On Friday, July 7, 2017 at 2:23:16 PM UTC-7, Michael Press wrote:
> In article <
cd0dde23-9aee-42c1...@googlegroups.com>,
> > Reading this statute on what CNN did takes more than generosity. What is it that CNN supposedly stole? The core of this crime is stealing. If their "dissemination" wasn't a threat to get the victim to hand over something, this statute doesn't apply at all.
> Restraint of trade. CNN gets to control what he can publish.
No property is being exchanged here. That's not theft.
That CAN be something else, but there's no property taken.
Mike