On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 16:24:59 -0700 (PDT),
J25...@protonmail.com wrote:
>Hugh, recreational means that you don=E2=80=99t need a special medical card=
>. I imagine the Illinois dispensaries will offer a variety of thc content.=
> I=E2=80=99ve only been to one legal dispensary. About a year ago in Vegas=
>. I don=E2=80=99t remember the exact percentages but there were a variety =
>of doses. The counter person took special care to ask us about our using h=
>abits in order to find the right dosage for us. It was a very respectable o=
>peration, and there was one senior citizen in there who I assumed was a reg=
>ular since the employees knew his name. Edibles might be the best choice fo=
>r your wife. They don=E2=80=99t hit you with an instant intoxication like t=
>he smokable varieties. It=E2=80=99s more of what they call a body high... =
>at least for me.
I'm still learning about the issue and I appreciate your help. If she
had the medical card I could do everything legally. 30 years ago I
would have aquired some. If caught I would have enjoyed the fight in
court and media. But I just don't have the energy now.
I agree about the edibles. I have heard that places in CO have it
separated based on the pain it might help. One son has a second home
in CO but there is the risk of sniffing dogs. And I don't want anyone
in the family to do something illegal - except me if necessary.
As I understand the 17% does not give a high so I would not have a
need for the stronger stuff. I have never touched it. A sheriff in
Pickens Co. AL had a plant in his office and I saw that several times
since he lived across the street from our house in AL. And I can smell
it at football games. I was offered a smoke one time but I refused. I
get high on life.
I want to know more about the issue rather than have to trust others.
I'll listen but any decision will be mine (and hers) once I have more
confidence.
Hugh