Palin's book on top at amazon
Frank Ketchum
But she is just a dumb "bimbo" who sank McCain.
William Clark
"Frank Ketchum" <nos...@thanksanyway.com> wrote:
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/books/ref=pd_ts_zgc_b_books_more?pf_rd_p=
> 475709271&pf_rd_s=right-3&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_i=283155&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_
> rd_r=04Z2838ADTRY60MV6A3E
>
> But she is just a dumb "bimbo" who sank McCain.
Indeed she is. Remember that Fox News is #1, too, and no one ever
pretends that has anything to do with taste or reality, either. Being #1
on lists like that with a book like her piece of garbage have to do with
cheap sensationalism - nothing else.
dene
"William Clark" <wcl...@colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
news:wclark2-B7987F...@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
In the same context, the Dems have the number one jobs as well.....
-Greg
BAR
state.edu>, wcl...@colnospamumbus.rr.com says...
"The Ohio State University" must not have been in the top of any
national academic rankings, again.
BigSlicer
>
http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/books/ref=pd_ts_zgc_b_books_more?pf_rd_p=475709271&pf_rd_s=right-3&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_i=283155&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=04Z2838ADTRY60MV6A3E
>
> But she is just a dumb "bimbo" who sank McCain.
What does this have to do with golf?
This is REC.SPORT.GOLF
________________________________________________________________________�
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
R&B
A car wreck draws a crowd.
Put Jon Bon Jovi in a Barnes and Noble store to sign his book (if he
ever wrote one) and the crowd wrapping around the store would make the
Sarah Palin crowd look like a Girl Scout camp fire.
Randy
aeiouy
> But she is just a dumb "bimbo" who sank McCain.
Pretty much sums her up
johnty
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/books/ref=pd_ts_zgc_b_books_more...
>
Would have been more impressive if it wasn't being shifted at half
price...
BAR
2685f2...@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com>, joh...@hotmail.com says...
It's too bad you didn't do any basic research.
All of the books on Amazon's Top 100 are selling for 40% to 65% off list
price. I can see how that would not support your argument and why you
left out that very important piece of information.
You may have a future as a news reporting for the MSM.
William Clark
BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
Wouldn't want to be, for exactly that reason. But I couldn't expect you
to understand that.
BAR
state.edu>, cl...@nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
Mediocrity becomes you Billy.
William Clark
BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
Your usual non sequitur. Sigh.
Chris Bellomy
cb
MNMikeW
"Chris Bellomy" <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote in message
news:SZqdncnBoYf_6ZjW...@supernews.com...
> In other news, Crayola is reporting record sales this week.
>
> cb
MNMikeW
"R&B" <none_of_yo...@all.com> wrote in message
news:2009111900591075249-noneofyourbusiness@allcom...
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20091119/D9C28MC00.html
GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (AP) - College students ditched class, employees skipped
work and some huddled in the cold overnight just to make sure they get an
orange wristband Wednesday that would let them meet Sarah Palin.
Thousands gathered outside a Barnes & Noble and chanted "Palin! Palin!
Palin!" for the kickoff of the former Republican vice presidential
candidate's "Going Rogue" book tour, which has taken on the feel of a
political pep rally.
bkn...@conramp.net
wrote:
Reminds me of H.B. Barnum's famous quote.
BK
MNMikeW
<bkn...@conramp.net> wrote in message
news:4l7bg55fe05b1g0fs...@4ax.com...
More bubble bursting:
http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/11/sarah-palin-oprah-ratings-.html
Sarah Palin gives Oprah biggest audience in two years
bkn...@conramp.net
wrote:
>More bubble bursting:
>
>http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/11/sarah-palin-oprah-ratings-.html
>
>Sarah Palin gives Oprah biggest audience in two years
>
Of course. People love car wrecks too. :-)
BK
Dinosaur_Sr
wrote:
> In article <Wd1Nm.7485$tz6.2...@newsfe02.iad>,
> "Frank Ketchum" <nos...@thanksanyway.com> wrote:
>
> >http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/books/ref=pd_ts_zgc_b_books_more...
> > 475709271&pf_rd_s=right-3&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_i=283155&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_
> > rd_r=04Z2838ADTRY60MV6A3E
>
> > But she is just a dumb "bimbo" who sank McCain.
>
> Indeed she is. Remember that Fox News is #1, too, and no one ever
> pretends that has anything to do with taste or reality, either. Being #1
> on lists like that with a book like her piece of garbage have to do with
> cheap sensationalism - nothing else.
No one ever pretends? Pretty pretentious of you to claim to speak for
everyone. IMHO FOX News has a strong conservative bias, but they are
more honest than any of the other major networks, IMHO. Unlike say NBC
and MSNBC, they don't make up news to comment on.
Dinosaur_Sr
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:03:15 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> >More bubble bursting:
>
> >http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/11/sarah-palin-oprah-ratings-.html
>
> >Sarah Palin gives Oprah biggest audience in two years
>
> Of course. People love car wrecks too. :-)
>
> BK
I dunno...the current US economic policy isn't all that popular......
Don Kirkman
<7mlk6tF...@mid.individual.net>:
>
>"R&B" <none_of_yo...@all.com> wrote in message
>news:2009111900591075249-noneofyourbusiness@allcom...
>> On 2009-11-18 20:34:07 -0500, "Frank Ketchum" <nos...@thanksanyway.com>
>> said:
>>> she is just a dumb "bimbo" who sank McCain.
>> A car wreck draws a crowd.
>> Put Jon Bon Jovi in a Barnes and Noble store to sign his book (if he ever
>> wrote one) and the crowd wrapping around the store would make the Sarah
>> Palin crowd look like a Girl Scout camp fire.
>Sorry to burst your bubble Randy.
>http://apnews.myway.com/article/20091119/D9C28MC00.html
>GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (AP) - College students ditched class, employees skipped
>work and some huddled in the cold overnight just to make sure they get an
>orange wristband Wednesday that would let them meet Sarah Palin.
>Thousands gathered outside a Barnes & Noble and chanted "Palin! Palin!
>Palin!" for the kickoff of the former Republican vice presidential
>candidate's "Going Rogue" book tour, which has taken on the feel of a
>political pep rally.
And a few paragraphs further down, "The memoir was released Tuesday
but has topped best-seller lists for weeks. At the Barnes & Noble,
about 1,000 orange wristbands were handed out, allowing wearers to get
two copies autographed by Palin at the three-hour signing event."
The LA Times' reporter, however, wrote" "After the mall opened
Wednesday morning, each of the estimated 1,500 people in line were
outfitted with orange wristbands, . . . ." [For the record, it should
read "each . . . was outfitted."]
So if we combine the two reports, we *do* reach "thousands". :-)
Gee, drawing crowds like that makes her a real candidate for something
or other in 2012, 2016, or 2020, doesn't it?
--
Don Kirkman
don...@charter.net
Corky's Nemesis
<bkn...@conramp.net> wrote in message
news:go9bg5lect2bpbaha...@4ax.com...
30 off-topic posts in one day. Trying to set a record?
POST ON-TOPIC OR DON'T POST AT ALL.
Hor...@net.net
<nos...@thanksanyway.com> wrote this crap:
>http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/books/ref=pd_ts_zgc_b_books_more?pf_rd_p=475709271&pf_rd_s=right-3&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_i=283155&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=04Z2838ADTRY60MV6A3E
>
>But she is just a dumb "bimbo" who sank McCain.
>
You lefty whackos are brilliant. She was the governor of the largest
state in the most powerful country in the world. She is the most
popular woman in the world, (next to Oprah, of course.) Her book is
already a best seller. She is a better shot than you. Even her
family is popular. What have you got? She's even better looking than
you, Frank. Of course most circus freaks are better looking than you.
Vote for Palin-Ahhhnold in 2012.
Hor...@Horvath.net
My T-shirt says, "This shirt is the
ultimate power in the universe."
dene
<Hor...@net.net> wrote in message
news:okbag55fru0lacsv1...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:34:07 -0500, "Frank Ketchum"
> <nos...@thanksanyway.com> wrote this crap:
>
>
>http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/books/ref=pd_ts_zgc_b_books_more?pf_rd
_p=475709271&pf_rd_s=right-3&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_i=283155&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DE
R&pf_rd_r=04Z2838ADTRY60MV6A3E
> >
> >But she is just a dumb "bimbo" who sank McCain.
> >
>
> You lefty whackos are brilliant. She was the governor of the largest
> state in the most powerful country in the world. She is the most
> popular woman in the world, (next to Oprah, of course.) Her book is
> already a best seller. She is a better shot than you. Even her
> family is popular. What have you got? She's even better looking than
> you, Frank. Of course most circus freaks are better looking than you.
Frank is not a lefty. His comment was tongue in cheek, dumbass.
-Greg
Carbon
> But she is just a dumb "bimbo" who sank McCain.
Pretty much.
Frank Ketchum
"William Clark" <wcl...@colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
news:wclark2-B7987F...@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
>
> pretends that has anything to do with taste or reality, either. Being #1
> on lists like that with a book like her piece of garbage have to do with
> cheap sensationalism - nothing else.
Sort of the same reason we ended up with Obama for president.
Sensationalism - nothing else (clearly now).
gray asphalt
"Frank Ketchum" <nos...@thanksanyway.com> wrote in message
news:Wd1Nm.7485$tz6....@newsfe02.iad...
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/books/ref=pd_ts_zgc_b_books_more?pf_rd_p=475709271&pf_rd_s=right-3&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_i=283155&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=04Z2838ADTRY60MV6A3E
>
> But she is just a dumb "bimbo" who sank McCain.
You can get the book, "Going Rogue", for $4.99 along with 4 issues of
a magazine, "Newsmax".
http://mediamatters.org/research/200911160066
Actually, I'd be interested in Mrs. Palin, if she started
showing an interest in educating herself. I'd be happy
if she took an impartially conducted reading test to see
at what level her comprehension is and what conclusions
or points she can draw from a serious article similar to a
what would be a "briefing" to a political leader.
johnty
>
> All of the books on Amazon's Top 100 are selling for 40% to 65% off list
> price. I can see how that would not support your argument ...
..and which argument would that be?
Hor...@net.net
<dont...@gmail.com> wrote this crap:
>
>Actually, I'd be interested in Mrs. Palin, if she started
>showing an interest in educating herself. I'd be happy
>if she took an impartially conducted reading test to see
>at what level her comprehension is and what conclusions
>or points she can draw from a serious article similar to a
>what would be a "briefing" to a political leader.
Be serious. All the president has to do is read off the teleprompter,
and visit all 57 states.
Vote for Palin-Ahhnold in 2012.
Frank Ketchum
"johnty" <joh...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5b800483-210c-41af...@37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
The one you posted:
William Clark
<c358f488-1fbd-400e...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
Dinosaur_Sr <frostb...@att.net> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 7:52�pm, William Clark <wcla...@colnospamumbus.rr.com>
> wrote:
> > In article <Wd1Nm.7485$tz6.2...@newsfe02.iad>,
> > �"Frank Ketchum" <nos...@thanksanyway.com> wrote:
> >
> > >http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/books/ref=pd ts zgc b books more...
> > > 475709271&pf rd s=right-3&pf rd t=101&pf rd i=283155&pf rd
> > > m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf
> > > rd r=04Z2838ADTRY60MV6A3E
> >
> > > But she is just a dumb "bimbo" who sank McCain.
> >
> > Indeed she is. Remember that Fox News is #1, too, and no one ever
> > pretends that has anything to do with taste or reality, either. Being #1
> > on lists like that with a book like her piece of garbage have to do with
> > cheap sensationalism - nothing else.
>
> No one ever pretends? Pretty pretentious of you to claim to speak for
> everyone. IMHO FOX News has a strong conservative bias, but they are
> more honest than any of the other major networks, IMHO. Unlike say NBC
> and MSNBC, they don't make up news to comment on.
Yes, well it just shows how biased and worthless your opinion is, then.
William Clark
Indeed, here's an indication of how smart and accurate Fox News is:
Clearly the most reliable and unbiased news source around. Right.
BAR
nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
>
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:34:07 -0500, Frank Ketchum wrote:
>
> > But she is just a dumb "bimbo" who sank McCain.
>
> Pretty much.
McCain sank himself. I've got to suspend my campaign and go back to
Washington and fix the economy. I can't point out the differences
between Obama and me, it wouldn't be fair.
Talk about idiots, McCain tops the list.
Lloyd Parsons
BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
Add picking Palin to run with him, and I'm with you.
The Republicans did themselves no favors by selecting him for a
candidate.
Moderate
"William Clark" <cl...@nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
news:clark-93CB2D....@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
Clark uses youtube for political analysis.
Moderate
"BAR" <sc...@you.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.25706d2ef...@news.giganews.com...
The economy sank McCain just like it is drowning Obama.
Lloyd Parsons
"Moderate" <no_spam_@no_mail.com> wrote:
Amen! Regardless of who won, the economy was going to kick their ass.
Next election won't be about the 'economy', it will be about JOBS!
Regardless of good or bad news for Wall Street and the bankers, if the
people don't have jobs, then their congress critter is in danger of
being recalled home.
Dinosaur_Sr
state.edu> wrote:
> In article
> <c358f488-1fbd-400e-9a82-77357bec1...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
> Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...@att.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 18, 7:52 pm, William Clark <wcla...@colnospamumbus.rr.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > In article <Wd1Nm.7485$tz6.2...@newsfe02.iad>,
> > > > "Frank Ketchum" <nos...@thanksanyway.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > 475709271&pf rd s=right-3&pf rd t=101&pf rd i=283155&pf rd
> > > > > m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf
> > > > > rd r=04Z2838ADTRY60MV6A3E
>
> > > > > But she is just a dumb "bimbo" who sank McCain.
>
> > > > Indeed she is. Remember that Fox News is #1, too, and no one ever
> > > > pretends that has anything to do with taste or reality, either. Being #1
> > > > on lists like that with a book like her piece of garbage have to do with
> > > > cheap sensationalism - nothing else.
>
> > > No one ever pretends? Pretty pretentious of you to claim to speak for
> > > everyone. IMHO FOX News has a strong conservative bias, but they are
> > > more honest than any of the other major networks, IMHO. Unlike say NBC
> > > and MSNBC, they don't make up news to comment on.
>
> Indeed, here's an indication of how smart and accurate Fox News is:
>
> http://tiny.cc/FqC5z
>
> http://tiny.cc/jtCJ5
>
> Clearly the most reliable and unbiased news source around. Right.
Sorry. I didn't even bother to check the link. Same old lame response
from people whose thesis has zero rhetorical content...find some
presumed errors in fact. Everyone makes errors in fact, especially
those errors presumed by sickos on the other side of some political
debate.
Again, MSNBC makes up the news, as does NBC. That's a lot different
from a presumed error in fact. FWIW, why didn't AP put fact checkers
on Obama's book? ...or Biden's?
I suppose you live in a cave up there in Cowlumbus, so here's an
example (one I have posted before). David Gregory wants to get some
negative commentary about people at tea parties, so he shows a guy
with a sign saying its time to water the tree of liberty. Gregory then
refers to the origin of the phrase, and then claims, without any
citation or even an image, that one of the OK City bombers wore a T
Shirt with that slogan, and thus the guy at the tea party must be a
foaming at the mouth nutcase militia type. Of course he could have
just interviewed the guy...but who needs reality when you have your
imagination.......anyhoo, he gives this absurd rant and then asked his
panel of sickophants to comment...and this on the only NBC news show
with any respect...so much for meet the press.
Even yesterday, some NBC loon was talking to people lined up to see
Palin and has to challenge the Palin supporter by saying she supported
the Bush bailout when she ran with McCain...and so how can anyone
support Palin...some "journalist" ...would do better covering UFOs for
the National Enquirer!
Dinosaur_Sr
> In article <4b06a6a4$0$5350$bbae4...@news.suddenlink.net>,
>
>
>
> "Moderate" <no_spam_@no_mail.com> wrote:
> > "BAR" <sc...@you.com> wrote in message
> >news:MPG.25706d2ef...@news.giganews.com...
> > > nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
>
> > >> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:34:07 -0500, Frank Ketchum wrote:
>
> > >> > But she is just a dumb "bimbo" who sank McCain.
>
> > >> Pretty much.
>
> > > McCain sank himself. I've got to suspend my campaign and go back to
> > > Washington and fix the economy. I can't point out the differences
> > > between Obama and me, it wouldn't be fair.
>
> > > Talk about idiots, McCain tops the list.
>
> > The economy sank McCain just like it is drowning Obama.
>
> Amen! Regardless of who won, the economy was going to kick their ass.
>
> Next election won't be about the 'economy', it will be about JOBS!
> Regardless of good or bad news for Wall Street and the bankers, if the
> people don't have jobs, then their congress critter is in danger of
> being recalled home.
I dunno. Could be an interesting election. The salvation of the dems
is the fact that the same kind of out of touch elitists run the GOP as
run the Dems. Palin talks to conservatives, who the GOP must have to
win, but they reject Palin and put forth people like Romney and
Huckabee, not to mention invisible "leaders" like Steele, Boehner and
McConnell. People simply don't hear these "leaders". They do hear
Sarah Palin, and that's one of the principle things in politics.
Liberals hate Palin, of course, as much as conservatives hate
Obama...and there are 2X the conservatives as there are liberals...but
the GOP doesn't want to listen to conservatives...they expect them to
just vote GOP, which may well not happen.
JMHO, but of the GOP embraces Palin they will mop up the floor with
dems in 2010. If they don't, conservatives will be indifferent towards
the GOP. IMHO they won't. Didn't go to the "right" schools, doesn't
come from the "right" family". Comes from Idaho! No one from Idaho can
be taken seriously...not when we have elitists from the east coast who
have done such a great job so far!
William Clark
<bb54b54f-bffd-4523...@d5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
Dinosaur_Sr <frostb...@att.net> wrote:
> On Nov 20, 8:01�am, William Clark <cl...@nospam.matsceng.ohio-
> state.edu> wrote:
> > In article
> > <c358f488-1fbd-400e-9a82-77357bec1...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, �
No, I didn't think you would - which makes it all the more hypocritical
of you to pretend that your beloved news source, Fox, is fair and
balanced, and the others not. How can that be when you show your own
self to anyhting BUT far and balanced?
>
> Again, MSNBC makes up the news, as does NBC. That's a lot different
> from a presumed error in fact. FWIW, why didn't AP put fact checkers
> on Obama's book? ...or Biden's?
As opposed to simply either a) distorting it (video 1) for their own
ends (remember the famous TEA party DC rally picture, actually from two
years previously?), or being just plain incompetent, ad videlo 2 shows.
>
> I suppose you live in a cave up there in Cowlumbus, so here's an
> example (one I have posted before). David Gregory wants to get some
> negative commentary about people at tea parties, so he shows a guy
> with a sign saying its time to water the tree of liberty. Gregory then
> refers to the origin of the phrase, and then claims, without any
> citation or even an image, that one of the OK City bombers wore a T
> Shirt with that slogan, and thus the guy at the tea party must be a
> foaming at the mouth nutcase militia type. Of course he could have
> just interviewed the guy...but who needs reality when you have your
> imagination.......anyhoo, he gives this absurd rant and then asked his
> panel of sickophants to comment...and this on the only NBC news show
> with any respect...so much for meet the press.
Did Gregory lie about the T shirt? I don't think so:
A government exhibit from McVie's trial. Perhaps the guy was a relative
of the cretin that turned up to a carefully orchestrated rally against
Obama in Columbus with a sign that read "End Socailism (sic) Now".
Clearly from the top end of the intellectual tree.
>
> Even yesterday, some NBC loon was talking to people lined up to see
> Palin and has to challenge the Palin supporter by saying she supported
> the Bush bailout when she ran with McCain...and so how can anyone
> support Palin...some "journalist" ...would do better covering UFOs for
> the National Enquirer!
Actually it is hard to fathom why people would line up for 24 hours to
have a grabage book signed by her. But then, they line up for Paris
Hilton and Mylie Cyrus, too, so perhaps it shouldn't be a surprise.
William Clark
"Moderate" <no_spam_@no_mail.com> wrote:
No, just to show you the what kind of trash news outlet Fox New really
is. They condemn themselves with their own prejudice and incompetence. I
think the "Going Rouge" gaffe is hilarious.
Moderate
"Dinosaur_Sr" <frostb...@att.net> wrote in message
news:bb54b54f-bffd-4523...@d5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
<snip>
Even yesterday, some NBC loon was talking to people lined up to see
Palin and has to challenge the Palin supporter by saying she supported
the Bush bailout when she ran with McCain...and so how can anyone
support Palin...some "journalist" ...would do better covering UFOs for
the National Enquirer!
****************************************************
What an insult. The National Enquirer has more integrity than NBC.
Moderate
<snip>
> A government exhibit from McVie's trial. Perhaps the guy was a relative
> of the cretin that turned up to a carefully orchestrated rally against
> Obama in Columbus with a sign that read "End Socailism (sic) Now".
> Clearly from the top end of the intellectual tree.
>>
>> Even yesterday, some NBC loon was talking to people lined up to see
>> Palin and has to challenge the Palin supporter by saying she supported
>> the Bush bailout when she ran with McCain...and so how can anyone
>> support Palin...some "journalist" ...would do better covering UFOs for
>> the National Enquirer!
>
> Actually it is hard to fathom why people would line up for 24 hours to
> have a grabage book signed by her. But then, they line up for Paris
> Hilton and Mylie Cyrus, too, so perhaps it shouldn't be a surprise.
Perhaps he should have drawn a sign that said, "Socailism is grabage (sic)."
William Clark
"Moderate" <no_spam_@no_mail.com> wrote:
Hook. line and sinker. At least you read this one.
Dinosaur_Sr
state.edu> wrote:
>
> Did Gregory lie about the T shirt? I don't think so:
>
Nope. The lie was that it had anything to do with tea parties.
> Actually it is hard to fathom why people would line up for 24 hours to
> have a grabage book signed by her. But then, they line up for Paris
> Hilton and Mylie Cyrus, too, so perhaps it shouldn't be a surprise.
Or Barack Obama. Too bad no one bought your book!
johnty
> "johnty" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
And indeed it would have been more impressive to see it on top at full
price. So what argument is not supported?
Frank Ketchum
>
> Indeed, here's an indication of how smart and accurate Fox News is:
>
> http://tiny.cc/FqC5z
>
> http://tiny.cc/jtCJ5
>
> Clearly the most reliable and unbiased news source around. Right.
That's the best you can do to attack Fox? Pretty laughable.
BAR
lloydp...@mac.com says...
Jobs is the economy. If the economy suck there are no jobs.
BAR
5ed87b...@l13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, joh...@hotmail.com says...
Does the fact that none of the Top 100 books on Amazon are selling at
full prices mean anything to you?
Lloyd Parsons
BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
You misunderstand what I said. The people don't care about 'the
economy' as it isn't a direct hit to their perception. But no job, or
underemployed, or reduced pay because of that 'economy' matter to them.
It will be what determines the next election.
Not that the 'economy' turned around, but do they personally have a job.
William Clark
"Frank Ketchum" <nos...@thanksanyway.com> wrote:
Not when some idiot is holding it up as the only impartial and accurate
news source, it isn't.
William Clark
<0ea27d18-f4dd-4524...@j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
Dinosaur_Sr <frostb...@att.net> wrote:
> On Nov 20, 9:24�am, William Clark <cl...@nospam.matsceng.ohio-
> state.edu> wrote:
>
> >
> > Did Gregory lie about the T shirt? I don't think so:
> >
>
> Nope. The lie was that it had anything to do with tea parties.
You missed the point - people who hold up signs saying "End Socailism
(sic)" tend to wear t shirts like that. McVeigh did, and we know where
he stood on the political spectrum. Or do they all have Che Guevara ones?
But I am glad to see that you no longer challenge the accuracy of
Gregory's comment about McVeigh t shirt. That is progress.
>
> > Actually it is hard to fathom why people would line up for 24 hours to
> > have a grabage book signed by her. But then, they line up for Paris
> > Hilton and Mylie Cyrus, too, so perhaps it shouldn't be a surprise.
>
> Or Barack Obama. Too bad no one bought your book!
Oh, but they did. At full price, too.
Moderate
You obviously misread his original post. Here it is again
**
No one ever pretends? Pretty pretentious of you to claim to speak for
everyone. IMHO FOX News has a strong conservative bias, but they are
more honest than any of the other major networks, IMHO. Unlike say NBC
and MSNBC, they don't make up news to comment on.
**
Last time I checked, "strong conservative bias," doesn't mean impartial.
Frank Ketchum
>
> Not when some idiot is holding it up as the only impartial and accurate
> news source, it isn't.
You don't even comprehend what he said but he is the idiot. Got it.
William Clark
"Frank Ketchum" <nos...@thanksanyway.com> wrote:
You don't even know whose quote I am referring to, but you are an
expert. Got it.
William Clark
"Moderate" <no_spam_@no_mail.com> wrote:
> "William Clark" <cl...@nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
> news:clark-123909....@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> > In article <FaANm.17212$gd1....@newsfe05.iad>,
> > "Frank Ketchum" <nos...@thanksanyway.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "William Clark" <cl...@nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
> >> news:clark-93CB2D....@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> >> >
> >> > Indeed, here's an indication of how smart and accurate Fox News is:
> >> >
> >> > http://tiny.cc/FqC5z
> >> >
> >> > http://tiny.cc/jtCJ5
> >> >
> >> > Clearly the most reliable and unbiased news source around. Right.
> >>
> >> That's the best you can do to attack Fox? Pretty laughable.
> >
> > Not when some idiot is holding it up as the only impartial and accurate
> > news source, it isn't.
>
> You obviously misread his original post. Here it is again
>
> **
> No one ever pretends? Pretty pretentious of you to claim to speak for
> everyone. IMHO FOX News has a strong conservative bias, but they are
> more honest than any of the other major networks, IMHO. Unlike say NBC
> and MSNBC, they don't make up news to comment on.
> **
>
> Last time I checked, "strong conservative bias," doesn't mean impartial.
It was the "more honest" that I was talking about - "they don't make
news up to comment on". Please - fake footage purporting to show big
crowds ata Palin book signing, that is actually from a year ago. That
might be excused as a slip is it was not their track record - witness
the DC Tea Party rally, where Fox had to blow up the numbers by using a
two year old picture of a totally different gathering on the Mall. "More
honest" - give me strength.
Dinosaur_Sr
state.edu> wrote:
> In article
> <0ea27d18-f4dd-4524-acc0-bfb0afd22...@j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
Really? Did you sell as many copies as Palin's book sold before
Palin's book came out?
R&B
>
> "R&B" <none_of_yo...@all.com> wrote in message
> news:2009111900591075249-noneofyourbusiness@allcom...
>> On 2009-11-18 20:34:07 -0500, "Frank Ketchum" <nos...@thanksanyway.com>
>> said:
>>
>>> http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/books/ref=pd_ts_zgc_b_books_more?pf_rd_p=475709271&pf_rd_s=right-3&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_i=283155&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=04Z2838ADTRY60MV6A3E
But
she
>>>
>>> is just a dumb "bimbo" who sank McCain.
>>
>>
>> A car wreck draws a crowd.
>>
>> Put Jon Bon Jovi in a Barnes and Noble store to sign his book (if he ever
>> wrote one) and the crowd wrapping around the store would make the Sarah
>> Palin crowd look like a Girl Scout camp fire.
>>
>> Randy
>>
> Sorry to burst your bubble Randy.
>
> http://apnews.myway.com/article/20091119/D9C28MC00.html
>
>
> GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (AP) - College students ditched class, employees skipped
> work and some huddled in the cold overnight just to make sure they get an
> orange wristband Wednesday that would let them meet Sarah Palin.
>
> Thousands gathered outside a Barnes & Noble and chanted "Palin! Palin!
> Palin!" for the kickoff of the former Republican vice presidential
> candidate's "Going Rogue" book tour, which has taken on the feel of a
> political pep rally.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but we put The Bangles on a freeway for a
free concert in Houston in 1990 and a half million people showed up.
No joke.
That doesn't make them Presidential material.
Randy
Chris Bellomy
That's because it didn't end like this:
cb
Lloyd Parsons
Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote:
I guess she wasn't finished quitting yet, huh? :)
Frank Ketchum
I am no expert. I can read what you posted. That is all it takes to
discredit you usually.
Carbon
> JMHO, but of the GOP embraces Palin they will mop up the floor with dems
> in 2010. If they don't, conservatives will be indifferent towards the
> GOP.
JMHO you are as wrong as you could possibly be. She will polarize the
electorate, most of which will vote against her. It's just hard to
conceive of a differently-abled person winning the Presidency so soon
after the last one. That idiot jingoism just is not going to sell. At
least not with enough of the electorate to win the election.
assim...@borg.org
On 20-Nov-2009, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
> > And indeed it would have been more impressive to see it on top at full
> > price. So what argument is not supported?
>
> Does the fact that none of the Top 100 books on Amazon are selling at
> full prices mean anything to you?
no book in America sells at retail, period.
--
bill-o
gray asphalt
<Hor...@net.net> wrote in message
news:3fvcg59k00v2jgs46...@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:57:20 -0800, "gray asphalt"
> <dont...@gmail.com> wrote this crap:
>
>>
>>Actually, I'd be interested in Mrs. Palin, if she started
>>showing an interest in educating herself. I'd be happy
>>if she took an impartially conducted reading test to see
>>at what level her comprehension is and what conclusions
>>or points she can draw from a serious article similar to a
>>what would be a "briefing" to a political leader.
>
>
> Be serious. All the president has to do is read off the teleprompter,
> and visit all 57 states.
>
>
> Vote for Palin-Ahhnold in 2012.
>
>
> Hor...@Horvath.net
>
> My T-shirt says, "This shirt is the
> ultimate power in the universe."
I'm serious. I like her spirit. If she really tried to
educate herself or proved she already is, then I
would support her attempt to be a political force ...
a legitimate one.
Lone Golfer
> <Hor...@net.net> wrote in message
> news:okbag55fru0lacsv1...@4ax.com...
> > On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:34:07 -0500, "Frank Ketchum"
> > <nos...@thanksanyway.com> wrote this crap:
> >
> >
> >http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/books/ref=pd_ts_zgc_b_books_more?pf_rd
> _p=475709271&pf_rd_s=right-3&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_i=283155&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DE
> R&pf_rd_r=04Z2838ADTRY60MV6A3E
> > >
> > >But she is just a dumb "bimbo" who sank McCain.
> > >
> >
> > You lefty whackos are brilliant. She was the governor of the largest
> > state in the most powerful country in the world. She is the most
> > popular woman in the world, (next to Oprah, of course.) Her book is
> > already a best seller. She is a better shot than you. Even her
> > family is popular. What have you got? She's even better looking than
> > you, Frank. Of course most circus freaks are better looking than you.
>
> Frank is not a lefty. His comment was tongue in cheek, dumbass.
>
> -Greg
I think that point will be lost on Mr. Leadership Greg.
_______________________________________________________________________�
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
annika1980
>
> I'm serious. I like her spirit. If she really tried to
> educate herself or proved she already is, then I
> would support her attempt to be a political force ...
> a legitimate one
Why should she bother with educating herself with facts when she can
spew out lie after lie and even contradict herself while her tea-
bagging worshippers line up all day to eat it up.
William Clark
"Frank Ketchum" <nos...@thanksanyway.com> wrote:
> "William Clark" <cl...@nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
> news:clark-E0F3E1....@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> > In article <zFCNm.19618$We2....@newsfe09.iad>,
> > "Frank Ketchum" <nos...@thanksanyway.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "William Clark" <cl...@nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
> >> news:clark-123909....@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> >> >
> >> > Not when some idiot is holding it up as the only impartial and accurate
> >> > news source, it isn't.
> >>
> >> You don't even comprehend what he said but he is the idiot. Got it.
> >
> > You don't even know whose quote I am referring to, but you are an
> > expert. Got it.
>
> I am no expert. I can read what you posted. That is all it takes to
> discredit you usually.
In other words, you have absolutely nothing - zippo.
Dinosaur_Sr
It worked for Obama? Why wouldn't it work for Palin? Add to that that
Palin is a conservative, and 40% of the US electorate says they are
conservative; only 20% say they are, as is Obama, liberal. Should work
twice as well!
The real kicker is that the US electorate is clearly sick of elitists
like Obama and the Bushes, and Palin is ideal...but the GOP, like the
Dems, is dominated by elitists at the moment...we'll have to see what
happens in Florida though.
gray asphalt
"annika1980" <annik...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3f567517-6814-4955...@j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
____________________
I don't think she is lying. Kind of brainwashed. She has
character, imo, but the brainwashing was done in a thimble.