Johnson/Stein/Trumo voters: You blew it for AMERICA

[Tonawanda Kardex]

You should be ashamed of yourselves for not listening to experts smarter and wiser than you.

Instead, you thought you knew better, right?

"Oh, but her emails!"

What a disgrace to this nation you are.

[Eric Ramon]

Drop it. That attitude drove people away in the first place

[Eric Ramon]

Drop it. That attitude drove people away in the first place.

[unclejr]

[Con Reeder, unhyphenated American]

On 2017-08-13, Tonawanda Kardex <tonawan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You should be ashamed of yourselves for not listening to experts smarter and wiser than you.
>
> Instead, you thought you knew better, right?
>
> "Oh, but her emails!"

Actually, for most it was like "Oh, but her Supreme Court nomination."

>
> What a disgrace to this nation you are.

I think anyone who thinks that way is a disgrace.



--
There's nothing sweeter than life nor more precious than time.
-- Barney

[michael anderson]

On Sunday, August 13, 2017 at 11:55:42 AM UTC-5, Tonawanda Kardex wrote:
> You should be ashamed of yourselves for not listening to experts smarter and wiser than you.
>
> Instead, you thought you knew better, right?

huh? Do you think those same people wouldnt do the same thing again? Hillary is even more despised now s/p election

[Ken Olson]

On 8/13/2017 3:40 PM, Con Reeder, unhyphenated American wrote:
> On 2017-08-13, Tonawanda Kardex <tonawan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> You should be ashamed of yourselves for not listening to experts smarter and wiser than you.
>>
>> Instead, you thought you knew better, right?
>>
>> "Oh, but her emails!"
>
> Actually, for most it was like "Oh, but her Supreme Court nomination."
>
>>
>> What a disgrace to this nation you are.
>
> I think anyone who thinks that way is a disgrace.
>
>
>

Yes. For such an intelligent person Sam's simple minded rhetoric is
disgraceful.

[plai...@gmail.com]

Uhhhh.....Con, exactly who did Hillary nominate for the Supreme Court?

Not that it matters. Most people wouldn't have been able to name Scalia, let alone either of the Supreme Court nominees. It was a fairly small issue in the election.

3 1/2 more years. Sigh.

[wolfie]

plai...@gmail.com wrote

> 3 1/2 more years. Sigh.

I expect it to become much, much more entertaining
in Jan. 2019.

[Ken Olson]

The beginning of the 2nd term.

[Some dued]

No way in hell he's a two termer, with the possible caveat that a conveniently timed war occurs ala GWB.

[wolfie]

"Some dued" wrote

> No way in hell he's a two termer, with the
> possible caveat that a conveniently timed
> war occurs ala GWB.

Not even then. He's got a loose cannon
reputation, not GWB's gunslinger one.

[Some dued]

He may not even want to run.

Has an incumbent president who was willing to run ever not been the party nominee?

[Ken Olson]

On 8/13/2017 11:02 PM, Some dued wrote:
> Has an incumbent president who was willing to run ever not been the party nominee?

http://www.npr.org/sections/politicaljunkie/2009/07/a_president_denied_renominatio.html

[Some dued]

Trump has a chance to be #2.

[wolfie]

"Some dued" wrote

> He may not even want to run.

That's my bet.

> Has an incumbent president who was willing
> to run ever not been the party nominee?

He's certainly going to get a primary challenge.
I'd be amazed if the RNC backed him. And the
big money is already planning to run someone
else - almost certainly without overcrowding the
field. Probably a Cruz/Pence type from one
side and Sasse/Kasich type from the other. Trump's
*real* base is too small to win a limited primary.
I'm guessing 80% or more closed their eyes and
said "not Hillary...."

[Ken Olson]

I was eye wide open, but yes.

[Con Reeder, unhyphenated American]

Are you serious? For most Republicans who held their nose and
voted for Trump, it was the main issue. That and stemming the
tide of over-regulation. Say what you will about Trump, he has
delivered in those areas.

> 3 1/2 more years. Sigh.

I feel the same way. But my sigh is partly relief.

--
"The secret of a good sermon is to have a good beginning and a good
ending, then having the two as close together as possible."
-- George Burns

[J. Hugh Sullivan]

On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 22:59:19 -0400, "wolfie" <bgbd...@gte.net> wrote:

>"Some dued" wrote
>
>> No way in hell he's a two termer,

>Not even then. He's got a loose cannon
>reputation,

I have to agree.

There are only two reasons Trump was elected IMO - Obama and Hillary.
They are good enough.

Apparently he has already caused a break between
"progressives" and other socialist democrats - that split can only
help real Americans.

One more SCOTUS,
One more SCOTUS,
Rah, rah, rah.

Hugh


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

[J. Hugh Sullivan]

On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 01:34:29 -0500, "Con Reeder, unhyphenated
American" <cons...@duxmail.com> wrote:

>Are you serious? For most Republicans who held their nose and
>voted for Trump, it was the main issue. That and stemming the
>tide of over-regulation.

The driving of that nail is completed.

[agavi...@gmail.com]

This is good bate