info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Charles Krauthammer's fair and balanced assessment of Hillary Clinton
47 views
Skip to first unread message
Michael Press
Jun 4, 2017, 6:52:01 PM6/4/17
to
"I mean just look at the fact she couldn’t shake the challenge
of a 74-year-old socialist, who, this is the best part about
Bernie Sanders, honeymooned in the Soviet Union. She couldn’t
shake his challenge for six months."
"She ought to sit for a while and let people appreciate her
good qualities."
<http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/06/02/krauthammer-childish-pathetic-hillary-wont-take-blame-election-loss/>
<http://tinyurl.com/ydefoxm7>
--
Michael Press
of a 74-year-old socialist, who, this is the best part about
Bernie Sanders, honeymooned in the Soviet Union. She couldn’t
shake his challenge for six months."
"She ought to sit for a while and let people appreciate her
good qualities."
<http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/06/02/krauthammer-childish-pathetic-hillary-wont-take-blame-election-loss/>
<http://tinyurl.com/ydefoxm7>
--
Michael Press
Futbol Phan
Jun 4, 2017, 11:55:24 PM6/4/17
to
OTOH, there is a small cadre of a half dozen or so rsfckers who cannot seem to find it in themselves to make a single statement that could in any way be considered critical of the current POTUS.
Keep it up.
CtrlAltDel
Jun 5, 2017, 12:34:46 AM6/5/17
to
looks a little too crazy; how is that?
Michael Press
Jun 5, 2017, 2:28:33 AM6/5/17
to
In article <99f05ce3-37bc-4c7c...@googlegroups.com>,
You are the one here who must post about President Trump
because here you are posting about President Trump in
response to a message that has nothing to do with
President Donald Trump.
--
Michael Press
because here you are posting about President Trump in
response to a message that has nothing to do with
President Donald Trump.
--
Michael Press
J. Hugh Sullivan
Jun 5, 2017, 9:36:09 AM6/5/17
to
On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 20:55:21 -0700 (PDT), Futbol Phan
<sgz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I'm not sure who in this chatrum could be identified as a die-hard HRC fan;=
determined she was the best you had - not me.
>OTOH, there is a small cadre of a half dozen or so rsfckers who cannot seem=
> to find it in themselves to make a single statement that could in any way =
the latter.
hUGH
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
<sgz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I'm not sure who in this chatrum could be identified as a die-hard HRC fan;=
> if there is such a person I have missed it.
You, and a bunch of others, were until she made losers of you. You
determined she was the best you had - not me.
>OTOH, there is a small cadre of a half dozen or so rsfckers who cannot seem=
> to find it in themselves to make a single statement that could in any way =
>be considered critical of the current POTUS.
So far the ends justify the methods, although I often disagree with
the latter.
hUGH
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Some dued
Jun 5, 2017, 10:57:31 AM6/5/17
to
So I guess that makes you a die-hard Trump fan.
Futbol Phan
Jun 5, 2017, 12:14:57 PM6/5/17
to
On Monday, June 5, 2017 at 8:36:09 AM UTC-5, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 20:55:21 -0700 (PDT), Futbol Phan
> <sgz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I'm not sure who in this chatrum could be identified as a die-hard HRC fan;=
> > if there is such a person I have missed it.
>
> You, and a bunch of others, were until she made losers of you. You
> determined she was the best you had - not me.
I determined this? There you go, lying again. Please show me a single poast I have made in which I indicated that HRC was my preferred choice for POTUS. Only when she was running against a clown did I hold my nose and support her. So that we wouldn't end up where we are now.
> On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 20:55:21 -0700 (PDT), Futbol Phan
> <sgz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I'm not sure who in this chatrum could be identified as a die-hard HRC fan;=
> > if there is such a person I have missed it.
>
> You, and a bunch of others, were until she made losers of you. You
> determined she was the best you had - not me.
J. Hugh Sullivan
Jun 5, 2017, 12:54:24 PM6/5/17
to
On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 07:57:26 -0700 (PDT), Some dued
<theodo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>So I guess that makes you a die-hard Trump fan.
I am a die-hard Bama and NY fan.
<theodo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>So I guess that makes you a die-hard Trump fan.
I'm not a "fan" of Trump - he is just the person who made liberals
kiss his ass, and I approve.
Hugh
J. Hugh Sullivan
Jun 5, 2017, 1:01:16 PM6/5/17
to
On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 09:14:55 -0700 (PDT), Futbol Phan
>an;=3D
>st I have made in which I indicated that HRC was my preferred choice for PO=
>TUS. Only when she was running against a clown did I hold my nose and supp=
>ort her.
Quoting your last sentence states without any doubt she was your
preferred candidate. You being a queer son of a bitch and including
time parameters and/or reasons doesn't change the fact.
I did err however, You were always a loser - I should not have blamed
Hillary for that you 4S piss ant.
Hugh
<sgz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Monday, June 5, 2017 at 8:36:09 AM UTC-5, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>> On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 20:55:21 -0700 (PDT), Futbol Phan
>> <sgz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >I'm not sure who in this chatrum could be identified as a die-hard HRC f=
>On Monday, June 5, 2017 at 8:36:09 AM UTC-5, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>> On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 20:55:21 -0700 (PDT), Futbol Phan
>> <sgz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>an;=3D
>> > if there is such a person I have missed it.
>>
>> You, and a bunch of others, were until she made losers of you. You
>> determined she was the best you had - not me.
>
>I determined this? There you go, lying again.
>Please show me a single poa=
>>
>> You, and a bunch of others, were until she made losers of you. You
>> determined she was the best you had - not me.
>
>I determined this? There you go, lying again.
>st I have made in which I indicated that HRC was my preferred choice for PO=
>TUS. Only when she was running against a clown did I hold my nose and supp=
>ort her.
Quoting your last sentence states without any doubt she was your
preferred candidate. You being a queer son of a bitch and including
time parameters and/or reasons doesn't change the fact.
I did err however, You were always a loser - I should not have blamed
Hillary for that you 4S piss ant.
Hugh
agavi...@gmail.com
Jun 5, 2017, 6:20:55 PM6/5/17
to
Where are we now?
Eric Ramon
Jun 5, 2017, 7:28:40 PM6/5/17
to
It's a dishonest comment from Krauthammer and cheapens the rest of his point.
Ken Olson
Jun 5, 2017, 9:50:57 PM6/5/17
to
Ken Olson
Jun 5, 2017, 9:53:11 PM6/5/17
to
J. Hugh Sullivan
Jun 6, 2017, 7:45:07 AM6/6/17
to
On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 21:50:57 -0400, Ken Olson <kol...@freedomnet.org>
wrote:
I would need more convincing to even permit a lib kiss my ass.
Hugh
wrote:
Hugh
Michael Press
Jun 7, 2017, 5:07:53 PM6/7/17
to
In article <569d26a0-5984-4ce6...@googlegroups.com>,
> The dumbest part is the Bernie bit. He got married when he was Mayor of Burlington and went to the USSR on a business trip. And I thought there was no big deal about being friendly with Russians.
>
> It's a dishonest comment from Krauthammer and cheapens the rest of his point.
Thirty years later and it still gets bites. That is a lot of
explaining. "Most of the political class thrives on deception and
role-playing." Bernie Sanders put himself into this situation.
Just because you try to explain away Bernie Sanders getting
married one day then taking his wife and a political contingent
to the USSR the next day does not mean it is dishonest for a
politician to bring it up. Bernie wants to look like a commie
stooge, he has to take the heat. Thirty years of smoke. There is
definitely fire. Bernie's pants?
Bernie also visited the mayor of Cuba and visited Nicaragua as
well as other socialist countries. Wonder what kept Bernie Sanders
out of Viet Nam and China? Has he been to Venzuela?
In a 1985 letter addressed to the people of Nicaragua, penned in
conjunction with that trip “In the long run, I am certain that
you will win,” Sanders wrote, “and that your heroic revolution
against the Somoza dictatorship will be maintained and
strengthened.” The Sandinistas were voted out in 1990.
Anyway, the point was that Hillary Clinton took an inordinately
long time to shake Bernie Sanders, who in addition to having a
toxic platform, has relatively few, if loud, followers.
--
Michael Press
Eric Ramon <ramon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 3:52:01 PM UTC-7, Michael Press wrote:
> > "I mean just look at the fact she couldn’t shake the challenge
> > of a 74-year-old socialist, who, this is the best part about
> > Bernie Sanders, honeymooned in the Soviet Union. She couldn’t
> > shake his challenge for six months."
> >
> > "She ought to sit for a while and let people appreciate her
> > good qualities."
> >
> > <http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/06/02/krauthammer-childish-pathetic-hillary-wont-take-blame-election-loss/>
> > <http://tinyurl.com/ydefoxm7>
> >
> > --
> > Michael Press
>
> what a shock. It's a link from Breitbart.
Kill the messenger.
> On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 3:52:01 PM UTC-7, Michael Press wrote:
> > "I mean just look at the fact she couldn’t shake the challenge
> > of a 74-year-old socialist, who, this is the best part about
> > Bernie Sanders, honeymooned in the Soviet Union. She couldn’t
> > shake his challenge for six months."
> >
> > "She ought to sit for a while and let people appreciate her
> > good qualities."
> >
> > <http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/06/02/krauthammer-childish-pathetic-hillary-wont-take-blame-election-loss/>
> > <http://tinyurl.com/ydefoxm7>
> >
> > --
> > Michael Press
>
> what a shock. It's a link from Breitbart.
> The dumbest part is the Bernie bit. He got married when he was Mayor of Burlington and went to the USSR on a business trip. And I thought there was no big deal about being friendly with Russians.
>
> It's a dishonest comment from Krauthammer and cheapens the rest of his point.
explaining. "Most of the political class thrives on deception and
role-playing." Bernie Sanders put himself into this situation.
Just because you try to explain away Bernie Sanders getting
married one day then taking his wife and a political contingent
to the USSR the next day does not mean it is dishonest for a
politician to bring it up. Bernie wants to look like a commie
stooge, he has to take the heat. Thirty years of smoke. There is
definitely fire. Bernie's pants?
Bernie also visited the mayor of Cuba and visited Nicaragua as
well as other socialist countries. Wonder what kept Bernie Sanders
out of Viet Nam and China? Has he been to Venzuela?
In a 1985 letter addressed to the people of Nicaragua, penned in
conjunction with that trip “In the long run, I am certain that
you will win,” Sanders wrote, “and that your heroic revolution
against the Somoza dictatorship will be maintained and
strengthened.” The Sandinistas were voted out in 1990.
Anyway, the point was that Hillary Clinton took an inordinately
long time to shake Bernie Sanders, who in addition to having a
toxic platform, has relatively few, if loud, followers.
--
Michael Press
0 new messages