On Monday, August 3, 2015 at 1:20:09 PM UTC-5, xyzzy wrote:
> On Monday, August 3, 2015 at 2:09:39 PM UTC-4, michael anderson wrote:
> > On Monday, August 3, 2015 at 11:43:44 AM UTC-5, xyzzy wrote:
> > > On Monday, August 3, 2015 at 12:36:07 PM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
> > > > On Monday, August 3, 2015 at 11:59:46 AM UTC-4, The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior wrote:
> > > > > On Sunday, August 2, 2015 at 8:37:07 AM UTC-5, The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior wrote:
> > > > > > Love this young woman's attitude here - her HS in NYC says she got her diploma - she doesn't think she earned it and doesn't like this
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
http://nypost.com/2015/08/02/students-stunning-plea-why-did-nyc-let-me-graduate-high-school/
> > > > >
> > > > > And a follow up
> > > > >
> > > > >
http://nypost.com/2015/08/02/teacher-explains-why-she-passed-student-who-deserved-to-fail/
> > > >
> > > > What's interesting is that she uses the fact that the girl passed her Regents history exam as justification (in fact pressure) for passing her.
> > > >
> > > > Another unintended consequence of high-stakes testing?
> > > >
> > > > (btw Regents have been around in NYS forever. My parents talked about taking them in the 1950s. so they waaaay pre-date the current testing mania, though I don't know if they have been "updated" in response to it).
> > >
> > > Speaking of unintended consequences in education.... this week's This American Life is about what happens when students in failing schools are allowed to choose new schools. Hint: the parents in the schools they choose aren't happy.
> >
> > fortunately though this is restricted to the district, and in most cases when one school in a district is just terrible the other schools are nothing to write home about either.
> >
> > This is certainly case where I live. Birmingham city schools are maybe the worst in the entire country(it's close if they aren't). Mountain brook schools, otoh, are universally sterling and just a few miles away. A parent of a kid in a terrible Birmingham city school(and they are all terrible) can't put their kid in an A+++ mountain brook school just 3 miles away....they can only choose between Birmingham city schools.
> >
> > People in certain districts pay an enormous amount of money to live in those school districts. Obviously that investment has to be protected, and the only way to do that is to prevent transfers.
>
> Well in the case I referenced, an entire school system had its accreditation revoked so the kids could pick from any of the surrounding school districts. The kids could pick any district, but the failing district was only required to provide transportation to one neighboring district, of the failing district's choice.
wait....that's what I don't get. Why would the good systems with separate school systems(if they are in fact good districts) be ok with this? why would they agree to it? You are talking about entirely different school systems right and not schools within the same system? That doesn't seem to make any sense and it seems that it would be in direct opposition to their interests. I don't even have kids, but if I bought a house in one of the few good school districts close to Birmingham, I would be incredibly upset because so much of my property value is tied up in school districts that are separate. These have been very well defined for years and are essentially not changeable.(the school lines within the system are changeable, but these don't matter so much).
Maybe im missing part of the story, because I have no idea why a school board would vote to allow kids from an inferior school system to go to any school in their superior school system...that's the most puzzling thing Ive ever heard. If in fact this is two different school systems.