Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

I agree, Nancy should definately stay....

74 views
Skip to first unread message

michael anderson

unread,
Jun 25, 2017, 5:19:46 PM6/25/17
to

Damon Hynes, Cyclone Ranger

unread,
Jun 25, 2017, 5:41:26 PM6/25/17
to
On Sunday, June 25, 2017 at 4:19:46 PM UTC-5, michael anderson wrote:
> http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/22/politics/nancy-pelosi-not-going/index.html
>
> I love having nancy as minority leader

+1

unclejr

unread,
Jun 25, 2017, 6:06:13 PM6/25/17
to
On Sunday, June 25, 2017 at 4:19:46 PM UTC-5, michael anderson wrote:
Perv.

Ken Olson

unread,
Jun 26, 2017, 1:11:55 AM6/26/17
to
On 6/25/2017 5:19 PM, michael anderson wrote:
> http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/22/politics/nancy-pelosi-not-going/index.html
>
> I love having nancy as minority leader
>

IAWTP. She will definitely help destroy the Democratic Party as we know it.

Some dued

unread,
Jun 26, 2017, 7:16:04 AM6/26/17
to
If it weren't Nancy it'd be whoever else was in that position. I doubt the particular individual is all that relevant.

J. Hugh Sullivan

unread,
Jun 26, 2017, 8:23:32 AM6/26/17
to
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 04:16:00 -0700 (PDT), Some dued
<theodo...@gmail.com> wrote:

>If it weren't Nancy it'd be whoever else was in that position. I doubt the particular individual is all that relevant.

I agree - the name and apparent sex of the loser doesn't matter much.
Is she the Bride of Chucky?

Hugh

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

Some dued

unread,
Jun 26, 2017, 8:42:10 AM6/26/17
to
Why bring your wife into this?

xyzzy

unread,
Jun 26, 2017, 10:07:33 AM6/26/17
to
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 7:16:04 AM UTC-4, Some dued wrote:
> If it weren't Nancy it'd be whoever else was in that position. I doubt the particular individual is all that relevant.

In 2006 after the Dems took the house I said that seniority is the dumnest way to pick congressional leaders.

In 2010 after losing the house she should have stepped down.

I'll give the house GOP this, they discard leaders who don't get it done. The Dems needed to learn from this about six years ago.

J. Hugh Sullivan

unread,
Jun 26, 2017, 11:32:50 AM6/26/17
to
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 05:42:07 -0700 (PDT), Some dued
<theodo...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Why bring your wife into this?

My wife is not named Nancy.

Do I need to copy and paste the posts so you can keep up? Don't take
the training wheels off your computer yet.

A hint - Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Shumer - both sad sack socialist
shits. Ergo Bride of Chucky.

J. Hugh Sullivan

unread,
Jun 26, 2017, 11:35:02 AM6/26/17
to
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 07:07:29 -0700 (PDT), xyzzy <xyzzy...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Seems to me that the socialist policy is the problem, not Nancy per
se. Who would you suggest replace her - and why?

plai...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 26, 2017, 11:43:18 AM6/26/17
to
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 8:32:50 AM UTC-7, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 05:42:07 -0700 (PDT), Some dued
> <theodo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Why bring your wife into this?
>
> My wife is not named Nancy.

Hank? Or maybe Bubba?

Some dued

unread,
Jun 26, 2017, 12:33:43 PM6/26/17
to
He's from Alabama, she goes by "sis".

J. Hugh Sullivan

unread,
Jun 26, 2017, 12:37:42 PM6/26/17
to
No, she is not related to you.

Some dued

unread,
Jun 26, 2017, 12:39:06 PM6/26/17
to
Not that you know of.

J. Hugh Sullivan

unread,
Jun 26, 2017, 12:39:24 PM6/26/17
to
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 09:33:40 -0700 (PDT), Some dued
<theodo...@gmail.com> wrote:

>He's from Alabama, she goes by "sis".

She is not but lots of folks there are called "sis". You probably
would be.

J. Hugh Sullivan

unread,
Jun 26, 2017, 3:00:39 PM6/26/17
to
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 09:39:04 -0700 (PDT), Some dued
<theodo...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Not that you know of.

Right, sis.

dotsla...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 26, 2017, 9:43:23 PM6/26/17
to
Yeah, the poor dnc, all it has going for it is the fact that 60-70% of Americans support their policy proposals pretty much straight down the line.

Being able to screw up that out of the gate advantage? Legendary.

Cheers.

Some dued

unread,
Jun 26, 2017, 9:49:46 PM6/26/17
to
The DNC supporters weren't angry in the past. That may change now, but the GOP has a big head start in inciting rage.

J. Hugh Sullivan

unread,
Jun 27, 2017, 8:27:14 AM6/27/17
to
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:43:21 -0700 (PDT), dotsla...@gmail.com
wrote:

>Yeah, the poor dnc, all it has going for it is the fact that 60-70% of Americans support their policy proposals pretty much straight down the line.

One would notmally think that more than 60-70% of the freeloaders
would support being paid to avoid working.

michael anderson

unread,
Jun 27, 2017, 11:08:23 AM6/27/17
to
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 8:43:23 PM UTC-5, dotsla...@gmail.com wrote:
> Yeah, the poor dnc, all it has going for it is the fact that 60-70% of Americans support their policy proposals pretty much straight down the line.

it all depends on how the question is asked...tweak it a little different and it's 60-70% the other way...

irishra...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 27, 2017, 12:44:39 PM6/27/17
to
On Sunday, June 25, 2017 at 5:19:46 PM UTC-4, michael anderson wrote:
> http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/22/politics/nancy-pelosi-not-going/index.html
>
> I love having nancy as minority leader

I agree. If fact I would like to see Pelosi get a life time appointment as
Minority Leader. I also hope the Democrats get Hillary a truck load of
Depends, some new pants suits and wheel her out of the barn and run her
again in 2020!

Irish Mike

“If you want to piss off a Conservative - tell him a lie.
If you want to piss off a Liberal - tell him the truth.”
0 new messages