Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
The Queens Riddle
101 views
Skip to first unread message
jay birdsong
May 31, 2013, 5:03:57 PM5/31/13
to
THE QUEENS RIDDLE
When Barack Obama met with Queen Elizabeth II, the Queen of England ,
he
asked her…
"Your Majesty, how do you run such an efficient government?
Are there any tips you can give me?"
"Well," said the Queen,
"The most important thing is to surround yourself with intelligent
people."
Obama frowned, and then asked,
"But how do I know if the people around me are really intelligent?"
The Queen took a sip of champagne.
"Oh, that's easy; you just ask them to answer an intelligent riddle,
watch"
The Queen pushed a button on her intercom.
"Please send Tony Blair in here, would you?"
Tony Blair walked into the room and said,
"Yes, your Majesty?"
The Queen smiled and said,
"Answer me this please Tony.
Your mother and father have a child.
It is not your brother and it is not your sister.
Who is it?"
Without pausing for a moment, Tony Blair answered…
"That would be me."
"Yes! Very good." said the Queen.
Obama went back home to ask Joe Biden the same question.
"Joe, answer this for me."
"Your mother and your father have a child.
It's not your brother and it's not your sister.
Who is it?"
"I'm not sure," said Biden.
"Let me get back to you on that one."
He went to his advisors and asked everyone, but none could give him an
answer.
Frustrated, Biden went to work in congressional gym and saw Paul Ryan
there.
Biden went up to him and asked, "Hey Paul, see if you can answer this
question."
"Shoot Joe."
“Your mother and father have a child and it's not your brother or your
sister.
Who is it?"
Paul Ryan answered,
"That's easy, it's me!"
Biden smiled, and said, "Good answer Paul!"
Biden then, went back to speak with President Obama.
"Say, I did some research and I have the answer to that riddle."
"It's Paul Ryan!"
Obama got up, stomped over to Biden, and angrily yelled into his face,
"No! You idiot! It's Tony Blair!"
...AND THAT MY FRIENDS IS PRECISELY WHAT'S GOING ON AT THE WHITE HOUSE
When Barack Obama met with Queen Elizabeth II, the Queen of England ,
he
asked her…
"Your Majesty, how do you run such an efficient government?
Are there any tips you can give me?"
"Well," said the Queen,
"The most important thing is to surround yourself with intelligent
people."
Obama frowned, and then asked,
"But how do I know if the people around me are really intelligent?"
The Queen took a sip of champagne.
"Oh, that's easy; you just ask them to answer an intelligent riddle,
watch"
The Queen pushed a button on her intercom.
"Please send Tony Blair in here, would you?"
Tony Blair walked into the room and said,
"Yes, your Majesty?"
The Queen smiled and said,
"Answer me this please Tony.
Your mother and father have a child.
It is not your brother and it is not your sister.
Who is it?"
Without pausing for a moment, Tony Blair answered…
"That would be me."
"Yes! Very good." said the Queen.
Obama went back home to ask Joe Biden the same question.
"Joe, answer this for me."
"Your mother and your father have a child.
It's not your brother and it's not your sister.
Who is it?"
"I'm not sure," said Biden.
"Let me get back to you on that one."
He went to his advisors and asked everyone, but none could give him an
answer.
Frustrated, Biden went to work in congressional gym and saw Paul Ryan
there.
Biden went up to him and asked, "Hey Paul, see if you can answer this
question."
"Shoot Joe."
“Your mother and father have a child and it's not your brother or your
sister.
Who is it?"
Paul Ryan answered,
"That's easy, it's me!"
Biden smiled, and said, "Good answer Paul!"
Biden then, went back to speak with President Obama.
"Say, I did some research and I have the answer to that riddle."
"It's Paul Ryan!"
Obama got up, stomped over to Biden, and angrily yelled into his face,
"No! You idiot! It's Tony Blair!"
...AND THAT MY FRIENDS IS PRECISELY WHAT'S GOING ON AT THE WHITE HOUSE
Frank Ketchum
May 31, 2013, 8:14:41 PM5/31/13
to
"jay birdsong" <jaybi...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:kob2vi$22m$1...@dont-email.me...
>>
> Obama got up, stomped over to Biden, and angrily yelled into his face,
>
> "No! You idiot! It's Tony Blair!"
>
>
> ...AND THAT MY FRIENDS IS PRECISELY WHAT'S GOING ON AT THE WHITE HOUSE
Funny but it's hard to beat the entertainment value of what this
> Obama got up, stomped over to Biden, and angrily yelled into his face,
>
> "No! You idiot! It's Tony Blair!"
>
>
> ...AND THAT MY FRIENDS IS PRECISELY WHAT'S GOING ON AT THE WHITE HOUSE
administration actually does. Just pick up your newspaper, you'll swear
you're reading the comics.
gpsman
May 31, 2013, 11:22:50 PM5/31/13
to
On May 31, 8:14 pm, "Frank Ketchum" <fr...@nospam.com> wrote:
> "jay birdsong" <jaybirds...@aol.com> wrote in message
-----
- gpsman
> "jay birdsong" <jaybirds...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
>
> > ...AND THAT MY FRIENDS IS PRECISELY WHAT'S GOING ON AT THE WHITE HOUSE
>
> Funny but it's hard to beat the entertainment value of what this
> administration actually does.
Not at all. http://mm4a.org/11qZWq6
>
> > ...AND THAT MY FRIENDS IS PRECISELY WHAT'S GOING ON AT THE WHITE HOUSE
>
> Funny but it's hard to beat the entertainment value of what this
> administration actually does.
-----
- gpsman
Frank Ketchum
May 31, 2013, 11:39:53 PM5/31/13
to
"gpsman" <gps...@driversmail.com> wrote in message
news:c9f011ce-d0f6-48df...@k10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
That's all you've got after all this time lol? Not surprising.
gpsman
Jun 1, 2013, 10:45:42 AM6/1/13
to
Welshing doesn't stop the vig...
-----
- gpsman
Frank Ketchum
Jun 1, 2013, 12:19:05 PM6/1/13
to
news:06db0535-f8e2-44c3...@v2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
Still on this bit of stupidity are you? Even Bobby tried telling you what a
complete idiot you were. Give it a rest imbecile.
complete idiot you were. Give it a rest imbecile.
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 1, 2013, 12:43:13 PM6/1/13
to
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 12:19:05 -0400, "Frank Ketchum" <fr...@nospam.com>
wrote:
>
>"gpsman" <gps...@driversmail.com> wrote in message
>news:06db0535-f8e2-44c3...@v2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
>On May 31, 11:39 pm, "Frank Ketchum" <fr...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> "gpsman" <gps...@driversmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:c9f011ce-d0f6-48df...@k10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > Not at all. http://mm4a.org/11qZWq6
>>
>> That's all you've got after all this time lol? Not surprising.
>
>Well, there's the $2637.93 you now owe me, on a $1000 bet...
>
>Welshing doesn't stop the vig...
> -----
>
>Still on this bit of stupidity are you? Even Bobby tried telling you what a
>complete idiot you were. Give it a rest imbecile.
>
EVEN Bobby? That's hurtful. :)
>
>"gpsman" <gps...@driversmail.com> wrote in message
>news:06db0535-f8e2-44c3...@v2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
>On May 31, 11:39 pm, "Frank Ketchum" <fr...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> "gpsman" <gps...@driversmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:c9f011ce-d0f6-48df...@k10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > Not at all. http://mm4a.org/11qZWq6
>>
>> That's all you've got after all this time lol? Not surprising.
>
>Well, there's the $2637.93 you now owe me, on a $1000 bet...
>
>Welshing doesn't stop the vig...
> -----
>
>Still on this bit of stupidity are you? Even Bobby tried telling you what a
>complete idiot you were. Give it a rest imbecile.
>
Frank Ketchum
Jun 1, 2013, 12:56:10 PM6/1/13
to
<bkn...@conramp.net> wrote in message
news:t39kq85c3l8cpqk2i...@4ax.com...
with me on anything political.
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 1, 2013, 1:11:59 PM6/1/13
to
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 12:56:10 -0400, "Frank Ketchum" <fr...@nospam.com>
wrote:
>
><bkn...@conramp.net> wrote in message
>news:t39kq85c3l8cpqk2i...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 12:19:05 -0400, "Frank Ketchum" <fr...@nospam.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"gpsman" <gps...@driversmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:06db0535-f8e2-44c3...@v2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
>>>On May 31, 11:39 pm, "Frank Ketchum" <fr...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>> "gpsman" <gps...@driversmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> news:c9f011ce-d0f6-48df...@k10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>> > Not at all. http://mm4a.org/11qZWq6
>>>>
>>>> That's all you've got after all this time lol? Not surprising.
>>>
>>>Well, there's the $2637.93 you now owe me, on a $1000 bet...
>>>
>>>Welshing doesn't stop the vig...
>>> -----
>>>
>>>Still on this bit of stupidity are you? Even Bobby tried telling you what
>>>a
>>>complete idiot you were. Give it a rest imbecile.
>>>
>> EVEN Bobby? That's hurtful. :)
>
>"Even Bobby" in the sense that you would normally prefer death over agreeing
>with me on anything political.
>
It happens.
>
><bkn...@conramp.net> wrote in message
>news:t39kq85c3l8cpqk2i...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 12:19:05 -0400, "Frank Ketchum" <fr...@nospam.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"gpsman" <gps...@driversmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:06db0535-f8e2-44c3...@v2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
>>>On May 31, 11:39 pm, "Frank Ketchum" <fr...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>> "gpsman" <gps...@driversmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> news:c9f011ce-d0f6-48df...@k10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>> > Not at all. http://mm4a.org/11qZWq6
>>>>
>>>> That's all you've got after all this time lol? Not surprising.
>>>
>>>Well, there's the $2637.93 you now owe me, on a $1000 bet...
>>>
>>>Welshing doesn't stop the vig...
>>> -----
>>>
>>>Still on this bit of stupidity are you? Even Bobby tried telling you what
>>>a
>>>complete idiot you were. Give it a rest imbecile.
>>>
>> EVEN Bobby? That's hurtful. :)
>
>"Even Bobby" in the sense that you would normally prefer death over agreeing
>with me on anything political.
>
golfbum18
Jun 1, 2013, 3:29:38 PM6/1/13
to
became queen. The only one I can't recall would be the Dark Days of
Dubya when there were so many jokes going around that it probably got
lost in the shuffle. Here's one that's newer...pull my finger.
golfbum18
Jun 1, 2013, 3:32:48 PM6/1/13
to
On May 31, 8:14 pm, "Frank Ketchum" <fr...@nospam.com> wrote:
> "jay birdsong" <jaybirds...@aol.com> wrote in message
Whistling through the graveyard again frankie? You're not the least
big amused and in fact, you are bitter every day of your life that
Prez Obama is in office and the economy is improving by leaps and
bounds. How tough is it to admit something like this to the guy in the
mirror? There's a reason why they call that little cylinder of mystery
meat made form bits and pieces of some kind of shit they can't even
put on a label......a "frank."
> "jay birdsong" <jaybirds...@aol.com> wrote in message
big amused and in fact, you are bitter every day of your life that
Prez Obama is in office and the economy is improving by leaps and
bounds. How tough is it to admit something like this to the guy in the
mirror? There's a reason why they call that little cylinder of mystery
meat made form bits and pieces of some kind of shit they can't even
put on a label......a "frank."
jay birdsong
Jun 1, 2013, 6:00:01 PM6/1/13
to
"golfbum18" wrote in message
news:ed4cbaf2-aaed-4ea3...@n5g2000pbg.googlegroups.com...
> The only one I can't recall would be the Dark Days of
>Dubya when there were so many jokes going around that it probably got
>lost in the shuffle.
with him, Rumsfeld and Chaney.
Even though Obama is a horses ass and doesn't know jack shit, and must
pinch himself every day and say "Am really the president!!?" think he
could be fun to hang with a blow a few joints.
I might even consider visiting Michelle's Brillo patch.
>Here's one that's newer...pull my finger.
One word of advice, don't bring Alwin Baker as your assistant. I'm
not sure if he's allowed to be closer than 1000 feet to a child.
gpsman
Jun 3, 2013, 9:27:47 AM6/3/13
to
On Jun 1, 12:19 pm, "Frank Ketchum" <fr...@nospam.com> wrote:
> "gpsman" <gps...@driversmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:06db0535-f8e2-44c3...@v2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> On May 31, 11:39 pm, "Frank Ketchum" <fr...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> > "gpsman" <gps...@driversmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:c9f011ce-d0f6-48df...@k10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > Not at all.http://mm4a.org/11qZWq6
> "gpsman" <gps...@driversmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:06db0535-f8e2-44c3...@v2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> On May 31, 11:39 pm, "Frank Ketchum" <fr...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> > "gpsman" <gps...@driversmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:c9f011ce-d0f6-48df...@k10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
>
> > That's all you've got after all this time lol? Not surprising.
>
> Well, there's the $2637.93 you now owe me, on a $1000 bet...
>
> Welshing doesn't stop the vig...
>
> > That's all you've got after all this time lol? Not surprising.
>
> Well, there's the $2637.93 you now owe me, on a $1000 bet...
>
> Welshing doesn't stop the vig...
>
> Still on this bit of stupidity are you?
Ah, appeal to ridicule!
I'm not "still on it", it is a source of amusement.
> Even Bobby tried telling you what a
> complete idiot you were.
is controlled by Congress.
"Federal law requires Congress to authorize the government to borrow
any money that is needed to pay for the programs that Congress has
passed.
"The Constitution gives Congress the power to control spending and
borrowing."
> Give it a rest imbecile.
The juice never stops...
-----
- gpsman
MNMikeW
Jun 3, 2013, 11:36:20 AM6/3/13
to
KenPitts
Jun 9, 2013, 8:22:43 PM6/9/13
to
On Friday, May 31, 2013 4:03:57 PM UTC-5, jay birdsong wrote:
Here is what our worthless president has done in throwing our strongest ally, Great Britain, under the bus.
Ken
http://www.libertynews.com/2013/05/plainly-annoyed-major-british-newspaper-lists-obamas-top-ten-insults-against-the-u-k-british-say-obama-is-guilty-of-breathtaking-diplomatic-ineptitude/
Here is what our worthless president has done in throwing our strongest ally, Great Britain, under the bus.
Ken
http://www.libertynews.com/2013/05/plainly-annoyed-major-british-newspaper-lists-obamas-top-ten-insults-against-the-u-k-british-say-obama-is-guilty-of-breathtaking-diplomatic-ineptitude/
Frank Ketchum
Jun 9, 2013, 8:35:34 PM6/9/13
to
"KenPitts" <ken....@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e4137e17-1a29-42b3...@googlegroups.com...
diplomatic ineptitude' after he gave the former Prime Minister, Gordon Brown
a set of twenty-five DVDs"
Yes this really did happen as unbelievable as it sounds. One that they
failed to mention was that our dear leader also gave the queen an ipod
containing his speeches. That is not a joke, he really did.
It could be worse limeys, he could be running your country.
Carbon
Jun 9, 2013, 8:50:28 PM6/9/13
to
On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 20:35:34 -0400, Frank Ketchum wrote:
> "KenPitts" <ken....@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e4137e17-1a29-42b3...@googlegroups.com...
>> On Friday, May 31, 2013 4:03:57 PM UTC-5, jay birdsong wrote:
>>
>> Here is what our worthless president has done in throwing our strongest
>> ally, Great Britain, under the bus.
>>
> "KenPitts" <ken....@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e4137e17-1a29-42b3...@googlegroups.com...
>> On Friday, May 31, 2013 4:03:57 PM UTC-5, jay birdsong wrote:
>>
>> Here is what our worthless president has done in throwing our strongest
>> ally, Great Britain, under the bus.
>>
>> http://www.libertynews.com/2013/05/plainly-annoyed-major-british-newspaper-lists-obamas-top-ten-insults-against-the-u-k-british-say-obama-is-guilty-of-breathtaking-diplomatic-ineptitude/
>
> "The Telegraph wrote that President Obama is guilty of 'Breathtaking
> diplomatic ineptitude' after he gave the former Prime Minister, Gordon
> Brown a set of twenty-five DVDs"
What crime was committed again?
>
> "The Telegraph wrote that President Obama is guilty of 'Breathtaking
> diplomatic ineptitude' after he gave the former Prime Minister, Gordon
> Brown a set of twenty-five DVDs"
KenPitts
Jun 9, 2013, 8:51:47 PM6/9/13
to
Ken
KenPitts
Jun 9, 2013, 8:53:10 PM6/9/13
to
Ken
BobM
Jun 9, 2013, 9:05:59 PM6/9/13
to
KenPitts
Jun 9, 2013, 9:19:56 PM6/9/13
to
On Sunday, June 9, 2013 8:05:59 PM UTC-5, BobM wrote:
What do you think you are proving by posting a link to a picture that everyone knows has been doctored? It is as immature as when Bobby Knight was doing it. Knight is a hateful old curmudgeon who has a grudge against me. But, I have no idea who you are.
Ken
What do you think you are proving by posting a link to a picture that everyone knows has been doctored? It is as immature as when Bobby Knight was doing it. Knight is a hateful old curmudgeon who has a grudge against me. But, I have no idea who you are.
Ken
BobM
Jun 9, 2013, 9:32:57 PM6/9/13
to
> But, I have no idea who you are.
We've played golf together. I've met you and Shahla.
.
Carbon
Jun 9, 2013, 9:41:23 PM6/9/13
to
On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 17:53:10 -0700, KenPitts wrote:
> On Sunday, June 9, 2013 7:50:28 PM UTC-5, Carbon wrote:
>> On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 20:35:34 -0400, Frank Ketchum wrote:
>>> "KenPitts" <ken....@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:e4137e17-1a29-42b3...@googlegroups.com...
>>>
> On Sunday, June 9, 2013 7:50:28 PM UTC-5, Carbon wrote:
>> On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 20:35:34 -0400, Frank Ketchum wrote:
>>> "KenPitts" <ken....@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:e4137e17-1a29-42b3...@googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>> Here is what our worthless president has done in throwing our
>>>> strongest ally, Great Britain, under the bus.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.libertynews.com/2013/05/plainly-annoyed-major-british-newspaper-lists-obamas-top-ten-insults-against-the-u-k-british-say-obama-is-guilty-of-breathtaking-diplomatic-ineptitude/
>>>
>>> "The Telegraph wrote that President Obama is guilty of 'Breathtaking
>>> diplomatic ineptitude' after he gave the former Prime Minister, Gordon
>>> Brown a set of twenty-five DVDs"
>>
>> What crime was committed again?
>
> The crime was electing the pot-smoking, coke-whiffing, no transcript
> showing clown in the first place.
You say that like being unpopular with kooks is a bad thing.
>>>> strongest ally, Great Britain, under the bus.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.libertynews.com/2013/05/plainly-annoyed-major-british-newspaper-lists-obamas-top-ten-insults-against-the-u-k-british-say-obama-is-guilty-of-breathtaking-diplomatic-ineptitude/
>>>
>>> "The Telegraph wrote that President Obama is guilty of 'Breathtaking
>>> diplomatic ineptitude' after he gave the former Prime Minister, Gordon
>>> Brown a set of twenty-five DVDs"
>>
>> What crime was committed again?
>
> The crime was electing the pot-smoking, coke-whiffing, no transcript
> showing clown in the first place.
KenPitts
Jun 9, 2013, 9:53:42 PM6/9/13
to
On Sunday, June 9, 2013 8:32:57 PM UTC-5, BobM wrote:
> > But, I have no idea who you are.
>
>
>
> We've played golf together. I've met you and Shahla.
>
>
Then, what are you doing? You know that picture is not right. You are intentionally lying about me by posting that. You are as bad as Knight and Brown.
> > But, I have no idea who you are.
>
>
>
> We've played golf together. I've met you and Shahla.
>
>
Ken
KenPitts
Jun 9, 2013, 9:54:47 PM6/9/13
to
Ken
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 9, 2013, 10:21:19 PM6/9/13
to
preposterous piece of crap? I have never posted a picture of you,
ever. I don't have one of you and don't know of any.
You've become a pitiful whining asshole who doesn't know what you're
talking about, and babble over things that just aren't true.
Before you throw out lies get your facts together.
KenPitts
Jun 9, 2013, 10:27:50 PM6/9/13
to
On Sunday, June 9, 2013 9:21:19 PM UTC-5, bkn...@conramp.net wrote:
>
>
> That is an outright lie Ken. Where did you come up with such a
>
> preposterous piece of crap? I have never posted a picture of you,
>
> ever. I don't have one of you and don't know of any.
>
> You've become a pitiful whining asshole who doesn't know what you're
>
> talking about, and babble over things that just aren't true.
>
>
>
> Before you throw out lies get your facts together.
You sure as Hell did circulate that piece of shit. And you were called out on it. I believe by MN Mike. It is clearly photoshopped. More selective amnesia. You'd fit right in with Hussein.
>
>
> That is an outright lie Ken. Where did you come up with such a
>
> preposterous piece of crap? I have never posted a picture of you,
>
> ever. I don't have one of you and don't know of any.
>
> You've become a pitiful whining asshole who doesn't know what you're
>
> talking about, and babble over things that just aren't true.
>
>
>
> Before you throw out lies get your facts together.
Ken
Horva...@net.net
Jun 9, 2013, 11:42:20 PM6/9/13
to
On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 17:51:47 -0700 (PDT), KenPitts <ken....@gmail.com>
wrote this crap:
>>
>>
>
>I'm surprised that did not make the list. I think the worst may be
> sending that bust back.
I agree with you.
> I hope whoever is president next will offer
> sincere apologies for the childish actions of Hussein and offer to
> take the bust back in a place of honor in the White House.
>In my book, Sir Winston Churchill was the greatest man of the 20th century.
Not me. I think Albert Einstein was the greatest man of the 20th
century, but I'm a scientist, and I think all politicians are scum.
This signature is now the ultimate
power in the universe
wrote this crap:
>>
>>
>
>I'm surprised that did not make the list. I think the worst may be
> sending that bust back.
> I hope whoever is president next will offer
> sincere apologies for the childish actions of Hussein and offer to
> take the bust back in a place of honor in the White House.
>In my book, Sir Winston Churchill was the greatest man of the 20th century.
century, but I'm a scientist, and I think all politicians are scum.
This signature is now the ultimate
power in the universe
Frank Ketchum
Jun 9, 2013, 11:46:31 PM6/9/13
to
"Carbon" <nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2013.06...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com...
are really coming off the rails. I guess the frustration of trying to
excuse everything this idiot does is proving too much. Only 3.5 more years
to go, keep your chin up!
Horva...@net.net
Jun 10, 2013, 12:10:42 AM6/10/13
to
On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 18:53:42 -0700 (PDT), KenPitts <ken....@gmail.com>
wrote this crap:
Did you see the pic he posted and tried to say was me?
http://www.ncyc.net/newNCYC/Images/BBimages/Horvath.jpg
The really funny part is that I know that guy and I know it's not me.
Here's me. I never hide my beautiful looks.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/73688745@N05/8180383667/in/photostream
wrote this crap:
http://www.ncyc.net/newNCYC/Images/BBimages/Horvath.jpg
The really funny part is that I know that guy and I know it's not me.
Here's me. I never hide my beautiful looks.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/73688745@N05/8180383667/in/photostream
Alan Baker
Jun 10, 2013, 12:41:16 AM6/10/13
to
In article <91215a33-54fc-4568...@googlegroups.com>,
Because it isn't.
Are you a teetotaler, Ken? When was the last teetotaling president...
...who also didn't smoke...
...or drink coffee?
--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."
Are you a teetotaler, Ken? When was the last teetotaling president...
...who also didn't smoke...
...or drink coffee?
--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."
Carbon
Jun 10, 2013, 12:53:43 AM6/10/13
to
previous administration--in economic policy and now in lack of respect for
the privacy of voters. Obviously Romney would have done the same if he had
won last November, but that doesn't excuse Obama.
But back to the DVDs. The story originally came from the Daily Fail or
some such, and naturally Pitts latches onto it like a moray eel. If you're
done your hyperventilating for the day, can you please tell me what was
wrong with giving someone DVDs of classic American movies?
I've seen gloating on far right blogs that there was an issue with region
encoding. If true, this was a screw-up by some assistant at the bottom of
the food chain. You would never hold a Republican administration
responsible for something like this and we both know it.
Horva...@net.net
Jun 10, 2013, 7:09:54 AM6/10/13
to
On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 21:41:16 -0700, Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net>
wrote this crap:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > You say that like being unpopular with kooks is a bad thing.
>>
>> You say it like Hussein being an admitted drug user is not a problem.
>>
>> Ken
>
>Because it isn't.
>
>Are you a teetotaler, Ken? When was the last teetotaling president...
>
>...who also didn't smoke...
That was George W. Bush
wrote this crap:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > You say that like being unpopular with kooks is a bad thing.
>>
>> You say it like Hussein being an admitted drug user is not a problem.
>>
>> Ken
>
>Because it isn't.
>
>Are you a teetotaler, Ken? When was the last teetotaling president...
>
>...who also didn't smoke...
jay birdsong
Jun 10, 2013, 8:15:10 AM6/10/13
to
"Alan Baker" wrote in message
news:alangbaker-13F82...@news.shawcable.net...
needs attention. Wadda Loser.
snip dumb cunt sig.
Frank Ketchum
Jun 10, 2013, 9:51:56 AM6/10/13
to
"Carbon" <nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2013.06...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com...
> Obviously Romney would have done the same if he had
> won last November
Given this statement, why on the world would anyone ever read your opinion
> won last November
about anything again?
> If you're done your hyperventilating for the day,
of this administration's idiocy. It is rather nice that so many people can
finally fucking see it.
> can you please tell me what was wrong with giving someone DVDs of classic
> American movies?
giving him the Porky's collection.
MNMikeW
Jun 10, 2013, 10:23:28 AM6/10/13
to
Carbon wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 23:46:31 -0400, Frank Ketchum wrote:
>> "Carbon" <nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:pan.2013.06...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com...
>>> On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 20:35:34 -0400, Frank Ketchum wrote:
>>>
>>>> "The Telegraph wrote that President Obama is guilty of 'Breathtaking
>>>> diplomatic ineptitude' after he gave the former Prime Minister, Gordon
>>>> Brown a set of twenty-five DVDs"
>>>
>>> What crime was committed again?
>>
>> Nobody said anything about a crime but thanks for that absurd grasp. You
>> are really coming off the rails. I guess the frustration of trying to
>> excuse everything this idiot does is proving too much. Only 3.5 more
>> years to go, keep your chin up!
>
> On the contrary. In a lot of ways Obama is uncomfortably close to the
> previous administration--in economic policy and now in lack of respect for
> the privacy of voters. Obviously Romney would have done the same if he had
> won last November, but that doesn't excuse Obama.
Yes, obviously <rolls eyes>.
> On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 23:46:31 -0400, Frank Ketchum wrote:
>> "Carbon" <nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:pan.2013.06...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com...
>>> On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 20:35:34 -0400, Frank Ketchum wrote:
>>>
>>>> "The Telegraph wrote that President Obama is guilty of 'Breathtaking
>>>> diplomatic ineptitude' after he gave the former Prime Minister, Gordon
>>>> Brown a set of twenty-five DVDs"
>>>
>>> What crime was committed again?
>>
>> Nobody said anything about a crime but thanks for that absurd grasp. You
>> are really coming off the rails. I guess the frustration of trying to
>> excuse everything this idiot does is proving too much. Only 3.5 more
>> years to go, keep your chin up!
>
> On the contrary. In a lot of ways Obama is uncomfortably close to the
> previous administration--in economic policy and now in lack of respect for
> the privacy of voters. Obviously Romney would have done the same if he had
> won last November, but that doesn't excuse Obama.
>
> But back to the DVDs. The story originally came from the Daily Fail or
> some such, and naturally Pitts latches onto it like a moray eel. If you're
> done your hyperventilating for the day, can you please tell me what was
> wrong with giving someone DVDs of classic American movies?
Right. Good thing I'm not on your Christmas list.
> But back to the DVDs. The story originally came from the Daily Fail or
> some such, and naturally Pitts latches onto it like a moray eel. If you're
> done your hyperventilating for the day, can you please tell me what was
> wrong with giving someone DVDs of classic American movies?
>
> I've seen gloating on far right blogs that there was an issue with region
> encoding. If true, this was a screw-up by some assistant at the bottom of
> the food chain. You would never hold a Republican administration
> responsible for something like this and we both know it.
>
I can just imagine your howling had Bush done this.
> I've seen gloating on far right blogs that there was an issue with region
> encoding. If true, this was a screw-up by some assistant at the bottom of
> the food chain. You would never hold a Republican administration
> responsible for something like this and we both know it.
>
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 10, 2013, 10:23:27 AM6/10/13
to
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:51:56 -0400, "Frank Ketchum" <fr...@nospam.com>
wrote:
The Office of Protocol and a staff at the State Department that
decides on such gifts. Plus, both sides have offered some dumb ones
in the past. Obama got a framed pic of Her Majesty, something that is
a standard to any visiting dignitary. Big deal.
wrote:
decides on such gifts. Plus, both sides have offered some dumb ones
in the past. Obama got a framed pic of Her Majesty, something that is
a standard to any visiting dignitary. Big deal.
Frank Ketchum
Jun 10, 2013, 10:36:53 AM6/10/13
to
<bkn...@conramp.net> wrote in message
news:f5obr890itd9piqo9...@4ax.com...
fun of this default answer from you still? LOL. What's wrong, can't figure
a way to blame Bush?
> Obama got a framed pic of Her Majesty, something that is
> a standard to any visiting dignitary. Big deal.
have handed Brown fifty bucks.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1159627/To-special-friend-Gordon-25-DVDs-Obama-gives-Brown-set-classic-movies-Lets-hope-likes-Wizard-Oz.html
Horva...@net.net
Jun 10, 2013, 11:12:34 AM6/10/13
to
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 10, 2013, 11:55:27 AM6/10/13
to
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 10:36:53 -0400, "Frank Ketchum" <fr...@nospam.com>
Oh bullshit Frank. The same thing applies to Bush or any POTUS.
>
>> Obama got a framed pic of Her Majesty, something that is
>> a standard to any visiting dignitary. Big deal.
>
>No. Obama was given a very thoughtful and symbolic gift. Obama may as well
>have handed Brown fifty bucks.
>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1159627/To-special-friend-Gordon-25-DVDs-Obama-gives-Brown-set-classic-movies-Lets-hope-likes-Wizard-Oz.html
>
Snore.
>> Obama got a framed pic of Her Majesty, something that is
>> a standard to any visiting dignitary. Big deal.
>
>No. Obama was given a very thoughtful and symbolic gift. Obama may as well
>have handed Brown fifty bucks.
>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1159627/To-special-friend-Gordon-25-DVDs-Obama-gives-Brown-set-classic-movies-Lets-hope-likes-Wizard-Oz.html
>
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 10, 2013, 12:18:33 PM6/10/13
to
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 10:36:53 -0400, "Frank Ketchum" <fr...@nospam.com>
I thought I'd check on some earlier presents given to the British. The
Daily Mail has been snooty before.
"President and Mrs. Bush gave Her Majesty a bronze statuette "High
Desert Princess" with a personal inscription on the bottom of the
base. It is a replica of the original life size statue that is located
in front of the National Cowgirl Museum and Hall of Fame in Ft. Worth,
Texas". (2007)
"The Prime Minister has not had the best of luck when receiving gifts
from U.S. presidents.
He was given a fur-trimmed brown leather bomber jacket by George W.
Bush during his first trip to America in the summer of 2007.
Commentators gleefully pointed out that the garment was hardly in
keeping with Mr Brown's usual sober attire of business suit and tie".
wrote:
>
><bkn...@conramp.net> wrote in message
>news:f5obr890itd9piqo9...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:51:56 -0400, "Frank Ketchum" <fr...@nospam.com>
>> wrote:
>> The Office of Protocol and a staff at the State Department that
>> decides on such gifts. Plus, both sides have offered some dumb ones
>> in the past.
>
>Very good Bobby. It's not Obama's fault. Do you really wonder why I make
>fun of this default answer from you still? LOL. What's wrong, can't figure
>a way to blame Bush?
Screw you Frank. Read this.
>
><bkn...@conramp.net> wrote in message
>news:f5obr890itd9piqo9...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:51:56 -0400, "Frank Ketchum" <fr...@nospam.com>
>> wrote:
>> The Office of Protocol and a staff at the State Department that
>> decides on such gifts. Plus, both sides have offered some dumb ones
>> in the past.
>
>Very good Bobby. It's not Obama's fault. Do you really wonder why I make
>fun of this default answer from you still? LOL. What's wrong, can't figure
>a way to blame Bush?
I thought I'd check on some earlier presents given to the British. The
Daily Mail has been snooty before.
"President and Mrs. Bush gave Her Majesty a bronze statuette "High
Desert Princess" with a personal inscription on the bottom of the
base. It is a replica of the original life size statue that is located
in front of the National Cowgirl Museum and Hall of Fame in Ft. Worth,
Texas". (2007)
"The Prime Minister has not had the best of luck when receiving gifts
from U.S. presidents.
He was given a fur-trimmed brown leather bomber jacket by George W.
Bush during his first trip to America in the summer of 2007.
Commentators gleefully pointed out that the garment was hardly in
keeping with Mr Brown's usual sober attire of business suit and tie".
Frank Ketchum
Jun 10, 2013, 12:26:57 PM6/10/13
to
<bkn...@conramp.net> wrote in message
news:9pubr8th2tit7kqpc...@4ax.com...
>> What's wrong, can't figure a way to blame Bush?
>
> I thought I'd check on some earlier presents given to the British.
That's more like it. Was worried about you there for a minute.
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 10, 2013, 12:32:51 PM6/10/13
to
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:26:57 -0400, "Frank Ketchum" <fr...@nospam.com>
wrote:
>
Don't be a smart ass. My point was made. The Brits were critical
about POTUS gifts before.
wrote:
>
about POTUS gifts before.
Frank Ketchum
Jun 10, 2013, 12:38:28 PM6/10/13
to
<bkn...@conramp.net> wrote in message
news:novbr8pd6nrvsl4jp...@4ax.com...
don't remember claiming anything to the contrary.
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 10, 2013, 1:04:18 PM6/10/13
to
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:38:28 -0400, "Frank Ketchum" <fr...@nospam.com>
decision regarding gifts to foreign dignitaries. That comes from the
Chief of Protocol. Interesting to see the gifts, good and bad, from
the past. Google it.
wrote:
>
><bkn...@conramp.net> wrote in message
>news:novbr8pd6nrvsl4jp...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:26:57 -0400, "Frank Ketchum" <fr...@nospam.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>><bkn...@conramp.net> wrote in message
>>>news:9pubr8th2tit7kqpc...@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>>> What's wrong, can't figure a way to blame Bush?
>>>>
>>>> I thought I'd check on some earlier presents given to the British.
>>>
>>>That's more like it. Was worried about you there for a minute.
>>>
>> Don't be a smart ass. My point was made. The Brits were critical
>> about POTUS gifts before.
>
>Congratulations, you've made the point that Obama is as stupid as Bush. I
>don't remember claiming anything to the contrary.
>
Congratulations, you get the WHOOSH award. Neither one of them made a
>
><bkn...@conramp.net> wrote in message
>news:novbr8pd6nrvsl4jp...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:26:57 -0400, "Frank Ketchum" <fr...@nospam.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>><bkn...@conramp.net> wrote in message
>>>news:9pubr8th2tit7kqpc...@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>>> What's wrong, can't figure a way to blame Bush?
>>>>
>>>> I thought I'd check on some earlier presents given to the British.
>>>
>>>That's more like it. Was worried about you there for a minute.
>>>
>> Don't be a smart ass. My point was made. The Brits were critical
>> about POTUS gifts before.
>
>Congratulations, you've made the point that Obama is as stupid as Bush. I
>don't remember claiming anything to the contrary.
>
decision regarding gifts to foreign dignitaries. That comes from the
Chief of Protocol. Interesting to see the gifts, good and bad, from
the past. Google it.
Horva...@net.net
Jun 10, 2013, 1:06:48 PM6/10/13
to
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:18:33 -0500, bkn...@conramp.net wrote this
crap:
I suppose you'd rather see him get a Stetson?
crap:
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 10, 2013, 1:11:16 PM6/10/13
to
from The Daily Mail, a British newspaper.
Horva...@net.net
Jun 10, 2013, 1:35:06 PM6/10/13
to
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:11:16 -0500, bkn...@conramp.net wrote this
crap:
>>>
crap:
>>>
>>>"The Prime Minister has not had the best of luck when receiving gifts
>>>from U.S. presidents.
>>>He was given a fur-trimmed brown leather bomber jacket by George W.
>>>Bush during his first trip to America in the summer of 2007.
>>>
>>>Commentators gleefully pointed out that the garment was hardly in
>>>keeping with Mr Brown's usual sober attire of business suit and tie".
>>>
>>
>>I suppose you'd rather see him get a Stetson?
>>
>Damn you're an idiot. I don't care one way or another. This came
>from The Daily Mail, a British newspaper.
What are you bitchin at me for? I didn't give him the gift.
>>>from U.S. presidents.
>>>He was given a fur-trimmed brown leather bomber jacket by George W.
>>>Bush during his first trip to America in the summer of 2007.
>>>
>>>Commentators gleefully pointed out that the garment was hardly in
>>>keeping with Mr Brown's usual sober attire of business suit and tie".
>>>
>>
>>I suppose you'd rather see him get a Stetson?
>>
>Damn you're an idiot. I don't care one way or another. This came
>from The Daily Mail, a British newspaper.
KenPitts
Jun 10, 2013, 5:48:24 PM6/10/13
to
How much trouble would Great Britain have been in if they had continued with the panty waist Neville Chamberlain? Churchill single handedly held off the Nazi Wehrmacht until our forces could ride to the rescue.
Most inspiring words I have ever heard given the circumstances. "Let us therefore brace ourselves to our duties, and so bear ourselves that, if the British Empire and its Commonwealth lasts for a thousand years, men will still say, “This was their finest hour!”".
It was an intentional insult that Hussein sent that bust back. One of the first in a series of never ending outrages.
Ken
kcpjun...@gmail.com
Jun 10, 2013, 6:08:27 PM6/10/13
to
You're a bigger idiot than I thought.
Ken
Alan Baker
Jun 10, 2013, 6:27:20 PM6/10/13
to
In article <b2447ec6-a881-4343...@googlegroups.com>,
"Update:
Since my post on the fact that the bust of Winston Churchill has
remained on display in the White House, despite assertions to the
contrary, I have received a bunch of questions -- so let me provide some
additional info. The White House has had a bust of Winston Churchill
since the 1960零. At the start of the Bush administration Prime Minister
Blair lent President Bush a bust that matched the one in the White
House, which was being worked on at the time and was later returned to
the residence. The version lent by Prime Minister Blair was displayed
by President Bush until the end of his Presidency. On January 20, 2009
-- Inauguration Day -- all of the art lent specifically for President
Bush零 Oval Office was removed by the curator零 office, as is common
practice at the end of every presidency. The original Churchill bust
remained on display in the residence. The idea put forward by Charles
Krauthammer and others that President Obama returned the Churchill bust
or refused to display the bust because of antipathy towards the British
is completely false and an urban legend that continues to circulate to
this day. "
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/07/27/fact-check-bust-winston-church
ill>
'Like a plot twist in a sitcom, IT TURNS OUT THERE ARE TWO CHURCHILL
BUSTS!!!!!
The one in the White House residence was a gift to the White House from
the British Embassy during the Johnson administration.
The other one was loaned to President George W. Bush by British Prime
Minister Tony Blair.
Says James Barbour, press secretary and head of communications for the
British Embassy, "The bust of Sir Winston Churchill, by Sir Jacob
Epstein, was lent to the George W. Bush administration from the U.K.'s
government art collection, for the duration of the presidency. When that
administration came to an end so did the loan; the bust now resides in
the British Ambassador's Residence in Washington D.C. The White House
collection has its own Epstein bust of Churchill, which President Obama
showed to Prime Minister Cameron when he visited the White House in
March."'
<http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/07/is-the-churchill-bust-contr
oversy-a-total-bust/>
Read it again:
'Says James Barbour, press secretary and head of communications for the
British Embassy, 袍he bust of Sir Winston Churchill, by Sir Jacob
Epstein, was lent to the George W. Bush administration from the U.K.'s
government art collection, for the duration of the presidency. When that
administration came to an end so did the loan;'
Now I'm sure you want to do some whining about how mean I'm being to an
old man by using such unfair tactics as knowing the facts.
Please commence.
kcpjun...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >>Commentators gleefully pointed out that the garment was hardly in
> >
> > >>keeping with Mr Brown's usual sober attire of business suit and tie".
> >
> > >>
> >
> > >
> >
> > >I suppose you'd rather see him get a Stetson?
> >
> > >
> >
> > Damn you're an idiot. I don't care one way or another. This came
> >
> > from The Daily Mail, a British newspaper.
>
> You don't care that Hussein insulted all of Great Britain by sending that
> bust of Churchill back?
>
> You're a bigger idiot than I thought.
The only idiot here is you:
> > >>Commentators gleefully pointed out that the garment was hardly in
> >
> > >>keeping with Mr Brown's usual sober attire of business suit and tie".
> >
> > >>
> >
> > >
> >
> > >I suppose you'd rather see him get a Stetson?
> >
> > >
> >
> > Damn you're an idiot. I don't care one way or another. This came
> >
> > from The Daily Mail, a British newspaper.
>
> You don't care that Hussein insulted all of Great Britain by sending that
> bust of Churchill back?
>
> You're a bigger idiot than I thought.
"Update:
Since my post on the fact that the bust of Winston Churchill has
remained on display in the White House, despite assertions to the
contrary, I have received a bunch of questions -- so let me provide some
additional info. The White House has had a bust of Winston Churchill
since the 1960零. At the start of the Bush administration Prime Minister
Blair lent President Bush a bust that matched the one in the White
House, which was being worked on at the time and was later returned to
the residence. The version lent by Prime Minister Blair was displayed
by President Bush until the end of his Presidency. On January 20, 2009
-- Inauguration Day -- all of the art lent specifically for President
Bush零 Oval Office was removed by the curator零 office, as is common
practice at the end of every presidency. The original Churchill bust
remained on display in the residence. The idea put forward by Charles
Krauthammer and others that President Obama returned the Churchill bust
or refused to display the bust because of antipathy towards the British
is completely false and an urban legend that continues to circulate to
this day. "
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/07/27/fact-check-bust-winston-church
ill>
'Like a plot twist in a sitcom, IT TURNS OUT THERE ARE TWO CHURCHILL
BUSTS!!!!!
The one in the White House residence was a gift to the White House from
the British Embassy during the Johnson administration.
The other one was loaned to President George W. Bush by British Prime
Minister Tony Blair.
Says James Barbour, press secretary and head of communications for the
British Embassy, "The bust of Sir Winston Churchill, by Sir Jacob
Epstein, was lent to the George W. Bush administration from the U.K.'s
government art collection, for the duration of the presidency. When that
administration came to an end so did the loan; the bust now resides in
the British Ambassador's Residence in Washington D.C. The White House
collection has its own Epstein bust of Churchill, which President Obama
showed to Prime Minister Cameron when he visited the White House in
March."'
<http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/07/is-the-churchill-bust-contr
oversy-a-total-bust/>
Read it again:
'Says James Barbour, press secretary and head of communications for the
British Embassy, 袍he bust of Sir Winston Churchill, by Sir Jacob
Epstein, was lent to the George W. Bush administration from the U.K.'s
government art collection, for the duration of the presidency. When that
administration came to an end so did the loan;'
Now I'm sure you want to do some whining about how mean I'm being to an
old man by using such unfair tactics as knowing the facts.
Please commence.
Carbon
Jun 10, 2013, 8:50:22 PM6/10/13
to
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:23:28 -0500, MNMikeW wrote:
> Carbon wrote:
>
>> I've seen gloating on far right blogs that there was an issue with
>> region encoding. If true, this was a screw-up by some assistant at the
>> bottom of the food chain. You would never hold a Republican
>> administration responsible for something like this and we both know it.
>
> I can just imagine your howling had Bush done this.
Like any sane person, I wouldn't have cared.
> Carbon wrote:
>
>> I've seen gloating on far right blogs that there was an issue with
>> region encoding. If true, this was a screw-up by some assistant at the
>> bottom of the food chain. You would never hold a Republican
>> administration responsible for something like this and we both know it.
>
> I can just imagine your howling had Bush done this.
Carbon
Jun 10, 2013, 9:15:09 PM6/10/13
to
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:23:28 -0500, MNMikeW wrote:
> Carbon wrote:
>> On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 23:46:31 -0400, Frank Ketchum wrote:
>>> "Carbon" <nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>>> news:pan.2013.06...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com...
>>>> On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 20:35:34 -0400, Frank Ketchum wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "The Telegraph wrote that President Obama is guilty of 'Breathtaking
>>>>> diplomatic ineptitude' after he gave the former Prime Minister,
>>>>> Gordon Brown a set of twenty-five DVDs"
>>>>
>>>> What crime was committed again?
>>>
>>> Nobody said anything about a crime but thanks for that absurd grasp.
>>> You are really coming off the rails. I guess the frustration of
>>> trying to excuse everything this idiot does is proving too much. Only
>>> 3.5 more years to go, keep your chin up!
>>
>> On the contrary. In a lot of ways Obama is uncomfortably close to the
>> previous administration--in economic policy and now in lack of respect
>> for the privacy of voters. Obviously Romney would have done the same if
>> he had won last November, but that doesn't excuse Obama.
>
> Yes, obviously <rolls eyes>.
Obama continued with the Bush administration's economic and domestic
>> On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 23:46:31 -0400, Frank Ketchum wrote:
>>> "Carbon" <nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>>> news:pan.2013.06...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com...
>>>> On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 20:35:34 -0400, Frank Ketchum wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "The Telegraph wrote that President Obama is guilty of 'Breathtaking
>>>>> diplomatic ineptitude' after he gave the former Prime Minister,
>>>>> Gordon Brown a set of twenty-five DVDs"
>>>>
>>>> What crime was committed again?
>>>
>>> Nobody said anything about a crime but thanks for that absurd grasp.
>>> You are really coming off the rails. I guess the frustration of
>>> trying to excuse everything this idiot does is proving too much. Only
>>> 3.5 more years to go, keep your chin up!
>>
>> On the contrary. In a lot of ways Obama is uncomfortably close to the
>> previous administration--in economic policy and now in lack of respect
>> for the privacy of voters. Obviously Romney would have done the same if
>> he had won last November, but that doesn't excuse Obama.
>
> Yes, obviously <rolls eyes>.
spying programs. Romney would have continued them as well. He would have
made superficial changes that would have been trumpeted by the far right
media for a while, and that would have been it.
Romney was very proud of Romneycare until that became politically
disadvantageous. In fact, I would bet money he thinks all you zealots on
the far right are a bunch of idiots. He would have gone along until he had
your votes, and then it would have been "Fuck you, I'm the boss."
William Clark
Jun 10, 2013, 9:13:47 PM6/10/13
to
In article <Ga9tt.66714$vh.2...@newsfe20.iad>,
> >
> > http://www.libertynews.com/2013/05/plainly-annoyed-major-british-newspaper-l
> > ists-obamas-top-ten-insults-against-the-u-k-british-say-obama-is-guilty-of-b
> > reathtaking-diplomatic-ineptitude/
> failed to mention was that our dear leader also gave the queen an ipod
> containing his speeches. That is not a joke, he really did.
>
> It could be worse limeys, he could be running your country.
The Telegraph is not known as the Torygraph in the UK for nothing. It is
the most blatantly right wing major newspaper in the country, so this
line of bombast should come as no surprise to anyone with an IQ. Just
head over there and look up the ultra-wingnut crap that Janet Daley was
writing for it ahead of the election - Newsmax and Fox News would have
been proud of it.
"Frank Ketchum" <fr...@nospam.com> wrote:
> "KenPitts" <ken....@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e4137e17-1a29-42b3...@googlegroups.com...
> "KenPitts" <ken....@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e4137e17-1a29-42b3...@googlegroups.com...
> > On Friday, May 31, 2013 4:03:57 PM UTC-5, jay birdsong wrote:
> >
> >
> > Here is what our worthless president has done in throwing our strongest
> > ally, Great Britain, under the bus.
> >
> > Ken
> > ally, Great Britain, under the bus.
> >
> >
> > http://www.libertynews.com/2013/05/plainly-annoyed-major-british-newspaper-l
> > ists-obamas-top-ten-insults-against-the-u-k-british-say-obama-is-guilty-of-b
> > reathtaking-diplomatic-ineptitude/
>
> "The Telegraph wrote that President Obama is guilty of 'Breathtaking
> diplomatic ineptitude' after he gave the former Prime Minister, Gordon Brown
> a set of twenty-five DVDs"
>
> Yes this really did happen as unbelievable as it sounds. One that they
> "The Telegraph wrote that President Obama is guilty of 'Breathtaking
> diplomatic ineptitude' after he gave the former Prime Minister, Gordon Brown
> a set of twenty-five DVDs"
>
> failed to mention was that our dear leader also gave the queen an ipod
> containing his speeches. That is not a joke, he really did.
>
> It could be worse limeys, he could be running your country.
The Telegraph is not known as the Torygraph in the UK for nothing. It is
the most blatantly right wing major newspaper in the country, so this
line of bombast should come as no surprise to anyone with an IQ. Just
head over there and look up the ultra-wingnut crap that Janet Daley was
writing for it ahead of the election - Newsmax and Fox News would have
been proud of it.
William Clark
Jun 10, 2013, 9:15:26 PM6/10/13
to
In article <b1m5r1...@mid.individual.net>,
list of interests.
MNMikeW <mnmi...@aol.com> wrote:
> Carbon wrote:
> > On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 23:46:31 -0400, Frank Ketchum wrote:
> >> "Carbon" <nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> >> news:pan.2013.06...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com...
> >>> On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 20:35:34 -0400, Frank Ketchum wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> "The Telegraph wrote that President Obama is guilty of 'Breathtaking
> >>>> diplomatic ineptitude' after he gave the former Prime Minister, Gordon
> >>>> Brown a set of twenty-five DVDs"
> >>>
> >>> What crime was committed again?
> >>
> >> Nobody said anything about a crime but thanks for that absurd grasp. You
> >> are really coming off the rails. I guess the frustration of trying to
> >> excuse everything this idiot does is proving too much. Only 3.5 more
> >> years to go, keep your chin up!
> >
> > On the contrary. In a lot of ways Obama is uncomfortably close to the
> > previous administration--in economic policy and now in lack of respect for
> > the privacy of voters. Obviously Romney would have done the same if he had
> > won last November, but that doesn't excuse Obama.
>
> Yes, obviously <rolls eyes>.
> >
> > But back to the DVDs. The story originally came from the Daily Fail or
> > some such, and naturally Pitts latches onto it like a moray eel. If you're
> > done your hyperventilating for the day, can you please tell me what was
> > wrong with giving someone DVDs of classic American movies?
>
> Right. Good thing I'm not on your Christmas list.
We all understand that classic literature does not figure high on your
> Carbon wrote:
> > On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 23:46:31 -0400, Frank Ketchum wrote:
> >> "Carbon" <nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> >> news:pan.2013.06...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com...
> >>> On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 20:35:34 -0400, Frank Ketchum wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> "The Telegraph wrote that President Obama is guilty of 'Breathtaking
> >>>> diplomatic ineptitude' after he gave the former Prime Minister, Gordon
> >>>> Brown a set of twenty-five DVDs"
> >>>
> >>> What crime was committed again?
> >>
> >> Nobody said anything about a crime but thanks for that absurd grasp. You
> >> are really coming off the rails. I guess the frustration of trying to
> >> excuse everything this idiot does is proving too much. Only 3.5 more
> >> years to go, keep your chin up!
> >
> > On the contrary. In a lot of ways Obama is uncomfortably close to the
> > previous administration--in economic policy and now in lack of respect for
> > the privacy of voters. Obviously Romney would have done the same if he had
> > won last November, but that doesn't excuse Obama.
>
> Yes, obviously <rolls eyes>.
> >
> > But back to the DVDs. The story originally came from the Daily Fail or
> > some such, and naturally Pitts latches onto it like a moray eel. If you're
> > done your hyperventilating for the day, can you please tell me what was
> > wrong with giving someone DVDs of classic American movies?
>
> Right. Good thing I'm not on your Christmas list.
list of interests.
William Clark
Jun 10, 2013, 9:18:26 PM6/10/13
to
> On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 18:32:57 -0700 (PDT), BobM
> <defangeda...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> But, I have no idea who you are.
> >
> >We've played golf together. I've met you and Shahla.
> >
> >.
> >
> >On Sunday, June 9, 2013 6:19:56 PM UTC-7, KenPitts wrote:
> >> On Sunday, June 9, 2013 8:05:59 PM UTC-5, BobM wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> What do you think you are proving by posting a link to a picture that
> >> everyone knows has been doctored? It is as immature as when Bobby Knight
> >> was doing it. Knight is a hateful old curmudgeon who has a grudge against
> >> me. But, I have no idea who you are.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Ken
Oh, God, wee Kenny is getting the (self) pity party started again.
> <defangeda...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> But, I have no idea who you are.
> >
> >We've played golf together. I've met you and Shahla.
> >
> >.
> >
> >On Sunday, June 9, 2013 6:19:56 PM UTC-7, KenPitts wrote:
> >> On Sunday, June 9, 2013 8:05:59 PM UTC-5, BobM wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> What do you think you are proving by posting a link to a picture that
> >> everyone knows has been doctored? It is as immature as when Bobby Knight
> >> was doing it. Knight is a hateful old curmudgeon who has a grudge against
> >> me. But, I have no idea who you are.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Ken
Oh, God, wee Kenny is getting the (self) pity party started again.
Carbon
Jun 10, 2013, 9:44:53 PM6/10/13
to
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 21:13:47 -0400, William Clark wrote:
> In article <Ga9tt.66714$vh.2...@newsfe20.iad>, "Frank Ketchum"
> <fr...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> "KenPitts" <ken....@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:e4137e17-1a29-42b3...@googlegroups.com...
>>> On Friday, May 31, 2013 4:03:57 PM UTC-5, jay birdsong wrote:
>>>
>>> Here is what our worthless president has done in throwing our
>>> strongest ally, Great Britain, under the bus.
>>>
> In article <Ga9tt.66714$vh.2...@newsfe20.iad>, "Frank Ketchum"
> <fr...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> "KenPitts" <ken....@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:e4137e17-1a29-42b3...@googlegroups.com...
>>> On Friday, May 31, 2013 4:03:57 PM UTC-5, jay birdsong wrote:
>>>
>>> Here is what our worthless president has done in throwing our
>>> strongest ally, Great Britain, under the bus.
>>>
>>> http://www.libertynews.com/2013/05/plainly-annoyed-major-british-newspaper-l
>>> ists-obamas-top-ten-insults-against-the-u-k-british-say-obama-is-guilty-of-b
>>> reathtaking-diplomatic-ineptitude/
>>
>> "The Telegraph wrote that President Obama is guilty of 'Breathtaking
>> diplomatic ineptitude' after he gave the former Prime Minister, Gordon
>> Brown a set of twenty-five DVDs"
>>
>> Yes this really did happen as unbelievable as it sounds. One that they
>> failed to mention was that our dear leader also gave the queen an ipod
>> containing his speeches. That is not a joke, he really did.
>>
>> It could be worse limeys, he could be running your country.
>
> The Telegraph is not known as the Torygraph in the UK for nothing. It is
> the most blatantly right wing major newspaper in the country, so this
> line of bombast should come as no surprise to anyone with an IQ. Just
> head over there and look up the ultra-wingnut crap that Janet Daley was
> writing for it ahead of the election - Newsmax and Fox News would have
> been proud of it.
It's true, and the Daily Mail is even worse. What a couple of rags.
>>> ists-obamas-top-ten-insults-against-the-u-k-british-say-obama-is-guilty-of-b
>>> reathtaking-diplomatic-ineptitude/
>>
>> "The Telegraph wrote that President Obama is guilty of 'Breathtaking
>> diplomatic ineptitude' after he gave the former Prime Minister, Gordon
>> Brown a set of twenty-five DVDs"
>>
>> Yes this really did happen as unbelievable as it sounds. One that they
>> failed to mention was that our dear leader also gave the queen an ipod
>> containing his speeches. That is not a joke, he really did.
>>
>> It could be worse limeys, he could be running your country.
>
> The Telegraph is not known as the Torygraph in the UK for nothing. It is
> the most blatantly right wing major newspaper in the country, so this
> line of bombast should come as no surprise to anyone with an IQ. Just
> head over there and look up the ultra-wingnut crap that Janet Daley was
> writing for it ahead of the election - Newsmax and Fox News would have
> been proud of it.
KenPitts
Jun 10, 2013, 9:49:19 PM6/10/13
to
On Monday, June 10, 2013 8:44:53 PM UTC-5, Carbon wrote:
> It's true, and the Daily Mail is even worse. What a couple of rags.
I guess you would believe it if a reputable org like MSNBC posted it. As if.
> It's true, and the Daily Mail is even worse. What a couple of rags.
Ken
Alan Baker
Jun 10, 2013, 9:59:00 PM6/10/13
to
In article <0508e12b-b019-4956...@googlegroups.com>,
Would you believe you were wrong about the Churchill bust...
...if it were published by WND?
:-)
...if it were published by WND?
:-)
Moderate
Jun 10, 2013, 10:09:48 PM6/10/13
to
Carbon <nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> Wrote in message:
So why do liberals support Obama? He gave liberals the
finger
while screwed all of us.
What has he accomplished?
--
finger
while screwed all of us.
What has he accomplished?
--
Message has been deleted
BobM
Jun 10, 2013, 10:41:04 PM6/10/13
to
> So why do liberals support Obama? He gave liberals the
> finger while screwed all of us.
Why?
> finger while screwed all of us.
1. McCain-Palin (2008)
2. Romney-Ryan (2012)
I would vote for Huntsman.
Not so much lean left but recoil in disgust from what the right wing has become.
I used to be a Republican, but I no longer recognize the party I supported. The current GOP is paralyzed by the parasitic infestation of fringe right, batshitcrazies, and a bunch of social revisionists.
There are other reasons.
BAR
Jun 11, 2013, 7:22:56 AM6/11/13
to
In article <pan.2013.06...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>, nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com
says...
> Romney was very proud of Romneycare until that became politically
> disadvantageous. In fact, I would bet money he thinks all you zealots on
> the far right are a bunch of idiots. He would have gone along until he had
> your votes, and then it would have been "Fuck you, I'm the boss."
How long have you been living here? You still don't grasp the basic concepts of how the USA
was created and structured to operate. Each state is an labratory unto itself and they are
allowed to implement laws and programs that are unique to them or proven to be effective by
other states. This is why I don't have any issues with Romney Care. I don't live in Mass. and
I doubt I ever will. A co-worker of mine who lives in Mass. left and went to another company.
She had to start working at the new company right away in order to not run afould of the
Romney Care laws. Most of the people I talk to in Mass. don't like Romney Care. There is a
reason that it didn't catch on and be implemented in other states and it is the same reason
that Obamacare should never have been implemented across aall of the states.
says...
>
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:23:28 -0500, MNMikeW wrote:
> > Carbon wrote:
> >> On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 23:46:31 -0400, Frank Ketchum wrote:
> >>> "Carbon" <nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:pan.2013.06...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com...
> >>>> On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 20:35:34 -0400, Frank Ketchum wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> "The Telegraph wrote that President Obama is guilty of 'Breathtaking
> >>>>> diplomatic ineptitude' after he gave the former Prime Minister,
> >>>>> Gordon Brown a set of twenty-five DVDs"
> >>>>
> >>>> What crime was committed again?
> >>>
> >>> Nobody said anything about a crime but thanks for that absurd grasp.
> >>> You are really coming off the rails. I guess the frustration of
> >>> trying to excuse everything this idiot does is proving too much. Only
> >>> 3.5 more years to go, keep your chin up!
> >>
> >> On the contrary. In a lot of ways Obama is uncomfortably close to the
> >> previous administration--in economic policy and now in lack of respect
> >> for the privacy of voters. Obviously Romney would have done the same if
> >> he had won last November, but that doesn't excuse Obama.
> >
> > Yes, obviously <rolls eyes>.
>
> Obama continued with the Bush administration's economic and domestic
> spying programs. Romney would have continued them as well. He would have
> made superficial changes that would have been trumpeted by the far right
> media for a while, and that would have been it.
Why does it matter who is elected president if they all just do what their predecessors did?
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:23:28 -0500, MNMikeW wrote:
> > Carbon wrote:
> >> On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 23:46:31 -0400, Frank Ketchum wrote:
> >>> "Carbon" <nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:pan.2013.06...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com...
> >>>> On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 20:35:34 -0400, Frank Ketchum wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> "The Telegraph wrote that President Obama is guilty of 'Breathtaking
> >>>>> diplomatic ineptitude' after he gave the former Prime Minister,
> >>>>> Gordon Brown a set of twenty-five DVDs"
> >>>>
> >>>> What crime was committed again?
> >>>
> >>> Nobody said anything about a crime but thanks for that absurd grasp.
> >>> You are really coming off the rails. I guess the frustration of
> >>> trying to excuse everything this idiot does is proving too much. Only
> >>> 3.5 more years to go, keep your chin up!
> >>
> >> On the contrary. In a lot of ways Obama is uncomfortably close to the
> >> previous administration--in economic policy and now in lack of respect
> >> for the privacy of voters. Obviously Romney would have done the same if
> >> he had won last November, but that doesn't excuse Obama.
> >
> > Yes, obviously <rolls eyes>.
>
> Obama continued with the Bush administration's economic and domestic
> spying programs. Romney would have continued them as well. He would have
> made superficial changes that would have been trumpeted by the far right
> media for a while, and that would have been it.
> Romney was very proud of Romneycare until that became politically
> disadvantageous. In fact, I would bet money he thinks all you zealots on
> the far right are a bunch of idiots. He would have gone along until he had
> your votes, and then it would have been "Fuck you, I'm the boss."
was created and structured to operate. Each state is an labratory unto itself and they are
allowed to implement laws and programs that are unique to them or proven to be effective by
other states. This is why I don't have any issues with Romney Care. I don't live in Mass. and
I doubt I ever will. A co-worker of mine who lives in Mass. left and went to another company.
She had to start working at the new company right away in order to not run afould of the
Romney Care laws. Most of the people I talk to in Mass. don't like Romney Care. There is a
reason that it didn't catch on and be implemented in other states and it is the same reason
that Obamacare should never have been implemented across aall of the states.
jay birdsong
Jun 11, 2013, 7:56:28 AM6/11/13
to
"Alan Baker" wrote in message
news:alangbaker-7C284...@news.shawcable.net...
In article <b2447ec6-a881-4343...@googlegroups.com>,
kcpjun...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >>Commentators gleefully pointed out that the garment was hardly
> > >>in
> >
> > >>keeping with Mr Brown's usual sober attire of business suit and
> > >>tie".
> >
> > >>
> >
> > >
> >
> > >I suppose you'd rather see him get a Stetson?
> >
> > >
> >
> > Damn you're an idiot. I don't care one way or another. This came
> >
> > from The Daily Mail, a British newspaper.
>
> You don't care that Hussein insulted all of Great Britain by sending
> that
> bust of Churchill back?
>
> You're a bigger idiot than I thought.
The only idiot here is you:
"Update:
Since my post on the fact that the bust of Winston Churchill has
remained on display in the White House, despite assertions to the
contrary, I have received a bunch of questions -- so let me provide
some
additional info. The White House has had a bust of Winston Churchill
Minister
Blair lent President Bush a bust that matched the one in the White
House, which was being worked on at the time and was later returned to
the residence. The version lent by Prime Minister Blair was displayed
by President Bush until the end of his Presidency. On January 20,
2009
-- Inauguration Day -- all of the art lent specifically for President
Bush�s Oval Office was removed by the curator�s office, as is common
Blair lent President Bush a bust that matched the one in the White
House, which was being worked on at the time and was later returned to
the residence. The version lent by Prime Minister Blair was displayed
by President Bush until the end of his Presidency. On January 20,
2009
-- Inauguration Day -- all of the art lent specifically for President
Epstein, was lent to the George W. Bush administration from the U.K.'s
government art collection, for the duration of the presidency. When
that
government art collection, for the duration of the presidency. When
that
administration came to an end so did the loan;'
Now I'm sure you want to do some whining about how mean I'm being to
an
old man by using such unfair tactics as knowing the facts.
Please commence.
****************************************************************
Now I'm sure you want to do some whining about how mean I'm being to
an
old man by using such unfair tactics as knowing the facts.
Please commence.
Alwin Baker, "Mr. how to make friends and influence people".
You worthless POS.
How is your "Deathwatch" going?
Is mommie sinking?
One day closer to payday.
snip hdcs.
Love "Michael".
Horva...@net.net
Jun 11, 2013, 10:24:52 AM6/11/13
to
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:48:24 -0700 (PDT), KenPitts
forget Einstein's contributions in science and math. His theory of
relativity will be with us forever, and so his Nobel Prize in the
photoelectric effect. We have billions of devices that use the
photoelectric effect today. If your computer has an LED screen you
can thank Einstein. Does your computer have a mouse with a laser? Do
you have a DVD/CD on your computer? Thank Einstein. Does your phone
or watch have a LCD screen? Your car dash? Do you have florescent
lights? A golf GPS? These devices all depend of the photoelectric
effect.
>How much trouble would Great Britain have been in if they
. had continued with the panty waist Neville Chamberlain? Churchill
several of his books, quite inspirational and informative reading. His
writing style is very pleasant. You might think he would be
longwinded and verbose but he was not. I particularly liked, "The
Boer War." Most historians go into excessive detail about the
political and economic reasons for a war but Winnie does not. His
description of one battle against the Zulus helped make the famous
movie starring Michael Caine.
>It was an intentional insult that Hussein sent that bust back.
> One of the first in a series of never ending outrages.
>
>Ken
Agreed.
<ken....@gmail.com> wrote this crap:
>On Sunday, June 9, 2013 10:42:20 PM UTC-5, Horva...@net.net wrote:
>> On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 17:51:47 -0700 (PDT), KenPitts <ken....@gmail.com>
>>
>> wrote this crap:
>>
>>
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >
>>
>> >I'm surprised that did not make the list. I think the worst may be
>>
>> > sending that bust back.
>>
>>
>>
>> I agree with you.
>>
>>
>>
>> > I hope whoever is president next will offer
>>
>> > sincere apologies for the childish actions of Hussein and offer to
>>
>> > take the bust back in a place of honor in the White House.
>>
>> >In my book, Sir Winston Churchill was the greatest man of the 20th century.
>>
>>
>>
>> Not me. I think Albert Einstein was the greatest man of the 20th
>>
>> century, but I'm a scientist, and I think all politicians are scum.
>>
>>
>On Sunday, June 9, 2013 10:42:20 PM UTC-5, Horva...@net.net wrote:
>> On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 17:51:47 -0700 (PDT), KenPitts <ken....@gmail.com>
>>
>> wrote this crap:
>>
>>
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >
>>
>> >I'm surprised that did not make the list. I think the worst may be
>>
>> > sending that bust back.
>>
>>
>>
>> I agree with you.
>>
>>
>>
>> > I hope whoever is president next will offer
>>
>> > sincere apologies for the childish actions of Hussein and offer to
>>
>> > take the bust back in a place of honor in the White House.
>>
>> >In my book, Sir Winston Churchill was the greatest man of the 20th century.
>>
>>
>>
>> Not me. I think Albert Einstein was the greatest man of the 20th
>>
>> century, but I'm a scientist, and I think all politicians are scum.
>>
>>
>Einstein may have been the greatest intellect, but there was
> also Oppenheimer, Henry Ford, Bardeen and Shockley. Jonas Salk?
Einstein helped us win WW2. Probably more so than Winnie. And never
> also Oppenheimer, Henry Ford, Bardeen and Shockley. Jonas Salk?
forget Einstein's contributions in science and math. His theory of
relativity will be with us forever, and so his Nobel Prize in the
photoelectric effect. We have billions of devices that use the
photoelectric effect today. If your computer has an LED screen you
can thank Einstein. Does your computer have a mouse with a laser? Do
you have a DVD/CD on your computer? Thank Einstein. Does your phone
or watch have a LCD screen? Your car dash? Do you have florescent
lights? A golf GPS? These devices all depend of the photoelectric
effect.
>How much trouble would Great Britain have been in if they
single handedly held off the Nazi Wehrmacht until our forces could
ride to the rescue.
>
>Most inspiring words I have ever heard given the circumstances.
> "Let us therefore brace ourselves to our duties, and so bear
> ourselves that, if the British Empire and its Commonwealth lasts
> for a thousand years, men will still say, “This was their finest hour!”".
Winnie was definitely an inspiration to many people. I've read
ride to the rescue.
>
>Most inspiring words I have ever heard given the circumstances.
> "Let us therefore brace ourselves to our duties, and so bear
> ourselves that, if the British Empire and its Commonwealth lasts
> for a thousand years, men will still say, “This was their finest hour!”".
several of his books, quite inspirational and informative reading. His
writing style is very pleasant. You might think he would be
longwinded and verbose but he was not. I particularly liked, "The
Boer War." Most historians go into excessive detail about the
political and economic reasons for a war but Winnie does not. His
description of one battle against the Zulus helped make the famous
movie starring Michael Caine.
>It was an intentional insult that Hussein sent that bust back.
> One of the first in a series of never ending outrages.
>
>Ken
MNMikeW
Jun 11, 2013, 10:25:47 AM6/11/13
to
MNMikeW
Jun 11, 2013, 10:27:52 AM6/11/13
to
what Romney would have done. Yet here you are pretending you do.
Horva...@net.net
Jun 11, 2013, 10:28:31 AM6/11/13
to
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:27:20 -0700, Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net>
wrote this crap:
Wouldn't you think just one of obama's bootlicks would think of asking
if it could be donated to the George W. Bush Library instead of just
returning it? This is not only an insult to the limeys but an insult
to George W. Bush and the American people.
wrote this crap:
if it could be donated to the George W. Bush Library instead of just
returning it? This is not only an insult to the limeys but an insult
to George W. Bush and the American people.
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 11, 2013, 10:41:26 AM6/11/13
to
Here it is again.
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 11, 2013, 10:57:08 AM6/11/13
to
>>>>> On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 13:28:34 -0500, MNMikeW <mnmi...@aol.com> wrote:
>>> Of course, had this happened to a Republican, this would be getting wall to wall coverage
>>>> and it would be a HUGE deal. No media bias, lol!
Horva...@net.net
Jun 11, 2013, 11:18:02 AM6/11/13
to
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:41:26 -0500, bkn...@conramp.net wrote this
crap:
>>>
>>>
the limeys ask for the return of the bust? Since Winnie was a
conservative you liberals treat his bust like it was pond scum.
crap:
>>>
>>>
>>>Now I'm sure you want to do some whining about how mean I'm being to an
>>>old man by using such unfair tactics as knowing the facts.
>>>
>>>Please commence.
>>
>>Wouldn't you think just one of obama's bootlicks would think of asking
>>if it could be donated to the George W. Bush Library instead of just
>>returning it? This is not only an insult to the limeys but an insult
>>to George W. Bush and the American people.
>>
> The British government didn't have a problem with it. Can't you read?
>Here it is again.
>
>Says James Barbour, press secretary and head of communications for the
>British Embassy, 袍he bust of Sir Winston Churchill, by Sir Jacob
>Epstein, was lent to the George W. Bush administration from the U.K.'s
>government art collection, for the duration of the presidency. When
>that administration came to an end so did the loan;'
Apparently you can't even ask if it can be donated to a library? Did
>>>old man by using such unfair tactics as knowing the facts.
>>>
>>>Please commence.
>>
>>Wouldn't you think just one of obama's bootlicks would think of asking
>>if it could be donated to the George W. Bush Library instead of just
>>returning it? This is not only an insult to the limeys but an insult
>>to George W. Bush and the American people.
>>
> The British government didn't have a problem with it. Can't you read?
>Here it is again.
>
>Says James Barbour, press secretary and head of communications for the
>British Embassy, 袍he bust of Sir Winston Churchill, by Sir Jacob
>Epstein, was lent to the George W. Bush administration from the U.K.'s
>government art collection, for the duration of the presidency. When
>that administration came to an end so did the loan;'
the limeys ask for the return of the bust? Since Winnie was a
conservative you liberals treat his bust like it was pond scum.
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 11, 2013, 11:26:39 AM6/11/13
to
returned at the end of Bush's second term. I'm sure that the Brits
were happy to have it back in their collection. Remember that there
is another such bust still in the White House.
Bullshit is called. I don't know of anyone who doesn't have great
respect for Churchill. Most people aren't like you and make stupid,
snap, decisions about others based on their politics. My closest
friend is a conservative and we have absolutely no problems because
both recognize that politics are not of importance to a friendship.
MNMikeW
Jun 11, 2013, 11:33:45 AM6/11/13
to
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 11, 2013, 11:37:01 AM6/11/13
to
Alan Baker
Jun 11, 2013, 12:36:59 PM6/11/13
to
Horva...@net.net
Jun 11, 2013, 12:54:46 PM6/11/13
to
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 10:26:39 -0500, bkn...@conramp.net wrote this
crap:
>>>Says James Barbour, press secretary and head of communications for the
>>>British Embassy, 袍he bust of Sir Winston Churchill, by Sir Jacob
>>>Epstein, was lent to the George W. Bush administration from the U.K.'s
>>>government art collection, for the duration of the presidency. When
>>>that administration came to an end so did the loan;'
>>
>>Apparently you can't even ask if it can be donated to a library? Did
>>the limeys ask for the return of the bust? Since Winnie was a
>>conservative you liberals treat his bust like it was pond scum.
>
>Are you just stupid or not able to understand English? It was to be
>returned at the end of Bush's second term. I'm sure that the Brits
>were happy to have it back in their collection. Remember that there
>is another such bust still in the White House.
I'm wondering about you. All I asked was if the limeys asked for the
bust back. I wasn't implying that we just keep it. I'm saying that
one of obama's lackeys should have asked if it could be donated to the
George W. Bush Library where it could be displayed in a place of
honor.
crap:
>>>Says James Barbour, press secretary and head of communications for the
>>>British Embassy, 袍he bust of Sir Winston Churchill, by Sir Jacob
>>>Epstein, was lent to the George W. Bush administration from the U.K.'s
>>>government art collection, for the duration of the presidency. When
>>>that administration came to an end so did the loan;'
>>
>>Apparently you can't even ask if it can be donated to a library? Did
>>the limeys ask for the return of the bust? Since Winnie was a
>>conservative you liberals treat his bust like it was pond scum.
>
>Are you just stupid or not able to understand English? It was to be
>returned at the end of Bush's second term. I'm sure that the Brits
>were happy to have it back in their collection. Remember that there
>is another such bust still in the White House.
bust back. I wasn't implying that we just keep it. I'm saying that
one of obama's lackeys should have asked if it could be donated to the
George W. Bush Library where it could be displayed in a place of
honor.
Horva...@net.net
Jun 11, 2013, 12:56:39 PM6/11/13
to
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:36:59 -0700, Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net>
wrote this crap:
>> >>
wrote this crap:
>> >>
>> >Einstein may have been the greatest intellect, but there was
>> > also Oppenheimer, Henry Ford, Bardeen and Shockley. Jonas Salk?
>>
>> Einstein helped us win WW2. Probably more so than Winnie. And never
>> forget Einstein's contributions in science and math. His theory of
>> relativity will be with us forever, and so his Nobel Prize in the
>> photoelectric effect. We have billions of devices that use the
>> photoelectric effect today. If your computer has an LED screen you
>> can thank Einstein. Does your computer have a mouse with a laser? Do
>> you have a DVD/CD on your computer? Thank Einstein. Does your phone
>> or watch have a LCD screen? Your car dash? Do you have florescent
>> lights? A golf GPS? These devices all depend of the photoelectric
>> effect.
>
>No, actually, they don't.
Which one doesn't emit light?
>> > also Oppenheimer, Henry Ford, Bardeen and Shockley. Jonas Salk?
>>
>> Einstein helped us win WW2. Probably more so than Winnie. And never
>> forget Einstein's contributions in science and math. His theory of
>> relativity will be with us forever, and so his Nobel Prize in the
>> photoelectric effect. We have billions of devices that use the
>> photoelectric effect today. If your computer has an LED screen you
>> can thank Einstein. Does your computer have a mouse with a laser? Do
>> you have a DVD/CD on your computer? Thank Einstein. Does your phone
>> or watch have a LCD screen? Your car dash? Do you have florescent
>> lights? A golf GPS? These devices all depend of the photoelectric
>> effect.
>
>No, actually, they don't.
Alan Baker
Jun 11, 2013, 12:58:53 PM6/11/13
to
In article <7kler8tghop2klrvm...@4ax.com>,
The photoelectric effect isn't about the emission of light, Steve.
Wrong again, but that can come as no shock, can it?
Wrong again, but that can come as no shock, can it?
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 11, 2013, 1:03:17 PM6/11/13
to
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:54:46 -0400, Horva...@net.net wrote:
>On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 10:26:39 -0500, bkn...@conramp.net wrote this
>crap:
>
>>>>Says James Barbour, press secretary and head of communications for the
>>>>British Embassy, ³The bust of Sir Winston Churchill, by Sir Jacob
>On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 10:26:39 -0500, bkn...@conramp.net wrote this
>crap:
>
>>>>Says James Barbour, press secretary and head of communications for the
>>>>Epstein, was lent to the George W. Bush administration from the U.K.'s
>>>>government art collection, for the duration of the presidency. When
>>>>that administration came to an end so did the loan;'
>>>
>>>Apparently you can't even ask if it can be donated to a library? Did
>>>the limeys ask for the return of the bust? Since Winnie was a
>>>conservative you liberals treat his bust like it was pond scum.
>>
>>Are you just stupid or not able to understand English? It was to be
>>returned at the end of Bush's second term. I'm sure that the Brits
>>were happy to have it back in their collection. Remember that there
>>is another such bust still in the White House.
>
>I'm wondering about you. All I asked was if the limeys asked for the
>bust back. I wasn't implying that we just keep it. I'm saying that
>one of obama's lackeys should have asked if it could be donated to the
>George W. Bush Library where it could be displayed in a place of
>honor.
I don't wonder about you. You have mental problems.
>>>>government art collection, for the duration of the presidency. When
>>>>that administration came to an end so did the loan;'
>>>
>>>Apparently you can't even ask if it can be donated to a library? Did
>>>the limeys ask for the return of the bust? Since Winnie was a
>>>conservative you liberals treat his bust like it was pond scum.
>>
>>Are you just stupid or not able to understand English? It was to be
>>returned at the end of Bush's second term. I'm sure that the Brits
>>were happy to have it back in their collection. Remember that there
>>is another such bust still in the White House.
>
>I'm wondering about you. All I asked was if the limeys asked for the
>bust back. I wasn't implying that we just keep it. I'm saying that
>one of obama's lackeys should have asked if it could be donated to the
>George W. Bush Library where it could be displayed in a place of
>honor.
If you had a lick of sense you'd know that the word "loan" means just
that. Why then would anyone as for it to be donated?
Horva...@net.net
Jun 11, 2013, 2:52:21 PM6/11/13
to
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:58:53 -0700, Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net>
absorb light and emit electrons. The reverse also happens. Einstein's
mathematics show how this is possible and with a predictable pattern.
wrote this crap:
>In article <7kler8tghop2klrvm...@4ax.com>,
> Horva...@net.net wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:36:59 -0700, Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net>
>> wrote this crap:
>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >Einstein may have been the greatest intellect, but there was
>> >> > also Oppenheimer, Henry Ford, Bardeen and Shockley. Jonas Salk?
>> >>
>> >> Einstein helped us win WW2. Probably more so than Winnie. And never
>> >> forget Einstein's contributions in science and math. His theory of
>> >> relativity will be with us forever, and so his Nobel Prize in the
>> >> photoelectric effect. We have billions of devices that use the
>> >> photoelectric effect today. If your computer has an LED screen you
>> >> can thank Einstein. Does your computer have a mouse with a laser? Do
>> >> you have a DVD/CD on your computer? Thank Einstein. Does your phone
>> >> or watch have a LCD screen? Your car dash? Do you have florescent
>> >> lights? A golf GPS? These devices all depend of the photoelectric
>> >> effect.
>> >
>> >No, actually, they don't.
>>
>> Which one doesn't emit light?
>
>The photoelectric effect isn't about the emission of light, Steve.
>
>Wrong again, but that can come as no shock, can it?
Technically the photoelectric effect happens when certain materials
>In article <7kler8tghop2klrvm...@4ax.com>,
> Horva...@net.net wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:36:59 -0700, Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net>
>> wrote this crap:
>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >Einstein may have been the greatest intellect, but there was
>> >> > also Oppenheimer, Henry Ford, Bardeen and Shockley. Jonas Salk?
>> >>
>> >> Einstein helped us win WW2. Probably more so than Winnie. And never
>> >> forget Einstein's contributions in science and math. His theory of
>> >> relativity will be with us forever, and so his Nobel Prize in the
>> >> photoelectric effect. We have billions of devices that use the
>> >> photoelectric effect today. If your computer has an LED screen you
>> >> can thank Einstein. Does your computer have a mouse with a laser? Do
>> >> you have a DVD/CD on your computer? Thank Einstein. Does your phone
>> >> or watch have a LCD screen? Your car dash? Do you have florescent
>> >> lights? A golf GPS? These devices all depend of the photoelectric
>> >> effect.
>> >
>> >No, actually, they don't.
>>
>> Which one doesn't emit light?
>
>The photoelectric effect isn't about the emission of light, Steve.
>
>Wrong again, but that can come as no shock, can it?
absorb light and emit electrons. The reverse also happens. Einstein's
mathematics show how this is possible and with a predictable pattern.
jay birdsong
Jun 11, 2013, 3:03:02 PM6/11/13
to
"Alan Baker" wrote in message
non-talents. Wadda worthless gasbag.
snip hdcs
Alan Baker
Jun 11, 2013, 7:31:58 PM6/11/13
to
In article <j3ser8t73coan5emq...@4ax.com>,
None of that changes that the devices you mentioned do not depend on the
photoelectric effect.
>
>
> This signature is now the ultimate
> power in the universe
photoelectric effect.
>
>
> This signature is now the ultimate
> power in the universe
Alan Baker
Jun 11, 2013, 7:32:48 PM6/11/13
to
In article <kp7s03$hd5$1...@dont-email.me>,
Again, why is it you think that the only way anyone can have knowledge
of a subject you don't have is to be an expert?
of a subject you don't have is to be an expert?
KenPitts
Jun 11, 2013, 8:56:10 PM6/11/13
to
On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 9:24:52 AM UTC-5, Horva...@net.net wrote:
WRT GPS the Theory of General Relativity is what allows the clocks on the various devices to be synced up.
Ken
WRT GPS the Theory of General Relativity is what allows the clocks on the various devices to be synced up.
Ken
Carbon
Jun 11, 2013, 9:32:24 PM6/11/13
to
an accident.
In a lot of ways it doesn't matter. You replace a couple of guys at the
top but the rest of the machinery stays the same. There are the same
pressures, the same corruption, and all the rest of it that makes D.C. the
cesspool that it is. And also there is a lot more raw intel, so things
that your predecessor did that seemed inexplicable suddenly make a lot
more sense.
You guys are also completely wrong about Obama. He is way more pragmatic
and conservative than you think. Romney is also more liberal than most
TPers would like. In practice I really don't think there would be a lot of
difference between them.
Don Kirkman
Jun 12, 2013, 2:13:12 AM6/12/13
to
that bureaucracies and their practices tend to persevere and therefore
were conservative of practices and policies. Weber, however, was
describing "pure" bureaucracy, non-political and based on what passed
for education and scholarship in ancient China. His studies also led
him to propose a civil service as a measure to promote a well
regulated society. Economy and Society. 1922
--
Don Kirkman
don...@charter.net
BAR
Jun 12, 2013, 7:27:15 AM6/12/13
to
The one thing that the Democrat/liberal/progressives have done is to infest acdemia and
government with their kind.
Obama is not pragmatic nor conservative. Obama is out to destroy everything that made this
country.
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 12, 2013, 7:46:48 AM6/12/13
to
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 07:27:15 -0400, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
>Obama is not pragmatic nor conservative. Obama is out to destroy everything that made this
>country.
You've said many stupid things over the years on RSG, but this, by
>Obama is not pragmatic nor conservative. Obama is out to destroy everything that made this
>country.
far, shows how much of an imbecile you really are.
MNMikeW
Jun 12, 2013, 10:36:22 AM6/12/13
to
he was quite liberal.
MNMikeW
Jun 12, 2013, 10:38:38 AM6/12/13
to
they have not been paying attention for the last five years or so.
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 12, 2013, 5:28:39 PM6/12/13
to
brain damage.
William Clark
Jun 12, 2013, 8:08:08 PM6/12/13
to
In article <b1oqf8...@mid.individual.net>,
Believable - given that Romney clearly had NO idea what he would have
done.
done.
MNMikeW
Jun 13, 2013, 10:53:56 AM6/13/13
to
administration. Unlike the current occupant.
MNMikeW
Jun 13, 2013, 10:55:36 AM6/13/13
to
bkn...@conramp.net wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 09:38:38 -0500, MNMikeW <mnmi...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> bkn...@conramp.net wrote:
>>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 07:27:15 -0400, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Obama is not pragmatic nor conservative. Obama is out to destroy everything that made this
>>>> country.
>>>
>>> You've said many stupid things over the years on RSG, but this, by
>>> far, shows how much of an imbecile you really are.
>>>
>> Anyone who says Obama is pragmatic or conservative is an imbecile. Or
>> they have not been paying attention for the last five years or so.
>
> I have no problem with that opinion, but the second sentence shows
> brain damage.
>
Your brain damage perhaps.
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 09:38:38 -0500, MNMikeW <mnmi...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> bkn...@conramp.net wrote:
>>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 07:27:15 -0400, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Obama is not pragmatic nor conservative. Obama is out to destroy everything that made this
>>>> country.
>>>
>>> You've said many stupid things over the years on RSG, but this, by
>>> far, shows how much of an imbecile you really are.
>>>
>> Anyone who says Obama is pragmatic or conservative is an imbecile. Or
>> they have not been paying attention for the last five years or so.
>
> I have no problem with that opinion, but the second sentence shows
> brain damage.
>
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 13, 2013, 11:07:04 AM6/13/13
to
country.
You were, that's WERE, one of the conservatives here that I had
respect for. You're as full of shit as LLLLarrry, Ken, Bert and
Moderate.
KenPitts
Jun 13, 2013, 11:27:43 AM6/13/13
to
On Thursday, June 13, 2013 10:07:04 AM UTC-5, bkn...@conramp.net wrote:
>
> You were, that's WERE, one of the conservatives here that I had
>
> respect for. You're as full of shit as LLLLarrry, Ken, Bert and
>
> Moderate.
You're being a hypocrite Bobby. You asked me to forget all about you. Yet, here you continue to rattle on about me. A gentleman would extend the same courtesy that he asks.
>
> You were, that's WERE, one of the conservatives here that I had
>
> respect for. You're as full of shit as LLLLarrry, Ken, Bert and
>
> Moderate.
I am willing to leave you completely alone if you are man enough to do the same for me.
Ken
MNMikeW
Jun 13, 2013, 11:57:44 AM6/13/13
to
His ineptitude is.
MNMikeW
Jun 13, 2013, 11:58:50 AM6/13/13
to
Alan Baker
Jun 13, 2013, 12:38:20 PM6/13/13
to
In article <cc3351c6-8bf5-43aa...@googlegroups.com>,
on about me?
>
> I am willing to leave you completely alone if you are man enough to do the
> same for me.
>
> Ken
KenPitts <ken....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, June 13, 2013 10:07:04 AM UTC-5, bkn...@conramp.net wrote:
> >
> > You were, that's WERE, one of the conservatives here that I had
> >
> > respect for. You're as full of shit as LLLLarrry, Ken, Bert and
> >
> > Moderate.
>
> You're being a hypocrite Bobby. You asked me to forget all about you. Yet,
> here you continue to rattle on about me. A gentleman would extend the same
> courtesy that he asks.
You mean like you claim you want me to leave me alone, but then rattle
> On Thursday, June 13, 2013 10:07:04 AM UTC-5, bkn...@conramp.net wrote:
> >
> > You were, that's WERE, one of the conservatives here that I had
> >
> > respect for. You're as full of shit as LLLLarrry, Ken, Bert and
> >
> > Moderate.
>
> You're being a hypocrite Bobby. You asked me to forget all about you. Yet,
> here you continue to rattle on about me. A gentleman would extend the same
> courtesy that he asks.
on about me?
>
> I am willing to leave you completely alone if you are man enough to do the
> same for me.
>
> Ken
bkn...@conramp.net
Jun 13, 2013, 12:50:18 PM6/13/13
to
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:57:44 -0500, MNMikeW <mnmi...@aol.com> wrote:
>bkn...@conramp.net wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:55:36 -0500, MNMikeW <mnmi...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>> bkn...@conramp.net wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 09:38:38 -0500, MNMikeW <mnmi...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> bkn...@conramp.net wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 07:27:15 -0400, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Obama is not pragmatic nor conservative. Obama is out to destroy everything that made this
>>>>>>> country.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You've said many stupid things over the years on RSG, but this, by
>>>>>> far, shows how much of an imbecile you really are.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone who says Obama is pragmatic or conservative is an imbecile. Or
>>>>> they have not been paying attention for the last five years or so.
>>>>
>>>> I have no problem with that opinion, but the second sentence shows
>>>> brain damage.
>>>>
>>> Your brain damage perhaps.
>>
>> IOW you think that Obama is out to destroy everything that made this
>> country.
>>
>> You were, that's WERE, one of the conservatives here that I had
.respect for. You're as full of shit as LLLLarrry, Ken, Bert and
>bkn...@conramp.net wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:55:36 -0500, MNMikeW <mnmi...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>> bkn...@conramp.net wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 09:38:38 -0500, MNMikeW <mnmi...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> bkn...@conramp.net wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 07:27:15 -0400, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Obama is not pragmatic nor conservative. Obama is out to destroy everything that made this
>>>>>>> country.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You've said many stupid things over the years on RSG, but this, by
>>>>>> far, shows how much of an imbecile you really are.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone who says Obama is pragmatic or conservative is an imbecile. Or
>>>>> they have not been paying attention for the last five years or so.
>>>>
>>>> I have no problem with that opinion, but the second sentence shows
>>>> brain damage.
>>>>
>>> Your brain damage perhaps.
>>
>> IOW you think that Obama is out to destroy everything that made this
>> country.
>>
>> You were, that's WERE, one of the conservatives here that I had
>> Moderate.
>>
>LOL, I'm so hurt. Obama is probably not purposely trying to destroy it.
>His ineptitude is.
You had a chance to disassociate yourself with a distasteful and
>>
>LOL, I'm so hurt. Obama is probably not purposely trying to destroy it.
>His ineptitude is.
erroneous statement by the village idiot and you agreed with him.
You know full well that his intentions are not as Bert the Shallow
says.
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages