I don't know if I'd say Iceland suffered it quietly. But with a national
population well below a half million you couldn't just hear them over the
soothing waves of the vast North Atlantic.
>> The Euro has its advantages for countries with similar
>> outlooks, but a country that doesn't control its own currency is not
>> really sovereign. A lot of the Euro zone countries are OK with that
>> and work well within the ECB's guidelines, but countries that don't
>> or can't shouldn't be in the Euro.
>
> The Euro was a bad idea. The UK was prescient when they didn't join it,zx
> and Margaret Thatcher was a big reason:
>
> Perhaps the Labour party would give all those things up easily.
> Perhaps it would agree to a single currency and abolition of the
> pound sterling. Perhaps, being totally incompetent in monetary
> matters, it would be only too delighted to hand over full
> responsibility to a central bank, as it did to the IMF. The fact is
> that the Labour party has no competence on money and no competence
> on the economy -- so, yes, the right hon. Gentleman would be glad to
> hand it all over. What is the point of trying to get elected to
> Parliament only to hand over sterling and the powers of this House
> to Europe?
>
>
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/04/watch-margaret-thatcher-explain-why-the-euro-is-a-terrible-idea-in-1990/274768/
I think the Euro is a good idea for countries that embrace the idea and
know what they are getting into. The biggest problem with the Euro zone is
that it got too big and diverse. If it had consisted of Germany, France,
Austria, Britain and other similarly wealthy and situated countries I think
it would have been fine. On the plus side it eliminated a lot of currency
conversion friction. Where it went wrong is extending it to poorer
countries as a crypto welfare program. IMO.