Trump supporters, line up!

[Futbol Phan]

Please, tell me why the statement, taken directly from FAKE NEWS! earlier today, is wrong:

"If the Trump administration were not plagued with stunning incompetence, someone might have realized that welcoming Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Russia's ambassador to the United States, Sergei Kislyak, on a day when Trump was being accused of trying to quash an investigation into his campaign's ties with Russia, was an extraordinarily stupid thing to do."

[Some dued]

Because its an opinion, so not quantifiable as right or wrong?
That's my guess, but I have no opinion on the quality of the post. Maybe a bad idea for previous administrations, barely registers for this one.

[Emperor Wonko the Sane]

On Thursday, May 11, 2017 at 5:31:42 PM UTC-5, Futbol Phan wrote:
> Please, tell me why the statement, taken directly from FAKE NEWS! earlier today, is wrong:
>
> "If the Trump administration were not plagued with stunning incompetence, someone might have realized that welcoming Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Russia's ambassador to the United States, Sergei Kislyak, on a day when Trump was being accused of trying to quash an investigation into his campaign's ties with Russia, was an extraordinarily stupid thing to do."

Since said investigation has turned up zero evidence of collusion (unless they have something they're not telling the public) after five months of investigation, should the president change his schedule based on every baseless accusation?

Doug

[J. Hugh Sullivan]

On Thu, 11 May 2017 15:31:40 -0700 (PDT), Futbol Phan
<sgz...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Please, tell me why the statement, taken directly from FAKE NEWS! earlier t=
>oday, is wrong:
>
>"If the Trump administration were not plagued with stunning incompetence, s=
>omeone might have realized that welcoming Russian Foreign Minister Sergei L=
>avrov and Russia's ambassador to the United States, Sergei Kislyak, on a da=
>y when Trump was being accused of trying to quash an investigation into his=

> campaign's ties with Russia, was an extraordinarily stupid thing to do."

I don't know that it is wrong.

But there is something to be said for not breaking too quickly from
tradition observed by the previous administration albeit with liberal,
not Russian, terrorists.

At the same time we need to remember that Comrade Obama was more
responsible for electing Trump than Russia. we need to give credit
where credit is due.

Hugh


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

[dotsla...@gmail.com]

Didn't take y'all long to line up your "why we're not responsible for the nut that we chose in our primary and voted for in the general" talking points.

No worries - expecting a Republican to own anything they do would be like expecting to see a black swan collide with a freaking unicorn on the ride in this morning.

"The buck stops with them. Always them."

Cheers.

[JGibson]

Watching this group, especially the conservatives who claimed they wouldn't vote for Trump, since Trump has become president has been very enlightening.

[xyzzy]

It's a progression I predicted last summer.

1. It proves media bias that they are treating that clown Trump like he's a serious candidate for the GOP nomination

2. It proves media bias that the clown Trump is being portrayed as the face of the GOP just because he won a few fragmented primaries

3. It proves media bias that the MSM is acting like that clown Trump is likely to be our nominee.

and finally...

3. It proves media bias that Trump is being portrayed as a clown, just like we all did right up until the moment he became our guy.

[Con Reeder, unhyphenated American]

Trump *is* a clown, and I have said so repeatedly. That doesn't excuse what
the left is doing.


--
Life is a long lesson in humility. -- James Barrie

[J. Hugh Sullivan]

On Fri, 12 May 2017 06:20:52 -0700 (PDT), dotsla...@gmail.com
wrote:

>Didn't take y'all long to line up your "why we're not responsible for the nut that we chose in our primary and voted for in the general" talking points.

It was easy - between Johnson and Obama I never expected liberals to
do anything intelligent.

>No worries - expecting a Republican to own anything they do would be like expecting to see a black swan collide with a freaking unicorn on the ride in this morning.

Anyone would have a very difficult time proving I didn't take
responsibility for anything I do.

Do you expect your video of the swan and unicorn to go viral?

Once again I approve of Trump's direction even if not all of his
methods. The presidency is not the place to be that confrontational -
I thought Obama proved that.

[J. Hugh Sullivan]

On Fri, 12 May 2017 07:02:41 -0700 (PDT), xyzzy <xyzzy...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Promotion from Comrade Obama to Clown Trump was HUGE, except maybe for
those who are unable to compete.

"Our guy" sounds like you are making progress. Good on ye.

[agavi...@gmail.com]

Agree. Especially the "unbiased" media.

Obama. Unqualified clown. Worshipped.

Trump. More qualified, still a clown. Vilified.

[Con Reeder, unhyphenated American]

I don't know what they intend, but to my mind and the mind of a lot of
people I know, the left throws what appears to be a temper tantrum when
they don't get their way.

--
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps
US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists
worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct
from natural variation." - Bob Carter

[JGibson]

On Friday, May 12, 2017 at 1:39:20 PM UTC-4, Con Reeder, unhyphenated American wrote:
> On 2017-05-12, the_andr...@yahoo.com <agavi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Agree. Especially the "unbiased" media.
> >
> > Obama. Unqualified clown. Worshipped.
> >
> > Trump. More qualified, still a clown. Vilified.
>
> I don't know what they intend, but to my mind and the mind of a lot of
> people I know, the left throws what appears to be a temper tantrum when
> they don't get their way.

That's the best description I've seen of Trump yet.

[Con Reeder, unhyphenated American]

Him too. But the reason a whole lot of people don't condemn him for it
is that the left is just as bad. They look like Elastic Man compared to the
dreaded Republican overreach.

--
Find the grain of truth in criticism, chew it, and swallow
it. -- anonymous

[darkst...@gmail.com]

On Thursday, May 11, 2017 at 3:31:42 PM UTC-7, Futbol Phan wrote:
> Please, tell me why the statement, taken directly from FAKE NEWS! earlier today, is wrong:
>
> "If the Trump administration were not plagued with stunning incompetence, someone might have realized that welcoming Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Russia's ambassador to the United States, Sergei Kislyak, on a day when Trump was being accused of trying to quash an investigation into his campaign's ties with Russia, was an extraordinarily stupid thing to do."

Not really.

When you are famous, you can grab 'em in the pussy.

This is just an extension of what got the bastard elected.

Mike

[J. Hugh Sullivan]

On Sun, 14 May 2017 11:53:28 -0700 (PDT), darkst...@gmail.com
wrote:

>On Thursday, May 11, 2017 at 3:31:42 PM UTC-7, Futbol Phan wrote:

>> Please, tell me why the statement, taken directly from FAKE NEWS! earlier=
> today, is wrong:
>>
>> "If the Trump administration were not plagued with stunning incompetence,=
> someone might have realized that welcoming Russian Foreign Minister Sergei=
> Lavrov and Russia's ambassador to the United States, Sergei Kislyak, on a =
>day when Trump was being accused of trying to quash an investigation into h=
>is campaign's ties with Russia, was an extraordinarily stupid thing to do."=

>
>
>Not really.
>
>When you are famous, you can grab 'em in the pussy.
>
>This is just an extension of what got the bastard elected.
>
>Mike

I think not electing a comrade bitch to replace acomrade bastard was
cause and effect to some degree.

[Futbol Phan]

On Friday, May 12, 2017 at 12:17:50 PM UTC-5, the_andr...@yahoo.com wrote:




Trump. More qualified,



Just wanted to see those three words all by themselves.

[J. Hugh Sullivan]

What do you want me to send for your 8th birthday? I choose that age
because you are almost as smart as out 10 year old granddaughter but
not even close to our 18 year old grandson.