Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Anyone want to make a quick few thousand?

55 views
Skip to first unread message

michael anderson

unread,
Jun 1, 2015, 12:07:11 AM6/1/15
to

Take the warriors to win the nba finals....they were -230 or so a couple days ago. It's going to be much higher after a game 1 win, so get in on it.
the warriors are a historically good team this year, and this should be -550 or so. I've made a lot of easy money on the warriors so far, astill have some warriors futures tickets I bought when the playoffs started(at an absurd plus 195).

The cavs are horribly overmatched this series, and there are literally dozens of potential mismatch combinations for them to face this series....especially when the warriors go small.

dnrapp

unread,
Jun 1, 2015, 1:55:02 AM6/1/15
to
Oh Shit there goes the title hopes for the 'Dubs.

you know you can not claim any of those "bets" you have on the Warriors since you did not post about them before hand.

michael anderson

unread,
Jun 1, 2015, 1:29:27 PM6/1/15
to
well it's documented in the facebook group, but I'm not 'claiming' them as I didn't post a +/- or anything.

but I'm telling you right now I've got a bunch of money on warriors futures(some of them from when the playoffs started and some just before this series)....

and my record over the last 6 months speaks for itself.

darkst...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 1, 2015, 2:45:51 PM6/1/15
to
On Monday, June 1, 2015 at 10:29:27 AM UTC-7, michael anderson wrote:

> well it's documented in the facebook group, but I'm not 'claiming' them as I didn't post a +/- or anything.
>
> but I'm telling you right now I've got a bunch of money on warriors futures(some of them from when the playoffs started and some just before this series)....
>
> and my record over the last 6 months speaks for itself.

And that is why dnrapp said what he said.

But my friend has said something to me the whole playoffs: No team, in the history of the NBA Finals, has had an .800 winning percentage with a 10-point average differential, made the Finals, and lost.

The only team which did faced another team with the same criteria in the Conference Finals.

Mike

michael anderson

unread,
Jun 1, 2015, 3:13:33 PM6/1/15
to
On Monday, June 1, 2015 at 1:45:51 PM UTC-5, darkst...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, June 1, 2015 at 10:29:27 AM UTC-7, michael anderson wrote:
>
> > well it's documented in the facebook group, but I'm not 'claiming' them as I didn't post a +/- or anything.
> >
> > but I'm telling you right now I've got a bunch of money on warriors futures(some of them from when the playoffs started and some just before this series)....
> >
> > and my record over the last 6 months speaks for itself.
>
> And that is why dnrapp said what he said.

which doesn't make sense because I've been doing very well now for a long time.


>
> But my friend has said something to me the whole playoffs: No team, in the history of the NBA Finals, has had an .800 winning percentage with a 10-point average differential, made the Finals, and lost.
>
> The only team which did faced another team with the same criteria in the Conference Finals.
>

this is true....and what people should have been realizing all playoffs(when you could have gotten golden state +190 to win at the start of the playoffs....which was insane).


> Mike

dnrapp

unread,
Jun 1, 2015, 6:59:00 PM6/1/15
to
On Monday, June 1, 2015 at 12:13:33 PM UTC-7, michael anderson wrote:
> On Monday, June 1, 2015 at 1:45:51 PM UTC-5, darkst...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Monday, June 1, 2015 at 10:29:27 AM UTC-7, michael anderson wrote:
> >
> > > well it's documented in the facebook group, but I'm not 'claiming' them as I didn't post a +/- or anything.
> > >
> > > but I'm telling you right now I've got a bunch of money on warriors futures(some of them from when the playoffs started and some just before this series)....
> > >
> > > and my record over the last 6 months speaks for itself.
> >
> > And that is why dnrapp said what he said.
>
> which doesn't make sense because I've been doing very well now for a long time.
>
>

A long time? Weren't you something like -100 units during the College Football season? I would not call spotty betting over a 4 month period a long time.

michael anderson

unread,
Jun 1, 2015, 7:15:21 PM6/1/15
to
lol....you always pick the bad and ignore the good. Yes, at one point I was like -100 at one point in the football season. Actually a tad more than that. Then I erased that, and then I became positive, and then after the super bowl win very positive. I documented the nfl picks every week over that stretch. It was an insane run....full of brilliant play(especially in game play). I may never duplicate that again. Then were other big documented wins since then(against a paucity of losses).
I haven't documented all the nba playoff wins here(although I have been documenting my warrior futures in the fb group), but it's pretty obvious that right now I'm the side to be on for these nba playoffs.

0 new messages