Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Woodward says this reminds him of Watergate

14 views
Skip to first unread message

la...@pivotforpower.com

unread,
May 17, 2013, 9:14:18 PM5/17/13
to
Obama is following the script. He is doing what Nixon did. Someone should tell him that Nixon did all of that and still had to resign to avoid impeachment.

Watch for Obama to start feeding his sheep to the wolves to save himself. He will start firing people in the IRS and Justice and throughout the government in the futile hope that will satisfy the wolves not salivating to eat him. Won't work.

And hopefully as the media turns on him, the media will start using its unlimited power to uncover the facts about Obama that were hidden in 2008. Who is this guy? Where are his school transcripts? Where was he born? Is he really eligible to be POTUS? They didn't care before, maybe they do now that Obama has loosed the Justice Department on them.

Larry

Alan Baker

unread,
May 18, 2013, 1:35:16 AM5/18/13
to
In article <304f8e71-19ac-46fd...@googlegroups.com>,
Now... ...some truth:

"JOE SCARBOROUGH: Bob Woodward, this is the first time you've been back
since all of these -- we're not exactly sure, do you call them scandals?
Do you call them elapses? We're not exactly sure what you call them, but
what do you make of what's happened over the past week and a half?

MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Starting with the IRS, what's the impact?

BOB WOODWARD: Okay, well it's a big mess, obviously. I know there have
been these comparisons to Watergate. I would say not yet, Joe. "

<http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/05/17/woodward_on_comparing_
obama_scandals_to_watergate_i_would_say_not_yet.html>

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

golfbum18

unread,
May 18, 2013, 2:58:58 PM5/18/13
to
On May 17, 9:14 pm, "la...@pivotforpower.com"
Ya woodward would say that wouldn't he. You forgot to go on and
mention that he said that "it's really not." YOu're cherry picking
sport and it's so transparent.

la...@pivotforpower.com

unread,
May 18, 2013, 5:31:49 PM5/18/13
to
I wrote that Obama et. al. are "following the script" and acknowledge that Woodward said Obama is NOT YET at the Nixon impeachment level. But they are definitely getting closer.. and pros like Woodward see no sign that Obama and team will be able to stop this runaway train. Obama simply doesn't have the class or ability to reverse the course of events that his philosophy started. And new revelations will almost certainly nail the White House with infallible evidence that they fostered the Benghazi massacre, the AP personal email intrusions, and the encouragement of IRS to attack individual conservative taxpayers. The IRS certainly thought they were doing what Obama wanted them to do-- and certainly they were doing EXPLICITELY what Senators Levin and Schumer, et. al. DEMANDED they do. Who doesn't think those demand letters were not coordinated with the White House? NOBODY!

________________________________________
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324767004578487332636180800.html?KEYWORDS=strassel+irs

"
." Mr. Carney cut off the reporter with "That's a preposterous assertion."

Preposterous because, according to Mr. Obama, he is "outraged" and "angry" that the IRS looked into the very groups and individuals that he spent years claiming were shady, undemocratic, even lawbreaking. After all, he expects the IRS to "operate with absolute integrity." Even when he does not. "

That was the Friday WSJ. Circulation MILLIONS around the world.

Larry

la...@pivotforpower.com

unread,
May 18, 2013, 5:48:54 PM5/18/13
to
SOOOO, like in Watergate and Monicagate and all the other Democrat "gates," the deed itself is not impeachable nor criminal. It is just reprehensible and admission will cost them future elections. But the coverup will be criminal. It will necessarily include perjury and obstruction of justice. The congress WILL push them into perjury traps-- wherein they can either confess their culpability to have actually stolen the election for Obama by suppressing Republican donations and activity in Ohio and elsewhere-- or put themselves in PERSONAL criminal liability, jail time like the Watergate actors.

It will be fun to watch. The Republican congress is full of lawyers, many with significant experience as criminal prosecutors. Some as state and federal judges. Do they really think they will skate on this?

Larry
0 new messages