Obama-Appointed IG: I Was ‘Threatened’ For Reporting Concerns About Hillary’s Private Server

[Michael Press]

<https://thepoliticalinsider.com/charles-mccullough-threatened/>

Charles McCullough, the Intelligence Community Inspector General
appointed by former President Barack Obama in 2011, claims he was
`marginalized and threatened' when he voiced concerns about
Hillary Clinton's private emails.

McCullough said he contacted James Clapper, Director of National
Intelligence at the time about his concerns, but received
"personal blowback... to my family [and] my office."

In an interview with Fox News' Catherine Herridge, he also said
that others informed him that he would be one of the first
firings under a potential President Clinton.

McCullough claimed, "Emails beyond Top Secret passed through the
unsecured server."

For raising that concern---a national security concern to the
Director of National Intelligence---his family and job were
threatened.

Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com

Indeed, the Political Insider reported on McCullough's finding
that documents "beyond top secret" were being shared on the
server back in January of 2016, a claim Clinton officials said
demonstrated he was coordinating releases of information to help
Republicans.

They didn't refute his claims, rather, they pointed a finger for
sharing information with Republicans. It wasn't just with
Republicans, however, whom he made those claims to.

In a letter to Congress, McCullough wrote, "These declarations
cover several dozen emails containing classified information
determined ... to be at the confidential, secret and top secret/SAP
levels."

--
Michael Press

[unclejr]

Out of curiosity, do you ever read any "normal" news outlets, like the New York Times, the Washington Post, Time, Newsweek, U.S. News and World Report, etc?

Asking for a friend.

[CtrlAltDel]

On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 17:33:24 -0700, unclejr wrote:


> Out of curiosity, do you ever read any "normal" news outlets, like the
> New York Times, the Washington Post, Time, Newsweek, U.S. News and World
> Report, etc?
>
> Asking for a friend.

Why would anyone consume news that doesn't tell them the truth, twists
facts, or just doesn't report on current topics if it doesn't glorify
democrats? That is like sticking your head in the sand, isn't it?

Would you care to refute anything in Michael's post? Was it untrue?

[Damon Hynes, Cyclone Ranger]

TMML

[J. Hugh Sullivan]

On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 17:24:13 -0700, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net>
wrote:

><https://thepoliticalinsider.com/charles-mccullough-threatened/>
>
>Charles McCullough, the Intelligence Community Inspector General
>appointed by former President Barack Obama in 2011, claims he was
>`marginalized and threatened' when he voiced concerns about
>Hillary Clinton's private emails.

If truth was not harmful to liberals they could remove their heads
from their asses.

But that would make it impossible to identify liberals any more.

C'est la vie.

Hugh

[RoddyMcCorley]

Loonie

--
False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the soul
with evil.

Pennsylvania - Tá sé difriúil anseo.

[CtrlAltDel]

On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 16:18:29 -0400, RoddyMcCorley wrote:

> On 8/31/2018 3:30 AM, CtrlAltDel wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 17:33:24 -0700, unclejr wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Out of curiosity, do you ever read any "normal" news outlets, like the
>>> New York Times, the Washington Post, Time, Newsweek, U.S. News and
>>> World Report, etc?
>>>
>>> Asking for a friend.
>>
>> Why would anyone consume news that doesn't tell them the truth, twists
>> facts, or just doesn't report on current topics if it doesn't glorify
>> democrats? That is like sticking your head in the sand, isn't it?
>>
>> Would you care to refute anything in Michael's post? Was it untrue?
>>
> Loonie

So, you don't deny anything in the article, you just don't like the
source?