It would be nice if they did that, but they don't. And I don't see
that taxpayers from another state should be on the hook, nor even
that other taxpayers in the same state should be on the hook. The
employees of the state of Illinois knew, or should have known, that
the promises they were receiving were ridiculous. Their unions fought
tooth and nail against making what were needed concessions. The
people they represent reaped the benefit of that, now they should
reap the whirlwind. They should get the same sort of protection that
the PBG provides.
Detroit city employees paid a good chunk, though not nearly as
much as I thought they should have. I paid a big chunk -- stolen
by Obama -- as he gave my retirement (bonds) to the unions. Why should
government protect state employees retirement and not mine?
--
One conclusion should be obvious: If nations such as Indonesia,
Bangladesh and Thailand can not make themselves inoffensive to Militant
Islamism there is no way that the United States could perform such a
feat, no matter which policies we changed or how much our public
diplomacy improved. -- Clifford May