

[bkn...@conramp.net]

On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:19:23 -0500, "MNMikew" <MNMi...@aol.com>
wrote:

LOL. Unless he was cremated.

BK

[Howard Brazee]

On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:14:01 -0500, "MNMikew" <MNMi...@aol.com>
wrote:

>> Seriously: you just don't get it.
>>
>The majority of the protestors sure don't get it.

As is true with non-protestors.

[Carbon]

On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:17:36 -0500, MNMikew wrote:

> Leave it to one of these morons to bring a $5000 Mac to a protest.
> Five grand for a Mac, really?

That has to be wrong. The most expensive Mac right now is the 17"
Macbook Pro, MSRP $2500. You can only pack so many options into one
computer, even a Mac.

[kommienezuspadt]

"Carbon" wrote in message
news:pan.2011.10...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com...

===

You most certainly must be wrong -- this information came from a Murdoch run
publication.

[kommienezuspadt]

"MNMikew" wrote in message news:9gllja...@mid.individual.net...

==

Bert is still running as fast as he can from answering my question -- and
you would not have clue how to judge any answer.

[Horva...@net.net]

On 24 Oct 2011 23:05:19 GMT, Carbon <nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>
wrote this crap:

Have you ever known a liberal to tell the truth?

Vote for Romney. Repeal the nightmares.

[Howard Brazee]

On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 21:23:13 -0400, Horva...@net.net wrote:

>Have you ever known a liberal to tell the truth?

I know a lot of conservatives who hide from the truth.

[MNMikew]

"kommienezuspadt" <noth...@nospam.com> wrote in message

news:nLmpq.13$0s1...@newsfe11.iad...

How exactly does one judge nothing?

>

[MNMikew]

"kommienezuspadt" <noth...@nospam.com> wrote in message

news:bHmpq.10$Ra...@newsfe07.iad...

Looks like we have to start calling them the RACIST flea party now.

[Alan Baker]

In article <9go03j...@mid.individual.net>,

Really? Based on what he just said, how does that work?

[MNMikew]

"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message

news:alangbaker-E0887...@news.shawcable.net...

> In article <9go03j...@mid.individual.net>,
> "MNMikew" <MNMi...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> "kommienezuspadt" <noth...@nospam.com> wrote in message
>> news:bHmpq.10$Ra...@newsfe07.iad...
>> >
>> >
>> > "Carbon" wrote in message
>> > news:pan.2011.10...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com...
>> >
>> > On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:17:36 -0500, MNMikew wrote:
>> >
>> >> Leave it to one of these morons to bring a $5000 Mac to a protest.
>> >> Five grand for a Mac, really?
>> >
>> > That has to be wrong. The most expensive Mac right now is the 17"
>> > Macbook Pro, MSRP $2500. You can only pack so many options into one
>> > computer, even a Mac.
>> >
>> > ===
>> >
>> > You most certainly must be wrong -- this information came from a
>> > Murdoch
>> > run publication.
>> Looks like we have to start calling them the RACIST flea party now.
>
> Really? Based on what he just said, how does that work?
>

No, based on the video I just watched of one of the fine OWS crew.

[Alan Baker]

In article <9goja3...@mid.individual.net>,

So given that you didn't provide a link to the video and given that your
reply was completely ungermane to the post to which you replied...

...why did you make this claim if it wasn't just deflecting?

[MNMikew]

"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message

news:alangbaker-F5E6C...@news.shawcable.net...

We were talking about the OWS protestors so it is not completely ungermane.

Here is a couple for starters.
http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/07/anti-semitism-at-occupy-wall-street/

[Alan Baker]

In article <9gooib...@mid.individual.net>,

In the context it was. It was a complete deflection.

>
> Here is a couple for starters.
> http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/07/anti-semitism-at-occupy-wall-street/

And I won't play.

You have serious problems in your system, Mike. Canada has them too, but
not to the same degree. The system really is rigged for the rich.

[Moderate]

Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net> wrote:
> In article <9gooib...@mid.individual.net>,
> "MNMikew" <MNMi...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> "Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
>>>

>>> ...why did you make this claim if it wasn't just deflecting?
>>>
>> We were talking about the OWS protestors so it is not completely ungermane.
>
> In the context it was. It was a complete deflection.
>
>>
>> Here is a couple for starters.
>> http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/07/anti-semitism-at-occupy-wall-street/
>
> And I won't play.
>
> You have serious problems in your system, Mike. Canada has them too, but
> not to the same degree. The system really is rigged for the rich.

Thanks for deflecting.

[Moderate]

Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 21:23:13 -0400, Horva...@net.net wrote:
>
>> Have you ever known a liberal to tell the truth?
>
> I know a lot of conservatives who hide from the truth.

I know one liberal who tries to hide from his own liberal agenda. He lacks
integrity.

[Alan Baker]

In article <790124675341277025.16...@news.aioe.org>,

So not discussing whether you can find racists in the midst of almost
every group and instead discussing the issues...

...is deflection now?

LOL

[Horva...@net.net]

On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 23:12:38 +0000 (UTC), Moderate <nos...@nomail.com>
wrote this crap:

Don't they all?

[Hollis2]

The reason the rich do so well is because they're rich and can afford the
best of everything. The poor would do just as well if they had money.

---- 

[Kommienezuspadt]

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
news:alangbaker-F5E6C...@news.shawcable.net...

===

He & Bert have so much in common

[Kommienezuspadt]

"Hollis2" wrote in message news:qv1kn8x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...

Well I agree with you that the rich can afford to purchase their
politicians.

[Kommienezuspadt]

"Moderate" wrote in message
news:1005752910341276743.5...@news.aioe.org...

===

Romney?

[Kommienezuspadt]

"MNMikew" wrote in message news:9go01q...@mid.individual.net...

Yeah -- Bert does have nothing --

[MNMikew]

"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message

news:alangbaker-653ED...@news.shawcable.net...

Rigged, LOL!

[Alan Baker]

In article <9gqhv7...@mid.individual.net>,

Yes, Mike. Rigged.

[MNMikew]

"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message

news:alangbaker-F250F...@news.shawcable.net...

What are some examples of this rigging?